1. Rebellion (7.25 stars, 2026 notes)

Shiirn wrote:

Let's do this.

Suggestions
Heavily Recommend
Vital


[Rebellion]
00:01:091 (1) - Starting with a spinner always has a weird effect on the player. The fact that it ends, not on a beat, but when noise stops, makes it even weirder. I suggest having the spinner get progressively louder over time with the final note being much softer in volume. I lowered volume to 40% but I think the volume is fine since you don't really get any 1000's until midway through the spinner atleast (using auto) so the volume should fit well.
00:12:908 (2,3,4,5) - The 2,4,5 are not in a straight line. Fixed.
00:21:109 (1) - This is pretty freakin' far outside the grid area. Is that really necessary? Well, its not off screen, but i made this a bit nicer. I like using the full area of the screen, not just the limits of the grid, especially when it fits the structure i've set up here.
01:20:959 (1,2,3,4) - You can move these apart in such a way to allow them to not overlap with 01:21:837 (7,8,9,10,1) - . This will also move 01:22:422 (3) - . Yea Alright, fixed this, and applied to some other stacked triplets too.
04:53:300 (2,3,4) - doesn't need to overlap with (1). You could space this out a bit. Alright, did something cool.

Curse your efficient mapping style that leaves little chance for error.

Aeril wrote:

04:18:910 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - SPACING WHYYYYY ;W; :DD Well, i might nerf them after some more testplays but i'm impressed you can FC (if not for this part). The rest of the map is still 6.75 stars without this.

the one part that keeps me from fcing

02:41:446 (1,2,1) - also weird jump from the kicksliders to that note I think they play really nicely though. I really like this jump design anyways.

1. 00:06:519 (2,1) - like 1 pixel off the bottom and in everyone's score meters without any real necessity for keeping neat strucutre stuff plsmoveup
2. 00:41:600 (1) - feeling like you could control emphasis on 00:41:600 (1) - way more by having 34 not being sharper than 12. like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4272252, keeping the idea you did with 00:39:836 (1,2,3,4) - then having a non wideaf angle to 00:41:600 (1) -
3. 00:56:373 (1,1,1,1) - vocals literally saying 1234 and you decide to combo spam why
4. 01:35:007 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - kinda dont understand how you structured rhythm for this stuff. 01:35:007 (1) - this combo goes 100% instrumental, 01:36:178 (1) - prioritizes instrumentals then has a loud af thing on the tail of 2, and 01:37:349 (1) - goes for vocal emphasis only and ignores the loud af thing in the middle of 2 wat
5. 01:54:617 (7) - separate from pattern like youd done up til now. something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4272261 works pretty well linear transition into 1's sliderbody so planned rite
6. 02:24:178 (1,2,3) - 02:25:349 (1,2,3) - gonna break everything here but i dunno why you go with the 1/1 emphasis while switching to 3/2 during the stream stuff at 02:28:861 (1) - . and like 02:26:520 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - this stuff is emphasizing 3/2ness while the streamy stuff prior had the same stuff to emphasize uuuuuu u
7. 04:02:081 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - 04:04:422 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - these are the same things dood. putting emphasis on the white tick like the first one is cool, so like sdsdsd on both = max cool
8. 04:28:276 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - wouldnt this make more sense split into 6+6+4 cuz hello song hello 1000 other times you did it right
9. 04:59:906 - pls

pishifat wrote:

look at me i put letters

1. 00:06:519 (2,1) - like 1 pixel off the bottom and in everyone's score meters without any real necessity for keeping neat strucutre stuff plsmoveup Ok
2. 00:41:600 (1) - feeling like you could control emphasis on 00:41:600 (1) - way more by having 34 not being sharper than 12. like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4272252, keeping the idea you did with 00:39:836 (1,2,3,4) - then having a non wideaf angle to 00:41:600 (1) - True. Fixed.
3. 00:56:373 (1,1,1,1) - vocals literally saying 1234 and you decide to combo spam why Literally deaf
4. 01:35:007 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - kinda dont understand how you structured rhythm for this stuff. 01:35:007 (1) - this combo goes 100% instrumental, 01:36:178 (1) - prioritizes instrumentals then has a loud af thing on the tail of 2, and 01:37:349 (1) - goes for vocal emphasis only and ignores the loud af thing in the middle of 2 wat I wanted to follow instruments and keep a simpler rhythm here but yea, ignoring that drum in the middle of 2 was kinda random so I split that into a circle + 1/2 slider instead.
5. 01:54:617 (7) - separate from pattern like youd done up til now. something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4272261 works pretty well linear transition into 1's sliderbody so planned rite Good idea.
6. 02:24:178 (1,2,3) - 02:25:349 (1,2,3) - gonna break everything here but i dunno why you go with the 1/1 emphasis while switching to 3/2 during the stream stuff at 02:28:861 (1) - . and like 02:26:520 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - this stuff is emphasizing 3/2ness while the streamy stuff prior had the same stuff to emphasize uuuuuu u This, Honestly i have no reason other than switching up the rhythm. And I felt like using 1/4 repeat sliders for a bit of a break after the stream without losing the intensity that a 3/2 rhythm gives. The 1/1 rhythm is exclusively 1/4, without any 1/2 gaps so its an easy to play rhythm that i think transitions a bit better after the streams than just going straight into 3/2's.
7. 04:02:081 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - 04:04:422 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - these are the same things dood. putting emphasis on the white tick like the first one is cool, so like sdsdsd on both = max cool Cool
8. 04:28:276 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - wouldnt this make more sense split into 6+6+4 cuz hello song hello 1000 other times you did it right Right
9. 04:59:906 - pls Ok ;w;

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/387185 ty mONSTRATA