epocsodielaK wrote:

Hi~
M4M request ;w;

日本語が下手ですが、これは勉強のために。。。大丈夫かな。。。

approachcircle.pngのサイズは、必ず128x128で
Oh, it's a serious mistake. Fix it!

[Ex]
この譜面が、Exより、Lunaticという名前にリネームしたほうがいいと思います
普通難度順はeasy->Normal->Hard->Lunatic->Extraの順番だから
それに、Extraくらい難しいではないと思います
no, sorry
diff-nameのExは、"Extra"ではなく、"Exルーミア"からとっています。よってこのままで
（東方くわしいですね。fine~）

00:17:172 (2) - 少し下に移動して（132, 97）　fix

00:46:249 (3) - kiaiがスタート時、NCが必要です（ranking criteriaによって）
Really?
見つけられなかったのでどこに書いてあるか教えてくれるとうれしいです

01:00:096 (1) - 少し右へ（370，173）　fix

00:54:211 (3,4) - (3)と(4)を交換すると、流れが良くなると思います
Helpful suggetion
DSをそろえるため、交換するのは(2)と(3)にします

[Hard]
00:18:557 (1,2) - (1)と(2)を交換するのほうがいいかもｗ　一番長い白線のそばのふたつ白線はとても重要だと思います fix
00:46:249 (3) - NC - Exと同じ
00:59:172 (1,2,3,4) - ここのリズムはちょっと変
　　(2)は(192,312)に、remove（3）そして01:00:788 - add note どう？
Remap!

[Normal]
00:46:249 (2) - NC fix

Sorry for the short mod ...orz I think this mapset is fine enough.. and whenever you are free, can you give a simple mod to this? Thank you in advance :3

The song is nice and I like the Ex diff xD thanks~

Thank you for M4M!
Green: my reply
日本語お上手ですね
replyも一部日本語で書きました。意味のわからないところがあればPMくださいね

Sorry but actually i didn't find relative rules ;w;

I've just been told by other experienced modders 2 months ago,

maybe this rule is out of date /.\

I'm not sure

epocsodielaK wrote:

Sorry but actually i didn't find relative rules ;w;

I've just been told by other experienced modders 2 months ago,

maybe this rule is out of date /.\

I'm not sure

I see
I cotton to your studious attitude~

Hey there, M4M just as I promised. Website kept going down so it delayed me on finishing this earlier but lets see here:

[Normal]

1. 00:51:326 (2,3,4) - for some reason I can imagine a "few" people would get confused on this. Maybe it's just me but I didn't get confused on this part on the first run. Just saying, maybe that's why people say this can be a normal? I'll say keep it
2. Same for 01:08:403 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - maybe that's why they said it can be a normal cause of intensity of clicking. Keep it because I think it creates a nice point of climax in this kind of level.
   
   Can honestly say this difficulty is done and checked out very well. I can consider this as a Normal difficulty yes.
   Actual level of difficulty that this can be under : Easy ~ Normal
   
   Results

   Did three tries:
   1st and 2nd:
   
   3rd( with mods (I'm bad with mods hahah)):
   

[Hard]

1. 00:41:634 (6,7) - A Suggestion (you can accept it or leave it as it is):
   
   
2. Doesn't seem to be a problem but just want to point out: move 00:46:249 (3) - to x:251 y:56. Reason that I say this is because the second point of that slider doesn't completely cover the 00:47:172 (5) - just by x: 1. Again, not really an issue I believe.
3. 01:03:326 (3) - Move this to x:127 y:142 ( You intended to make this part and the next part linear and distance snap of 1.4 or around it yes? If not then you can skip this and the box below.
   
   If you did intended to make that part linear

   1. 01:03:788 (4) - Shift + Alt downward
   2. 01:04:249 (1,2) - Shift + Alt to the right
   Pretty sure you won't agree with this but yeah (A Suggestion) :
4. 01:06:096 (1) - Remove NC
5. 01:06:557 (1) - Add NC
6. 01:08:634 (1) - Remove NC
7. 01:08:865 (2) - Add NC
8. 01:10:249 (1) - Remove NC
9. 01:10:711 (3) - Add NC
   
   Smooth gameplay indeed, some parts can be quite challenging I believe such as doing the triplet circle notes( as in the distance snap of those) and 00:52:711 (3,4,5) - but hey, it's a Hard difficulty and I shouldn't complain about that,but I'm actually not. Again, smooth gameplay!
   Actual level of difficulty that this can be under : Hard
   Okay, since I tried out this beatmap once I woke up I probably was too drowsy to stay full focus on during gameplay sorry.
   
   Results

   Did two tries:
   1st:
   
   2nd(After fully analyzing the difficulty without mods):
   

Okay this is what I found so far, sorry if this isn't helpful or not enough but I hope it did help. As for Ex difficulty I'll come back to this thread again and mod it tomorrow carefully analyzing it and try to make it the best! hahah I'll try! Since the website was having crashes and troubles at the time I was doing this, it cut time for me to doing Ex difficulty today. Expect to see me posting it tomorrow around nighttime (Eastern Time) fully done.
❀ Good Luck~❀ ^ ^
You can ✉ me on osu if you have any comments or questions about this

Okay, back again to finish with my modding for the Ex difficulty, I can say that there weren't much mistakes that I've found. Though it was pretty tough for me to figure out the pace I had to move for the triplet circles and the streams due to the distance snap but that's just me, keep it for now, but lets see here:

[Ex]

1. 01:01:019 (1) - Remove NC
2. 01:01:941 (4,5,6,7,8) - Bit of re-positioning (Suggestion)
   

   184,112,61941,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   232,80,62056,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   288,68,62172,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   344,80,62287,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   388,112,62403,2,0,P|405:148|393:184,1,80,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   Before

   
   After

   
3. 01:04:249 (1) - Remove NC
4. 01:04:710 (2) - Add NC

Actual level of difficulty that this can be under : Insane
Test Play
I've done reasonable amount of tries on this difficulty (5-6 tries?)
Either doing it single tapping, alternate tapping or both. Reason is because I wanted to see which is better. Here was my results:


Gosh I wanted to write more about this difficulty but I honestly don't see much mistakes in this difficulty. Can't complain about the triplets and the streams because they can be playable. Just me not being able to know the speed of it and it's a Insane difficulty yes. So overall I guess you can say these are just suggestions rather than minor mistakes. I hoped my mod helped and again wish you good luck on this!

M4M from your queue

My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/96436

[General]
Nicely mapped!
Just some suggestions

[Normal]
00:13:019 (2) - Make this blanket with the first
00:24:096 (1) - 斜めのsliderがストレートよりいいとおもう (my japanese is not good and lazy to type XD)
00:43:480 (2) - これも、たとえば

00:51:788 (3,4) - Too close, can make (4) a little down
01:15:788 - Break starts here
01:23:172 (1,2,3,4) - Make a shape, triangle or diamond is better

[Hard]
00:24:788 (2) - Stack perfectly, hold shift (or toggle Gird Snap) and move left by just a little
00:55:249 (4) - This too, try to stack perfectly if possible
01:13:249 (2) - ^
01:15:788 - Break starts here

[Insane]
00:10:711 (2) - Off grid and move to left for just a little
00:12:556 (4) - Off grid and move to right for just a little
00:13:942 (3) - ^ Move left a little
00:20:864 (2) - ^ Move up and left a little
00:55:480 (1) - Stack perfectly with 00:54:557 (5) -
00:59:403 (3) - Stack with tail of 00:58:711 (4) - ?
00:59:403 (3) - This and 00:59:865 (7) - is not on the same line, make it a regular diamond, ignore if you rotated it from a square
01:05:633 (6) - Stack with 01:06:672 (3) - ? you can keep, this is extra suggestion
01:15:788 - Break starts here

AllStar12 wrote:

Hey there, M4M just as I promised. Website kept going down so it delayed me on finishing this earlier but lets see here:

[Normal]

1. 00:51:326 (2,3,4) - for some reason I can imagine a "few" people would get confused on this. Maybe it's just me but I didn't get confused on this part on the first run. Just saying, maybe that's why people say this can be a normal? I'll say keep it
2. Same for 01:08:403 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - maybe that's why they said it can be a normal cause of intensity of clicking. Keep it because I think it creates a nice point of climax in this kind of level.
   
   Can honestly say this difficulty is done and checked out very well. I can consider this as a Normal difficulty yes.
   You're right
   this diff is a litte difficult for beginner player by resoun of the kind of above your comment. so I changed the diff-name form "easy" to "normal"
   Actual level of difficulty that this can be under : Easy ~ Normal
   
   Results

   Did three tries:
   1st and 2nd:
   
   3rd( with mods (I'm bad with mods hahah)):
   

[Hard]

1. 00:41:634 (6,7) - A Suggestion (you can accept it or leave it as it is):
   fix
   that's smoother cursor moving!
   
   
2. Doesn't seem to be a problem but just want to point out: move 00:46:249 (3) - to x:251 y:56. Reason that I say this is because the second point of that slider doesn't completely cover the 00:47:172 (5) - just by x: 1. Again, not really an issue I believe. fix
3. 01:03:326 (3) - Move this to x:127 y:142 ( You intended to make this part and the next part linear and distance snap of 1.4 or around it yes? If not then you can skip this and the box below.
   no sorry
   I intend to uniform DS
   
   If you did intended to make that part linear

   1. 01:03:788 (4) - Shift + Alt downward
   2. 01:04:249 (1,2) - Shift + Alt to the right
   Pretty sure you won't agree with this but yeah (A Suggestion) :
4. 01:06:096 (1) - Remove NC OK
5. 01:06:557 (1) - Add NC OK
6. 01:08:634 (1) - Remove NC no
7. 01:08:865 (2) - Add NC no
8. 01:10:249 (1) - Remove NC no
9. 01:10:711 (3) - Add NC no
   
   Smooth gameplay indeed, some parts can be quite challenging I believe such as doing the triplet circle notes( as in the distance snap of those) and 00:52:711 (3,4,5) - but hey, it's a Hard difficulty and I shouldn't complain about that,but I'm actually not. Again, smooth gameplay!
   Actual level of difficulty that this can be under : Hard
   Okay, since I tried out this beatmap once I woke up I probably was too drowsy to stay full focus on during gameplay sorry.
   
   Results

   Did two tries:
   1st:
   
   2nd(After fully analyzing the difficulty without mods):
   

[Ex]

1. 01:01:019 (1) - Remove NC why?
2. 01:01:941 (4,5,6,7,8) - Bit of re-positioning (Suggestion) mmm... KEEP
   

   184,112,61941,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   232,80,62056,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   288,68,62172,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   344,80,62287,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   388,112,62403,2,0,P|405:148|393:184,1,80,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   Before

   
   After

   
3. 01:04:249 (1) - Remove NC fix
4. 01:04:710 (2) - Add NC fix

Actual level of difficulty that this can be under : Insane
Test Play
I've done reasonable amount of tries on this difficulty (5-6 tries?)
Either doing it single tapping, alternate tapping or both. Reason is because I wanted to see which is better. Here was my results:

Results

You can tell which part I kept getting wrong on

Gosh I wanted to write more about this difficulty but I honestly don't see much mistakes in this difficulty. Can't complain about the triplets and the streams because they can be playable. Just me not being able to know the speed of it and it's a Insane difficulty yes. So overall I guess you can say these are just suggestions rather than minor mistakes. I hoped my mod helped and again wish you good luck on this!

Thank you for modding and test play!
red is my reply
the vocaloid skin you use is so cute

Rakuen wrote:

M4M from your queue

My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/96436

[General]
Nicely mapped!
Just some suggestions

[Normal]
00:13:019 (2) - Make this blanket with the first no
00:24:096 (1) - 斜めのsliderがストレートよりいいとおもう (my japanese is not good and lazy to type XD)
KEEP
ここはspaceが狭いので変えません
00:43:480 (2) - これも、たとえば　
fix
ここは気に入ったので変えました！

00:51:788 (3,4) - Too close, can make (4) a little down
no, sorry
I intend to uniform DS
01:15:788 - Break starts here fix
01:23:172 (1,2,3,4) - Make a shape, triangle or diamond is better
Change
I choose triangle

[Hard]
00:24:788 (2) - Stack perfectly, hold shift (or toggle Gird Snap) and move left by just a little fix
00:55:249 (4) - This too, try to stack perfectly if possible fix
01:13:249 (2) - ^ fix
01:15:788 - Break starts here fix

[Insane]
00:10:711 (2) - Off grid and move to left for just a little All fix your stack suggestion!
00:12:556 (4) - Off grid and move to right for just a little
00:13:942 (3) - ^ Move left a little
00:20:864 (2) - ^ Move up and left a little
00:55:480 (1) - Stack perfectly with 00:54:557 (5) -
00:59:403 (3) - Stack with tail of 00:58:711 (4) - ?
00:59:403 (3) - This and 00:59:865 (7) - is not on the same line, make it a regular diamond, ignore if you rotated it from a square
Let me think...
I made this pattern by use of hold shift
01:05:633 (6) - Stack with 01:06:672 (3) - ? you can keep, this is extra suggestion
KEEP
There is little point in it, imo
01:15:788 - Break starts here fix

Thank you for M4M!
red is my reply

Hi~ from m4m
ありがとう～XD

[General]
説明文?に「Artist:Sensitive Heart」「Album:Scarlet Destiny」も入れるといいかも？

[Insane]
CS-1すれば万人受けするとは思いますが、今のままのほうがらしい難しさがあって好きです:D
00:20:403 (1) - add finish
00:27:789 (1) - ^
00:27:789 (1) - ^
00:28:481 (3)から00:28:711 (4)が少し入りにくいかなと感じたのでこんなのとか
00:34:249 (6) - Ctrl＋Gしてこんなのとか
00:36:326 (4,5) - 前後の(3)(5)(6)が均等に並ぶこんな感じもいいかもです
00:37:943 (8) - ここはスタックさせないで離したほうがもっと面白いかもです。こんな感じとか？
00:45:788 (1)or00:46:020 (2)にadd whistle　どちらも入れると変だけどどっちかに入れるといい感じ？試してみて気に入ったほうにどうぞ！
00:53:635 (1) - add finish
00:59:403 (3) - add whistle?
00:59:864 (7) - ^
Whistle2つは試してみて気に入ったらどうぞ～
01:00:558 (3) - finish削除　始端にadd whistle
01:01:019 (1) - add finish
01:01:480 (3) - ここのスライダーはリズムがあわないかなと思うのでこのようにしたらどうでしょうか
01:05:171 (3,4) - Ctrl＋G
01:08:402 (1) - add finish
01:14:634 (4,5) - note2つでこういうのも面白いかもしれません（形が雑でごめんなさい）

[Hard]
finishはinsaneとほぼ同様です
00:25:942 (5) - スライダーでこんなのとか
00:28:711 (3) - Ctrl＋Jの形でスタックさせたほうがスムーズに入れるかも
01:01:019 (1) - 音楽の伸びてる所にスライダーをあわせてこんなとかどうですか
01:23:172 (1) からのところすごく好きです　XD
01:26:865 (1)と01:27:788 (3)を逆にしてもいいかもです

[Normal]
Distance spacingが1.2なのが少し気になりました。
最低難易度なのでできたら1.0のほうがいいと思います。
こちらもfinish音はinsane diffとほぼ同様です。
00:01:942 - 00:08:865　ここまでなにもないですがスライダーを入れるべきかと思います
00:36:096 (2) - 斜めじゃなく縦にまっすぐのがいいかも？
00:46:249 (1) - add finish

配置がとても勉強になりました！
音楽もskinも素敵でしたｗ
good luck!

Pandiar wrote:

Hi~ from m4m
ありがとう～XD

[General]
説明文?に「Artist:Sensitive Heart」「Album:Scarlet Destiny」も入れるといいかも？
KEEP
Tagsには入っているので
[Insane]
CS-1すれば万人受けするとは思いますが、今のままのほうがらしい難しさがあって好きです:D KEEP
00:20:403 (1) - add finish no
00:27:789 (1) - ^
00:27:789 (1) - ^
00:28:481 (3)から00:28:711 (4)が少し入りにくいかなと感じたのでこんなのとか
Remap
提案を参考にsliderを調整し、stackのやり方も一部変えました

SPOILER

00:34:249 (6) - Ctrl＋Gしてこんなのとか
fix
たたきやすくていい感じ

SPOILER

00:36:326 (4,5) - 前後の(3)(5)(6)が均等に並ぶこんな感じもいいかもです
fix
DSが変わるのでわかりにくいかと思ったのですが、むしろわかりやすくなったかも

SPOILER

00:37:943 (8) - ここはスタックさせないで離したほうがもっと面白いかもです。こんな感じとか？
Remap
rhythmが良いのでこっちに変更。配置はさらにいじりました

SPOILER

00:45:788 (1)or00:46:020 (2)にadd whistle　どちらも入れると変だけどどっちかに入れるといい感じ？試してみて気に入ったほうにどうぞ！
fix
(1)にしました～
00:53:635 (1) - add finish fix
00:59:403 (3) - add whistle?
00:59:864 (7) - ^
Whistle2つは試してみて気に入ったらどうぞ～ prefer it!
01:00:558 (3) - finish削除　始端にadd whistle fix
01:01:019 (1) - add finish fix
01:01:480 (3) - ここのスライダーはリズムがあわないかなと思うのでこのようにしたらどうでしょうか KEEP

SPOILER

01:05:171 (3,4) - Ctrl＋G KEEP
DSがだんだん広がってちょっとたたきにくいので
01:08:402 (1) - add finish fix
01:14:634 (4,5) - note2つでこういうのも面白いかもしれません（形が雑でごめんなさい） KEEP

SPOILER

[Hard]
finishはinsaneとほぼ同様です
00:25:942 (5) - スライダーでこんなのとか
Remap
note×2はsliderに変えました。DSをそろえるために配置は少し変えました

SPOILER

00:28:711 (3) - Ctrl＋Jの形でスタックさせたほうがスムーズに入れるかも fix
01:01:019 (1) - 音楽の伸びてる所にスライダーをあわせてこんなとかどうですか fix

SPOILER

01:23:172 (1) からのところすごく好きです　XD XD
01:26:865 (1)と01:27:788 (3)を逆にしてもいいかもです
mmm... KEEP
迷ったのですが左回りを維持した方がよさそうなのでこのままで

[Normal]
Distance spacingが1.2なのが少し気になりました。
最低難易度なのでできたら1.0のほうがいいと思います。
KEEP
Normalとして扱うつもりなのでこのままで
こちらもfinish音はinsane diffとほぼ同様です。
00:01:942 - 00:08:865　ここまでなにもないですがスライダーを入れるべきかと思います Let me think...
00:36:096 (2) - 斜めじゃなく縦にまっすぐのがいいかも？ fix
00:46:249 (1) - add finish

配置がとても勉強になりました！
音楽もskinも素敵でしたｗ
good luck!

Thank you for modding!
Red: my reply
hit-sound苦手なのでとても助かりました！

Hello, M4M Req. I am Chinese. Poor English sorry.

[General]

None.

[Normal]

00:22:249 (3) -Hold to "shift" x:133 y:47 ?
00:59:172 (2) - Cancel the slider medium's whistle sound?


[Hard]
00:05:634 (2,3) - End + whistle?
00:10:711 (2,4) - +whistle
00:36:096 (2) - Can cover the 00:34:249 (5) - slider head.
00:48:096 (1) - Blanket the 00:47:865 (6) - ?
00:51:788 (1) - Can cover the 00:51:096 (2) .
00:53:634 (1) - DS 1.3x? Not 1.4x?
00:54:096 (2) - Blanket the 00:53:634 (1)
00:54:557 (3) - Blanket the 00:53:634 (1) 's slider end.
00:56:403 (3) - Try blanket 00:55:942 (2) 's slider end.
00:59:172 (1) - You can cover the 00:57:326 (1) slider head feel good.
01:03:788 (4) - You can cover the 01:01:942 (3) slider head feel good.

[Ex] HP+1?

00:10:711 (2,4) - whistle?
00:13:480 (2,4) - ^
00:17:634 (4) - You can copy 00:16:711 (1) 's slider to do symmetric.
00:30:095 (3,4,5) - DS suggest narrow?
01:05:171 (3,4) - ctrl+g?
01:05:633 (5) - cover the 01:06:672 (3) .


[Other]

1.If you have any mod questions, you can PM or in-game to me.
2.Hope to you Ranked.
3.Can you help me my map for a mod? Thanks!

smallboat wrote:

Hello, M4M Req. I am Chinese. Poor English sorry.

[General]

None.

[Normal]

00:22:249 (3) -Hold to "shift" x:133 y:47 ?
OK
00:59:172 (2) - Cancel the slider medium's whistle sound?
no, sorry
it's on purpose


[Hard]
00:05:634 (2,3) - End + whistle?
unnecessary
in this part(selected S:C2), normal-hitsound is same as whistle
00:10:711 (2,4) - +whistle
00:36:096 (2) - Can cover the 00:34:249 (5) - slider head.
KEEP
because of long time between them, it doesn't seem worthwhile to stack
00:48:096 (1) - Blanket the 00:47:865 (6) - ?
KEEP
I intend smoother cursor moving to the next slider
00:51:788 (1) - Can cover the 00:51:096 (2) .
KEEP
I intend to uniform 00:51:788 (1,2,3) - to the straight slider (45 degree)
00:53:634 (1) - DS 1.3x? Not 1.4x? I mistaked 1.4x is correct
00:54:096 (2) - Blanket the 00:53:634 (1) fix
00:54:557 (3) - Blanket the 00:53:634 (1) 's slider end. fix
00:56:403 (3) - Try blanket 00:55:942 (2) 's slider end. no. previously, blanket 00:57:326 (1) -
00:59:172 (1) - You can cover the 00:57:326 (1) slider head feel good. fix
01:03:788 (4) - You can cover the 01:01:942 (3) slider head feel good. no

[Ex] HP+1? KEEP

00:10:711 (2,4) - whistle?
00:13:480 (2,4) - ^
00:17:634 (4) - You can copy 00:16:711 (1) 's slider to do symmetric.
no
slider's length is defferent
00:30:095 (3,4,5) - DS suggest narrow? Good suggetion!
01:05:171 (3,4) - ctrl+g? no. it is smoother cursor moving, imo
01:05:633 (5) - cover the 01:06:672 (3) . no


[Other]

1.If you have any mod questions, you can PM or in-game to me.
2.Hope to you Ranked.
3.Can you help me my map for a mod? Thanks!

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Hi, from M4M!

NORMAL

00:36:096 (2) - Rotate right 45 degrees

00:46:249 (1) - No need to NC

00:51:788 (3,4,5,6) - This square pattern looks a little confusing when its too close to 00:51:326 (2) -

Consider moving the square a few units lower

01:10:249 (1) - Add a finish hitsound


HARD

00:40:480 (4,5) - Bettter if these notes were stacked above the the tail end of 00:38:865 (1) -

00:47:865 (6) - I wouldnt suggest stacking this, maybe move to X:428 Y:208?

Pattern is really good for this one so not many mods needed

Ex

00:31:019 - Add a note here to maintain rhythm flow

00:38:865 (1) - Move to X:272 Y:136, not so good if stack with 00:38:750 (11) -

00:42:557 (10) - Add this note here, and slider start at 00:42:672

01:05:171 (3,4) - Swap locations with each other? So 3 on the left, 4 on the right

01:06:557 (1) - NC this to show new pattern

Pretty good mapping skills in general! Good luck, and I hope I helped!

ritsu-tanaika wrote:

Hi, from M4M!

NORMAL

00:36:096 (2) - Rotate right 45 degrees OK

00:46:249 (1) - No need to NC KEEP

00:51:788 (3,4,5,6) - This square pattern looks a little confusing when its too close to 00:51:326 (2) -
Consider moving the square a few units lower
Remap
rotate 00:51:326 (2) - 90-degree

01:10:249 (1) - Add a finish hitsound That's fine! good sense~


HARD

00:40:480 (4,5) - Bettter if these notes were stacked above the the tail end of 00:38:865 (1) - fix

00:47:865 (6) - I wouldnt suggest stacking this, maybe move to X:428 Y:208?
I agree
and remap in the way of not stack
Pattern is really good for this one so not many mods needed XD

Ex

00:31:019 - Add a note here to maintain rhythm flow
KEEP
I intend to add a little rest
00:38:865 (1) - Move to X:272 Y:136, not so good if stack with 00:38:750 (11) -
OK
but DS makes a little small
00:42:557 (10) - Add this note here, and slider start at 00:42:672 no, sorry

01:05:171 (3,4) - Swap locations with each other? So 3 on the left, 4 on the right
OK, fix
several modders indicated the same
01:06:557 (1) - NC this to show new pattern fix

Pretty good mapping skills in general! Good luck, and I hope I helped!

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

M4M

[Ex]
I think a higher slider velocity would fit better the song, it's what I feel. I guess is late for that, but you could keep in mind for next time.
00:13:019 (1,2,3,4) - I suggest you to follow the music better in this combo. Like this http://puu.sh/4OBgL.jpg
00:18:903 (4) - this would sound better if you shorten and it by 1/4, starting it at 00:19:019 - and adding a single note at 00:18:903 -
00:26:289 (3) - same
00:36:326 (4) - I think would be nicer if you remove this note, sounds better to me.
00:42:557 - make a triplet adding a note here, and move the spinner 1/4 beat later (the spinner's start doesn't have sounds, so it feels like is missing something there)
01:01:480 (3) - shorten by 1/4 and add a reverse, sounds good
01:03:327 (3) - same, actually these combo doesn't follow the music very well
01:30:556 (1) - I don't see the point of that change in spacing, nothing in the music is calling for it

[Hard]
00:51:096 (2) - remove this note, if you do fix the spacing
there are some parts that I would of follow the music more, but I guess is fine

Good luck!~

Lissette wrote:

M4M

[Ex]
I think a higher slider velocity would fit better the song, it's what I feel. I guess is late for that, but you could keep in mind for next time. Let me think...
00:13:019 (1,2,3,4) - I suggest you to follow the music better in this combo. Like this http://puu.sh/4OBgL.jpg
OK
additional to your suggetion, add a note at 00:14:403
00:18:903 (4) - this would sound better if you shorten and it by 1/4, starting it at 00:19:019 - and adding a single note at 00:18:903 - fix
00:26:289 (3) - same
KEEP
Considering following pattern, I want not to change
00:36:326 (4) - I think would be nicer if you remove this note, sounds better to me. fix and make DS larger
00:42:557 - make a triplet adding a note here, and move the spinner 1/4 beat later (the spinner's start doesn't have sounds, so it feels like is missing something there)
fix
I got the same indicaton at the latest modding
01:01:480 (3) - shorten by 1/4 and add a reverse, sounds good KEEP
01:03:327 (3) - same, actually these combo doesn't follow the music very well KEEP
01:30:556 (1) - I don't see the point of that change in spacing, nothing in the music is calling for it
Remap
change for regular pentagon

[Hard]
00:51:096 (2) - remove this note, if you do fix the spacing fix
there are some parts that I would of follow the music more, but I guess is fine

Good luck!~

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Random mod (いつもmodしてもらっているので…）
[General]
fine.
[Normal]
Placement
00:55:480(3,4,5) 外から大回りさせるように配置したほうが流れが自然だと思います
Rhythm
00:01:942~ ここが空白なんですが、やはりちゃんと作った方がいいです。古い譜面だとよくあるんですが、今それやると手抜きに見られることがあります…
00:09:326(1) 最低難易度なのでBPMが変わるということでなければ、基本スライダーの速度は一定にするべきです。
Hit Sonud
00:44:403(3) 始点にfinish追加？Exにはついていたので
[Hard]
Placement
00:24:788(2) 次の(4)はスタックさせていないのに、ここだけスタックさせるのもどうかなと思うので離してみては？　e.g.)
00:46:249(3) KIAI始点なのでNC
[Ex]
Placement
00:10:711(2,4) ここのスタックは流れを止める漢字がしてやや窮屈だと思います、前のパート同様に離して配置したいです　e.g.)
00:46:249(3) KIAIの始点なのでNC
01:06:096(1) ここだけフっと出てきたようにNCがあるのも何か微妙なので消してみては
Rhythm
00:19:942(8) ここは単発よりも1/2スライダーで、00:20:172のドラム音をフォローしてみては？単発で止まってしまうのもやや流れが悪いと思いました
00:25:711(1) ここはスライダーよりも単発の方が曲にあっているように思います、00:25:711 00:25:942 それぞれの音がはっきり聞こえ、かつ手前の赤線から長い白線にかかるスライダーはあまり見ません。
01:01:480(3) 単発3つに置き換えたほうが曲をフォローしています、前の部分でもそうなっていたので。逆に後ろの(4)~(8)ストリームはややovermapな感があるので削除してみては？

Good Luck!

kajiyatta wrote:

Random mod (いつもmodしてもらっているので…） thank you! お役に立ててるとよいのですが・・・
[General]
fine.
[Normal]
Placement
00:55:480(3,4,5) 外から大回りさせるように配置したほうが流れが自然だと思います No: ５へのつながりが不自然なので

SPOILER

Rhythm
00:01:942~ ここが空白なんですが、やはりちゃんと作った方がいいです。古い譜面だとよくあるんですが、今それやると手抜きに見られることがあります…
Let me think...
noteを増やすと不自然ですし、簡単な配置だと非常にboringなのでこのままに
00:09:326(1) 最低難易度なのでBPMが変わるということでなければ、基本スライダーの速度は一定にするべきです。
KEEP
SVを戻すとsliderが長すぎてえらいことになるためこのままに
Hit Sonud
00:44:403(3) 始点にfinish追加？Exにはついていたので fix
[Hard]
Placement
00:24:788(2) 次の(4)はスタックさせていないのに、ここだけスタックさせるのもどうかなと思うので離してみては？　e.g.) fix

SPOILER

00:46:249(3) KIAI始点なのでNC OK
[Ex]
Placement
00:10:711(2,4) ここのスタックは流れを止める漢字がしてやや窮屈だと思います、前のパート同様に離して配置したいです　e.g.) fix

SPOILER

00:46:249(3) KIAIの始点なのでNC OK
01:06:096(1) ここだけフっと出てきたようにNCがあるのも何か微妙なので消してみては fix
Rhythm
00:19:942(8) ここは単発よりも1/2スライダーで、00:20:172のドラム音をフォローしてみては？単発で止まってしまうのもやや流れが悪いと思いました fix

SPOILER

00:25:711(1) ここはスライダーよりも単発の方が曲にあっているように思います、00:25:711 00:25:942 それぞれの音がはっきり聞こえ、かつ手前の赤線から長い白線にかかるスライダーはあまり見ません。 fix
01:01:480(3) 単発3つに置き換えたほうが曲をフォローしています、前の部分でもそうなっていたので。逆に後ろの(4)~(8)ストリームはややovermapな感があるので削除してみては？
mmm..., KEEP
同じ配置ばかりだと飽きるのでこのままに。同じことを指摘されたときは変えます

Good Luck!

Thank you for modding!
red: change
purple: no change

Hello! From your queue!


Nothing much to say, your mapset is well made!
Good luck for ranking!

HI~ RandomEffect

Pagno wrote:

Hello! From your queue!

[General]
It would be cool if you added a kiai time at the last note of each difficulty ( 01:30:557 ), just for an instant!
Nice Idea! : I'll try it

[Normal]
00:41:634 (4,5) - In my opinion, things like these are quite hard for a normal, consider replacing them with two hitcircles instead
OK: but I chose Natsu's suggetion
00:51:326 (2) - Something like this? fine! fix~



01:00:557 (1,2) - Maybe put a single ½ slider instead like all the next ones
Reconsider
I delteted 01:00:788 (2) - in order to be easier
[Hard]
AR7 maybe? OK

00:25:942 (5,1) - In my opinion, it would be 'more playable' if you made it like this: KEEP


00:32:403 (2) - Add reverse arrow and fix
00:33:096 (3) - delete this fix

00:38:865 (1,2) - The distance between those two makes it hard understand the rythm, consider fixing it KEEP

01:08:865 (3,4,5) - I am unsure about those, in my opinion a hard should not have triplets at all, especially if not stacked, maybe place a reverse slider instead like the previous ones KEEP: for hard-diff, it can be allowed, imo
01:10:711 (3,4,5) - ^

[Ex]
Slider Tick Rate 2? mmm.. KEEP

00:21:326 (4,5) - I think that it would be more playable if you put a hitcircle even on the red tick between those two notes
OK: move "5" on the red line
00:42:557 (1) - Place this nearer the other two fix

Nothing much to say, your mapset is well made!
Good luck for ranking!

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Natsu wrote:

HI~ RandomEffect

General:

1. Im not sure but aimod say this:
   
   
   Skin Dimensions

   Skin Dimensions comboburst.png's dimensions must not be larger than 500x767 (currently 650x650).
   hit0.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 250x250).
   hit50.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 250x250).
   hit100.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 250x250).
   hit100k.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 312x312).
   hit300.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 312x312).
   hit300k.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 250x250).
   hit300g.png's dimensions must be exactly 256x256 (currently 250x250).
2. Unused Image Files
   hit100g.png
   
   It's a great help to me!
   my god! I didn't notice at all since my AI-mod doesn't tell me that. that's a fatal mistake for ranked

EX:

1. 00:05:634 I know you want to keep the 1 solo colour but maybe you want to add NC there to follow your combo patterns betters feel free to ignore both are fines Considering, but KEEP
2. 00:01:942 - whistle or soft finish empathize very well with the music imo try and check if is good for you
3. 00:05:634 (3) - same as above
4. 00:09:326 ^
5. missing alot of whistles in this finish maybe you can add some of them cuz they realy sound cool
   fix: add whistle in common whth ohter diffs
6. 00:13:942 (4) - move this one a little more down to add more distance with previous (3) actually after the jump pattern 00:13:711 (3,4) - the spacing there feel bad for play imo OK
7. 00:14:865 part like this and others need hitsounds imo no
8. 00:16:250 (2,3,4,5) - this get overlaped by previous sider and dont play good and dont look good try another way on this fix
9. 00:18:788 mm why you ignore the music here? it will play better if you do a little stream there wil follow the music better imo
   no: I cannot hear the sound like stream
10. 00:22:019 what about to add circle and make a triplet it will play alot better (Also add NC ther following your stanzas pattern if not add it here 00:22:134)
    no: but adding NC is done
11. 00:24:097 (1,2) - really nazi stack this perfect. fix
12. 00:26:865 (5,6,7) - reduce the distance here to 1.0? actually is kinda hard to play D: OK
13. 00:30:442 need to be a circle here to represent the music better fix
14. 00:36:326 why ignoring the music here?
15. 00:36:557 same as above also this downbeat got a stronger sound than 00:36:442 (4) - (Is better to map the triplet imo
    OK: I make triplet
16. 00:35:172 (1) - missing finish here I guess you was using it on symilar parts no: not use finish on similar part?
17. 00:39:557 move this one a little down so it dont touch the previous slider? OK: I used Distance Snap, but your suggetion is better
18. 00:42:557 this need finish also dont you think this 1/4 jump is kinda hard to notice? is the first time you was using this kind of jumps in this diff is better for me if you use a properly distance fix: unifrom DS (finish is not added)
19. 00:46:712 (2,3,4) - same as 00:26:865 KEEP: I want to make the same triplet as after part
20. 00:48:558 (2,3,4) - ^
21. 00:54:557 (5,1) - yeah nazi like hittler lol but stack this perfect you mean not good? but I don't have other good idea
22. 00:58:249 (3,4) - try to move it them a little so it dont touch themselves
    no
    I intend to uniform DS

Hard:

1. 00:01:942 (1,2) - add whistle on the head of this sliders fix
2. 00:07:480 (3,1) - same as above fix: but "3" is no
3. 00:13:019 (1) - add finish or whistle sound really cool and less monotonous OK: add whistle
4. 00:16:249 (3) - you forget to add clap here? cuz it empathize with music really nice OK
5. 00:29:634 this really need a circle here to follow better the music and start the spinner in 00:29:749 KEEP
6. 00:49:942 (1) - this overlap with 00:51:788 (1) - try to move it a little to avoid it? fix
7. 00:56:403 (3,4) - turn off gridsnap and stack this perfect yeah im nazi owo ?? : is it not stack correctly?
8. 01:28:249 (4,5,6,7) - just feeling the 2.10 jumps are to much for a hard but maybe just me
   You have a point there
   I reduce DS a little

Normal:

1. 00:09:326 (1,2) - same here whistles in the head sound really cool Fine!
2. 00:31:480 (1,2) - Fix the distance here I mistaked...
3. 00:42:096 (5) - this two are kinda hard for a normal under 3.0 try thgis better: fix
   http://puu.sh/52EGz.jpg
4. 00:51:326 (2,3) - Is better If you do a 1/1 slider here Change: but I chose Pagno's suggetion
5. 01:00:557 (1,2,3,4) - make this rhythm simple plz actually is too hard for newbies take in consideration you dont have a easy diff here
   OK
   I delteted 01:00:788 (2) - in order to be easier
6. 01:08:403 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - maybe make this more easy imo Remap

GL RandomEffect hope this help you (will mod normal later need to do some

Thank you for modding!
Your skinning indication is great helpful
red: change
blue: no change

your lucky won ~
hi from queue ~







I love this instrumen :3
Ganbatte ne ~

I'm winner? Lucky me!

Xinely wrote:

your lucky won ~
hi from queue ~

• 
  General
  gray combo colour seems not really fit with this BG, try colour like http://puu.sh/57tno.png ?
  
  i change only combo 1, here is the code if you want

  Combo1 : 216,1,28

  no, sorry
  combo1 and combo2 come to be so similar
  
  oh yeah, for SB. size of 1024x768 (in base_a1.jpg) is not allowed because rules from Ranking Criteria, you should make it become 640x480 or 800x600 for rankable
  It's a great help to me!
  wow, I didn't know it... I intened not to roughen the picture used SB. but the rule is so, I'll fix it (my other pending maps have the same problem )

• 
  Normal
  00:09:326 - SV changes is not recommended for Easy/Normal diff D: , i think you can use 1,00 SV with make slider art, it will be nice >w<
  OK, I fix it and remap
  there was the same indication in previous modding. so I've decided to change
  00:19:480 (4) - aaa you can make flow better here if you make a curve here. maybe like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1077616 for blanket too with (3)? fix
  00:45:788 (1) - no need to keep NC ~ OK
  00:52:711 (4) - i know it will be make break consistency hitsound but add whistle in this circle because flute sound? it's really fit ;-;
  Oh, nice suggetion~
  adding your suggetion, I also add whisle at 00:51:788
  01:00:557 (1,2) - swap NC because stanza? fix
  01:03:788 (3) - move to 148,124 for same flow with 01:01:942 (4) - , for spacing of 01:04:711 (1) - you can move it to 44,300 :3
  fix and remap a little
  I'll use the symmetric slider about 01:01:942 (3) -
  01:23:172 (1) - volume 5% is not fit in this time because piano sound not really low as 5%, try 15 or 20% instead
  incease a little
  01:23:172 (1,2,3,4) - why spacing increase here, it's unrankable D:
  OK, fix
  when no change of spacing, I felt boring. but certainly, it is not good for normal-diff

• 
  Hard
  00:17:403 (2) - i know you did a blanket here but flow will be better if you move it to 144,264 fix
  00:20:403 - aaa add whistle? sound similar like 00:13:019 - and you should add whistle for every downbeat (long white tick) except when finish on downbeat,it's fine because background music
  Let me think...
  according to your suggetion, whistle is too many, imo. but I'll add a few whistles at downbeat
  00:41:634 (6) - move to 164,116 for avoid bad overlapping. also for make nice jump, trust me >w< trust you!
  00:53:172 (5) - try this http://puu.sh/57uDM.jpg for better flow? Nice!
  01:04:249 (1,3) - swap NC for stanza KEEP
  01:06:096 (6) - move it like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1077673 for avoid almost overlap and for better visual fix and Remap
  01:23:172 (1) - same as Normal ~
  01:23:634 (2,3) - ctrl+G this, for low sound like this, keep consistency for each pattern better ~
  OK
  I change all for anti-clockwise pattern
  01:30:096 - increase volume 10% OK

• 
  Insane
  flute have 1/8 sound here, start from 00:07:365 - and have sound 00:07:422 - . also in 00:14:749 - and 00:14:807 - too and etc, i'm sure you know where where and where since a lot here lol . idk you will add circle/slider in that map but just saying here ~
  KEEP
  when add theis1/8 beat, I feel not good
  00:19:596 - add note for follow piano? no: I intend to follow drum sound
  00:31:019 - add circle with drum sound? lol fix
  00:53:056 (6) - i think you should keep this spacing, use 1,4 instead 1,5 fix
  01:00:558 (3,3) - try to avoid overlapping here fix
  01:03:327 (3,4,5) - try to make its little far, it will be neat for visual https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1077731 fix
  01:12:557 (3,5) - NC because increase of spacings
  Fine!
  become easy-to-understand~
  01:23:172 - same as Normal ~

I love this instrumen :3
Ganbatte ne ~

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change
sorry to ignore your first rule, Gomen ne...
my favorite fruit is apple!

NORMAL

00:33:326 (3) - x 92 y 248

Other than that, all good :3

HARD

All fine

INSANE

00:13:365 (2,3) - I would flip these two since it'll flow better

00:46:249 (1) - One grid square right. I'm serious

00:50:980 (2,3) - Found these unnecessary

00:55:480 (1) - Bad flow

01:23:172 (1) until 01:29:633 (7) - You just put the notes in random spots I'll guess. Try do something fancier like increase DS with each note

Sorry for bad mod. Good map though the song ain't my type. Stars anyways~

You have been modded out by Yurun Ceroia Neram~

yurunneram wrote:

NORMAL

00:33:326 (3) - x 92 y 248:arrow: fix: blanket correctly, OK!

Other than that, all good :3

HARD

All fine XD

INSANE

00:13:365 (2,3) - I would flip these two since it'll flow better
no
Considering DS, current condition is better, imo

00:46:249 (1) - One grid square right. I'm serious fix

00:50:980 (2,3) - Found these unnecessary no

00:55:480 (1) - Bad flow KEEP: I have no other idea

01:23:172 (1) until 01:29:633 (7) - You just put the notes in random spots I'll guess. Try do something fancier like increase DS with each note
Let me think...
if changing DS, it becomes very chaos map. I think again if I come up with any good idea
Sorry for bad mod. Good map though the song ain't my type. Stars anyways~

You have been modded out by Yurun Ceroia Neram~

hank you for modding and star!!
red: change
blue: no change

(」・ω・) hi~

結構前のフォームでのmod requestありがとうございます。　遅くなりました。

[General]

●一つ気になったことがありまして、一定のリズムでwhistleを刻むよりも、clapで刻んだほうが音が撮りやすいと思います。この曲は、一様drumかわかりませんけど、一定のリズムで　”うんたんうんたん”　と鳴らしている部分が多いので、　whistleよりもclapでやったほうがいいと思います。00:16:711～01:12:096のあいだですかね。 強くおすすめします。　 hitsoundをお探しの場合はこちらを　http://puu.sh/5c2Eq.zip
こちらにclapの音たくさんあります。　あと、スライダーのあいだでは tickに音を付ける手段をとったほうがいいと思います。 slidersldeに音を付ける手段がありますがあまりおすすめはできません。　音が少し変になるからです。　最後に、whistleの音は　この曲の主な音に付けるのがいいと思います。　リズムを刻むように。
もちろん、clapの音っていうのは　手拍子（デフォルト）みたいなのですよ。
説明不足かもしれない

●Tasg: 妖魔夜行を追加しませんか？　日本語で入れても問題ないです。検索のとき、この譜面を見つけやすくなりますー

[Normal]

●OD+1してもいいと思います。 低BPMで、そんな難しい連打とか要求してこない曲なので、ODが１くらい上がっても、そんな影響がないように思えます。
●00:01:942~00:09:326 - この部分を作成してもいいかと思います。　せっかく、音がありますので　ぜひ置くことをおすすめします。
●00:09:326 (1) - 終点にwhistleを追加。　いい感じだと思います。 そこまで騒がしくないので、つけてもいいと思います。
●00:11:172 (2) - 始点、終点にwhistleを追加。上と同じ理由ですが、もし上のwhistleを追加しなかった場合、始点だけでも付けるのもありかと思います。
●00:13:019 (3) - 終点にwhistleを追加。　^

[Hard]

●00:01:942 (1) - 終点にwhistleをついか。 いい感じだと思います。 そこまで騒がしくないので、つけてもいいと思います。
●00:07:480 (3) - 始点、終点にwhistleをついか。^
●00:10:711 (2) - whistleを追加。^
●00:12:557 (4) - ^ ^
●00:11:172 (3) - 始点にwhistleを追加。 ^
●00:14:865 (2) - ^ ^

[Ex]

●Normal, Hard といって、　Exというのは名前的にどうかなーって思います。　多分、ExってExtraのことだと思うんですが、　Extraは　Insaneの上にあるような感じがしますので、Hardの次の難易度がExっていうのはおかしいのではないかと思いました。 　
●00:03:788 (2) - 始点、終点にwhistleを追加。他diffと同じ理由。
●00:07:480 (4) - ^ ^
●00:10:711 (2) - whistleを追加。 ^
●00:11:172 (3) - 始点にwhistleを追加。 ^
●00:12:557 (4) - whistleを追加。 ^
●00:13:711 (3) - ^ ^
●00:13:942 (4) - 始点にwhistleと追加。 ^
●00:14:865 (1) - ^ ^
●00:44:403 (3) - Add new combo.　音が変わっているので。
●01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 全部選択して、　x:145 y:113に移動。　そうすると、01:05:633 (5)が01:06:672 (2)と重なって綺麗になります。
画像 : http://puu.sh/5c3oC.jpg
●01:23:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 何の形をとって、おいているのかわかりますけど、　このままじゃあまり綺麗ではありません。
Ctrl+Shift+Dの機能を使って、綺麗に図形を置くことをおすすめします。


以上です。　同じことばっかで申し訳ない。 good luck~

-Gamu- wrote:

(」・ω・) hi~

結構前のフォームでのmod requestありがとうございます。　遅くなりました。

[General]

●一つ気になったことがありまして、一定のリズムでwhistleを刻むよりも、clapで刻んだほうが音が撮りやすいと思います。この曲は、一様drumかわかりませんけど、一定のリズムで　”うんたんうんたん”　と鳴らしている部分が多いので、　whistleよりもclapでやったほうがいいと思います。00:16:711～01:12:096のあいだですかね。 強くおすすめします。　 hitsoundをお探しの場合はこちらを　http://puu.sh/5c2Eq.zip
こちらにclapの音たくさんあります。　あと、スライダーのあいだでは tickに音を付ける手段をとったほうがいいと思います。 slidersldeに音を付ける手段がありますがあまりおすすめはできません。　音が少し変になるからです。　最後に、whistleの音は　この曲の主な音に付けるのがいいと思います。　リズムを刻むように。
もちろん、clapの音っていうのは　手拍子（デフォルト）みたいなのですよ。
説明不足かもしれない
no, sorry
いろいろ試してみたのですが、今の音が一番しっくりくるのでこのままに。hitsoundありがとうございました～。今後の譜面の役に立てますね
slidertickとslidersideの違いは知りませんでした。この譜面には使ってないですが、他の譜面で参考にします
●Tasg: 妖魔夜行を追加しませんか？　日本語で入れても問題ないです。検索のとき、この譜面を見つけやすくなりますー
OK

[Normal]

●OD+1してもいいと思います。 低BPMで、そんな難しい連打とか要求してこない曲なので、ODが１くらい上がっても、そんな影響がないように思えます。 fix
●00:01:942~00:09:326 - この部分を作成してもいいかと思います。　せっかく、音がありますので　ぜひ置くことをおすすめします。
Let me think...
良い配置のideaが浮かんだら追加してみます
●00:09:326 (1) - 終点にwhistleを追加。　いい感じだと思います。 そこまで騒がしくないので、つけてもいいと思います。 fix
●00:11:172 (2) - 始点、終点にwhistleを追加。上と同じ理由ですが、もし上のwhistleを追加しなかった場合、始点だけでも付けるのもありかと思います。 fix
●00:13:019 (3) - 終点にwhistleを追加。　^　 fix

[Hard]

●00:01:942 (1) - 終点にwhistleをついか。 いい感じだと思います。 そこまで騒がしくないので、つけてもいいと思います。
●00:07:480 (3) - 始点、終点にwhistleをついか。^
●00:10:711 (2) - whistleを追加。^
●00:12:557 (4) - ^ ^
●00:11:172 (3) - 始点にwhistleを追加。 ^
●00:14:865 (2) - ^ ^

All Fix~
[Ex]

●Normal, Hard といって、　Exというのは名前的にどうかなーって思います。　多分、ExってExtraのことだと思うんですが、　Extraは　Insaneの上にあるような感じがしますので、Hardの次の難易度がExっていうのはおかしいのではないかと思いました。
no, sorry
実はここは"Extra"の意味ではなく、"Exルーミア"の意味でこの名前にしています。ちょっとこだわりたいのでこのままで 　
●00:03:788 (2) - 始点、終点にwhistleを追加。他diffと同じ理由。
●00:07:480 (4) - ^ ^
●00:10:711 (2) - whistleを追加。 ^
●00:11:172 (3) - 始点にwhistleを追加。 ^
●00:12:557 (4) - whistleを追加。 ^
●00:13:711 (3) - ^ ^
●00:13:942 (4) - 始点にwhistleと追加。 ^
●00:14:865 (1) - ^ ^
All fix about whistle suggetion
●00:44:403 (3) - Add new combo.　音が変わっているので。 fix
●01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 全部選択して、　x:145 y:113に移動。　そうすると、01:05:633 (5)が01:06:672 (2)と重なって綺麗になります。 Fine!
画像 : http://puu.sh/5c3oC.jpg
●01:23:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 何の形をとって、おいているのかわかりますけど、　このままじゃあまり綺麗ではありません。
Ctrl+Shift+Dの機能を使って、綺麗に図形を置くことをおすすめします。
Remap!
特に誰からも指摘がなかったのでRandom patternで通してきましたが、やっぱ気になります？
横着しないで形を作ってみますね

以上です。　同じことばっかで申し訳ない。 good luck~

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change
google form教えていただいてありがとうございます。queueで活用はじめました！

hi~

from my queue

すべて提案です。
[Normal]

1. 00:17:634 (2) - 00:19:019 (3) - をblanketするのならこんなかんじのスライダーのほうが綺麗になるかなと思います。
   
   SPOILER

   

[Hard]

1. 01:13:942 (1) - 01:14:865 (2) - を包み込むような感じになっていたので、緩やかにしたほうが綺麗かなと思います。
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:30:096 (1) - backにドラムの音が大きめに聞こえるのでimgのようにしてもいいかなと思いました。HitSoundはExと同じで
   
   SPOILER

   

[Ex]

1. 00:31:019 (8) - add Whistle
2. 00:55:249 (6) - x300y148 00:55:943 (2,3,4) - の真ん中がここになると思います。
3. 00:57:326 (1,2) - imgの重なりが少し気になりましたがいろいろと関連性を持った配置になっていたので修正するとなると大幅に配置を変えないといけないと思うので
   判断は任せます~　 (このままでも問題ないです！
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:02:403 (8) - 緩やかなスライダーのほうが良いと思いました。(01:01:480 (3) - みたいな!)
5. 01:13:942 (2) - NC入れたほうがタイミングがわかりやすいと思います。

私は食べてはいけない人類..
Nice Touhou map!
good luck

litoluna wrote:

hi~

from my queue

すべて提案です。
[Normal]

1. 00:17:634 (2) - 00:19:019 (3) - をblanketするのならこんなかんじのスライダーのほうが綺麗になるかなと思います。 fix
   
   SPOILER

   

[Hard]

1. 01:13:942 (1) - 01:14:865 (2) - を包み込むような感じになっていたので、緩やかにしたほうが綺麗かなと思います。 fix
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:30:096 (1) - backにドラムの音が大きめに聞こえるのでimgのようにしてもいいかなと思いました。HitSoundはExと同じで
   no, sorry
   
   SPOILER

   

[Ex]

1. 00:31:019 (8) - add Whistle fix: 忘れてた...
2. 00:55:249 (6) - x300y148 00:55:943 (2,3,4) - の真ん中がここになると思います。 fix
3. 00:57:326 (1,2) - imgの重なりが少し気になりましたがいろいろと関連性を持った配置になっていたので修正するとなると大幅に配置を変えないといけないと思うので判断は任せます~　 (このままでも問題ないです！
   f.., umm KEEP
   同じ指摘2回目なので迷ったのですが、気に入っているのでやっぱり保留に
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:02:403 (8) - 緩やかなスライダーのほうが良いと思いました。(01:01:480 (3) - みたいな!) Fine!
5. 01:13:942 (2) - NC入れたほうがタイミングがわかりやすいと思います。
   KEEP
   おっしゃる通り...なんですが、直前にたくさんNC入れていてskinがうるさくなるかな、と思いやめました

私は食べてはいけない人類..　(・q ・。)
Nice Touhou map!
good luck

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Mod request from Popner's Modding Team

1. Red - Unrankable
2. Purple - Highly recommended
3. Black - You'd better fixed
4. Gray - Just suggestion

• General

1. Any reason to use the diff name "Ex"? I mean, this is just a common "Insane" diff, not hell like "Extreme" or "Extra"
2. Awesome skin
   
   Normal
3. no unranked issue... but i think you can change some shapes of sliders to make this diff more funny to play
   
   Hard
4. 00:36:788 (4,5) - *nazi* not a good blanket
5. 00:38:865 (1) - weird to me
   
   Ex
6. 00:13:365 (2,3) - Ctrl+G?
7. 00:37:018 (8) - NC
8. 00:42:557 (1) - NC move to 00:41:633 (5) -
9. 00:59:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - This stream seems weird for me, 01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - the same. Quite uncomfortable
10. 01:01:480 (3) - triplet here fits the music better
11. 01:03:327 (3) - ^
    Also, triplets like 00:46:711 (2,3,4) - are quite unusual in mapping recently, It is hard to hit and quite bad for look, maybe you should change most of your triplets to smooth ones.

That's all, good luck

OniJAM wrote:

Mod request from Popner's Modding Team

1. Red - Unrankable
2. Purple - Highly recommended
3. Black - You'd better fixed
4. Gray - Just suggestion

• General

1. Any reason to use the diff name "Ex"? I mean, this is just a common "Insane" diff, not hell like "Extreme" or "Extra"
   that diff-name is from character name "Ex rumia". I don't intend that it means "Extreme" or "Extra"
2. Awesome skin thanks~
   
   Normal
3. no unranked issue... but i think you can change some shapes of sliders to make this diff more funny to play
   
   Hard
4. 00:36:788 (4,5) - *nazi* not a good blanket fix
5. 00:38:865 (1) - weird to me change a little
   
   Ex
6. 00:13:365 (2,3) - Ctrl+G? KEEP
7. 00:37:018 (8) - NC OK
8. 00:42:557 (1) - NC move to 00:41:633 (5) - KEEP: no problem, imo
9. 00:59:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - This stream seems weird for me, 01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - the same. Quite uncomfortable KEEP
10. 01:01:480 (3) - triplet here fits the music better
    KEEP
    you're right, but triplet pattern is too many in Kiai-time. so I avoid triplet at this position
11. 01:03:327 (3) - ^
    Also, triplets like 00:46:711 (2,3,4) - are quite unusual in mapping recently, It is hard to hit and quite bad for look, maybe you should change most of your triplets to smooth ones. OK: fix several ones

That's all, good luck

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

I am not a good modder, but i hope it will you :3

Normal

00:24:096 (1) Make it more curvy, it would diffenetely look better. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1102658
00:57:326 (1) Maybe, do the slider like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1102660

Hard

00:22:942 Add HC
00:42:557 (1) A little bit more curvy

Ex

00:05:634 (3,4) Well, maybe new sliders? Copy and paste seems boring here.
00:34:019 Add HC
00:41:403 ^
01:07:480 (1) Why that jump? It doesnt seem to fit (In my opinion)

Come[Back]Home wrote:

I am not a good modder, but i hope it will you :3

Normal

00:24:096 (1) Make it more curvy, it would diffenetely look better. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1102658 Nice!
00:57:326 (1) Maybe, do the slider like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1102660 fix

Hard

00:22:942 Add HC no sorry
00:42:557 (1) A little bit more curvy KEEP

Ex

00:05:634 (3,4) Well, maybe new sliders? Copy and paste seems boring here. KEEP
00:34:019 Add HC no
00:41:403 ^
01:07:480 (1) Why that jump? It doesnt seem to fit (In my opinion)
no, sorry
I intend to stack slider's end on 01:07:249 (7) -

Thank you for M4M!
red: change
blue: no change

thanks m4m :3

Black = suggestion.　 Blue = suggetion, but important thing for me. Red = Error Element.
These are all suggestions. so you can reject them without reason.

[Ex]

Hitsound

1. 00:16:250 (2,3) - 現在はclapをつけていますが、clapを削除して左上のSamplesetをNormalにして、Normal-hitnormalの音にしたほうが私は曲にあっている感じがします。ちなみに少し話が逸れますが、Samplesetはそのnoteだけ緑線で変えたときのように別のサウンドセットを使える機能です。ちなみにその下のAdittionは、対応するサウンドセットのカスタムヒットサウンドを使用する機能です。なので、変更前の状態のように、Drum-hitclap + Drum-hitnormalの音を使いたいのであれば、SamplesetをDrumにすることで緑線を使わずに音変更出来ます。AdittionをつかえばNormal-hitfinishをsoftサウンドを使用しているときに手軽に使えたり、使っていないサウンドセットにカスタムヒットサウンドを置くことで、擬似的にカスタムヒットサウンドを増やしたり出来ます。どちらも便利な機能なのでどんどん使っていきましょう！(知っていたらｺﾞﾒﾝﾅｻｲ！)
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:31:481 ~ 00:42:557 このパートのhitsoundingに少し違和感を感じます。詳しく言うと、00:31:481 (1) - のスライダーの終点、00:33:095 (4) - とパートの変わる部分から始めの2つのwhistleが赤線に乗っており、強調をしたい部分にwhistleを乗せている雰囲気を感じるのですが、00:35:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - などで単にパターン的に白線にwhistleを置いているので、パート全体のwhistleの傾向がボケてしまい、強調すべきところが強調できていない様に感じます。このままでも問題ないとは思いますが、下のリストを一度全て変えてから流して聞いてみてください
   
   1. 00:33:326 (5) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除
   2. 00:34:249 (6) - whistleを始点に追加
   3. 00:35:172 (1) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除
   4. 00:36:096 (3) - whistle追加
   5. 00:36:557 (6) - whistle削除
   6. 00:37:018 (1) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除 または 00:36:788 (5) - whistle追加　
   7. 00:37:942 (2) - whistleを追加
   8. 00:38:865 (1) - 終点のwhistle削除
   9. 00:39:788 (3) - 始点にwhistle追加
   10. 00:41:633 (5) - whistle追加
   11. 00:42:557 (1) - ^
   　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
3. 01:10:249 (1) - whistleに変更　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
4. 00:51:326 (4) - スライダーボディーのwhistleを意図的で無ければ削除
5. 01:30:096 (1,2) - 00:16:250 (2,3)と同じ提案
   
   譜面全体として、whistleをつけている基準がよくわからなかったです。指摘はしていませんが、例としてあげると、
   00:16:711 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
   00:24:097 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -
   この二つは大体同じ曲調の部分だと思うのですが、00:16:711 (1,2) - では(1)のスライダーの終わり+(2)で2連続のwhistle、00:24:097 (1,2) - では(2)のみにwhistleとなっています。もちろん単に統一することが良いと言っている訳ではないですが、意図的ではないhitsound patternのくずれは譜面の完成度を下げるように思えます。

General

1. 00:19:596 (x) - 今のままでももちろん問題ありませんが、おそらく00:16:711 (1,2,3,4) - のパートは大きな笛の音をフォローしており、00:18:326 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - はうしろのリズムをフォローした音取りとなっている様に感じました。だとすると、00:19:596 (x)にノートを置いて00:19:480 (6)-00:19:596 (7)-00:19:711 (8) と3連打にしたほうがよりリズムに沿っているように思います。
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:36:326 (4,5,6) - ここは3連打を置いていますが、大きな笛の音をフォローして置いたほうがパートの統一感があってクールだとおもいます
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:01:480 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - あまり曲をフォローしていないように思えます。きれいな曲なので、個人的にはどこかの音をフォローしてmappingしていったほうが良いかなとは思います。

[Hard]

Hitsound

1. Exの提案に合わせる感じの提案です
   
   1. 00:33:326 (3) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除
   2. 00:34:249 (4) - 始点にwhistle追加
   3. 00:35:172 (1) - 始点にwhistle 終点のwhistle削除
   4. 00:36:096 (2) - whistle追加
   5. 00:38:865 (1) - 終点のwhistle削除
   6. 00:39:788 (2) - whistle追加
   7. 00:40:480 (4) -
   8. 00:40:711 (5) - 始点にwhistle 終点のwhistle削除
   9. 00:41:634 (6) - 始点にwhistle追加
   10. 00:42:557 (1) - 始点にwhistle 終点のwhistle削除
   11. 00:43:480 (2) - 始点にwhistle追加
2. 01:10:249 (1) - whistleに変更

General

1. 00:19:480 (3) - このパートの流れ的に下ではなく上に移動する方が素直なフローのように感じます。
   SPOILER

   
   こんなかんじに置くと、私的にはつづきの00:19:942 (4) - から00:20:403 (1,2,3) - に繫がりやすいです。
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:59:172 (1) - <3

[Normal]

Hitsound

1. 00:59:172 (2) - 意図的でなかったらスライダーボディのwhistle削除

General
good fot me :3

ぐっどらっく<3333

terametis wrote:

thanks m4m :3

Black = suggestion.　 Blue = suggetion, but important thing for me. Red = Error Element.
These are all suggestions. so you can reject them without reason.

[Ex]

Hitsound

1. 00:16:250 (2,3) - 現在はclapをつけていますが、clapを削除して左上のSamplesetをNormalにして、Normal-hitnormalの音にしたほうが私は曲にあっている感じがします。ちなみに少し話が逸れますが、Samplesetはそのnoteだけ緑線で変えたときのように別のサウンドセットを使える機能です。ちなみにその下のAdittionは、対応するサウンドセットのカスタムヒットサウンドを使用する機能です。なので、変更前の状態のように、Drum-hitclap + Drum-hitnormalの音を使いたいのであれば、SamplesetをDrumにすることで緑線を使わずに音変更出来ます。AdittionをつかえばNormal-hitfinishをsoftサウンドを使用しているときに手軽に使えたり、使っていないサウンドセットにカスタムヒットサウンドを置くことで、擬似的にカスタムヒットサウンドを増やしたり出来ます。どちらも便利な機能なのでどんどん使っていきましょう！(知っていたらｺﾞﾒﾝﾅｻｲ！)
   It's a great help to me!
   これはすごい！さっそく使ってみます！　今まで他の譜面をmodしてきて理屈に合わないhitsoundを見かけることがあったのですが、この機能を使えば説明がつきます。あとはセンスがあれば・・・
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:31:481 ~ 00:42:557 このパートのhitsoundingに少し違和感を感じます。詳しく言うと、00:31:481 (1) - のスライダーの終点、00:33:095 (4) - とパートの変わる部分から始めの2つのwhistleが赤線に乗っており、強調をしたい部分にwhistleを乗せている雰囲気を感じるのですが、00:35:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - などで単にパターン的に白線にwhistleを置いているので、パート全体のwhistleの傾向がボケてしまい、強調すべきところが強調できていない様に感じます。このままでも問題ないとは思いますが、下のリストを一度全て変えてから流して聞いてみてください Fine!： ほぼご提案通りに修正しました～
   
   1. 00:33:326 (5) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除
   2. 00:34:249 (6) - whistleを始点に追加
   3. 00:35:172 (1) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除
   4. 00:36:096 (3) - whistle追加
   5. 00:36:557 (6) - whistle削除
   6. 00:37:018 (1) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除 または 00:36:788 (5) - whistle追加　
   7. 00:37:942 (2) - whistleを追加
   8. 00:38:865 (1) - 終点のwhistle削除
   9. 00:39:788 (3) - 始点にwhistle追加
   10. 00:41:633 (5) - whistle追加
   11. 00:42:557 (1) - ^
   　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
3. 01:10:249 (1) - whistleに変更 KEEP： ここのfinishは気に入っているので　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
4. 00:51:326 (4) - スライダーボディーのwhistleを意図的で無ければ削除 fix: mistake...
5. 01:30:096 (1,2) - 00:16:250 (2,3)と同じ提案 fix
   
   譜面全体として、whistleをつけている基準がよくわからなかったです。指摘はしていませんが、例としてあげると、
   00:16:711 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
   00:24:097 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -
   この二つは大体同じ曲調の部分だと思うのですが、00:16:711 (1,2) - では(1)のスライダーの終わり+(2)で2連続のwhistle、00:24:097 (1,2) - では(2)のみにwhistleとなっています。もちろん単に統一することが良いと言っている訳ではないですが、意図的ではないhitsound patternのくずれは譜面の完成度を下げるように思えます。
   改めて確認するとちょこちょこmissがありましたので修正しました。（指摘いただいた場所は明らかにmissです)

General

1. 00:19:596 (x) - 今のままでももちろん問題ありませんが、おそらく00:16:711 (1,2,3,4) - のパートは大きな笛の音をフォローしており、00:18:326 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - はうしろのリズムをフォローした音取りとなっている様に感じました。だとすると、00:19:596 (x)にノートを置いて00:19:480 (6)-00:19:596 (7)-00:19:711 (8) と3連打にしたほうがよりリズムに沿っているように思います。
   KEEP
   次のパートの同じ曲調部分ではtriplet使っているのですが、ここはこの形がしっくりきます
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:36:326 (4,5,6) - ここは3連打を置いていますが、大きな笛の音をフォローして置いたほうがパートの統一感があってクールだとおもいます
   fix
   統一感と言われればまさにその通り
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:01:480 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - あまり曲をフォローしていないように思えます。きれいな曲なので、個人的にはどこかの音をフォローしてmappingしていったほうが良いかなとは思います。 Remap

[Hard]

Hitsound

1. Exの提案に合わせる感じの提案です Fine!: ほぼ修正しました
   
   1. 00:33:326 (3) - スライダーの始点にwhistle、スライダーの終点のwhistleを削除
   2. 00:34:249 (4) - 始点にwhistle追加
   3. 00:35:172 (1) - 始点にwhistle 終点のwhistle削除
   4. 00:36:096 (2) - whistle追加
   5. 00:38:865 (1) - 終点のwhistle削除
   6. 00:39:788 (2) - whistle追加
   7. 00:40:480 (4) -
   8. 00:40:711 (5) - 始点にwhistle 終点のwhistle削除
   9. 00:41:634 (6) - 始点にwhistle追加
   10. 00:42:557 (1) - 始点にwhistle 終点のwhistle削除
   11. 00:43:480 (2) - 始点にwhistle追加
2. 01:10:249 (1) - whistleに変更 KEEP

General

1. 00:19:480 (3) - このパートの流れ的に下ではなく上に移動する方が素直なフローのように感じます。 OK
   
   SPOILER

   
   こんなかんじに置くと、私的にはつづきの00:19:942 (4) - から00:20:403 (1,2,3) - に繫がりやすいです。
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:59:172 (1) - <3 XD

[Normal]

Hitsound

1. 00:59:172 (2) - 意図的でなかったらスライダーボディのwhistle削除
   no, sorry: ここは意図的です

General
good fot me :3

ぐっどらっく<3333

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change
hitsound勉強になりました!
落ち着いたらmodしに行きます<3

食べたい人 Don't eat me! ;w;

Just posting for now. Will mod later. I'm lazy (:3[____]

Hi, mods are suggestion, if you disagree with any, please explain why and not just type "no"

Normal:
00:13:019 (1) - Here, I made it more symmetrical.
00:38:865 (1) - I recommend making it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155527. It will help flow more because moving from 4->1 keeps the same motion. If you leave it alone, it plays awkward because slider (4) is ending by going right and up. But slider (1) is going to move completely opposite and does not make movement natural. It is up to you because you might need to move a lot of notes. orz
00:57:326 (1) - I think you should delete middle point. I think the sharp turn is good.
00:59:172 (2) - Remove whistle from slider body? Also maybe change slider shape? It looks too cramped.


Hard:
00:01:942 (1) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155571 Here is code if you want to use. 00:16:480 - Maybe add note here? I think it would sound much better than having 1/1.
00:35:172 (1) - Maybe move this to 336:208 to blanket 00:34:711 (5) better? and to keep consistency of pattern since you had blankets here 00:31:480 (1,2,3).
01:01:942 (3,1) - Maybe change it to this? http://puu.sh/5FPK4.jpg I think it follows music better since (3) can be a hold note. And I think 01:02:865 starting a slider here would play much better!
01:07:019 (3,4) - Maybe make a small jump here? The music feels jumpy at this point so small jump? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155600

Ex:
00:01:942 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe think of a new way to map the beginning? Small example. I think beginning seems too simple for insane. I think you can do little more variety for insane.
00:51:095 (3) - I think moving (3) like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155626 would be a lot better. Since it is not a sharp turn, but a smooth curvy turn which will be a better flow.
00:55:943 (2,3,4) - Maybe like this? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155629 I think the triple look very weird and doesnt play too well with how you put it. Putting it like the screenshot will make the cursor keep moving instead of just stopping.
00:59:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - That's hard orz (私はSpaced Streamが嫌いですorzorz)
01:03:326 (3,4,5) - imo, I think you should make it look like this instead. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155660 http://puu.sh/5FQxL.jpg Jump from 2->3 will be more natural. http://puu.sh/5FQCP.jpg
01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - Imo I think you should make it a jump instead. You can hear the "jumpy" music louder than the stream music. (jumping曲よりstream曲をもっと聴きます :3) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155682 small example.
01:10:942 (4,5) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155689 Something like that? Moving 4 would make 01:10:480 (2,3) more smooth motion and moving 5 to make it flow better with new position.
01:23:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1) - 星がすきですね

ごめんね。英語がたくさん書きましたねｗｗ I hope you understand! orz.

Raging Bull wrote:

食べたい人 Don't eat me! ;w; (-ｑ - 。)

Just posting for now. Will mod later. I'm lazy (:3[____]

Hi, mods are suggestion, if you disagree with any, please explain why and not just type "no"

Normal:
00:13:019 (1) - Here, I made it more symmetrical. fine! thanks~

436,172,13019,2,0,B|372:109|256:57|140:109|76:172,1,400,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

00:38:865 (1) - I recommend making it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155527. It will help flow more because moving from 4->1 keeps the same motion. If you leave it alone, it plays awkward because slider (4) is ending by going right and up. But slider (1) is going to move completely opposite and does not make movement natural. It is up to you because you might need to move a lot of notes. orz
Remap
I understand your intention. but your suggetion forces me to change a lot of notes. so, I change previous notes 00:37:019 (3,4) -
00:57:326 (1) - I think you should delete middle point. I think the sharp turn is good. OK
00:59:172 (2) - Remove whistle from slider body? Also maybe change slider shape? It looks too cramped.
no, sorry
whistle of slider's body is on purpose to suit to backmusic. but slider shape is chaged a little

Hard:
00:01:942 (1) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155571 Here is code if you want to use. fine, too!

108,204,1942,2,0,B|104:120|148:36|256:-8|364:36|408:120|404:204,1,490,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

00:16:480 - Maybe add note here? I think it would sound much better than having 1/1.
no: I intend relax mapping before 00:16:711
00:35:172 (1) - Maybe move this to 336:208 to blanket 00:34:711 (5) better? and to keep consistency of pattern since you had blankets here 00:31:480 (1,2,3).
fix
01:01:942 (3,1) - Maybe change it to this? http://puu.sh/5FPK4.jpg I think it follows music better since (3) can be a hold note. And I think 01:02:865 starting a slider here would play much better!
KEEP
I intend to make 1/2 rhythm at this part
01:07:019 (3,4) - Maybe make a small jump here? The music feels jumpy at this point so small jump? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155600
Intersting idea!

Ex:
00:01:942 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe think of a new way to map the beginning? Small example.

324,164,1942,6,0,P|341:188|367:202,2,60
256,80,2865,2,0,L|240:172,1,80
136,280,3788,6,0,P|148:304|172:332,2,60
96,172,4711,2,0,L|184:140,1,80
272,216,5403,1,0,0:0:0:0:
375,280,5634,6,0,P|362:306|342:329,2,60
452,200,6557,2,0,L|404:128,1,80
304,68,7249,1,0,0:0:0:0:
304,68,7480,2,0,B|256:72|224:140|160:128,1,160,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

I think beginning seems too simple for insane. I think you can do little more variety for insane.
It's a great help to me!
Yes, certainly I do remap intro-part. your code is very helpful~
00:51:095 (3) - I think moving (3) like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155626 would be a lot better. Since it is not a sharp turn, but a smooth curvy turn which will be a better flow. fix
00:55:943 (2,3,4) - Maybe like this? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155629 I think the triple look very weird and doesnt play too well with how you put it. Putting it like the screenshot will make the cursor keep moving instead of just stopping. fix
00:59:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - That's hard orz (私はSpaced Streamが嫌いですorzorz) umm... KEEP!
01:03:326 (3,4,5) - imo, I think you should make it look like this instead. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155660 http://puu.sh/5FQxL.jpg Jump from 2->3 will be more natural. http://puu.sh/5FQCP.jpg OK
01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - Imo I think you should make it a jump instead. You can hear the "jumpy" music louder than the stream music. (jumping曲よりstream曲をもっと聴きます :3) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155682 small example.
no, sorry...
your jumpy pattern is also fine. but I prefer stream at this song
01:10:942 (4,5) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1155689 Something like that? Moving 4 would make 01:10:480 (2,3) more smooth motion and moving 5 to make it flow better with new position. fix
01:23:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1) - 星がすきですね ☆☆☆☆

ごめんね。英語がたくさん書きましたねｗｗ I hope you understand! orz.

Thank you for modding! ありがとうございました
red: change
blue: no change

From popner's modding team


[General]

[Normal]

[Hard]

[Ex]

Need more works.
Good luck.

[Minakami Yuki] wrote:

From popner's modding team

1. Black——My personal suggestions.
2. Bold——Highly recommended.
3. Red——Unrankable, you must fix it.

[General]

1. checked by AIBat：SB Elements Not .png: base_a4.jpg base_a3.jpg base_a1.jpg base_a2.jpg
   no change
   I think jpg is no problem for SB like https://osu.ppy.sh/s/77093

[Normal]

1. 00:22:249 (3) - whi on the head no
2. 00:25:942 (3) - ^ no
3. 00:31:480 (1,2) - I think the rhythm here is not good, use this? http://puu.sh/5I805.jpg
   fix
4. 00:40:711 (3) - well, the slider is not good. fix: curve gently
5. 00:55:480 (3) - whi no
6. 00:57:326 (1) - whi on the head no
7. 01:01:942 (3,1) - when use blankets, slider like 01:01:942 (3) - is bad imo, make it like http://puu.sh/5I8d9.jpg is much better 0.0
   fix

[Hard]

1. 00:29:403 - add a note OK
2. 00:55:480 (1,2) - well, I think this stack is not nice. KEEP
3. Actually, I don't like the style of sliders, but it's ok.

[Ex]

1. Please change the diff name to 'Extra' or 'Lunatic'
   KEEP
   this diff-name is from character name:EX Rumia. I want to keep it. If it is possibly unranked, I'll make a heartbreaking decision
2. 00:01:480 - you can add a note/slider here. OK
3. 00:07:365 - 00:14:749 - maybe can add a 1/8 slider here no
4. 00:08:865 (1) - change the whi on the end to finish fix
5. 00:08:865 (1,4) - what's the problem with your slider? seems really strange. Have you changed something in .osu file?
   ??
   sorry, I don't understand what is strange
6. 00:27:789 (1) - change the whi on the end to finish no
7. 00:29:634 (1) - whi OK
8. 01:00:327 (2,3) - this jump should be larger than 01:00:096 (1,2) -
   fix
   I conform DS
   
   The spacing between notes are too big, which makes the diff looks empty.
   Let me think...

Need more works.
Good luck.

Thank you for modding!
orange: change
blue: no change

Hello



Well the beatmaps itself is fine, so i can't give more suggestion.
Good Luck, good maps ><

Mintong wrote:

Hello

[EX]

The diff name is currently unrankable, see https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2725713 for more information.
change
I'm very sad, but I follow the rule...
Slider Tick Rate 2? it cause more neat for some slider like 00:31:481 (1) - . OK

00:02:865 (3) - I did prefer move right one grid, it just like with 00:01:480 (1) - as one line. fix
00:04:711 (5) - make same slider as 00:06:557 (2) - ? Just like 00:03:788 (4) - with 00:05:634 (1) - . fix
00:09:672 (2) - It's too curve for 00:10:249 (3) - imo. fix

[Normal]

00:51:326 (2) - Make as curve slider?
no change
it's too short to curve, imo

Well the beatmaps itself is fine, so i can't give more suggestion.
Good Luck, good maps ><

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

m4m request
Note: that these are only suggestions and thus can be ignored
[Key]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Red= Unrankable
Bold=Strong Suggestion
Plain= Regular Suggestion

[General]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
weird NC NC's dont occur every 4 notes it occurs by musical stanza
[Normal]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:09:326 (1,2) - not sure if you wanted these to look the same. but there not the same. i think it would look better if they were the same =3=
00:11:172 (2) - NC it should follow stanza
00:13:019 (3) - ^^
00:13:019 (3) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable BATs and Natsu will mention this. it got mentioned to me x.x
00:17:634 (2) - move to x:228 and y:132 to make it align with the previous sliders end. in normal you want to make it as clean as possible
00:17:634 (2) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
00:18:557 - a NC should be here
00:21:326 (2) - idk know about this slider you have it pointing down while the next note is upward.
00:22:249 (3) - NC
00:24:096 (1) - this slider doesnt really match with the song. maybe try putting a red tick first to make it seem sharped edged when that note hits on the blue tick
00:25:942 (3) - NC
00:33:326 (3) - NC
00:35:172 (1) - blanket is a bit off
00:37:019 (3) - NC
00:40:711 (3) - NC
00:43:480 (2) - this slider feels out of place like i feel the red tick should be earlier like it feels a bit late
00:44:403 (3) - NC
00:47:172 (2) - i feel like this slider should be the same with the previous slider
00:48:096 (3) - NC
00:48:096 (3,4,5) - the transiction between notes right here is to suddenly upward and downard. this should make it flow better >~<

00:51:326 (2) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
00:51:788 - NC should be here >~<
00:53:634 (1,2) - i never liked placements like this i personally dont think they flow very well
00:57:326 (1) - i dont feel this slider matches this part of the song maybe try a wave slider. try this one maybe :<

00:59:172 (2) - i actually fell in love with this slider good job +u+ but you should put an NC
01:00:557 (3) - okay the flow got a bit ruined right here since the slider had a very curved end and you put a circle extremely far right which ruined the flow. move the circle to x:256 y:184 so the flow will return natural and you get a cute blanket
01:07:480 (4,1) - im bit iffy about the flow here when people usually hit repeater they tend to follow the repeaters path.
01:07:480 (4) - NC
01:09:788 (3) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
01:10:249 - NC should be here
01:15:788 - Cool SB effect

Thats all for now ill do the rest of the mod tommorow

[Hard]
Omg the AR should be at least 6 i feel like 7 make the spread uneven because your normal is 4 AR and it just seems so uneven
OD seems to low with AR 7 but if you move Hard to AR 6 then it seems fine
Just my Opinion
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:01:942 (1) - i personally felt like this was way to long mostly cause in the middle of the slider there is a stanza and that stanza is very powerful and it felt like a waste that you didnt hit it
00:05:634 (2) - NC
00:07:480 (3) - NC
00:11:172 (3) - NC
00:12:557 (4,1) - i dont like this placement at all. to me it seems so clumped up and smushed together. to me it looks like a flow ruiner. also putting that circle where the previous circle was seemed very repetitive and boring :p
00:13:019 (1) - i dont think this slider matches with the music at all maybe try something more flowing like a wave slider
00:14:865 (2) - im not a big fan of these type of slider but its your map so do whatever you want and also NC
00:18:326 (4) - i feel like this circle ruined the flow by being so far left why the slider before was curved alot to the right
00:18:557 (1) - shouldnt there be a hitsound here?
00:20:403 (1,2,3) - maybe make 2 dip a little bit. i think making it go a little downward will seem less boring then a plain straight path. but dont make the dip super downward make it only a little bit downward
00:25:942 (5) - NC
00:27:788 (1,2,3,4) - i dont like patterns like this they always seem so clustered together :< but it was very creative
00:33:326 (3) - NC
00:37:019 (5) - NC
00:39:788 (2,3,4,5) - that pattern it when people put a circle under slider i feel bad playing it. also the last slider makes me feel like you ruined the flow. that curve plus far right = meh flow transition. try this maybe

00:40:711 (5) - NC
00:46:249 (1,2,3) - like i said im not fan of these type of patterns. to me they look weird
00:47:172 (3,4,1) - check your spacing on for its off it should be 1.40 but its at 1.33x
00:49:019 (3) - weird slider so curved XD
00:53:057 (4) - move to x:56 y:220 to align with the previous slider's end=
00:55:480 (1,2) - idk these 2 sliders placement dont seem to suit the song >~<
00:57:326 (1) - this slider doesnt fit this part of the song because the red tick usually show a sudden change in music so the slider can match it but in this part the song sounds like more of a wavey slider
00:59:172 (1) - see this is a part that should have redticks nice job i think it suits it well
01:02:403 (1) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
01:08:865 (3,4,5) - the placement here ruins flow because 4 is a bit to dipped. so what you should is move 4 more inward instead of being so outward
01:10:711 (3,4,5) - ^^
01:13:249 (2) - I dont feel like this should be under a slider it doesnt seem to fit
01:25:019 (5) - NC
01:28:711 (5) - ^^
01:30:096 (1) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
[Lunatic]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:03:788 (4) - NC
00:07:480 (3) - ^^
00:08:865 (1) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
00:10:711 (4) - ^^
00:17:172 (2) - i dont think putting a circle under the sliders tail feels right here. they dont have similar sound or volume
00:18:326 (1) - Remove NC
00:18:557 (2) - NC
00:18:903 (4) - i never liked it when slider started on blue ticks and ended on white ticks to me it sounds wrong. maybe try this :<

00:24:558 (2) - i dont think putting a circle under the sliders tail feels right here. they dont have similar sound or volume
00:26:288 (4) - idk i feel like this too curved doesnt seem right :<
00:26:865 (5,6,7) - i feel like 6 goes to outward. i never like going to outward to play triplets
00:28:250 (2) - i dont think putting a circle under the sliders tail feels right here. they dont have similar sound or volume
00:29:403 (5) - ^^
00:31:019 (1) - that stack actually fits good job
00:33:326 (5) - i think this would better like a blanket and also NC
00:34:249 (6,7,8,9,1) - Like i said i never like patterns like this but its your map so do whatever you like
00:40:711 (4) - NC
00:59:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this seems like a huge gameplay issues
01:07:480 (1) - A 2.0 DS FOR A STREAM OMG THAT IS WAY TO HARD FOR INSANE FOR EXTRA MAYBE BUT THAT WOULD PROBABLY CONFUSE A PLAYER TO THINK OF IT AS RED TICK.
sorry at the end i cant test the Lunatic diff to more things wrong since my mouse for gameplay is broken sorry ;(

LexiaLovesU wrote:

m4m request
Note: that these are only suggestions and thus can be ignored
[Key]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Red= Unrankable
Bold=Strong Suggestion
Plain= Regular Suggestion

[General]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
weird NC NC's dont occur every 4 notes it occurs by musical stanza
I'm not aware of 4 notes about NC (maybe fortuitously). but I consider your NC suggetion~
[Normal]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:09:326 (1,2) - not sure if you wanted these to look the same. but there not the same. i think it would look better if they were the same =3=
fix
00:11:172 (2) - NC it should follow stanza
00:13:019 (3) - ^^
00:13:019 (3) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable BATs and Natsu will mention this. it got mentioned to me x.x
KEEP: that is case by case, imo
00:17:634 (2) - move to x:228 and y:132 to make it align with the previous sliders end. in normal you want to make it as clean as possible
I understand: but I move 00:16:711 (1) - (it's easier)
00:17:634 (2) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
00:18:557 - a NC should be here
00:21:326 (2) - idk know about this slider you have it pointing down while the next note is upward.
KEEP
considering flow from previous slider, it is better
00:22:249 (3) - NC
00:24:096 (1) - this slider doesnt really match with the song. maybe try putting a red tick first to make it seem sharped edged when that note hits on the blue tick
fix
00:25:942 (3) - NC
00:33:326 (3) - NC
00:35:172 (1) - blanket is a bit off I feel no problem
00:37:019 (3) - NC
00:40:711 (3) - NC
00:43:480 (2) - this slider feels out of place like i feel the red tick should be earlier like it feels a bit late
00:44:403 (3) - NC
00:47:172 (2) - i feel like this slider should be the same with the previous slider
00:48:096 (3) - NC
00:48:096 (3,4,5) - the transiction between notes right here is to suddenly upward and downard. this should make it flow better >~<
fix

00:51:326 (2) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
00:51:788 - NC should be here >~< OK
00:53:634 (1,2) - i never liked placements like this i personally dont think they flow very well
fix: curve more gently and make blanket
00:57:326 (1) - i dont feel this slider matches this part of the song maybe try a wave slider. try this one maybe :<
You're right, I'll try!

00:59:172 (2) - i actually fell in love with this slider good job +u+ but you should put an NC
01:00:557 (3) - okay the flow got a bit ruined right here since the slider had a very curved end and you put a circle extremely far right which ruined the flow. move the circle to x:256 y:184 so the flow will return natural and you get a cute blanket
Nice idea~
01:07:480 (4,1) - im bit iffy about the flow here when people usually hit repeater they tend to follow the repeaters path.
no problem, imo
01:07:480 (4) - NC
01:09:788 (3) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
01:10:249 - NC should be here
01:15:788 - Cool SB effect <3

Thats all for now ill do the rest of the mod tommorow

[Hard]
Omg the AR should be at least 6 i feel like 7 make the spread uneven because your normal is 4 AR and it just seems so uneven
OD seems to low with AR 7 but if you move Hard to AR 6 then it seems fine
Just my Opinion
no change
considering playing, AR7 is better, imo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:01:942 (1) - i personally felt like this was way to long mostly cause in the middle of the slider there is a stanza and that stanza is very powerful and it felt like a waste that you didnt hit it
00:05:634 (2) - NC
00:07:480 (3) - NC
00:11:172 (3) - NC
00:12:557 (4,1) - i dont like this placement at all. to me it seems so clumped up and smushed together. to me it looks like a flow ruiner. also putting that circle where the previous circle was seemed very repetitive and boring :p
no change: I think no problem unless using many times
00:13:019 (1) - i dont think this slider matches with the music at all maybe try something more flowing like a wave slider
fix
00:14:865 (2) - im not a big fan of these type of slider but its your map so do whatever you want and also NC
fix to suit above change
00:18:326 (4) - i feel like this circle ruined the flow by being so far left why the slider before was curved alot to the right
Remap
00:18:557 (1) - shouldnt there be a hitsound here?
00:20:403 (1,2,3) - maybe make 2 dip a little bit. i think making it go a little downward will seem less boring then a plain straight path. but dont make the dip super downward make it only a little bit downward
Remap
00:25:942 (5) - NC OK: instead, remove NC from 00:26:288 (2) -
00:27:788 (1,2,3,4) - i dont like patterns like this they always seem so clustered together :< but it was very creative
00:33:326 (3) - NC
00:37:019 (5) - NC
00:39:788 (2,3,4,5) - that pattern it when people put a circle under slider i feel bad playing it. also the last slider makes me feel like you ruined the flow. that curve plus far right = meh flow transition. try this maybe OK, I did it

00:40:711 (5) - NC
00:46:249 (1,2,3) - like i said im not fan of these type of patterns. to me they look weird
00:47:172 (3,4,1) - check your spacing on for its off it should be 1.40 but its at 1.33x
no problem: 1.4x. isn't it 00:49:019 (3) - ?
00:49:019 (3) - weird slider so curved XD no change: but fix DS
00:53:057 (4) - move to x:56 y:220 to align with the previous slider's end= fix
00:55:480 (1,2) - idk these 2 sliders placement dont seem to suit the song >~<
00:57:326 (1) - this slider doesnt fit this part of the song because the red tick usually show a sudden change in music so the slider can match it but in this part the song sounds like more of a wavey slider a little change
00:59:172 (1) - see this is a part that should have redticks nice job i think it suits it well
01:02:403 (1) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
01:08:865 (3,4,5) - the placement here ruins flow because 4 is a bit to dipped. so what you should is move 4 more inward instead of being so outward
fix
01:10:711 (3,4,5) - ^^ fix
01:13:249 (2) - I dont feel like this should be under a slider it doesnt seem to fit
OK: avoid stack and make blanket
01:25:019 (5) - NC OK
01:28:711 (5) - ^^ OK
01:30:096 (1) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
[Lunatic]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:03:788 (4) - NC
00:07:480 (3) - ^^
00:08:865 (1) - dont end a slider on a stanza because there usually the most powerful part of the white ticks and thus should be clickable
00:10:711 (4) - ^^
00:17:172 (2) - i dont think putting a circle under the sliders tail feels right here. they dont have similar sound or volume
00:18:326 (1) - Remove NC
00:18:557 (2) - NC
00:18:903 (4) - i never liked it when slider started on blue ticks and ended on white ticks to me it sounds wrong. maybe try this :<
fix

00:24:558 (2) - i dont think putting a circle under the sliders tail feels right here. they dont have similar sound or volume
00:26:288 (4) - idk i feel like this too curved doesnt seem right :< fix: make a little gently
00:26:865 (5,6,7) - i feel like 6 goes to outward. i never like going to outward to play triplets
no change: this triplet is made DS short
00:28:250 (2) - i dont think putting a circle under the sliders tail feels right here. they dont have similar sound or volume
00:29:403 (5) - ^^
00:31:019 (1) - that stack actually fits good job
00:33:326 (5) - i think this would better like a blanket and also NC OK
00:34:249 (6,7,8,9,1) - Like i said i never like patterns like this but its your map so do whatever you like
00:40:711 (4) - NC OK
00:59:172 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this seems like a huge gameplay issues
01:07:480 (1) - A 2.0 DS FOR A STREAM OMG THAT IS WAY TO HARD FOR INSANE FOR EXTRA MAYBE BUT THAT WOULD PROBABLY CONFUSE A PLAYER TO THINK OF IT AS RED TICK.
sorry at the end i cant test the Lunatic diff to more things wrong since my mouse for gameplay is broken sorry ;(

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change (no comment means no change, too)

Hihi~~ M4M !!

I am sorry for late mod >.<


That's all from me ~

Good luck ~~

leon1341414 wrote:

Hihi~~ M4M !!

I am sorry for late mod >.<

[Normal]
seems great ~
[Hard]

1. 00:34:249(4) - The flow isn't good , maybe try some like this ? OK
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:40:134(3,4) - try to make spacing more far , cus rhythm has change here.
   It's quite confuse during playing
   no: but remap a litte

[Lunatic]

1. 00:03:788(4) - I think this slider can set radian with this path.
   will be better flow with next slider. OK
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:05:634(1) - If you fix 00:03:788(4) -'s suggestion , then same here to keep your symmetry :3 OK
3. 00:08:865(1) - , 00:10:711(7) - these two slider's end is on a stronger beat , seems it will more fit with slider's start in my view.
   KEEP
4. 00:10:711(4) - Is this slider shape deliberately to do ?
   don't want to set slider's radian symmetry like other ?
   Just curious about it and point out
   fix
   it is not on purpose
5. 00:13:711(3,4) - Suggest to set these note and slider more closer , cus rhythm has change here.
   It will be better to read.
   fix
   I intended to make more difficult by use of jump. but I perfer your idea <3
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:35:865(2,3) - This part seems can be a 3 combo hit
   another reason is currently rhythm setting from (1)'s end to (5) is 1/2 --> 1/2 --> 3/4 --> 3/4
   but all use single note to set , it's quite like a 1/2 jump.
   KEEP
   it might be no problem because of spacing
7. 00:42:326(5) - seems add a NC here and re move NC at 00:42:557(1) - will be better no
8. 00:52:711(5,6,7,8,9) - How about this :3
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   seems flow will be vivid and it have a nice jump with 00:53:634(1) - That's fine!
9. 01:13:942(1) - rhythm has change here. maybe add a NC for better reading ?
   OK, fix: I've gotten the same indication for other modder

That's all from me ~

Good luck ~~

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

from Quiz Modding Queue~


red: Unrankable issue.
blue: may be unrankable issue.
Bold: not unrankable, but should fix it.


[General]

1. fine

[Normal]

1. 00:13:019 (3) - なぜこのスライダーは00:13:942 の音を(1,2)と同様に拾わないのですか？
   そこには00:10:249 と全く同じ音が実際に存在していて、それを無視する必要、あるいは無視しなければならない音はこの辺りには存在していません。
   そこの音も拾うことも推奨します。
   また00:14:865 ~ 00:15:788 で笛の伸びている音が存在しているので、可能ならそこを拾うとより曲とフィットするでしょう。
   ここは曲も静かなパートですが、この後は音の取り方が変わるので、この程度なら少しオブジェクトを増やしても特にバランスを崩すこともありません。
2. 00:17:634 (2,3,4) - これはただの疑問でそれ以上の意味を持たないのですが、なぜ00:25:942 (3,4) - のようにより曲とフィットしていて格好良い音取りをこちらでも使わないのですか？
   BPMが低いのでそこまで難しさに神経質になる必要もありませんし、音も同じなのでそれを両方で使ったほうがリズムとしても良いと思います。
3. 00:27:788 (1) - なぜこれをスピナーで大きく省いたのでしょうか？
   ここはmappableでそもそもスピナーに合う音は00:29:634 からしか伸びているものくらいしか存在していません。
   Normalとしては短すぎるのも問題となってきますし、本来ここはmapされるべきポイントで、スピナーを入れられる要素は全くないはずです。
   あるいは00:20:403 (1,2,3,4) のところのように置くのではなにか問題があるのでしょうか？
4. 00:34:942 - ここの音も拾ってみてはどうでしょう。
   00:34:249 (4) のリバースも同じ音を拾ったものであるで、両方を拾ったほうが音取りにバラつきが出ず、この一連のリズムを聞いた時により良く聞こえると思います。
5. 00:42:326 - ^
6. 00:44:403 (3) - ここで音を大きく省略してしまっているのが私には非常に残念に感じました。
   00:44:403 - 00:44:749 - 00:45:096 - 00:45:326 - でこのパートのみならず曲をより印象深くさせる強い音が存在しているので、それを略してしまうと特徴的な箇所を殺してしまいます。
   3/4スライダーなどを使ってなんとしても拾って欲しいポイントです。
7. 00:59:172 (2) - 全体にwhistleが掛かっているのはミス？

[Hard]

1. 00:16:711 (1,2,3) - 個性の範囲内といえば範囲内なのですが、私にはこの流れがどうしても気になったのでそれに関して指摘を行います。
   (1,2)では緩やかな流れで比較的打ちやすそうな流れをしている反面、(2,3)では(3)への入りで鋭角的な配置が1回。そしてそのスライダーの向きがそれを補わずに鋭角の少し急な流れをずっと引き継いでいるので、見た目等以前の問題として少し打ちにくく感じそうだと思いました。
   
   
   この後の00:17:634 (3,1) - で対称性を持っていることは知っていますが、私にはそこまで拘っている配置のようにも見えなかったので、それらを無視して配置の提案をしています。
2. 00:29:403 (4) - うーん、これはいらないのではないでしょうか。あるいはスピナーの開始を少し後に移動させて開始地点にオブジェクト追加。
   00:27:557 とメロディーは同じで、そこと無意識に比較してしまいここに余計に足されているような印象を受けました。
   00:29:634 でスピナー、音がそのポイントですぐに鳴るオブジェクトではないので、本来不要な場所に音があるという印象をより強くさせています。
3. 00:35:172 (1) - ctrl+G?
   ここまでの配置を見るとランダムDSを嫌っているように見えます。ですが、そこで一つの区切りとしてジャンプを入れると簡単なバランス調節をさせることが出来、加えて流れもよくなるとおもいます。
4. 00:44:403 (1) - 言いたいことはNormalと同じです。
5. 00:49:019 (3) - ctrl+G
   ただの提案。
6. 01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5) - この配置、(2,3,4) - で鋭角の配置がかなり急なバランスで入っているので打ちにいかもしれない。
   
   
   流れとバランスを調整した一つの提案をだします。

[Lunatic]

1. 00:26:289 (4) - ctrl+Gしてランダムスペーシングにさせてみるのはどうでしょう。
2. 00:27:211 - 00:26:980 (6)の拾っている音を聞いているとここにも置けるのでは？
   裏の音を拾う感じではないので、正確に合わせるべきだと思います。
3. 00:38:865 (1,2,3) - あまりにこの流れが強引すぎるように感じられます。
   連続して急な流れを使っていて、(3)のリバースもそれを軽減させるような位置に存在していないので、顕著にそれが現れています。
   
   
   試した中で比較的楽に改善できたのが上記の画像の案で、円運動をより意識し、00:39:903 (1) からを右側に移動させることでより打ちやすい流れというのを提案しています。
   この1、2箇所弄っただけでは中々素直になってくれないので、少し大きめの調節となりますが、是非試してみてください。
4. 00:42:672 (1) - 一部の伸びた音をスピナーで拾うのがあまりに不自然で浮いているように感じました。
   もし他の伸びている音を片っ端からスピナーで拾っているならまた意見は変わってきますが、この近くで言えば00:38:865 など他と音取りが根本的に異なっているため、酷くそれに違和感を感じます。
   なぜ他の場所と同じようにmapしなかったのでしょうか？

以上です

mod time: 2 hours
lazy mod lol

gl

NewRulerNA wrote:

from Quiz Modding Queue~


red: Unrankable issue.
blue: may be unrankable issue.
Bold: not unrankable, but should fix it.


[General]

1. fine

[Normal]

1. 00:13:019 (3) - なぜこのスライダーは00:13:942 の音を(1,2)と同様に拾わないのですか？
   そこには00:10:249 と全く同じ音が実際に存在していて、それを無視する必要、あるいは無視しなければならない音はこの辺りには存在していません。
   そこの音も拾うことも推奨します。
   また00:14:865 ~ 00:15:788 で笛の伸びている音が存在しているので、可能ならそこを拾うとより曲とフィットするでしょう。
   ここは曲も静かなパートですが、この後は音の取り方が変わるので、この程度なら少しオブジェクトを増やしても特にバランスを崩すこともありません。
   fix
   ここはhardとrhythmがかぶらないように意識してたのですが、やってみると別に気にならないので直しました。
2. 00:17:634 (2,3,4) - これはただの疑問でそれ以上の意味を持たないのですが、なぜ00:25:942 (3,4) - のようにより曲とフィットしていて格好良い音取りをこちらでも使わないのですか？
   BPMが低いのでそこまで難しさに神経質になる必要もありませんし、音も同じなのでそれを両方で使ったほうがリズムとしても良いと思います。
   KEEP
   音が同じというのはその通りなのですが、あまり同じrhythmを使いたくなかったのであえてこうしています
3. 00:27:788 (1) - なぜこれをスピナーで大きく省いたのでしょうか？
   ここはmappableでそもそもスピナーに合う音は00:29:634 からしか伸びているものくらいしか存在していません。
   Normalとしては短すぎるのも問題となってきますし、本来ここはmapされるべきポイントで、スピナーを入れられる要素は全くないはずです。
   あるいは00:20:403 (1,2,3,4) のところのように置くのではなにか問題があるのでしょうか？
   fix
   ここはもともと00:29:634~のspinnerで、短すぎて難しいという理由から伸ばしていました。
   せっかく頑張ってskin作ったので、できるだけspinner入れたいという気持ちもあったんですがね...
4. 00:34:942 - ここの音も拾ってみてはどうでしょう。
   00:34:249 (4) のリバースも同じ音を拾ったものであるで、両方を拾ったほうが音取りにバラつきが出ず、この一連のリズムを聞いた時により良く聞こえると思います。
   KEEP
   プレイ難度があがるので保留に
5. 00:42:326 - ^
6. 00:44:403 (3) - ここで音を大きく省略してしまっているのが私には非常に残念に感じました。
   00:44:403 - 00:44:749 - 00:45:096 - 00:45:326 - でこのパートのみならず曲をより印象深くさせる強い音が存在しているので、それを略してしまうと特徴的な箇所を殺してしまいます。
   3/4スライダーなどを使ってなんとしても拾って欲しいポイントです。
   KEEP:
   最低難易度なのでこのままにしたいです
7. 00:59:172 (2) - 全体にwhistleが掛かっているのはミス？ 意図的です~

[Hard]

1. 00:16:711 (1,2,3) - 個性の範囲内といえば範囲内なのですが、私にはこの流れがどうしても気になったのでそれに関して指摘を行います。
   (1,2)では緩やかな流れで比較的打ちやすそうな流れをしている反面、(2,3)では(3)への入りで鋭角的な配置が1回。そしてそのスライダーの向きがそれを補わずに鋭角の少し急な流れをずっと引き継いでいるので、見た目等以前の問題として少し打ちにくく感じそうだと思いました。
   
   
   この後の00:17:634 (3,1) - で対称性を持っていることは知っていますが、私にはそこまで拘っている配置のようにも見えなかったので、それらを無視して配置の提案をしています。
   Remap
   確かに打ちにくいので作り直しました。ご提案の配置だとそのあとが厳しくなるので別な配置にしました
2. 00:29:403 (4) - うーん、これはいらないのではないでしょうか。あるいはスピナーの開始を少し後に移動させて開始地点にオブジェクト追加。
   00:27:557 とメロディーは同じで、そこと無意識に比較してしまいここに余計に足されているような印象を受けました。
   00:29:634 でスピナー、音がそのポイントですぐに鳴るオブジェクトではないので、本来不要な場所に音があるという印象をより強くさせています。
   delete
   ここにcircleがあるとsymmetricな配置できれいだなと思ったのですが、melody重視で消します
3. 00:35:172 (1) - ctrl+G?
   ここまでの配置を見るとランダムDSを嫌っているように見えます。ですが、そこで一つの区切りとしてジャンプを入れると簡単なバランス調節をさせることが出来、加えて流れもよくなるとおもいます。
   fine!
   プレイしてみるとこっちがよいですね～
4. 00:44:403 (1) - 言いたいことはNormalと同じです。
   fix
   normalでは保留しましたが、hardではmappingすることにしました
5. 00:49:019 (3) - ctrl+G
   ただの提案。
   fix
   おもしろいのでやりました。少し位置はいじりましたが
6. 01:06:557 (1,2,3,4,5) - この配置、(2,3,4) - で鋭角の配置がかなり急なバランスで入っているので打ちにいかもしれない。
   
   
   流れとバランスを調整した一つの提案をだします。
   fix
   難しくなった気がしますが、playしておもしろいので採用させてもらいます

[Lunatic]

1. 00:26:289 (4) - ctrl+Gしてランダムスペーシングにさせてみるのはどうでしょう。
   fix: sliderの形は少し変えました
2. 00:27:211 - 00:26:980 (6)の拾っている音を聞いているとここにも置けるのでは？
   裏の音を拾う感じではないので、正確に合わせるべきだと思います。
   no: ここはない方がしっくりきます
3. 00:38:865 (1,2,3) - あまりにこの流れが強引すぎるように感じられます。
   連続して急な流れを使っていて、(3)のリバースもそれを軽減させるような位置に存在していないので、顕著にそれが現れています。
   
   
   試した中で比較的楽に改善できたのが上記の画像の案で、円運動をより意識し、00:39:903 (1) からを右側に移動させることでより打ちやすい流れというのを提案しています。
   この1、2箇所弄っただけでは中々素直になってくれないので、少し大きめの調節となりますが、是非試してみてください。
   Remap
   ご提案の配置でも良かったのですが、その後の配置とうまく合わないため、drasticに変えました
4. 00:42:672 (1) - 一部の伸びた音をスピナーで拾うのがあまりに不自然で浮いているように感じました。
   もし他の伸びている音を片っ端からスピナーで拾っているならまた意見は変わってきますが、この近くで言えば00:38:865 など他と音取りが根本的に異なっているため、酷くそれに違和感を感じます。
   なぜ他の場所と同じようにmapしなかったのでしょうか？
   KEEP
   このmapsetでは少なくとも1diffに１つはspinnerを入れたかったのでこの位置にspinnerを入れています。
   他のご指摘の所に比べてそれほど違和感あるspinnerとは感じてなかったのでKEEP

以上です

mod time: 2 hours
lazy mod lol

gl

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Hello, really lately M4M here~! Sorry!

[General]
-Osu is suggesting you epilepsy warning.
[Normal]
00:13:015 (3,4) - Bad flow i think. Will be better if Ctrl+G (4)
00:42:322 - Maybe put note here?
00:25:015 (2) - Move it little right to make the same flow with 00:20:399 (1,2)
01:30:553 - I don't think this kiai flash is good here.
OD+?

[Hard]
01:01:476 (2) - 1/4 triplet?
01:30:553 - I don't think this kiai flash is good here.

[Insane]
00:59:168 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I think it's good, but flow behind 00:59:975 (8,1) isn't fantastic idea.


I can't see more. Great mapset!

Papcio wrote:

Hello, really lately M4M here~! Sorry!

[General]
Osu is suggesting you epilepsy warning.
no change
this SB is not bad for eyes, imo

[Normal]
00:13:015 (3,4) - Bad flow i think. Will be better if Ctrl+G (4)
no change
hard to maintain DS
00:42:322 - Maybe put note here?
no:
I intend the same pattern as 00:34:245 (4) -
00:25:015 (2) - Move it little right to make the same flow with 00:20:399 (1,2) change a little
01:30:553 - I don't think this kiai flash is good here.
OD+? no change

[Hard]
01:01:476 (2) - 1/4 triplet? OK, remap
01:30:553 - I don't think this kiai flash is good here.

[Insane]
00:59:168 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I think it's good, but flow behind 00:59:975 (8,1) isn't fantastic idea.
KEEP

I can't see more. Great mapset!

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Yo; modding for M4M o/

*Bolded = Unrankable or very, very strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.

>Normal

1. 00:13:015 (3,4) - Why are they different? I think this is a mistake since (3) uses the old slider algorithm. You probably made the red node there a regular node instead. (To make it short: Make (3) look like (4)?)
2. 00:14:861 (4,1) - Spacing inconsistency? Not a big deal, but still.
3. 00:29:630 (3) - Okay, what's with that node in the middle of the slider? lol
4. 00:43:476 (2,3) - Make them look like this? Looks neater.

>Hard

1. 00:48:092 (1) - Rotate 15 degrees clockwise, then move it to (371,284)? 00:47:861 (4,1,2) will flow better, IMO.

>Lunatic

1. 00:01:476 (1,2) - Space them by 2.1x DS or something? Maybe by moving (2) to somewhere around (349,196). These two objects have a relatively long gap of one beat in the timeline, and the spacing of the objects is a bit too small, making it uncomfortable to move your cursor from (1) to (2).
2. 00:10:245 (3) - Move this to (299,351) to make the spacing between 00:09:668 (2,3) bigger (which means you need to move your cursor more)? Bigger cursor movement makes playing this pattern better, in my opinion.
3. 01:04:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Umm, don't you think these jumps are making the difficulty spread between Hard and Lunatic kinda unbalanced, especially since Lunatic uses CS5? I recommend you to reduce the spacing here a little.
4. 01:06:553 (1,2,3,4) - ^. And the 1/4 jumps here can be difficult after hitting the 01:04:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) pattern. Most players might have a hard time adjusting their aim to play these 1/4 jumps after doing the accelerated spacing jumps. Again, reducing the spacing a little might work, although then you'll have to move 01:07:476 (1) somewhere.

Eh that's it. I'm not really fond of this mapping style to be honest, but it's totally fine otherwise. Couldn't find much to pick at. This map can still be a little more organized, though. It still looks kinda messy in terms of design.

Good luck on the way

Hinsvar wrote:

Yo; modding for M4M o/

*Bolded = Unrankable or very, very strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.

>Normal

1. 00:13:015 (3,4) - Why are they different? I think this is a mistake since (3) uses the old slider algorithm. You probably made the red node there a regular node instead. (To make it short: Make (3) look like (4)?)
   no change
   in this part, i avoid symmetric pattern on purpose
2. 00:14:861 (4,1) - Spacing inconsistency? Not a big deal, but still. mistaked... fix!
3. 00:29:630 (3) - Okay, what's with that node in the middle of the slider? lol mistaked too...
4. 00:43:476 (2,3) - Make them look like this? Looks neater. fix!

>Hard

1. 00:48:092 (1) - Rotate 15 degrees clockwise, then move it to (371,284)? 00:47:861 (4,1,2) will flow better, IMO. fix~

>Lunatic

1. 00:01:476 (1,2) - Space them by 2.1x DS or something? Maybe by moving (2) to somewhere around (349,196). These two objects have a relatively long gap of one beat in the timeline, and the spacing of the objects is a bit too small, making it uncomfortable to move your cursor from (1) to (2).
   OK
2. 00:10:245 (3) - Move this to (299,351) to make the spacing between 00:09:668 (2,3) bigger (which means you need to move your cursor more)? Bigger cursor movement makes playing this pattern better, in my opinion.
   OK
3. 01:04:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Umm, don't you think these jumps are making the difficulty spread between Hard and Lunatic kinda unbalanced, especially since Lunatic uses CS5? I recommend you to reduce the spacing here a little.
   mmm... let me think...
4. 01:06:553 (1,2,3,4) - ^. And the 1/4 jumps here can be difficult after hitting the 01:04:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) pattern. Most players might have a hard time adjusting their aim to play these 1/4 jumps after doing the accelerated spacing jumps. Again, reducing the spacing a little might work, although then you'll have to move 01:07:476 (1) somewhere.
   you're right. remap!

Eh that's it. I'm not really fond of this mapping style to be honest, but it's totally fine otherwise. Couldn't find much to pick at. This map can still be a little more organized, though. It still looks kinda messy in terms of design.
this map has been added miner changes for a long time. so whole adjusting may be needed. thanks for remarkable indication!

Good luck on the way

Thank you for modding!
orange: change
green: no change

finished adjustment

move to pending!

From your M4M queue

Nice song, have fun mapping~

pkmnyab wrote:

From your M4M queue

Normal

1. 00:17:630 (2,3,4) - not sure if you wanted to blanket any of these or not adjust a little
2. 00:35:168 (1) - maybe it'll be better if you move this to the right a bit. This is because the downward motion caused by the repeat of 00:34:245 (4) - makes it seem like 00:35:168 (1) - is closer than it is since it is directly under the slider. I guess what I'm trying to say is it'll be more fun if you move it to the right: that's fine!
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:37:938 (4) - same as above, maybe you could move this up a bit to make it more interesting (instead of just moving the cursor in the direction of 00:37:015 (3) - , now you also have to move it up. I guess it's more fun this way) Since I'm terrible at explaining I'll show you a flow diagram instead of before and after the change: fine, too!
   
   SPOILER

   
   You can see that after the change there's more cursor movement involved which = more fun \o/
4. 00:57:322 (1) - not sure if you wanted this to be symmetrical or not I couldn't...
5. 01:04:707 (1,2) - maybe you can blanket this fix~
6. 01:09:784 (3) - hmm just a suggestion, but how about deleting this slider and adding hit circle here instead, then adding a slider at 01:10:245 - ending at 01:10:476 - . I think this matches the music better.
   no change: but refine the position~

Rhythm seems good in this difficulty, I would say object placement needs a little work (making the map look nice).

Hard

1. 00:07:476 (4) - just a suggestion, but maybe adding a point before the last point will help this slider look better? fine!
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:44:745 (2,3) - consider improving the blanket, maybe moving the middle point of the slider up a bit will fix it fix
3. 00:46:015 (2) - try moving this down to around x 152 y 136 for a more interesting pattern remop to other pattern
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:59:168 (1) - hmm last time I checked the ranking criteria, it said using slider points to manipulate slider velocity is not allowed and changing slider velocity using timing point should be done instead. However I'm not exactly sure if it applies to this so you might want to check it out~
   KEEP
   I checked the criteria your indicating. but this slider is possible to be no problem
5. 01:02:399 (1,2) - blanket can be improved (move middle point of slider down a bit) fix
6. 01:09:322 (6) - this might be more fun to play if you curved it downwards instead of up good idea!
   
   SPOILER

   

Lunatic

1. 00:25:015 (4) - try ctrl+h and moving it to x 192 y 200 while also fixing it so it blankets 00:24:785 (3) - . Then stack 00:25:707 (1) - on top of the slider head. I think this is nice because it is sort of symmetrical with 00:24:093 (1) - and the flow before and after 00:25:015 (4) - is good. nice!
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:38:861 (1,3) - not perfectly stacked fix
3. 00:59:975 (8,1) - this might be surprising to some people because of the jump in the stream, not sure if it's a big issue though
   remap

Nice song, have fun mapping~

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

From my Q ~ =w=
[General]
00:45:784 - Preview point, cause the current preview point looks weird~
[Normal]
00:11:168 (2) - Move to x:140 y:268 ~ ?
00:13:015 (3) - NC
00:14:861 (4) - Ctrl+G
00:40:707 (3) - Change the shape like this:
It fits more~
00:43:476 (2) - Again, change shape:
01:02:861 (4) - Missing NC
01:10:707 (4) - ^
[Hard]
00:05:630 (3) - NC
00:25:938 (1) - Ctrl+G
[Lunatic]
-Amazing diff though ~ !

GL ~ ! : D

Lapis Aoki wrote:

From my Q ~ =w=
[General]
00:45:784 - Preview point, cause the current preview point looks weird~
no, sorry
chorus is also good for preview point. but I prefer intro-melody
[Normal]
00:11:168 (2) - Move to x:140 y:268 ~ ? adjust a little~
00:13:015 (3) - NC OK
00:14:861 (4) - Ctrl+G remap
00:40:707 (3) - Change the shape like this:

Example

It fits more~ OK
00:43:476 (2) - Again, change shape: no change

Example

01:02:861 (4) - Missing NC
01:10:707 (4) - ^
no: I intend to add NC par 2-bar
[Hard]
00:05:630 (3) - NC OK
00:25:938 (1) - Ctrl+G no change
[Lunatic]
-Amazing diff though ~ ! <3

GL ~ ! : D

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

hi

[Normal]

1. 00:37:938 (4) - 強い音が入っているので後ろにもwhistleを追加するのがベター
2. 00:39:784 (2) - 少し曲げたほうが見栄えがいいし、手前の1からのフローもよくなる。
   
   img

   
3. 00:46:938 - add note 少し簡単なdiffなのでこういったところは追加してもよさそう？
   他にも 00:48:784 - 00:49:707 - こういったところに追加してもよさそう。
4. 00:57:322 (1) - あんまり綺麗な形には見えないです・・・。
5. 01:06:553 (3) - 強い音もあるので頭にもwhistleを追加するのがベター
6. 01:09:784 (3) - ちょっと音取り無視してる気がします。拾いなおして下さい。

[Hard]

1. 00:36:092 (2,3,4) - こういうリズムの場所はDSを整えたほうがベター 00:39:784 (2,3,4) - こちらを参考に
2. 00:37:938 (6) - 後ろにもwhistleを追加したほうがベター
3. 00:42:092 (7) - ^
4. 00:43:476 (2) - ^
5. 00:55:476 (1) - ^
6. 01:02:399 (1) - 配置するために、音取りを無視してる気がする、もう一回音取りしなおしてみてください。
7. 01:03:322 (3) - ここだけジャンプしすぎに感じます。
8. 01:30:092 (1) - 直線スライダーはフィットしないかも？ちょっと曲げてみますか？
   
   img

   

[Lunatic]

1. 00:07:476 (3) - こんな感じでgrid使うときれいに配置できます。
   
   img

   
2. 01:00:554 (3) - Hardでは単発2個で拾ってたのでこちらも単発に変えて配置で遊びましょう！

Good Luck.

Satellite wrote:

hi

[Normal]

1. 00:37:938 (4) - 強い音が入っているので後ろにもwhistleを追加するのがベター OK
2. 00:39:784 (2) - 少し曲げたほうが見栄えがいいし、手前の1からのフローもよくなる。 OK
   
   img

   
3. 00:46:938 - add note 少し簡単なdiffなのでこういったところは追加してもよさそう？
   他にも 00:48:784 - 00:49:707 - こういったところに追加してもよさそう。
   no change
   最低難易度ですしこれ以上難しくするのは控えたいと思います
4. 00:57:322 (1) - あんまり綺麗な形には見えないです・・・。 remap
5. 01:06:553 (3) - 強い音もあるので頭にもwhistleを追加するのがベター OK
6. 01:09:784 (3) - ちょっと音取り無視してる気がします。拾いなおして下さい。
   KEEP
   tripletなどもありなのですがそれほど不自然に感じないのでこのままで

[Hard]

1. 00:36:092 (2,3,4) - こういうリズムの場所はDSを整えたほうがベター 00:39:784 (2,3,4) - こちらを参考に OK!
2. 00:37:938 (6) - 後ろにもwhistleを追加したほうがベター
3. 00:42:092 (7) - ^
4. 00:43:476 (2) - ^
5. 00:55:476 (1) - ^
   一部追加しました
6. 01:02:399 (1) - 配置するために、音取りを無視してる気がする、もう一回音取りしなおしてみてください。 fix
7. 01:03:322 (3) - ここだけジャンプしすぎに感じます。 remap
8. 01:30:092 (1) - 直線スライダーはフィットしないかも？ちょっと曲げてみますか？ nice idea~
   
   img

   

[Lunatic]

1. 00:07:476 (3) - こんな感じでgrid使うときれいに配置できます。 fix
   
   img

   
2. 01:00:554 (3) - Hardでは単発2個で拾ってたのでこちらも単発に変えて配置で遊びましょう！
   no change
   circleばっかりになってしまうので。。。

Good Luck.

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

hi, from my m4m queue

[Normal]

1. 00:13:015 (1,2) - make same slider
2. 00:26:861 (4,1) - make (4) curve and blanket

[Hard]

1. 00:53:630 (1,3) - blanket check
2. 00:57:092 (4) - stacking on end of slider is better

[Lunatic]

1. 00:30:322 (5) - remove whistle and add drum clap
2. 00:30:438 (6) - drum clap
3. 00:42:553 (1) - don't need to NC, imo

it's all.. it's so short..
Good Luck!

TaMul wrote:

hi, from my m4m queue

[Normal]

1. 00:13:015 (1,2) - make same slider
2. 00:26:861 (4,1) - make (4) curve and blanket

[Hard]

1. 00:53:630 (1,3) - blanket check fix
2. 00:57:092 (4) - stacking on end of slider is better

[Lunatic]

1. 00:30:322 (5) - remove whistle and add drum clap fine!
2. 00:30:438 (6) - drum clap ^
3. 00:42:553 (1) - don't need to NC, imo OK

it's all.. it's so short..
Good Luck!

Thank you for modding!
red: change
no comment: no change

from my modding queue

Rare's Modding
01:23:168 - 01:25:015 - これらの音量は小さすぎると思います。せめて20から上げていったほうがplayに支障もきたさないと思います。

[Normal]
00:59:168 (3) - このスライダーはnormal whistleで統一したほうがいいかなと思います。

[Hard]
00:25:938 (1,2) - 個人的にはもっとスペーシングを広げたほうがわかりやすいと思います。
00:48:553 (2) - 00:46:707 (2) - で3連打入れてるのでここも3連打にしてみてはどうでしょう。
00:55:938 (2) - 少し流れが気になりました。こんな感じが好きです http://puu.sh/99Ud2.jpg

[Lunatic]
00:38:861 (1,3) - 今ってrepeatに重ねるの大丈夫でしたっけ… 他にも指摘されたら他の配置考えてみてください。
01:03:323 (3,4,5) - スペーシング広げてみてはどうでしょう。 http://puu.sh/99Uqg.jpg

Sinch's Testplay
めっちゃいい曲
[Normal]
00:14:861 (2) - 赤点を使わず(1)をコピーして反転させたほうがよさそう
00:43:476 (2) - ^

[Hard]
looks good

[Lunatic]
言うところないです

Rare wrote:

from my modding queue

Rare's Modding
01:23:168 - 01:25:015 - これらの音量は小さすぎると思います。せめて20から上げていったほうがplayに支障もきたさないと思います。
OK!
[Normal]
00:59:168 (3) - このスライダーはnormal whistleで統一したほうがいいかなと思います。
OK: 他のdiffはそうなっているのでnormalもそうします
[Hard]
00:25:938 (1,2) - 個人的にはもっとスペーシングを広げたほうがわかりやすいと思います。 nice!
00:48:553 (2) - 00:46:707 (2) - で3連打入れてるのでここも3連打にしてみてはどうでしょう。
KEEP
このsliderの流れは気に入っているので保留で。
00:55:938 (2) - 少し流れが気になりました。こんな感じが好きです http://puu.sh/99Ud2.jpg
fix~
[Lunatic]
00:38:861 (1,3) - 今ってrepeatに重ねるの大丈夫でしたっけ… 他にも指摘されたら他の配置考えてみてください。
KEEP
reverseが見えなければNGだったはずですが、stackそのものはどうだろう・・・。指摘されたら考えます
01:03:323 (3,4,5) - スペーシング広げてみてはどうでしょう。 http://puu.sh/99Uqg.jpg
fine!: いい感じ

Sinch's Testplay
めっちゃいい曲　<3
[Normal]
00:14:861 (2) - 赤点を使わず(1)をコピーして反転させたほうがよさそう
KEEP
curved sliderばかりでちょっとつまんないかなと。そんなに違和感は感じないので保留に
00:43:476 (2) - ^ no change: ここはtripletっぽいrhythmなので角入れてます

[Hard]
looks good

[Lunatic]
言うところないです

Thank you for modding!
orange: change
blue: no change

Rareさん、Sinchさん　ありがとうございました！

From M4M Queue ~
Normal
No problem in this diff ~
Hard
00:20:399 (1) - Flow?
00:49:015 (3) - Shape is bad.
00:56:399 (3,4) - Too hard for Hard.
Insane
No problem, and this diff is so wonderful ~ I enjoy it ~

Hi there, coming from your modding q (m4m)

[General]

[Normal]

[Hard]

[Lunatic]

Glgl :3

Number5 wrote:

From M4M Queue ~
Normal
No problem in this diff ~
Hard
00:20:399 (1) - Flow? adjust!
00:49:015 (3) - Shape is bad. no change
00:56:399 (3,4) - Too hard for Hard. remap!
Insane
No problem, and this diff is so wonderful ~ I enjoy it ~

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

Yauxo wrote:

Hi there, coming from your modding q (m4m)

[General]

1. Looks fine to me, I like that small SB :3
   thanks!

[Normal]

1. 00:14:861 (2) - I'd assume that this one has a different shape due to the different sound, but I'd recommend a snakeish shape instead of a hard tick one. The map's mapped with round sliders in general, so this one seems off
   OK
   I fix it because many modder indicate the same one
2. 00:17:630 (2,3,4) - blankets would work just fine here. If not, try to adjust 2 a little bit so that it has about the same curve as 4
   fix
3. 00:49:938 (1,2) - Usually just a thing I like to do, but it'd feel better if the end of 1 would flow into 2 more
   fix
   
   What it is

   
   What I mean

   
4. 01:04:707 (1,2) - Blanket can be improved (end/head too far inside) fix

[Hard]

1. 00:07:476 (2,1) - Let 2 flow into 1 (move 1 to the left) no: unnecessary, imo
2. 00:31:476 (1,2) - blanket can be improved (head/tail too far outside) fix
3. 00:32:399 (2,3) - ^, inside
4. 01:13:938 (1,2) - ^

[Lunatic]

1. 00:32:399 (2,3,4) - How about letting these flow towards the right side of the screen instead of the left? Right now you have a weird zigzag out of the slider, into 2 and then just to the left into 3. Having it the other way around, (imagine it flipped) 2 into 4 into 3 would feel better
   change to other way
2. 01:14:630 (3) - how about this? no, sorry
   
   a

   
3. 01:23:168 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - These hitsounds are either too loud or off in general. If you want to keep them, lower their volume. Otherwise .. maybe find differtent hitsounds? :s
   no problem, imo

Glgl :3

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change

いい曲！

Kamio Misuzu wrote:

いい曲！

ありがとー

Hi! here my newbie mod for m4m if you think it is helpful >.<

[General]

1. Preview point at 00:30:553 ?

[Normal]

1. 00:09:322 (1,1) - overlap heads?
2. 00:11:168 (2,2) - try to overlap this tail with head. Although, i do prefer to 00:13:015 (1) - copy ctrl+j+h this, anyways you can overlap xd
3. 00:17:630 (2,3) - Improve blanket
4. 00:26:861 (4) - move it to x204
5. 00:41:630 (4) - move it to y137 maybe, and move 00:42:553 (1) - so it's blanket of (3)
6. 00:40:707 (3,2) - overlap head with tail
7. 00:45:784 (4) - try this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768922 fits better (improve blanket and stuff.)
8. 00:52:245 (3) - should be at x199 y155 to overlap correctly
9. 00:55:938 (4,5) - improve blanket?
10. 00:59:168 (3,4) - you can rotate 90° for like this>https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768915 but i'd change a lot D:
11. 01:06:092 (2) - move it to x198 for better blanket i think
12. 01:06:553 (3,4) - they are not correctly symmetrical >http://puu.sh/9Qp7Y/8acdae91a9.jpg

[Hard]

1. 00:07:476 (2) - you can rework it for something like this maybe > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768800 or https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768807, etc.
2. 00:14:861 (2) - rotate it by +10 at the same point
3. 00:27:784 (1,2) - improve blanket?
4. 00:27:784 (1,2,3) - try this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768832 (2) overlap with 00:25:707 (4) -
5. 00:31:476 (1,2) - Improve blanket
6. 00:34:245 (4,5) - maybe rotate it like -20 and make (5) blanket of 00:33:322 (3) -
7. 00:36:784 (4,5) - Improve blanket
8. 00:44:745 (2,3) - slider middle point is not at x256 and it doesnt make a good blanket
9. 00:38:861 (1) - make entirely curved so it flows better with the rest, something like this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768844
10. 00:45:784 (1,2) - align different, so it'd draw the same line that 00:44:745 (2,3) - does >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768849. Although, It also good like it is now.
11. 00:46:707 (2,3) - improve blanket
12. 00:49:015 (3,4) - you can try something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768853 with (4) stacking on (3), (as an alternative).
13. 00:53:630 (1) - this should be either y248 or y221. I think.
14. 00:54:553 (3,4) - Improve blanket > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768860
15. 00:55:938 (2) - try this at x128 y228
16. 00:57:322 (1,1) - overlap these heads
17. 01:01:938 (3,2,4) - these are not correctly overlapped
18. 00:56:399 (3,1) - Improve this blanket
19. 00:58:707 (2,3) - they are not symmetrical > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768867
20. 01:02:861 (1,2) - overlap this
21. 01:02:861 (1,5) - (5) should either be at the same X of (1) or be at x256 and 01:03:784 (4,1) - do these symmetrical (same Y)
22. 01:04:707 (1,3) - use same X here or even the 3 sliders 01:04:707 (1,2,3) -
23. 01:08:861 (3,4,5) - try to move things, so these 3 notes are around 01:07:476 (5) - head.
24. 01:30:092 (1) - you can try this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768884. So, the DS should be a bit better since you were increasing it.

[Lunatic]

1. 00:31:476 from this point, in my opinion, it would be funnier to have a slightly higher SV. and also it'd fit with the song.
2. 00:01:938 (2) - rotate it by -10 or -15 at the same origin and move 00:02:861 (3) - move a bit left at (x256)
3. 00:01:938 (2) - also its next object should be at 2.77x for a constant DS between these 00:01:938 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - (other possibilty may be this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768566)
4. 00:10:707 (4) - you can rotate it by +20 at the same origin, so the dropoff is better?
5. 00:13:361 (2) - Should be at y161
6. 00:16:246 (2,3,4,5) - here i do prefer this > http://puu.sh/9Qe5Y/88e46db545.jpg with SV 1x
7. ^ if not, move it at x256. (Although, I dont like too much how it looks try this maybe >http://puu.sh/9QetR/2c61820151.jpg 00:16:246 (2,3,4,5,1) - -30 rotation and put (3) at x256)
8. 00:21:091 (3,4) - move it a bit left, so (3) will be at x288 and fit with (1)
9. 00:24:093 (1) - should be at y120
10. 00:22:245 (1) - I was trying to find an alternative for it but, I didnt find something without change too much. So, maybe overlap 00:22:015 (5) - with 00:21:322 (4) - head? although i dont like the idea either xD.
11. 00:24:785 (3,4) - try to improve the blanket so it looks like this 00:24:093 (1,3) - >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768657
12. 00:27:785 (1) - move at x244 and 00:28:246 (2) - it doesnt overlap correctly
13. 00:28:477 (3,4) - blanket?
14. 00:29:630 (1,2) - move to x72 'cause of 00:29:399 (5) -
15. 00:30:092 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - here, I dont know if I understood correctly what you mapped but try this maybe (6) with increased SV >http://puu.sh/9Qggc/40943409f7.jpg > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768679
16. 00:33:091 (4,1) - Improve blanket?
17. 00:38:168 (3) - move to x464 'cause of 00:37:938 (2) - ?
18. 00:38:400 (4,5,1) - align this or make 00:38:400 (4) - curved
19. 00:39:553 (2,3) - improve blanket and (3) tail should be at x184 y148
20. 00:40:707 (1) - I think it doesnt blanket perfectly D: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768726
21. 00:41:629 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - you can increase DS a bit so it doesnt touch 00:40:707 (1) - and maybe try this > http://puu.sh/9QiEb/edfb41495d.jpg (or even this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768735)
22. 00:43:822 (1,2) - ctrl+h one of these?
23. 00:47:861 (6) - it doesnt overlap correctly
24. 00:49:707 (6) - you may move it to 00:49:015 (5) - tail (overlap) for a better rhythm
25. 00:51:322 (4) - tail should be at x357 y291
26. 00:51:784 (1,2,3,4,5) - if I understood correctly, try something like this >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768747
27. 00:55:245 (6,2,3,4) - improve this
28. 00:57:784 (2,4) - tails doesnt overlap correctly
29. 00:58:707 (4,3) - these neither
30. 00:59:629 (5,2) - ^same
31. 00:58:707 (4,1) - you can try align this and keep your combo >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768756. In that way, these notes 01:00:092 (1,2,3) - would connect better.
32. 01:02:399 (9) - ctrl+j ; at the same point?
33. 01:03:323 (3,4,5) - it's not a perfect triangle ithink >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768766
34. 01:04:708 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can rotate it bit. By +10 maybe.
35. 01:06:553 (1,2,3,4) - did you try to not overlap? >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768771
36. 01:07:476 (1,2) - move to y197 'cause of the previous combo
37. 01:09:322 (5,7) - it's not correctly done
38. 01:24:092 (3) - it's 2x (1grid maybe) off. If you want to do the figure perfectly.
39. 01:26:861 (1,2,3,4) - ^same https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768778

Here I may be totally wrong, so excuse in advance xD. Bad polarity
Lunatic

1. Add note here 00:09:553 - and here 00:11:399
2. 00:13:015 (1,2,3) - this combo may need to be changed for something else like this > http://puu.sh/9QdEf/5177cbd215.jpg or this http://puu.sh/9QdFY/212b9fcb50.jpg
3. 00:32:399 (2,3,4) - ^same
4. 00:36:092 (3,4,5) - ^same ; I guess you can still have the same but like this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768713
   [*00:42:668 (1,1,2,1,2,3) - ^same
5. 01:13:938 (1,2,3) - ^same

Hard

1. 00:36:092 (2,3,4) - ^^
2. 00:39:784 (2,3,4) - ^^
3. 00:43:476 (2,3) - ^^
4. 00:44:399 (1,2) - ^^

That's all i got, Pretty good map and song <3. Please, write what you changed.
Also, my english is bad, so tell me if you dont understand something.

Good luck! <3

rossonero1899 wrote:

Hi! here my newbie mod for m4m if you think it is helpful >.<

[General]

1. Preview point at 00:30:553 ?
   your suggetion is also good. but i prefer intro for preview point

[Normal]

1. 00:09:322 (1,1) - overlap heads?
2. 00:11:168 (2,2) - try to overlap this tail with head. Although, i do prefer to 00:13:015 (1) - copy ctrl+j+h this, anyways you can overlap xd
3. 00:17:630 (2,3) - Improve blanket fix
4. 00:26:861 (4) - move it to x204
5. 00:41:630 (4) - move it to y137 maybe, and move 00:42:553 (1) - so it's blanket of (3) OK
6. 00:40:707 (3,2) - overlap head with tail
7. 00:45:784 (4) - try this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768922 fits better (improve blanket and stuff.)
   not good flow
8. 00:52:245 (3) - should be at x199 y155 to overlap correctly fix
9. 00:55:938 (4,5) - improve blanket? fix
10. 00:59:168 (3,4) - you can rotate 90° for like this>https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768915 but i'd change a lot D:
11. 01:06:092 (2) - move it to x198 for better blanket i think fix
12. 01:06:553 (3,4) - they are not correctly symmetrical >http://puu.sh/9Qp7Y/8acdae91a9.jpg fix

[Hard]

1. 00:07:476 (2) - you can rework it for something like this maybe > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768800 or https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768807, etc.
   change a little
2. 00:14:861 (2) - rotate it by +10 at the same point OK
3. 00:27:784 (1,2) - improve blanket?
   
4. 00:27:784 (1,2,3) - try this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768832 (2) overlap with 00:25:707 (4) -
   fine!
   
5. 00:31:476 (1,2) - Improve blanket OK
6. 00:34:245 (4,5) - maybe rotate it like -20 and make (5) blanket of 00:33:322 (3) - not good flow, imo
7. 00:36:784 (4,5) - Improve blanket OK
8. 00:44:745 (2,3) - slider middle point is not at x256 and it doesnt make a good blanket OK
9. 00:38:861 (1) - make entirely curved so it flows better with the rest, something like this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768844
   good!
10. 00:45:784 (1,2) - align different, so it'd draw the same line that 00:44:745 (2,3) - does >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768849. Although, It also good like it is now.
    no change:
    because of deffernt DS, necessary, imo
11. 00:46:707 (2,3) - improve blanket fix
12. 00:49:015 (3,4) - you can try something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768853 with (4) stacking on (3), (as an alternative).
    mmm... don't like it...
13. 00:53:630 (1) - this should be either y248 or y221. I think. fix: to y211
14. 00:54:553 (3,4) - Improve blanket > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768860 change to the other way
15. 00:55:938 (2) - try this at x128 y228 why?
16. 00:57:322 (1,1) - overlap these heads OK
17. 01:01:938 (3,2,4) - these are not correctly overlapped fix
18. 00:56:399 (3,1) - Improve this blanket fix
19. 00:58:707 (2,3) - they are not symmetrical > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768867 ??
20. 01:02:861 (1,2) - overlap this
21. 01:02:861 (1,5) - (5) should either be at the same X of (1) or be at x256 and 01:03:784 (4,1) - do these symmetrical (same Y)
22. 01:04:707 (1,3) - use same X here or even the 3 sliders 01:04:707 (1,2,3) - no change: not good flow
23. 01:08:861 (3,4,5) - try to move things, so these 3 notes are around 01:07:476 (5) - head.
24. 01:30:092 (1) - you can try this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768884. So, the DS should be a bit better since you were increasing it.
    fix

[Lunatic]

1. 00:31:476 from this point, in my opinion, it would be funnier to have a slightly higher SV. and also it'd fit with the song.
   I think it isn't suitable
2. 00:01:938 (2) - rotate it by -10 or -15 at the same origin and move 00:02:861 (3) - move a bit left at (x256)
3. 00:01:938 (2) - also its next object should be at 2.77x for a constant DS between these 00:01:938 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - (other possibilty may be this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768566)
   because of insane, constant DS is unnecessary, imo
4. 00:10:707 (4) - you can rotate it by +20 at the same origin, so the dropoff is better? fix
5. 00:13:361 (2) - Should be at y161
   I intend to make the same y as 00:13:707 (3) -
6. 00:16:246 (2,3,4,5) - here i do prefer this > http://puu.sh/9Qe5Y/88e46db545.jpg with SV 1x
7. ^ if not, move it at x256. (Although, I dont like too much how it looks try this maybe >http://puu.sh/9QetR/2c61820151.jpg 00:16:246 (2,3,4,5,1) - -30 rotation and put (3) at x256) not good flow
8. 00:21:091 (3,4) - move it a bit left, so (3) will be at x288 and fit with (1) OK
9. 00:24:093 (1) - should be at y120
10. 00:22:245 (1) - I was trying to find an alternative for it but, I didnt find something without change too much. So, maybe overlap 00:22:015 (5) - with 00:21:322 (4) - head? although i dont like the idea either xD.
    you're right: I mistaked stack...
11. 00:24:785 (3,4) - try to improve the blanket so it looks like this 00:24:093 (1,3) - >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768657
    fix
12. 00:27:785 (1) - move at x244 and 00:28:246 (2) - it doesnt overlap correctly fix
13. 00:28:477 (3,4) - blanket? fix
14. 00:29:630 (1,2) - move to x72 'cause of 00:29:399 (5) -
15. 00:30:092 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - here, I dont know if I understood correctly what you mapped but try this maybe (6) with increased SV >
    http://puu.sh/9Qggc/40943409f7.jpg > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768679
    I don't like it...
16. 00:33:091 (4,1) - Improve blanket? OK
17. 00:38:168 (3) - move to x464 'cause of 00:37:938 (2) - ? fix
18. 00:38:400 (4,5,1) - align this or make 00:38:400 (4) - curved
19. 00:39:553 (2,3) - improve blanket and (3) tail should be at x184 y148
20. 00:40:707 (1) - I think it doesnt blanket perfectly D: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768726 fix
21. 00:41:629 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - you can increase DS a bit so it doesnt touch 00:40:707 (1) - and maybe try this > http://puu.sh/9QiEb/edfb41495d.jpg (or even this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768735)
22. 00:43:822 (1,2) - ctrl+h one of these?
23. 00:47:861 (6) - it doesnt overlap correctly
24. 00:49:707 (6) - you may move it to 00:49:015 (5) - tail (overlap) for a better rhythm
    nice idea!
25. 00:51:322 (4) - tail should be at x357 y291 OK
26. 00:51:784 (1,2,3,4,5) - if I understood correctly, try something like this >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768747
27. 00:55:245 (6,2,3,4) - improve this fix
28. 00:57:784 (2,4) - tails doesnt overlap correctly fix
29. 00:58:707 (4,3) - these neither no problem
30. 00:59:629 (5,2) - ^samefix
31. 00:58:707 (4,1) - you can try align this and keep your combo >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768756. In that way, these notes 01:00:092 (1,2,3) - would connect better. KEEP: but nice idea
32. 01:02:399 (9) - ctrl+j ; at the same point?
33. 01:03:323 (3,4,5) - it's not a perfect triangle ithink >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768766 ??
34. 01:04:708 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can rotate it bit. By +10 maybe. OK
35. 01:06:553 (1,2,3,4) - did you try to not overlap? >https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768771
36. 01:07:476 (1,2) - move to y197 'cause of the previous combo
37. 01:09:322 (5,7) - it's not correctly done fix
38. 01:24:092 (3) - it's 2x (1grid maybe) off. If you want to do the figure perfectly.
39. 01:26:861 (1,2,3,4) - ^same https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768778 sorry, I intend star pattern

Here I may be totally wrong, so excuse in advance xD. Bad polarity
no change
I don't like 1/4 circles in this map
Lunatic

1. Add note here 00:09:553 - and here 00:11:399
2. 00:13:015 (1,2,3) - this combo may need to be changed for something else like this > http://puu.sh/9QdEf/5177cbd215.jpg or this http://puu.sh/9QdFY/212b9fcb50.jpg
3. 00:32:399 (2,3,4) - ^same
4. 00:36:092 (3,4,5) - ^same ; I guess you can still have the same but like this > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1768713
   [*00:42:668 (1,1,2,1,2,3) - ^same
5. 01:13:938 (1,2,3) - ^same

Hard

1. 00:36:092 (2,3,4) - ^^
2. 00:39:784 (2,3,4) - ^^
3. 00:43:476 (2,3) - ^^
4. 00:44:399 (1,2) - ^^

That's all i got, Pretty good map and song <3. Please, write what you changed.
Also, my english is bad, so tell me if you dont understand something.

Good luck! <3

Thank you for modding!
red: change
blue: no change (no comment is also)