he knows he's off the hookakrolsmir wrote:
Way to lurk without posting anything, DxS.
he knows he's off the hookakrolsmir wrote:
Way to lurk without posting anything, DxS.
reading0_o wrote:
I will be gone all day Sunday
god forbid someone makes sure they stay aliveNoHItter wrote:
Also just so you guys know just in case,
Second on my list is Chris for his bad logic on insisting a self-preservation vote.
And perhaps we can tone down the fluff posts?
I actually don't understand this. Yes, he did accuse 2 people but he said he didn't want to vote because he didn't believe a gut vote was appropriate (which I agree with). So how did not wanting to vote due make him any more suspicious?pieguy1372 wrote:
Regarding Mashley, I saw a few posts from him, and while some were neutral, he did accuse a few people in one of them. However, he didn't actually vote anyone. IMO, this does seem somewhat suspicious. unvote: NoHItter, vote: Mashley
Which doesn't explain how he's more suspicious (outside the whole, there are less people so there is a higher chance he's anti-town argument)DeathxShinigami wrote:
@pieguy
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.
I'm not sure how exactly that makes him more likely to be mafia... the only thing that changed is that two people died. o.oDeathxShinigami wrote:
@pieguy
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.
One who doesn't want to help town progress, because town progress is bad for mafia...Rantai wrote:
Knowing that, what mafia would stay neutral?
Saying neutrality is a sign of mafia is about as factual as saying being aggressive is town. A person could easily change their play style to manipulate such thoughts (ie this alignment acts in these ways).Yes, and that's one of the only pieces of information available D1. It might be manipulable, but there's not really any other information to use. IMO, there is still a link correlating neutrality and mafia, though a weaker one, but I've noticed it still exists so this isn't entirely WIFOM.
In this case, I believe he was either indecisive or more likely, detached from the game. Now I know that doesn't help town at all but it's by no means a scum tell to me.That's WIFOM again, because the mafia could pretend to do that.
Hmm how does saying not wanting to vote on gut make it wifom? It sounds like a legitimate reason to not vote. Also, on the flip side, mislynching based on... someone not wanting to vote without evidence also allows a mafia to slip by and leaves us with nothing again.It's WIFOM because the mafia could say the same thing.
I think you misunderstood this one. I meant, knowing it's a scum tell or whatever, what mafia would stay neutral? Town progress could easily be taken off track by a well played mafia.pieguy1372 wrote:
One who doesn't want to help town progress, because town progress is bad for mafia...
Bandwagoning, overreactions something along those lines would be more solid than a preset criteria of playstyles.pieguy1372 wrote:
Yes, and that's one of the only pieces of information available D1. It might be manipulable, but there's not really any other information to use.
I've noticed that it also exists with any other alignment >.>pieguy1372 wrote:
IMO, there is still a link correlating neutrality and mafia, though a weaker one, but I've noticed it still exists so this isn't entirely WIFOM. .
Which part were you referring to?pieguy1372 wrote:
It's WIFOM because the mafia could say the same thing.
So far, I was said that akrolsmir's role, Paranoid Cat Lady, was a "One-Shot Lie Detector (ability unused)"Typo?
Not really. In some cases the person is told they are a Miller.Rantai wrote:
Hold on, isn't the miller role usually hidden?
Didn't akrolsmir die the previous Night? >.>Rantai wrote:
I'm confused on why you got his role if you receive info based on the dead.
Yeah that said should have been "told", more specifically by the mod.Rantai wrote:
Also:So far, I was said that akrolsmir's role, Paranoid Cat Lady, was a "One-Shot Lie Detector (ability unused)"Typo?
Apologies for being unclear.NoHItter wrote:
Didn't akrolsmir die the previous Night? >.>
NoHItter wrote:
I also received a PM stating that Swift is "Cop + 'Another Role'". I can also give the exact title of his role too.
That along with the fact that I've been investigated proves that the PM I received was indeed true, and that Swift is really a Cop.
Uh I don't think mafia works that way, he could be anything at this stage.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
!
The only way you would know is if you were mafia! My god does NOT tell anyone else! You're NOT a miller! You're flat-out lying!
The plot thickens, dun dun dun.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Rantai: It turned out "mafia", not "guilty".
IDK about insanity, but the very fact I was given a Miller in my role has to mean something.Rantai wrote:
The only thing stopping me from being completely convinced is the possibility of insanity : \
That would be a huge ass move by Swift. Huge.Chris wrote:
it is possible they are both mafia and are just liars
IDK if it is part of my role or it was just a chance thing , but I can say the contents of the PM I did get, and Swift can verify it.0_o wrote:
Calling BS on NoHItter's roleclaim. A miller whose "results" are completely unverifiable? Does this not seem wayyy too convenient to anyone?
vote NoHItter
Mafia Role Cop?NoHItter wrote:
IDK if it is part of my role or it was just a chance thing , but I can say the contents of the PM I did get, and Swift can verify it.
I said we can't verify your claimed results, not the thing about Swift. I didn't doubt that you got Swift's role, but it doesn't really matter with regards to whether you're scum or not.NoHItter wrote:
You vote me because you say that we can't verify any of what I say.
Then when I do give a way on how to verify something, you brush it off and say it's a scum aux power.
This is important, and was overlooked. NoHitter never questioned swift's alignment, and the possibility that he could be making up his night results.Chris wrote:
You don't really seem to be denying the fact you came back as Mafia though, NoHitter.
A miller is a pro-town player who turns up guilty under investigation.NoHItter wrote:
I'm not Mafia. I'm a Miller Graverobber.
A mafia would stay neutral to hinder town progress. Yes, a skilled mafia could actually throw it off, but that's an easier and more convenient shortcut, especially on D1.Rantai wrote:
I think you misunderstood this one. I meant, knowing it's a scum tell or whatever, what mafia would stay neutral? Town progress could easily be taken off track by a well played mafia.
Bandwagoning, overreactions something along those lines would be more solid than a preset criteria of playstyles.I really disagree with this very much...though I guess this is a difference in what we consider to be scumtells.
I've noticed that it also exists with any other alignment >.>IMO, that's the idea here. By D1, it is reasonable to assume that the more aggressive players or town. It's like when you're playing poker, you can classify players into various profiles (e.g. rocks, maniacs) and then change your playing based on that (ex. if a maniac raises a lot, it would be more worthwhile to call).
Which part were you referring to?This:
Hmm how does saying not wanting to vote on gut make it wifom?I guess this whole argument is a difference in our playstyles, but go ahead and accuse me if you wish = =||
I doubt there would be 5 mafia in a 15 person gamepieguy1372 wrote:
Oh I made a mistake, with 5 mafia we would be at LYLO with a myslynch. With 4 we could have another mislynch.
Not really, NoHItter claimed miller, remember? Swift is quite likely to be a cop regardless of how NoHItter flips.pieguy wrote:
if he's town, Swiftwolf is definitely mafia
oops0_o wrote:
Not really, NoHItter claimed miller, remember? Swift is quite likely to be a cop regardless of how NoHItter flips.pieguy wrote:
if he's town, Swiftwolf is definitely mafia
This makes me pretty sure that NoHItter is mafia, but Hammering right now would be a horrible idea for multiple reasons.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
There is a 50-50 chance as to whether or not the mafia gets to know about my role.
Awesome, thanks. Now I don't have to worry as much anymore.Rantai wrote:
Hi, I am posting in this thread with the intention of fulfilling a request.
it's a problem now cause they haven't posted in 2 days~Two wrote:
I don't have a prodding rule. If inactivity becomes a problem, I'll just replace/modkill case by case.
they are the only 3 which is why I called them out0_o wrote:
Seeing as yesterday only lasted about 12 hours, and nobody posted for the last 24 hours, I'd say not posting for the last 48 hours is somewhat reasonable?