forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
56,184
I wonder what the mods of latestagecapitalism also moderate
start up the rotorsGladiOol wrote:
Who knows.Yuudachi-kun wrote:
I wonder what the mods of latestagecapitalism also moderate
Jesus, that picture is stupid. Of course they're willing to engage in discussion with an "outsider" if they're mature and a decent person. Of course they're going to dislike someone who's an asshole.
Also mods on LSC are retarded. Shame, because the posts are great
Also mods on LSC are retarded. Shame, because the posts are great
LSC posts are great from an ironic point of view. You cannot seriously take anything posted there as an ''argument'' against capitalism.
Maybe if you're unable to think critically, sure.
u got me goodMahogany wrote:
Maybe if you're unable to think critically, sure.
I should make my own bot for posts and name it EdgeBot so it can just spam "people from tumblr, reddit and 4chan should all die in the most horrific ways possible" every time someone brings up one of those sites.
I look into this thread for the first time in days and I already want to fucking kill myself
same
hi
B1rd wrote:
I think you're reading too far into it.Dawnsday wrote:
This doesn't even surprise me. Can I inquire how he's earnt this nickname to you?
But if Sargon calls himself a classical liberal one more time I'll kill him, he has no idea what that word means.
Sargon's proven himself to be a complete idiot to me, the guy threw away his credibility a long time ago.
Mods of latestagecapitalism are complete shite, same with almost any political-related sub honestly. So many subreddits are like "You can say X as long as you agree with usGladiOol wrote:
" which is like what the fuck, y'know? People just want their safe spaces, rightwing and leftwings. I got banned from one of them for having an honest discussion about capitalism and provided some counterarguments to anti-capitalist critique, even though I explicitly acknowledged that they were just arguments that a defender of capitalism would say.On the other side, I got banned from the_donald for I don't even know what. If you don't worship Donnie's cock there, you're an outsider who doesn't belong in the community with your scary dangerous opinions apparently.
johnmedina999 wrote:
HAHAHA reddit
4chan is actually a far better place than reddit for the simple fact that unpopular opinions won't be censored by a retarded upvote system. It has the actual "free speech" unsufferable liberals so fiercely wish for.
Picture is horrible but I take particular offense to the "content from 4chan" argument.
Twitter is where all the best memes come from nowadays. Blackpeopletwitter is a wonderful place for sharing the best of the best.
4chan doesn't do anything but senseless trolling nowadays, like their shia flag obsession. Since there's no real moderation to control the flow of content, all the half decent people left. Some probably went to reddit, too. Oh, the irony.
The rest of the arguments are just fucking plain stupid
Twitter is where all the best memes come from nowadays. Blackpeopletwitter is a wonderful place for sharing the best of the best.
4chan doesn't do anything but senseless trolling nowadays, like their shia flag obsession. Since there's no real moderation to control the flow of content, all the half decent people left. Some probably went to reddit, too. Oh, the irony.
The rest of the arguments are just fucking plain stupid
the cake is a lie
Instead of getting downvoted then banned, you will just get banned. :thumbsup:Jordan wrote:
4chan is actually a far better place than reddit for the simple fact that unpopular opinions won't be censored by a retarded upvote system. It has the actual "free speech" unsufferable liberals so fiercely wish for.
Last question should be "do you have beaten wife syndrome and are ready to keep coming back after getting shat on and banned by mods multiple times? Yes -> 4chan No -> 8chanabraker wrote:
Just because he sometimes says stupid things or things I disagree with, like when he went full retard responding to the "questions for statists" video, doesn't mean he's lost credibility with everything else he says. I still agree with most of the stuff he says, or at least can respect where he's coming from.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Sargon's proven himself to be a complete idiot to me, the guy threw away his credibility a long time ago.
Fix awful sound quality, raise HP and OD. I should not be able to clear this. Other than that, patterns are pretty ok for what's given, though some might say it's too repetitive.Choofers wrote:
hey you dumb faggots rate my shitty mapChoofers wrote:
I think I mapped something that would push 7* naturally on osumania but I don't have osu installed so I can't check
vid: https://choof.s-ul.eu/8hzrxx8U
B1rd wrote:
Just because he sometimes says stupid things or things I disagree with, like when he went full retard responding to the "questions for statists" video, doesn't mean he's lost credibility with everything else he says. I still agree with most of the stuff he says, or at least can respect where he's coming from.
He goes full retard VERY often. Obviously I'm not saying he's incapable of telling the truth, that'd be daft, but the amount of stupid shit I've seen from Sargon in recent months means that I've lost any respect for him as a person, so to speak. The guy either can't read, or is very intellectually dishonest.
Also how tf do you get banned from 4chan my dude
my prefered website is better than yours
Sounds more like you're just biased against him, since even though he's left wing he still advocates for common sense border control.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
B1rd wrote:
Just because he sometimes says stupid things or things I disagree with, like when he went full retard responding to the "questions for statists" video, doesn't mean he's lost credibility with everything else he says. I still agree with most of the stuff he says, or at least can respect where he's coming from.
He goes full retard VERY often. Obviously I'm not saying he's incapable of telling the truth, that'd be daft, but the amount of stupid shit I've seen from Sargon in recent months means that I've lost any respect for him as a person, so to speak. The guy either can't read, or is very intellectually dishonest.
Also how tf do you get banned from 4chan my dude
You get banned from 4chan for literally anything.
"Sargon is left wing"B1rd wrote:
Sounds more like you're just biased against him, since even though he's left wing he still advocates for common sense border control.
You get banned from 4chan for literally anything.
You do realise he only says that for the extra credit that being an uncle tom nets you, right? He says he's left-wing, but he's voting conservative and unironically makes statements like "the left appears to be a long-term danger to the west as a whole". Sounds totally left-wing.
"The right are simply not nearly as threatening as the left when it comes to these ideals. They don't have the power." - presumably he doesn't mean the US government or the British government here when he says "they don't have the power" lmao. Those damned college campuses are scary and terrifying, aren't they? Those are the REAL people in charge!
There are many other examples of him being fucking stupid. I wouldn't describe my opinion as a "bias against him" as such because that implies unfairness. I'd say I've made a fair judgement of the guy's character from seeing what he puts out in the world + seeing his debates and videos.
Also I have no clue how you get banned from 4chan mate, it isn't hard to fit in there.
I've never posted on 4chan, however I've been hanging around that scene for long enough to know what I'm talking about when I say that 4chan is Reddit 2.0DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
"Sargon is left wing"
You do realise he only says that for the extra credit that being an uncle tom nets you, right? He says he's left-wing, but he's voting conservative and unironically makes statements like "the left appears to be a long-term danger to the west as a whole". Sounds totally left-wing.
"The right are simply not nearly as threatening as the left when it comes to these ideals. They don't have the power." - presumably he doesn't mean the US government or the British government here when he says "they don't have the power" lmao. Those damned college campuses are scary and terrifying, aren't they? Those are the REAL people in charge!
There are many other examples of him being fucking stupid. I wouldn't describe my opinion as a "bias against him" as such because that implies unfairness. I'd say I've made a fair judgement of the guy's character from seeing what he puts out in the world + seeing his debates and videos.
Also I have no clue how you get banned from 4chan mate, it isn't hard to fit in there.
Sargon isn't even black so I don't know why you'd use that derogatory term. Sure Sargon seems a little confused about left vs right wing, he might be correct in saying he was left wing if he were talking about a decade ago, however things have shifted so his opinion is now more on the right on some things, like free-speech, equality and immigration. However instead of calling himself Right-wing on these areas, he wants to reform the Left and bring it back to what he agrees with. And he still is Left-wing in a lot of things. So he's pretty much a centrist.
Anyway, it seems apparent that you're just annoyed that the centrist sceptic community agrees with the Right on a lot of things, thus it's harder for you to make our position out to be radical extremists and your position to be moderate and reasonable. Most of the time Sargon is very on-point with what he's saying, and always provides good sources and examples to back up his point. That's why he's so popular.
And I don't know what point you're trying to make out with your tweet, since it has zero context, but it seems apparent Sargon is talking about some Right-wing group and the others thought he was talking about the alt-Right. Not really seeing the big issue.
Uncle Tom is something that be applied to a lot of different people, not just black people. And eh, I'd've agreed with you about him "just wanting to reform the left" if he hadn't made his views so incredibly clear in recent times.
Also, reread the screenshot. You're making up the "obviously some right-wing group" thing, and I have no idea why you'd have that assumption, lol
Also, reread the screenshot. You're making up the "obviously some right-wing group" thing, and I have no idea why you'd have that assumption, lol
Ah yes, all opinionated judgements of character are meaningless ad-hominem that mean nothing. Cheers for your input. I'm sure you'd have exactly the same opinions about someone insulting someone you personally dislike.Dawnsday wrote:
ITT: Ad-hominem
>implying you didnt send a message where you just told b1rd he couldn't read
Edit: Also, I believe in attacking a person's arguments. Not just telling them they can't read. Which is a meaningless ad-hominem, since he clearly can. You edited your message after I posted. Lol.
Edit: Also, I believe in attacking a person's arguments. Not just telling them they can't read. Which is a meaningless ad-hominem, since he clearly can. You edited your message after I posted. Lol.
I mean, if you read the words "the alt right" and then somehow convert it into "right-wing group" or whatever, then yes, that means you've failed to read it correctly.Dawnsday wrote:
>implying you didnt send a message where you just told b1rd he couldn't read
Edit: Also, I believe in attacking a person's arguments. Not just telling them they can't read. Which is a meaningless ad-hominem, since he clearly can. You edited your message after I posted. Lol.
daddy
cool
If what he was quoting was the text under him post, it would make sense, I'm not familiar with Twatter. However it's still just of a case of you doing the thing where you use one quote or example to try and invalidate everything that person has done.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Uncle Tom is something that be applied to a lot of different people, not just black people. And eh, I'd've agreed with you about him "just wanting to reform the left" if he hadn't made his views so incredibly clear in recent times.
Also, reread the screenshot. You're making up the "obviously some right-wing group" thing, and I have no idea why you'd have that assumption, lol
Are you trying to say that I should've given you a comprehensive list of everything he's said that I either disagree with or find to be idiotic, or what? I was just using that as an example of something stupid that he's done recently, along with the other two quotes from him that I mentioned in my post.B1rd wrote:
If what he was quoting was the text under him post, it would make sense, I'm not familiar with Twatter. However it's still just of a case of you doing the thing where you use one quote or example to try and invalidate everything that person has done.
(Also yes, Twitter formatting is a bit weird if you're unfamiliar with it)
You can do all of that if you want but I doubt it will change my opinion on anything. Your problem with Sargon is obviously stemming from your partisan perspective.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Are you trying to say that I should've given you a comprehensive list of everything he's said that I either disagree with or find to be idiotic, or what? I was just using that as an example of something stupid that he's done recently, along with the other two quotes from him that I mentioned in my post.B1rd wrote:
If what he was quoting was the text under him post, it would make sense, I'm not familiar with Twatter. However it's still just of a case of you doing the thing where you use one quote or example to try and invalidate everything that person has done.
(Also yes, Twitter formatting is a bit weird if you're unfamiliar with it)
If you say so. As I said to the other guy (in sarcasm), I don't think you'd hold that same assumption if I was speaking negatively about someone you didn't agree with. Like, if I made fun of Jeremy Corbyn for his recent comments regarding never using Britain's nuclear deterrent, would you say my opinion is obviously stemming from my partisan perspective, and I'm just making assumptions about him based on my opinion on leftists in general? I really doubt it.
You just don't want to believe that my opinions come from looking at the content he puts out, and you'd rather think I'm simply biased due to my political views.
You just don't want to believe that my opinions come from looking at the content he puts out, and you'd rather think I'm simply biased due to my political views.
I seriously won't read all that shit you guys wrote, but that Sargon guy, based on those two pics, looks like someone in serious need of being gutted alive. :^)
today i saw tigers eating watermelon