TOP 50 (75,100) [added]

XEPCOH

Joined February 2011

Topic Starter

XEPCOH 2012-05-21T13:26:42+00:00

I think, we should do top 50, not top 40 because there are much more osu! players as 3 or 4 years ago and so top 40 doesn't make any sense.
Also, it is very difficult to reach top 40 in solo mode. We can make top 50 or top 75 or even top 100 of players because it looks more challenging. And number '40' is ugly, to my mind.

CaCtus112

227 posts

Joined May 2011

CaCtus112 2012-05-21T13:29:21+00:00

yep,you are right <3

Kurokami

osu! Alumni

4,024 posts

Joined February 2010

Kurokami 2012-05-21T13:46:15+00:00

Banana and crabby o.o xd
Yea, top 40 is ugly. 50 is better.

ursa

1,302 posts

Joined April 2010

ursa 2012-05-21T14:35:02+00:00

Since A long ago there's a Top 50 Scoreboard in the beatmap thread

but when playing only Top 40 showed , & now the 10 remaining still not showed until now

*Vote For the Top 50 ( 0 w 0) b

theowest

osu! Alumni

6,891 posts

Joined January 2009

theowest 2012-05-21T14:52:38+00:00

osu! is growing. Yeah. This would be cool.

Sieg

3,981 posts

Joined February 2012

Sieg 2012-05-22T03:15:07+00:00

+
nice idea

Aoko

1,053 posts

Joined June 2011

Aoko 2012-05-22T08:13:04+00:00

Support all the way!

fartownik

2,189 posts

Joined December 2008

fartownik 2012-05-22T09:57:39+00:00

Top50 seems more reasonable since it's also the same on the site, so why not in the game too. More than this would be too much in my opinion, getting in the top would be way too easy. I support expanding the top with 10 more players.

theowest

osu! Alumni

6,891 posts

Joined January 2009

theowest 2012-05-22T10:09:24+00:00

Should be implemented with this
t/79320

c:

XPJ38

osu! Alumni

3,570 posts

Joined February 2010

XPJ38 2012-05-22T20:03:57+00:00

I always found it odd to see the first 40 players in-game while the website is showing the top 50 so yes, support.

Enna Alouette

6,376 posts

Joined February 2011

Enna Alouette 2012-05-23T01:44:07+00:00

yeah ._. it's weird.support it~

Maneuver

112 posts

Joined October 2010

Maneuver 2012-05-23T02:21:04+00:00

I support~

XEPCOH

529 posts

Joined February 2011

Topic Starter

XEPCOH 2012-08-17T20:30:41+00:00

As osu! becomes much more famous worldwide and there are more than 5-10 thousand newbies per day, I think that top 100 is better than top 50 and top 40 is very ancient ofc

Marcin

osu! Alumni

4,944 posts

Joined March 2011

Marcin 2012-08-17T20:54:53+00:00

But, i'm not sure if replays are saved if you don't get to top40 - so if peppy expand it to top50, players from #41 to #50 wouldn't have any replay to watch.

XEPCOH

529 posts

Joined February 2011

Topic Starter

XEPCOH 2012-08-18T18:35:22+00:00

Marcin wrote:
But, i'm not sure if replays are saved if you don't get to top40 - so if peppy expand it to top50, players from #41 to #50 wouldn't have any replay to watch.

if player has local replay, it will upload to the server and people will be able to watch them

Mithos

636 posts

Joined February 2011

Mithos 2012-08-19T11:29:45+00:00

I don't see why this can't be implemented. the 41-50 slots not having replays isn't the biggest issue in the world, as those ranks usually get pushed up often.

deadbeat

osu! Alumni

9,218 posts

Joined June 2009

deadbeat 2013-06-12T13:58:39+00:00

wait, isn't this added?

CXu

osu! Alumni

3,558 posts

Joined March 2009

CXu 2013-06-12T16:00:47+00:00

Idd :p