1. advanced (1.9 stars, 227 notes)
2. hard (2.63 stars, 292 notes)
3. insane (3.37 stars, 334 notes)
4. normal (1.66 stars, 168 notes)
5. water (4.04 stars, 438 notes)

Natteke wrote:

1. 01:06:040 (6)
2. 01:20:809 (6)
3. 02:05:116 (6)
4. 02:19:886 (6)
5. 02:34:655 (6)
6. 02:49:424 (6)

Hollow Wings wrote:

m4m

water

1. 00:39:732 (1,1) - don't overlap the arrow.
2. 01:05:578 (1,2) - somehow i'd like to see these two notes swapped, and even with a bit larger distance. i see your idea but i wanted to group these in two while playing. your idea would maximize emphasis on the next combo when I don't want to do that.
3. 01:34:193 (1,2,3) - these objects has nearly nothing to snap... listen to the song carefully and see if you can reduce those rhythm to another pattern. [color=#FF0000]am I the only one who can hear these very clearly
4. great map, 2 stars.[/color]

Insane

1. 00:34:886 (6,1) - still think you can larger up this jump for that 1/1 gap, or just stack them like you've done other places. example like 00:43:424 (1,2,1) - or 00:49:655 (6,1) - is really good to me.
2. 01:24:040 (1,2) - well, still recommend you avoid overlapping the arrow. same to 02:52:655 (2,1) - . this one's fine though, i think
3. i think i start to like your style for the way you place sliders and notes ww. thank you!!

good with lower diffs... really nothing to say, great works! the only thing you should watch out in this map is that quiet part, ask more modders to see if those objects are snapped correctly or not.

and also, you mapping style fits my taste a lot, i'm considering if what can i deal with it www thanks

good luck!

polunochnik wrote:

NM

Normal
01:27:732 (1, 2, 3)
02:26:809 (1, 2)
02:56:347 (1, 2, 3)
In these moments the music is much more dynamic than the buttons. With headphones on my ears I automatically try to press more quickly than necessary. How about put here slider with reverse arrow? did something different

advanced
01:27:732 (1, 2, 3)
02:26:809 (1, 2)
02:56:347 (1, 2, 3)
As well as in the normal. did something different

00:51:270 (6) - new combo here? why
00:51:732 (1) remove new combo? why
same combos here:

1. 01:06:040 (6)
2. 01:20:809 (6)
3. 02:05:116 (6)
4. 02:19:886 (6)
5. 02:34:655 (6)
6. 02:49:424 (6)

Hard
Nothing much here, just my opinion:
00:36:501 (1, 2) - how about replaced by three buttons? that would be overmapping it, this just lets you click the two notes with more emphasis

Water water*
There are many combos consisting of a single element, like 00:29:578 (1) and 00:30:963 (1). to help readability
01:48:040 - 01:54:040 - at this point rhythm suddenly changes for a short time. I was confused by such changes even after several attempts. increased spacing a bit

Generally, your map is great!
I hope I could help.
Good luck!

Zero__wind wrote:

M4M from my queue

General
it's better to use .jpg for bg instead of .png, may make the file size smaller dunno if this is necessary
there are some unused inherited points in lower diffs, better remove them they dont cause any problems
I don't know about this song but you can probably add some tags will do
the preview point is at a kinda weird spot imo, maybe reset it to 00:29:347 - or else nah
hitsound suggestions also apply to other diffs
it feels weird that only Insane diff satrts from 00:29:578 - instead of 00:27:732 - like the other ones
I generally don't know what minor rhythm you're mapping to from 01:32:347 (1) - till 01:37:886 (1) - . there don't seem to be any 1/2 beats at 01:35:116 (2,3) - or 01:36:963 (2,3) - i must be crazy cuz i can distinctly hear the notes. try listening more carefully or with a higher volume

Normal
02:25:424 (3) - missing finish at end
02:41:578 (4) - probably missing some hitsounds on head
seems nothing wrong. some patterns like 02:06:501 (2,3,4) - and 02:32:809 (3,4,5,6) - don't flow really smooth imo though it's my style i guess

Advanced
00:36:040 (5,1) - 00:40:655 (1,2) - it's not recommended to use both 1/1 and 1/2 stacks in a low level diff which is not yet 2 stars. new plaers can get confused seeing these stacked circles when they have different rhythm from time to time. in your case, I think unstack the 1/2 stacks like 00:40:655 (1,2) - will be the better choice as you have quite a lot 1/1 stacks throughout the diff AR is high enough to do this imo
01:04:655 (4) - add NC to make the combo lengths even?
01:19:424 (4) - ^
02:12:040 (3) - missing some kind of hitsound here?
02:41:578 (3) - ^
02:30:963 (5,1) - spacing is inconsistent

Hard
OD6 recommended, Advanced is only with OD4, 4 -> 7 is really a big gap
00:33:270 (1,2,3,4,5) - hmm, this feels kinda unsmooth imo intentional antiflow
00:36:501 (1) - this kind of NC seems unnecessary as you have many 1/1 stacks without NC like 00:47:578 (5) - and 01:02:347 (5) - ...
00:43:886 (1) - ^
00:40:655 (1,2) - you may want to make the spacing at these particular points more consistent. it's 1.4x here and 1.8x at 01:24:963 (1,2) - , 2x at 02:53:578 (1,2) - . they just make your map feel quite random
02:35:116 (3) - where's the NC 0.0
02:41:578 (1) - the NC is inconsistent with 02:12:040 (6) -

Insane
OD7 for this diff seems more fitting with the map's actual difficulty
01:02:809 (1) - CTRL+G flows better imo flows better yes, fits better no
01:12:501 (1) - I don't consider it necessary to have a comboset with only this one object, maybe move the NC to 01:11:578 (5) - instead, or remove the NC on 01:12:963 (1) -
01:57:270 (1) - you don't have NC here in Water diff
02:41:578 (1) - maybe CTRL+G no that breaks the idea lol

water
01:02:232 - you may want a circle here no, i wanted to make a difference between this and the second half (i made it different there)
01:17:001 - similar thing g
01:07:424 (1) - why NC here while no NC on 01:07:886 (2) - ? why would i place an nc there
02:25:886 (1) - I think the sv is too high here which is unfitting with the music there's a new sound in the background now, i wanted to highlight that
not much

probabbly all that I've got
I felt sleepy every time I tried to mod this
sorry but I can't really get your flow in lower diffs. they feel so unnatural. yea this is just the way i do things

Skystar wrote:

checked and map looks good, bubbled!

Skystar wrote:

checked and map looks good, bubbled!