Yet I don't believe his claim.Mashley wrote:
Ordinarily DxS' roleclaim would seem odd, but if other people have the same restriction it's much more believable imo.
forum
Mafia Game [Town Win]
posted
Total Posts
676
you usually make long posts suburu why so closeted this game
I'm not 100% sure, but I think it's because of sheer inactivity. To be honest, I'd like to hear more about this claim, myself.Wojjan wrote:
explain your reasoning or I will eat youLybydose wrote:
Vote: Mashley
He's mafia.
Some of you may be able to pick up on why.
Can't say. Is Still fun thoughChris wrote:
you usually make long posts suburu why so closeted this game
Also, Lyby is likely right too
hold on eating sandwich
Suburu your last 3 posts have been 30 characters each
I assume that is a requirement for your role
edit: every single post?
I assume that is a requirement for your role
edit: every single post?
Every post. LS is either Jester or town.
@above: can't really see exactly 30-characters being a mafia post restriction but hey could be making the whole thing up
I agree with youLybydose wrote:
@above: can't really see exactly 30-characters being a mafia post restriction but hey could be making the whole thing up
that wasn't so hard see now I don't have to eet just for you chirs youLybydose wrote:
@above: can't really see exactly 30-characters being a mafia post restriction but hey could be making the whole thing up
Okay I'm done with sandwich wojjan what do you want.
opinions, logic, maybe a FOS if you're so kind.Rolled wrote:
Okay I'm done with sandwich wojjan what do you want.
no FOS really. Don't even have many opinions other than I feel the majority of D1 has been unproductive. I can at least give you opinions on who I feel is likely to be protown though.
LS: Strikes me as odd. Obviously appears to have a character restriction in their posts, but there's a couple reasons why I'm uneasy.
1. I know Two was planning on hosting a game for a while, and iirc he doesn't really care for jester roles.
2. I know Two also feels relatively strongly about including town roles that are worse than a vanilla townie.
That said, unless LS has some amazing aux ability and will eventually supply us with information, I think there's some kind of fibbing going on.
I feel like this was pointed at akro, animask, and maybe even DxS. They had obvious claim restrictions in their role PM, and posting what they did was borderline loopholing. Inability to claim a role is a pro-town trait, so the only thing left to consider is whether or not they're lying. Leaning town for all three, really.Two wrote:
10. don't try to exploit things plsjust a friendly reminder
LS: Strikes me as odd. Obviously appears to have a character restriction in their posts, but there's a couple reasons why I'm uneasy.
1. I know Two was planning on hosting a game for a while, and iirc he doesn't really care for jester roles.
2. I know Two also feels relatively strongly about including town roles that are worse than a vanilla townie.
That said, unless LS has some amazing aux ability and will eventually supply us with information, I think there's some kind of fibbing going on.
Topic Starter
Vote Count
DeathxShinigami (2): akrolsmir, LadySuburu
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, NoHItter
Lybydose (1): Chris
NoHItter (1): pieguy1372
Chris (1): foulcoon
Mashley (1): Lybydose
Not voting: Rantai, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, Wojjan, animask, Rolled, 0_o, Mashley
DeathxShinigami (2): akrolsmir, LadySuburu
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, NoHItter
Lybydose (1): Chris
NoHItter (1): pieguy1372
Chris (1): foulcoon
Mashley (1): Lybydose
Not voting: Rantai, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, Wojjan, animask, Rolled, 0_o, Mashley
lol @ Chris
Only a few hours left... to vote or not to vote... hmm.
Rolled made some pretty good points, but for some reason I feel suspicious of Lybydose. He doesn't
seem to be very open-minded about anything. Could be a playstyle, but I personally find some of those things
suspicious.
Vote: Lybydose
Only a few hours left... to vote or not to vote... hmm.
Rolled made some pretty good points, but for some reason I feel suspicious of Lybydose. He doesn't
seem to be very open-minded about anything. Could be a playstyle, but I personally find some of those things
suspicious.
Vote: Lybydose
No fibbing, I haven't said anything I don't believe is true. I did have an intent with any post I made, and any votes have actual reasoning behind them that I can't explain.Rolled wrote:
That said, unless LS has some amazing aux ability and will eventually supply us with information, I think there's some kind of fibbing going on.
That being said, I'm fairly sure Wojjan and Lyby are town, and Mashley and DxS are scum. However, at this point Mashley would be a better choice.
Unvote
Vote: Mashley
Still, Swift seems to be above on the list. due to Chris's interesting choice of voting method. Kinda suspicious, if you ask me.
LS fakes a typing quirk, Act 1. Or: Oh no, he broke it, what do?LadySuburu wrote:
No fibbing, I haven't said anything I don't believe is true. I did have an intent with any post I made, and any votes have actual reasoning behind them that I can't explain.Rolled wrote:
That said, unless LS has some amazing aux ability and will eventually supply us with information, I think there's some kind of fibbing going on.
That being said, I'm fairly sure Wojjan and Lyby are town, and Mashley and DxS are scum. However, at this point Mashley would be a better choice.
Unvote
Vote: Mashley
Still, Swift seems to be above on the list. due to Chris's interesting choice of voting method. Kinda suspicious, if you ask me.
I like a Mashley lynch much better than either DxS or Swift because they both kinda suck at mafia and are very easy targets. Vote:Mash
I'm kind of confused now.
LS makes post restriction apparent --> Rolled says there's really no way LS can have a post restriction unless awesome Aux --> LS posts medium-textwall, not acknowledging previous posts with like 15 characters max.
LS makes post restriction apparent --> Rolled says there's really no way LS can have a post restriction unless awesome Aux --> LS posts medium-textwall, not acknowledging previous posts with like 15 characters max.
I did have an intent with any post I made, and any votes have actual reasoning behind them that I can't explain.Unless that is addressing the tiny posts in some way I'm not understanding.
Kind of sounds like you'd rather deal with the heat of stopping your "character restriction" day 1, than be expected to come up with useful aux information at a later date.
Correct me if/where I'm wrong pls
Correct me if/where I'm wrong pls
I can't come up with useful aux information if I don't have an aux role.Rolled wrote:
Correct me if/where I'm wrong pls
Anyone who is able to understand my meaning should understand by now. Those who can't understand won't.
Feel free to lynch me if you'd like, just take the fact that I believe Wojjan and Lyby are almost guarenteed town into consideration once I flip. My role isn't important enough that I need to avoid lynch at all cost. It still hurts town but only as much as mislynching does.
I'll state again that the meaning of "Can't say." Is important. I can't claim, for one.
I think Wojjan is right at the uh oh it broke part
it's possible that if they were the jester with a post restriction, getting called out on it (thx lybydose) might of either removed their restriction or removed their role entirely
that's all I can come up with unless suburu is just outright lying, which is possible since they double posted and I assume a character restriction wouldn't allow you to just continually post
it's possible that if they were the jester with a post restriction, getting called out on it (thx lybydose) might of either removed their restriction or removed their role entirely
that's all I can come up with unless suburu is just outright lying, which is possible since they double posted and I assume a character restriction wouldn't allow you to just continually post
Feel free to lynch me if you'd likejesterjesterjesterjesterjester
If that's what you want to believe.Chris wrote:
Feel free to lynch me if you'd likejesterjesterjesterjesterjester
jesterjesterjesterjesterjesterLadySuburu wrote:
If that's what you want to believe.
hey
2. Rantai
5. 0_o
7. NoHItter
10. pieguy1372
13. akrolsmir
get in here. opinions.
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
what a noobChris wrote:
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
I'm not really sure what to say about LS... Either way, I don't think lynching him is a good idea for now.
Regarding Mashley, I saw a few posts from him, and while some were neutral, he did accuse a few people in one of them. However, he didn't actually vote anyone. IMO, this does seem somewhat suspicious. unvote: NoHItter, vote: Mashley
I don't know why, but I find this whole game really odd. No one seems to be giving reasons behind their votes unless asked. I've noticed foulcoon, Lybydose, and LS doing this, though apparently he had a post restriction that suddenly got lifted (and there are probably more people that I forgot).
Regarding Mashley, I saw a few posts from him, and while some were neutral, he did accuse a few people in one of them. However, he didn't actually vote anyone. IMO, this does seem somewhat suspicious. unvote: NoHItter, vote: Mashley
I don't know why, but I find this whole game really odd. No one seems to be giving reasons behind their votes unless asked. I've noticed foulcoon, Lybydose, and LS doing this, though apparently he had a post restriction that suddenly got lifted (and there are probably more people that I forgot).
All you've done this game is some aggressive day 1 "scumhunting" . You say you've contributed most to this game but you're really done nothing. My input has already been given sir.Chris wrote:
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
more than you ^_^foulcoon wrote:
All you've done this game is some aggressive day 1 "scumhunting" . You say you've contributed most to this game but you're really done nothing. My input has already been given sir.Chris wrote:
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
actually let's lynch foulcoon for being bad
vote: foulcoon
vote: foulcoon
i agree with foulcoon
Topic Starter
Vote Count
Mashley (4): Lybydose, LadySuburu, Wojjan, pieguy1372
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, NoHItter
Chris (1): foulcoon
Lybydose (1): animask
DeathxShinigami (1): akrolsmir
foulcoon (1): Chris
Not voting: Rantai, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, Rolled, 0_o, Mashley
Mashley (4): Lybydose, LadySuburu, Wojjan, pieguy1372
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, NoHItter
Chris (1): foulcoon
Lybydose (1): animask
DeathxShinigami (1): akrolsmir
foulcoon (1): Chris
Not voting: Rantai, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, Rolled, 0_o, Mashley
Mashley's posts thus far
Mashley's generally not very active and is leaning scum in my eyes, but I'd like DxS to respond first. Ideally on his own thoughts about Mashley.
Was this really just an earnest question? I doubt it.Mashley wrote:
Wait, who's exploiting?
Seems to me like he's trying to get away with defending DxS by lampshading the fact.Mashley wrote:
Might seem like I'm buddying up with him here but honestly I think from what he's said lynching him is far too big of a risk to take.
Mashley's generally not very active and is leaning scum in my eyes, but I'd like DxS to respond first. Ideally on his own thoughts about Mashley.
2 hours left
unvote
I don't think Mashley is gonna get a chance to defend himself
unvote
I don't think Mashley is gonna get a chance to defend himself
he knows he's off the hookakrolsmir wrote:
Way to lurk without posting anything, DxS.
Sorry, forgot to post this here:
viewtopic.php?p=1031900#p1031900
viewtopic.php?p=1031900#p1031900
reading0_o wrote:
I will be gone all day Sunday
Alrighty
-I agree with Rolled about akro, animask & DxS being likely town
-I think I got what LS was getting at, thus I believe he is also town
-Mashley lynch sounds good.
vote Mashley
-I agree with Rolled about akro, animask & DxS being likely town
-I think I got what LS was getting at, thus I believe he is also town
-Mashley lynch sounds good.
vote Mashley
... Why do I always wake up to an infinite number of posts?
So Mashley is the one being wagoned now?
I honestly don't see how he's more suspicious than others atm.
What exactly did he do except ask about the so called inability to roleclaim?
I'm keeping my vote on Swift.
So Mashley is the one being wagoned now?
I honestly don't see how he's more suspicious than others atm.
What exactly did he do except ask about the so called inability to roleclaim?
I'm keeping my vote on Swift.
Also just so you guys know just in case,
Second on my list is Chris for his bad logic on insisting a self-preservation vote.
And perhaps we can tone down the fluff posts?
Second on my list is Chris for his bad logic on insisting a self-preservation vote.
And perhaps we can tone down the fluff posts?
god forbid someone makes sure they stay aliveNoHItter wrote:
Also just so you guys know just in case,
Second on my list is Chris for his bad logic on insisting a self-preservation vote.
And perhaps we can tone down the fluff posts?
and lol @ you claiming anyone has bad logic after pyp
Topic Starter
Day 1 is now over. No more talking.
Mashley was just taking a nap, but when he woke u-- well, he didn't wake up.
Mashley - Pure Soul (town) has been lynched
Final Vote Count
Mashley (5): Lybydose, LadySuburu, Wojjan, pieguy1372, 0_o
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, NoHItter
Chris (1): foulcoon
Lybydose (1): animask
DeathxShinigami (1): akrolsmir
Not voting: Rantai, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, Rolled, Mashley, Chris
Mashley was just taking a nap, but when he woke u-- well, he didn't wake up.
Mashley - Pure Soul (town) has been lynched
Final Vote Count
Mashley (5): Lybydose, LadySuburu, Wojjan, pieguy1372, 0_o
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, NoHItter
Chris (1): foulcoon
Lybydose (1): animask
DeathxShinigami (1): akrolsmir
Not voting: Rantai, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, Rolled, Mashley, Chris
Topic Starter
It is now Night 1. wah my pretty image got removed somehow
Send all night actions within 24 hours of this post.
Send all night actions within 24 hours of this post.
Topic Starter
In the morning, you are all awoken to ear-shattering mewing. All of the old lady's cats got outside. k stopping rp here lazy
akrolsmir - Paranoid Cat Lady (Town Lie Detector) is dead
It's now Day 2. You have 72 hours until nightfall.
akrolsmir - Paranoid Cat Lady (Town Lie Detector) is dead
It's now Day 2. You have 72 hours until nightfall.
Vote: Swiftwolf Yellowtail
Now I have more confidence you really are mafia...
Now I have more confidence you really are mafia...
Hm...only one kill happened, so that means we probably have no SK. However, we still might have one, if the doctor successfully protected someone or if the mafia and SK targeted the same person. 
DxS, what makes you think Swiftwolf has a greater chance of being mafia than before?
DxS, what makes you think Swiftwolf has a greater chance of being mafia than before?
Apologies for sleeping through the lynch time.
It might be a bit late now but
@Wojjan - sifting through all that fluff, I don't see what Mashley did to be lynched. At worst all he did was make several neutral posts.
From what I can tell you were more or less promoting random voting (which a gut vote is essentially is imo.)
It might be a bit late now but
@Wojjan - sifting through all that fluff, I don't see what Mashley did to be lynched. At worst all he did was make several neutral posts.
I actually don't understand this. Yes, he did accuse 2 people but he said he didn't want to vote because he didn't believe a gut vote was appropriate (which I agree with). So how did not wanting to vote due make him any more suspicious?pieguy1372 wrote:
Regarding Mashley, I saw a few posts from him, and while some were neutral, he did accuse a few people in one of them. However, he didn't actually vote anyone. IMO, this does seem somewhat suspicious. unvote: NoHItter, vote: Mashley
From what I can tell you were more or less promoting random voting (which a gut vote is essentially is imo.)
@pieguy
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.
A higher power is telling me to focus on my homework I guess.
GL guys.
GL guys.
Which doesn't explain how he's more suspicious (outside the whole, there are less people so there is a higher chance he's anti-town argument)DeathxShinigami wrote:
@pieguy
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.
The same can be said for you (minus the logic, which can happen for an array of reasons).
IMO, trying to be neutral is a sign of being mafia, and not voting anyone is a sign of wanting to stay neutral. Even if it's just a gut vote, it's better than no vote at all.
Him saying that he didn't want to vote on his gut is somewhat WIFOM...it turned out that he was town, but if we didn't lynch anyone because of something like that, it would be easy enough for the mafia to just slip by.
Him saying that he didn't want to vote on his gut is somewhat WIFOM...it turned out that he was town, but if we didn't lynch anyone because of something like that, it would be easy enough for the mafia to just slip by.
I'm not sure how exactly that makes him more likely to be mafia... the only thing that changed is that two people died. o.oDeathxShinigami wrote:
@pieguy
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.
Knowing that, what mafia would stay neutral?
Saying neutrality is a sign of mafia is about as factual as saying being aggressive is town. A person could easily change their play style to manipulate such thoughts (ie this alignment acts in these ways). In this case, I believe he was either indecisive or more likely, detached from the game. Now I know that doesn't help town at all but it's by no means a scum tell to me.
Hmm how does saying not wanting to vote on gut make it wifom? It sounds like a legitimate reason to not vote. Also, on the flip side, mislynching based on... someone not wanting to vote without evidence also allows a mafia to slip by and leaves us with nothing again.
Also reading through again I don't think I believe LS's claims, call me skeptical.
Saying neutrality is a sign of mafia is about as factual as saying being aggressive is town. A person could easily change their play style to manipulate such thoughts (ie this alignment acts in these ways). In this case, I believe he was either indecisive or more likely, detached from the game. Now I know that doesn't help town at all but it's by no means a scum tell to me.
Hmm how does saying not wanting to vote on gut make it wifom? It sounds like a legitimate reason to not vote. Also, on the flip side, mislynching based on... someone not wanting to vote without evidence also allows a mafia to slip by and leaves us with nothing again.
Also reading through again I don't think I believe LS's claims, call me skeptical.
And just to clarify something, this is in regards to D1.
I still feel suspicious of Lybydose...
HoS Lybydose
I get what Rantai is saying about DxS being suspicious too. Based on who voted for who and
who got lynched.
HoS Lybydose
I get what Rantai is saying about DxS being suspicious too. Based on who voted for who and
who got lynched.
Oh wait, Rantai didn't say that. Well I guess I was just misreading things or something... I think Lybydose and/or DxS are mafia.
One who doesn't want to help town progress, because town progress is bad for mafia...Rantai wrote:
Knowing that, what mafia would stay neutral?
Saying neutrality is a sign of mafia is about as factual as saying being aggressive is town. A person could easily change their play style to manipulate such thoughts (ie this alignment acts in these ways).Yes, and that's one of the only pieces of information available D1. It might be manipulable, but there's not really any other information to use. IMO, there is still a link correlating neutrality and mafia, though a weaker one, but I've noticed it still exists so this isn't entirely WIFOM.
In this case, I believe he was either indecisive or more likely, detached from the game. Now I know that doesn't help town at all but it's by no means a scum tell to me.That's WIFOM again, because the mafia could pretend to do that.
Hmm how does saying not wanting to vote on gut make it wifom? It sounds like a legitimate reason to not vote. Also, on the flip side, mislynching based on... someone not wanting to vote without evidence also allows a mafia to slip by and leaves us with nothing again.It's WIFOM because the mafia could say the same thing.
I think you misunderstood this one. I meant, knowing it's a scum tell or whatever, what mafia would stay neutral? Town progress could easily be taken off track by a well played mafia.pieguy1372 wrote:
One who doesn't want to help town progress, because town progress is bad for mafia...
Bandwagoning, overreactions something along those lines would be more solid than a preset criteria of playstyles.pieguy1372 wrote:
Yes, and that's one of the only pieces of information available D1. It might be manipulable, but there's not really any other information to use.
I've noticed that it also exists with any other alignment >.>pieguy1372 wrote:
IMO, there is still a link correlating neutrality and mafia, though a weaker one, but I've noticed it still exists so this isn't entirely WIFOM. .
Which part were you referring to?pieguy1372 wrote:
It's WIFOM because the mafia could say the same thing.
DxS would only vote for me and state that I'm more suspicious of the previous night... either that, or he just has a grudge on me.
Too bad his teammate is at risk.
Vote: NoHitter
I KNOW you're mafia.
Too bad his teammate is at risk.
Vote: NoHitter
I KNOW you're mafia.
Um care to elaborate on how you know this?
Nighttime investigations.
Wow. That was the most 'subtle' roleclaim I've ever seen.
Vote: NoHItter
Seeing as I believe you, I think I shall go with this.
Vote: NoHItter
Seeing as I believe you, I think I shall go with this.
Oh yeah I'll just state now I'm feeling uneasy about pieguy. If only because I completely disagree about his play method (just because you can hide behind it so easily).
Ie - 'you're acting like something that can be associated with just about every role, you must be mafia!'
Leads to being able to vote anyone with 'reasoning'.
Ie - 'you're acting like something that can be associated with just about every role, you must be mafia!'
Leads to being able to vote anyone with 'reasoning'.
Vote: NoHItter
If you're lying, you're bad at being mafia or planning something (or just bad at playing).
If you're lying, you're bad at being mafia or planning something (or just bad at playing).
So I log in to this >.>
I knew it was a bad idea not to claim D1.
I'm not Mafia. I'm a Miller Graverobber.
Basically I get detailed role information about those who died during the Night, the next day by digging their graves.
I just assume that digging people's graves looks suspicious. That's probably why I'm a Miller.
I also received a PM stating that Swift is "Cop + 'Another Role'". I can also give the exact title of his role too.
That along with the fact that I've been investigated proves that the PM I received was indeed true, and that Swift is really a Cop.
I chose not to claim D1 as opposed to standard Miller play, because it would basically turn the entire discussion into WIFOM and perhaps make me a target for roleblocks and making me unable to use my ability.
So far, I was said that akrolsmir's role, Paranoid Cat Lady, was a "One-Shot Lie Detector (ability unused)"
I knew it was a bad idea not to claim D1.
I'm not Mafia. I'm a Miller Graverobber.
Basically I get detailed role information about those who died during the Night, the next day by digging their graves.
I just assume that digging people's graves looks suspicious. That's probably why I'm a Miller.
I also received a PM stating that Swift is "Cop + 'Another Role'". I can also give the exact title of his role too.
That along with the fact that I've been investigated proves that the PM I received was indeed true, and that Swift is really a Cop.
I chose not to claim D1 as opposed to standard Miller play, because it would basically turn the entire discussion into WIFOM and perhaps make me a target for roleblocks and making me unable to use my ability.
So far, I was said that akrolsmir's role, Paranoid Cat Lady, was a "One-Shot Lie Detector (ability unused)"
Hold on, isn't the miller role usually hidden?
I'm confused on why you got his role if you receive info based on the dead.
Also:
I'm confused on why you got his role if you receive info based on the dead.
Also:
So far, I was said that akrolsmir's role, Paranoid Cat Lady, was a "One-Shot Lie Detector (ability unused)"Typo?
Not really. In some cases the person is told they are a Miller.Rantai wrote:
Hold on, isn't the miller role usually hidden?
Didn't akrolsmir die the previous Night? >.>Rantai wrote:
I'm confused on why you got his role if you receive info based on the dead.
Yeah that said should have been "told", more specifically by the mod.Rantai wrote:
Also:So far, I was said that akrolsmir's role, Paranoid Cat Lady, was a "One-Shot Lie Detector (ability unused)"Typo?
Apologies for being unclear.NoHItter wrote:
Didn't akrolsmir die the previous Night? >.>
NoHItter wrote:
I also received a PM stating that Swift is "Cop + 'Another Role'". I can also give the exact title of his role too.
That along with the fact that I've been investigated proves that the PM I received was indeed true, and that Swift is really a Cop.
EBWOP:
Oh you were talking about Swift.
I received another role PM aside from my results.
It went something like this, paraphrasing:
"A voice tells you, 'Swiftwolf Yellowtail is XXX (Cop, YYY)'"
I censored the other parts. But if people want to, I can reveal them.
Oh you were talking about Swift.
I received another role PM aside from my results.
It went something like this, paraphrasing:
"A voice tells you, 'Swiftwolf Yellowtail is XXX (Cop, YYY)'"
I censored the other parts. But if people want to, I can reveal them.
!
The only way you would know is if you were mafia! My god does NOT tell anyone else! You're NOT a miller! You're flat-out lying!
The only way you would know is if you were mafia! My god does NOT tell anyone else! You're NOT a miller! You're flat-out lying!
Ok hmm.
So this means you could also be an enabler, right?
Correct me if I got the rolenames wrong.
So this means you could also be an enabler, right?
Correct me if I got the rolenames wrong.
Uh I don't think mafia works that way, he could be anything at this stage.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
!
The only way you would know is if you were mafia! My god does NOT tell anyone else! You're NOT a miller! You're flat-out lying!
Kind of want to hear from everyone else first, need a bit more information.
If you need me to role claim, I will.
Save it for now.
PI suggest you don't, at least not yet.
Doing that would just ruin the point of me keeping it a secret.
Perhaps let me claim first then you can verify if that time does come.
At the moment though, I don't think it's wise for you to claim at least not without the consensus of everyone.
Doing that would just ruin the point of me keeping it a secret.
Perhaps let me claim first then you can verify if that time does come.
At the moment though, I don't think it's wise for you to claim at least not without the consensus of everyone.
You don't really seem to be denying the fact you came back as Mafia though, NoHitter.
On top of that, you confirmed they are in fact a cop. Why shouldn't we believe them?
The only real question is if they are insane or not which unfortunately is possible.
On top of that, you confirmed they are in fact a cop. Why shouldn't we believe them?
The only real question is if they are insane or not which unfortunately is possible.
Swift, did your result come back as "mafia" or "guilty" or something else?
It is possible that I am an insane cop, as they may give out false results. However, I'm quite sure NoHitter is hiding something.
Rantai: It turned out "mafia", not "guilty".
I should have asked that first. Ok, that miller claim can be thrown out.
The plot thickens, dun dun dun.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Rantai: It turned out "mafia", not "guilty".
I'm really a Miller >.>
I know I'm not Mafia, but I also can't deny the fact that Swift is a Cop too as what happened including the PM does prove it.
I know I'm not Mafia, but I also can't deny the fact that Swift is a Cop too as what happened including the PM does prove it.
I'll say this, and leave you to think about it: my God is a cruel one.
The only thing stopping me from being completely convinced is the possibility of insanity : \
it is possible they are both mafia and are just liars
IDK about insanity, but the very fact I was given a Miller in my role has to mean something.Rantai wrote:
The only thing stopping me from being completely convinced is the possibility of insanity : \
Perhaps there's another cop?
That would be a huge ass move by Swift. Huge.Chris wrote:
it is possible they are both mafia and are just liars
Mod: Are the terms 'Mafia' and 'Guilty' interchangeable when it comes to results?
>.< well then.
Does anyone have any more information they'd like to share about last night
Calling BS on NoHItter's roleclaim. A miller whose "results" are completely unverifiable? Does this not seem wayyy too convenient to anyone?
vote NoHItter
vote NoHItter
IDK if it is part of my role or it was just a chance thing , but I can say the contents of the PM I did get, and Swift can verify it.0_o wrote:
Calling BS on NoHItter's roleclaim. A miller whose "results" are completely unverifiable? Does this not seem wayyy too convenient to anyone?
vote NoHItter
Mafia Role Cop?NoHItter wrote:
IDK if it is part of my role or it was just a chance thing , but I can say the contents of the PM I did get, and Swift can verify it.