@ Ph0x I'm understanding why you see animask as pro town but he's really an emotional player which makes it seem either a style base of playing like me or he's really new.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
On your post that you just posted, read what time it says it is. For me, I get Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:10 pm (3 minutes ago) .bmin11 wrote:
By the way, does anyone knows how to check the forum time? I'm still not clear with the dead line orz
Like I said. So, exactally 5 days from the time I posted my post. Since it's set to your timezone, you should know exactally when the deadline is.Quaraezha wrote:
I'm sorry but the forum time is set to whatever GMT Timezone we set it.
For me, it says "Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:10 am (6 minutes ago)" and I use GMT + 8
Wups; I was probably thinking of that PyP game.NoHItter wrote:
Re: ProddingI have to leave soon. Will post opinions later.LadySuburu wrote:
17. If a player has not posted in 24 hours, I will prod them if requested to do so. That is, it's up to you to ask me to prod a certain player.
Yes; see my analysis below.DeathxShinigami wrote:
@ Ph0x I'm understanding why you see animask as pro town but he's really an emotional player which makes it seem either a style base of playing like me or he's really new.
Any thoughts?
Mashley, what do you think of NoHItter's suspicions of you, exactly? I know you defended yourself already, but what of NoHItter's persistence?NoHItter wrote:
I think right now, I would prefer a lynch among either Mahsley or animask.
[...]
Mashley for that comment a while back that pinged me.
Haha! Kinda funny; I already saw that (see analysis below).bmin11 wrote:
First, I think animask is a townie now (ya I might have gotten influenced by Ph0X but whatever).
I didn't see that, and I agree with you. However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).bmin11 wrote:
If he was a mafia, he wouldn't have driven himself this far behind, unless his mafia fellow was being afk.
Really? You look like a pretty decent player.bmin11 wrote:
This is my first game and I'm looking forward to it.
....... which you are doing for animask...? I'll keep it on my note for now. Thanks Ph0XPh0X wrote:
I didn't see that, and I agree with you. However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).bmin11 wrote:
If he was a mafia, he wouldn't have driven himself this far behind, unless his mafia fellow was being afk.
awww thanks. I once played a very heavy role based mafia (on online real time) before. Some roles would be able to track the mafia if he targets the victim successfully, some will have one free shot of killing, some will simply not get lynched lol. It was a fast-paced game (only a brief 10min), because mafia would be spotted quite easily >_>...;; but a mafia with only cop/doc/mafia is my first time. Maybe this is why I'm relying to "lets just wait until cop does something". I'm getting the hang of this game now (and yes, no lynch wasn't a good idea I realized orz)Ph0X wrote:
Really? You look like a pretty decent player.
animask wrote:
bmin11 - Pairing up me and iMuffin as mafia. There are 2 mafia members(?)
there should be only two mafias according to this list unless LadySuburu is playing with us (and I am not amused in that case)LadySuburu wrote:
It consists of one of the following combinations of roles:
• 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Vanilla Townies.
• 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Vanilla Townies.
• 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies.
• 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Doctor, 6 Vanilla Townies.
I honestly don't think I've been too quiet in this game (certainly not as much as other games) but I suppose I can't blame you for being suspicious of me for not giving too many opinions, I would probably do the same thing.Ph0X wrote:
rust
Actually, I don't know. Let me look...
Oh look, I have only one comment about him. And it's pretty much useless. That trips my alarm! FoS! May have to look at him in isolation. Will do that in a follow-up post.
There are two mafia members.bmin11 wrote:
there should be only two mafias according to this list unless LadySuburu is playing with us (and I am not amused in that case)
Damn! You've figured me out!bmin11 wrote:
....... which you are doing for animask...? I'll keep it on my note for now. Thanks Ph0XPh0X wrote:
[...] However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).
Yeah, I was gonna read him ISO, in addition to rust. Comments are below.bmin11 wrote:
Another note to Ph0X:
I want to hear more about your suspicion against NoHitter, because to me, it just feels like he's following his gut (quite hasty as well). I just want to hear more from you (or just summarized post) since you are holding the strongest suspicion against NoHitter.
Remember: it was just a theory that iMuffin and animask are both mafia.bmin11 wrote:
I'm not sure if animask is acting out this one. He may be trying to act as if "huh? was there two mafias?" and to convince us he's not a mafia (mafia should know there are two mafias if I didn't count the number wrong). I'm not going to judge this yet, since this will also be confirmed if we lynch iMuffin.
I assume you meant "that"? And, it's called re-reading the thread from day 1's beginning and posting your thoughts as you read. ;PMashley wrote:
Such long post guys, how do you do than
Not remembering what you have done ≠ remembering you have done nothing. Also, posting "useless" comments (they weren't really useless; I just didn't gain anything from them) ≠ not posting at all. Separate can of worms.rust45 wrote:
I actually have a question for Ph0x now though. Why was I put on your "Suspicious" list for on "useless" comment that you have on me. Yet iMuffin is "Not-so-suspicious" even though he's barely been commenting?
This was correct, but animask brings up a good point about Mashley I didn't fully see before now. I'll add him to my FoS list (at the top). If anyone wants, I can elaborate.bmin11 wrote:
Ph0X: NoHitter, rust45
That was why at that moment, I pseudo-voted. Your gut isn't supposed to be a huge basis for a permanent vote. (Basically what I did was like a pressure vote except since we can't change votes...)Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter states the entent of his questionnaire, suggests we all "pseudo-vote", then votes (?) for Mashley based on (IMO) just gut feeling. The latter, of course, I didn't like; awful scummy vote.
Mashley's explanation for his suspicious post, didn't cut it. Doing something suspicious then saying, "Opps. I didn't mean that. It was supposed to be something like this." is not quite a valid excuse. If he EBWOP'd (edit by way of post) and made the correction right after he posted, that would be more acceptable.Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter posts his suspicion list. He continues to have a FoS for Mashley, unswayed by counterarguments to his argument by several other players. He also has a FoS on animask, not believing he is a "confused townie" as the current public opinion seems to be. (Funny that he has tunnel vision for Mashley almost, yet complained about DxS having tunnel vision (which I myself did not see) for bmin.)
[Possible WIFOM ahead] Yes I admit that mafia can be a part of the discussion, but from my experience, mafia tend to be less active to attarct less attention. Maybe I'm wrong with activeness as a town tell though.Ph0x wrote:
I find it fishy that NoHItter equates "participating" with "being townish". NoHItter: don't make that mistake. ;P Mafia can be a big part of the discussion as well. (See Echo and SFG of older Mafia games.)
Isn't that standard operating procedure for the lynchee? Well it is for MafiaScum.Ph0x wrote:
In this post, NoHItter also tells people who are about to be lynched to claim. Not sure what to make of that.
Wow. Now I know why my gut has been telling me about Mashley from the start. You're right. He has been trying to "fit in". No wonder I felt it odd.animask wrote:
Mashely seems to be following majority opinions for some reason. He is trying to fit in too well.
Yeah; we know.NoHItter wrote:
Regarding the "questionnaire":
It's RQS or Random Questioning Stage. Basically it's a way of starting off discussion.
Your "pseudo-vote" looked like an actual vote, because it was bolded. Please make the distinction next time.NoHItter wrote:
That was why at that moment, I pseudo-voted. Your gut isn't supposed to be a huge basis for a permanent vote. (Basically what I did was like a pressure vote except since we can't change votes...)Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter states the entent of his questionnaire, suggests we all "pseudo-vote", then votes (?) for Mashley based on (IMO) just gut feeling. The latter, of course, I didn't like; awful scummy vote.
He wasn't EBWOP'ing; he wasn't trying to cover up what he said at all. You misinterpreted what he said, and he re-explained his intent of the post. Of course, maybe I'm wrong, but I highly doubt that here.NoHItter wrote:
Mashley's explanation for his suspicious post, didn't cut it. Doing something suspicious then saying, "Opps. I didn't mean that. It was supposed to be something like this." is not quite a valid excuse. If he EBWOP'd (edit by way of post) and made the correction right after he posted, that would be more acceptable.Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter posts his suspicion list. He continues to have a FoS for Mashley, unswayed by counterarguments to his argument by several other players. He also has a FoS on animask, not believing he is a "confused townie" as the current public opinion seems to be. (Funny that he has tunnel vision for Mashley almost, yet complained about DxS having tunnel vision (which I myself did not see) for bmin.)
Yeah, but normally you don't need to tell people that. They can claim if they believe it'll help their team win. You're just setting people up for a "you didn't claim; you're clearly scum" argument.NoHItter wrote:
Isn't that standard operating procedure for the lynchee? Well it is for MafiaScum.Ph0x wrote:
In this post, NoHItter also tells people who are about to be lynched to claim. Not sure what to make of that.
Nope. An autolynch occurs on majority. Before then, in the "about to get lynched" stage (usually L-1 or L-2), a lynch can still occur on a different player.NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Nothing wrong with bmin posting a vote count; I did it in a few games.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Where's our host with updated vote counts?
Why are you the host bmin?
Sucks that you won't be able to be here for the last stretch.bmin11 wrote:
My internet dead line is coming... within 6 minutes ;_;
I hope everything will turn out good *cross finger*. Wish us luck!
Yeah. Is that really that unbelievable? ;Panimask wrote:
Did I actually bring up something smart?