forum

Haywyre - Everchanging

posted
Total Posts
48
Topic Starter
Beige
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2016년 8월 24일 수요일 at 오전 11:07:53

Artist: Haywyre
Title: Everchanging
Tags: w_h_i_t_e soundcloud monstercat electronic dubstep
BPM: 170
Filesize: 8597kb
Play Time: 05:05
Difficulties Available:
  1. Nature (5.28 stars, 888 notes)
Download: Haywyre - Everchanging
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------

For Approval

Mint
i love you
this is awesome !!
Sonnyc
00:45:602 (1,1) - 이전 슬라들은 빠른 속도에, 스택을 통해서 완급 조절이 어느정도 이루어졌는데 여기서 1/4 점프가 등장한게 약간 무리수스러웠어요.
04:54:426 (1) - 삼각형 문양이 핵심인 슬라아트이긴 한데.. 꼬리가 몸이랑 겹친 느낌이 좀 어색해보이네요.
Artavia
쫀득쫀득허네
Len
닌자는 밴이야
Tenseki
ㅋㅋ
Affirmation
일단은 모딩..

[자연]
00:30:448 (5,7) - 서로 스택해놓는건ㄴ 어떤가요
00:42:977 (1,2) - 얘도 조금 벌러주셨으면 합니다. 00:43:330 (1,2) - 얘가 넘 띄워져잇어서 말이죠...
00:49:154 (1,2,3) - 앞에랑 똑같이 애네도 삼각형으로 맞춰주세요~
01:11:389 (2,3) - 스택
01:23:213 (1,2,4) - 이렇게 셋은 삼각형 맞춰주시면 예쁠것 같습니다.
01:30:624 (3) - 뉴콤보?

뒤는 잡을거 없네요
굿럭
Topic Starter
Beige

Neoskylove wrote:

일단은 모딩..

[자연]
00:30:448 (5,7) - 서로 스택해놓는건ㄴ 어떤가요 약간 밋밋한 느낌이 들 것 같습니다.
00:42:977 (1,2) - 얘도 조금 벌러주셨으면 합니다. 00:43:330 (1,2) - 얘가 넘 띄워져잇어서 말이죠... 수정했습니다.
00:49:154 (1,2,3) - 앞에랑 똑같이 애네도 삼각형으로 맞춰주세요~ 너무 삼각형으로 통일하기는 좀 그렇습니다.
01:11:389 (2,3) - 스택 이것도 밋밋한 느낌이 듭니다.
01:23:213 (1,2,4) - 이렇게 셋은 삼각형 맞춰주시면 예쁠것 같습니다. 삼각형으로 맞추기에는 공간 조절이 안될것 같아서요...
01:30:624 (3) - 뉴콤보? 뒷부분 때문에 석연치 않은데 수정했습니다.

뒤는 잡을거 없네요
굿럭
모딩 감사합니다!
polka
Mod 4 Mod As requested via #modreq!

My map: t/460981

mod
00:04:507 (5,1,2,3) - This pattern doesn't really flow so well. Maybe point (3) the other way?

00:06:272 (1,3) - May come off confusing for certain players, especially on HD.

00:14:213 (5) - I would prefer a circle stacked on a 1/2 slider for this.

19:683 ~ 20:742 I feel these SV changes don't do anything for the rhythm.

00:39:448 (1,2) - Why a jump?

00:45:272 (1) - This SV is confusing. It may not be good for the play and flow factor of the map.

01:14:036 (1,2) - If you angled (2) to play off of (1) better, it would add to some nice flow.

01:25:860 (2) - I've noticed you've been placing sliders over a good snare for the chorus. Maybe consider mapping these?

01:37:683 (1) - I feel the stack takes away from the flow of the chorus.

01:45:095 (1,2,3) - Triplet is not called for here by the music.

01:54:624 (2,1) - These look like they lead into each other.

02:13:860 (2) - I dont like the fact that you mapped over that snare.

02:44:389 (1,2) - If you angled (2) to play off of (1) better, it would add to some nice flow.

02:46:860 (2,3,4,5) - Stream is not called for by music

02:54:624 (2,3) - The little slider isn't snapped, making this pattern feel odd to play.

02:54:977 (4) - Blanketing could be improved.

03:04:154 (1,2,3) - Triplet is not called for.

03:15:448 (1,2,3) - ^

03:22:507 (1,3) - The spacing between these two is a bit odd. I understand there's a note in the middle, but my gut is telling me to point out that this might play off as confusing.

03:26:389 (9,1) - These overlap, and it looks a bit unsightly when playing.

03:39:801 (8,9) - Blanketing could be improved.

03:43:507 (8,9,1) - Triplet is not called for by music.

03:44:389 (3,4,5) - ^

03:53:919 (3) - It would be better to let the snare be clickable.

03:59:566 (3) - ^

04:03:977 (2,1) - Not stacking these feels odd. As though they're next to each other in the timeline.

04:26:036 (1,1) - Having a space in these loops, especially the smaller one, would help add some aesthetic to it all.

04:42:977 (1) - If this bent at 4:44:036, it would match the music better.

04:54:448 (1) - EXTREMELY boring to play this slider. It lasts forever. Maybe a spinner would work here instead?
Topic Starter
Beige

PolkaMocha wrote:

Mod 4 Mod As requested via #modreq!

My map: t/460981

mod
00:04:507 (5,1,2,3) - This pattern doesn't really flow so well. Maybe point (3) the other way? No, I can't change it.

00:06:272 (1,3) - May come off confusing for certain players, especially on HD. Ok

00:14:213 (5) - I would prefer a circle stacked on a 1/2 slider for this. No, It is not weird.

19:683 ~ 20:742 I feel these SV changes don't do anything for the rhythm. That's ok, it is not problem.

00:39:448 (1,2) - Why a jump? Humm... ok

00:45:272 (1) - This SV is confusing. It may not be good for the play and flow factor of the map. Not confusing this...

01:14:036 (1,2) - If you angled (2) to play off of (1) better, it would add to some nice flow. Not sure.

01:25:860 (2) - I've noticed you've been placing sliders over a good snare for the chorus. Maybe consider mapping these? No...

01:37:683 (1) - I feel the stack takes away from the flow of the chorus. Ok

01:45:095 (1,2,3) - Triplet is not called for here by the music. I think so, but I want to same with the other patterns.

01:54:624 (2,1) - These look like they lead into each other. This beatmap will not have been played Newbies.

02:13:860 (2) - I dont like the fact that you mapped over that snare. No...

02:44:389 (1,2) - If you angled (2) to play off of (1) better, it would add to some nice flow. Not sure.

02:46:860 (2,3,4,5) - Stream is not called for by music I think so, but I want to same with the other patterns.

02:54:624 (2,3) - The little slider isn't snapped, making this pattern feel odd to play. it is 1/6 rhythm, It is snapped

02:54:977 (4) - Blanketing could be improved. I don't like that mod, but ok.

03:04:154 (1,2,3) - Triplet is not called for.

03:15:448 (1,2,3) - ^

03:22:507 (1,3) - The spacing between these two is a bit odd. I understand there's a note in the middle, but my gut is telling me to point out that this might play off as confusing.

03:26:389 (9,1) - These overlap, and it looks a bit unsightly when playing.

03:39:801 (8,9) - Blanketing could be improved.

03:43:507 (8,9,1) - Triplet is not called for by music.

03:44:389 (3,4,5) - ^

03:53:919 (3) - It would be better to let the snare be clickable.

03:59:566 (3) - ^

04:03:977 (2,1) - Not stacking these feels odd. As though they're next to each other in the timeline.

04:26:036 (1,1) - Having a space in these loops, especially the smaller one, would help add some aesthetic to it all.

04:42:977 (1) - If this bent at 4:44:036, it would match the music better.

04:54:448 (1) - EXTREMELY boring to play this slider. It lasts forever. Maybe a spinner would work here instead?
Ok, Thank you!
ReFaller
Always rearranging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging..........XD

I found this wong song few days ago in #modresa #modreqs

00:13:683 (2,3,4,5) - would you take care for fix spacing to more equal?
00:22:154 (1) - this notice is for wonder some my mind. Is it your favourite slider shape? XD
00:58:860 (3,4) - the flow between them is maybe basically broken, but is good-played. i'd like to suggest smooth this flow by doing something with slider 4, however not much need to fix.
01:09:448 (3) - ?definetely? your favourite slider shape, especially put horizontally XD. looks great!!!
01:30:272 (1,2,1) - what do you plan to say, if i suggest set it vertically like previous "1,2" combos? (i know the 01:29:919 (1,2,1) - is a triangle)
01:38:742 (5) - slider!!! <3
02:25:683 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - ALWAYS REARRANGING!!!
02:30:272 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - tu dudu tududu!!!
02:35:213 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - oh fuck...based on hexagon...I'm envying your skill... :(

Pink and bold are just my kawaii srrałłaaiii comments ;).
Topic Starter
Beige

ReFaller wrote:

Always rearranging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging-ging..........XD

I found this wong song few days ago in #modresa #modreqs

00:13:683 (2,3,4,5) - would you take care for fix spacing to more equal? Awesome!!
00:22:154 (1) - this notice is for wonder some my mind. Is it your favourite slider shape? XD Ok
00:58:860 (3,4) - the flow between them is maybe basically broken, but is good-played. i'd like to suggest smooth this flow by doing something with slider 4, however not much need to fix. I don't think so it's not bad
01:09:448 (3) - ?definetely? your favourite slider shape, especially put horizontally XD. looks great!!! xD
01:30:272 (1,2,1) - what do you plan to say, if i suggest set it vertically like previous "1,2" combos? (i know the 01:29:919 (1,2,1) - is a triangle) the end of the rhythm, it doesn't need to same with the patterns.
01:38:742 (5) - slider!!! <3 xD
02:25:683 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - ALWAYS REARRANGING!!!
02:30:272 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - tu dudu tududu!!!
02:35:213 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - oh fuck...based on hexagon...I'm envying your skill... :(

Pink and bold are just my kawaii srrałłaaiii comments ;).
Thank you! :D/
squirrelpascals
get ranked
Imakuri
M4M Cause, why not :
- I sent you a PM in game bla bla bla...

[ Nature]

  1. I didn't find so many things to mod ;__;
  2. 00:25:683 : A VERY VERY VERY small blanket, you can fix it.
  3. 00:32:742 : Maybe you can do a reverse slider, but it's up to you.
  4. 00:33:272 : And here, put a circle ? (Maybe, why not, it's up to you)
  5. 01:02:389 : Maybe you can put a circle like 01:02:742 ?
  6. 01:13:507 : A small blanket
  7. 01:37:772 : Maybe you can do a triple like 01:33:801 ?
  8. 01:43:860 : Blanket
  9. 03:10:860 : Maybe a triple can be a good idea ?
  10. I think that's it, rest is correct. (Sorry ;w;)
I'd love to see that ranked <3 Song is awesome !
Good Luck for rank !
~ Imakuri
Topic Starter
Beige

Imakuri wrote:

M4M Cause, why not :
- I sent you a PM in game bla bla bla...

[ Nature]

  1. I didn't find so many things to mod ;__;
  2. 00:25:683 : A VERY VERY VERY small blanket, you can fix it.
  3. 00:32:742 : Maybe you can do a reverse slider, but it's up to you.
  4. 00:33:272 : And here, put a circle ? (Maybe, why not, it's up to you)
  5. 01:02:389 : Maybe you can put a circle like 01:02:742 ?
  6. 01:13:507 : A small blanket
  7. 01:37:772 : Maybe you can do a triple like 01:33:801 ?
  8. 01:43:860 : Blanket
  9. 03:10:860 : Maybe a triple can be a good idea ?
  10. I think that's it, rest is correct. (Sorry ;w;)
I'd love to see that ranked <3 Song is awesome !
Good Luck for rank !
~ Imakuri
Fixed some patterns and blanket...
VINXIS
shieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
-kevincela-
nice :)
TenkaiPalm
Hi, here are some of my opinions :D

Nature
I won't mention anything about blankets LOL
00:28:154 (1,2,3,4) - Not saying you have to, but like better consistency with distance snap is nice. Just in general. I won't mention it again :)
00:43:330 (1) - I don't think this really needs a new combo per-say, but that's your judgement.
01:02:389 (1,2) - I wanna say fix these to be long enough to reach the blue tic.
01:51:801 (1) - Keep this a part of the old combo?
01:51:801 (1) - My fingers LOL. I'm not saying you need to change anything, but this feels like it contrasts in difficulty compared to the rest of your map.
02:32:742 (1,2) - Same note as above, I think these would be better if they just were a bit longer on the blue tics. It happens other times, but I won't mention it again.
03:33:448 (5) - Maybe make this slightly off positioned compared to 03:33:095 (3) . It helps see the note better, and it also fits what you've already done with the rest of the song. An example being 03:35:213 (1,3)
04:01:683 (1,1,1) - I think this is okay since you made a new combo for each and it's not hard to differentiate :D
04:09:095 (1) - Cool shapes :)
04:54:492 (1) - This spinner, dang it's super long. Although I think you're gonna keep it like that no matter what I say.

Generally, pretty cool map! I kinda think the distancing is here and there, but the variation is what makes it good too :D I also think the shaping of your sliders was well done as well~ Keep in mind when you're doing new combos as well!
Good luck on getting ranked~ :D
Et0iliS
hi


  • [Nature]
  1. 00:42:801 (8,1,2) - hard to jump
  2. 01:02:742 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ctrl+J?
  3. 03:47:919 (1,2,3) - maybe change to Click me ?
  4. 04:02:742 (1,2,1) - too close

it is almost perfect! can't give more suggestions xD
GOOD LUCK!
Topic Starter
Beige
Nothing to change it, I'm sorry
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply