Kanna wrote:

Saten wrote:

[General]
01:18:680 - Kiai end 01:18:721 - Kiai start
You should change too
01:18:638 - Kiai end 01:18:680 - Kiai start fix

[Another]
I think you should use tickrate 2 for various reasons fix
00:03:468 - what purpose does this timing section have? o.o Change to softsound
00:08:180 (1) - this should start on 00:08:013 - instead keep
00:24:680 (3) - unsnapped slider tail fix
00:32:346 (2) - unsnapped slider tail fix
00:54:513 (1,2) - I would change this to a slider with a repeat instead The reason we put the circle, because I want to beat this sound
00:59:847 (1,2) - change this to a slider with a repeat as well? More appropriate because of the triple afterwards ^
01:01:847 (4,1) - evil 1/4 jump keep
01:19:013 (6) - what is this doing here? fits better here 01:18:846 - imo keep
01:24:013 (2) - NC here as well fix
01:36:346 (5) - unsnapped slider tail fix
01:45:180 (8) - unsnapped slider tail fix
01:46:180 (2,3,4) - unsnapped slider tails fix
01:46:846 (2,3,4) - unsnapped as well. These should end on the white ticks fix

[Standard]
Broken storyboard. I can't see any notes.. wait are you using storyboarded hitsounds? As far as I know, it's not allowed because even if you miss, you'll still hear the storyboard sounds. loooooool delete
AR5 is much better. AR4 makes no sense with the current SV imo. fix
00:54:846 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - whistles on both sides (avoid adding whistle-slides though) fix
01:00:513 (2) - whistle on all 3 points fix
01:01:846 (2) - ^ fix
01:36:513 (3) - awkward single hitcircle, I suggest you turn this into a 1/2 slider just like 01:31:180 (4) - fix
01:50:680 (2,1) - I think this is too close, make it 1/2 instead? fix

[Beginner]
Storyboarded hitsounds, please avoid them D: delete
AR+1-2. AR2 is way too low imo fix
00:20:013 (1) - finish on end fix
00:54:680 (1) - I prefer having a spinner that ends here instead. single hitcircles like this can be frustrating. fix
01:00:013 (1,2) - complete overlaps D: custom stack these 2 instead fix

Goodluck rrtyui /o/

Saten wrote:

[General]
01:18:680 - Kiai end 01:18:721 - Kiai start
You should change too
01:18:638 - Kiai end 01:18:680 - Kiai start
Done

[HypeRegou]
00:13:180 (4,5,1) - I personally find it better if such stack has the first note as NC instead ok
00:21:180 (3,4,1) - as aboveok
00:33:013 (4) - unsnapped slider tail
00:34:680 (4) - unsnapped as well~
00:36:180 (1,2) - ^
00:37:013 (4,1) -
00:38:013 (3) - ^
00:41:013 (5) - ^ not much but still unsnapped
Fixed all unsnapped slider..?I'm not sure lol too lazy to check it with aibat...
01:16:013 (1) - you have everything but finish, I find it more fitting with a finish here imo ok
01:30:346 - feels empty here Added a note
01:50:680 (7) - place this more to the center of the map Ok
01:53:346 - what's the point of having a finish on the spinner if the end is muted? lol I like it \;D/

Goodluck rrtyui /o/

Silynn wrote:

rrtyui this map is great~<3

star^^

1. 00:11:680 (1) - (optional) Personal preference, for me it's better if this slider is facing right (:
2. 00:15:346 (3) - ...make this slider symmetrical by moving the waypoint to ~x:341 y:258?
3. 00:25:346 (1,3) - Perhaps try this to avoid overlap with upcoming 00:28:013 (1)?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:36:013 (1,2,3) - Err, this one also, to avoid overlap with your green (2) you can just simply do this:
   

   240,96,36013,6,0,B|242:148|222:187|222:187|240:252,1,160,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
   320,304,37013,1,2,0:0
   401,253,37346,2,0,B|420:191|420:191|398:151|400:99,1,160,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:3

5. 00:44:013 (1) - (optional) Put in ~x:166 y:81 instead? Current angle seems forced to me orz...
6. 00:52:013 (1) - Hmm, consider to use gradual volume increase (maybe 30% -> 40% -> 50% -> 60) on this spinner, to follow the synth's progression (:
7. 01:02:680 (1,2) - Err, no need to force (1) in the center here imo... Would be much better if you placed (1) in ~x:20 y:150 and stack (2) above 01:05:346 (1)'s end~
8. 01:14:680 (3) - Missing whistle on slider's start here? o.o...
9. 01:14:680 (3,4,1) - ...uhm, I can guess what you're aiming for here, but I think these three's angle will be better if you put (3) in ~x:80 y:122, encircle (2) and arrange the next like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:18:680 (5) - New combo should be here (listen to the instrument's progression :3)
11. 01:22:013 (2) - Move this to ~x:188 y:300 and the next 01:23:346 (4) to ~x:357 y:119 regardless of the spacing? (it won't be hard to catch, but it avoids overlap~)
12. 01:37:013 (4) - Delete this note? It'll sound much more dramatic imo - and if you do this:
13. 01:37:346 (1) until 01:40:013 (1) - Arrange like this? They'll look like this:
    
    SPOILER

    

    451,150,97346,6,0,B|411:134|371:150,1,79.9999999999999,12|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
    285,190,98013,2,0,B|246:205|206:189,1,79.9999999999999,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
    157,271,98680,1,0,0:0
    180,364,99013,1,0,0:0
    275,353,99347,2,0,B|315:337|360:355,1,80,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
    437,307,100013,6,8,B|376:248|289:260,2,160

14. 01:50:013 (1) - (optional) Put this slider in ~x:244 y:19 instead? This way, the angle looks less forced imo plus you can put the following (2) in the center if you do this (:

1. 00:11:680 (1,2,3) - orz, why the beginning is clustering already ._. - Simple straight arrangement like this flows much better though:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:12:346 (3,4,5) - ...and if you do above suggestion, you can just remove a repeat from (3) and adjust the next objects in a symmetry like this, should flow MUCH greater now (:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:18:680 (3,4) - Overlap won't happen if you tilted the slider a bit downward, really xD
4. 00:20:013 (2) - (optional) Make this encircle your next (3) instead?
5. 00:26:680 (2) - ...again, please move to ~x:234 y:198 regardless of the spacing to avoid overlap~
6. 00:28:680 (3,4) - I like how (1) is curved, maybe add a slight curve inward for both like this to compliment the previous (1)'s curve? It won't hurt though xD
   

   188,316,28680,2,0,B|135:295|80:319,1,110,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0
   0,184,29346,2,0,B|51:207|109:183,3,110,2|2|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0

7. 00:40:680 (1) - On this pattern, I suggest not to use standard bezier slider, but to use elbow slider instead, as following:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:43:680 (2) - (optional) Put this in ~x:400 y:65 and the next (3) in ~x:256 y:121? (3) is still in the center, and it looks MUCH less forced compared to your current one imo~
9. 00:56:180 (3) - Once more - move to ~x:284 y:349 regardless of the spacing to avoid overlap
10. 01:02:679 (1,2,1) - Try to use manual-stacking to the bottom-right for these three, they'll look more beautiful in play mode plus the first (1) won't overlap the previous slider as well (:
11. 01:14:680 (1,2,3,4,5) - Uhm, I know you want to stack (4) and (5) to next notes, but without moving (4,5) you can still get a much neater pentagon, really~
    

    202,339,74680,5,8,0:0
    48,328,75013,1,8,0:0
    19,176,75346,1,8,0:0
    152,92,75680,1,8,0:0
    256,204,76013,1,12,0:0

12. 01:20:680 (1) - (optional) Curve it downward instead, to let this slider brings the flow to your next (2)?
13. 01:36:513 (3) - Put the midpoint in ~x:475 y:303 and the endpoint in ~x:472 y:272, so it'll encircle 01:34:680 (1) from the outside?
14. 01:40:013 (1) - (optional) Slider wave flows wonderful here, especially with your red (2)... Really, try it xD
    

    340,188,100013,6,8,B|287:212|233:188|233:188|180:161|125:184,2,220

15. 01:50:680 (2) - Eh... I prefer to put it in the center (~x:256 y:296) orz, plays better before the spinner this way I think :3

1. 00:01:347 (1) - Use the new drum sampleset (with finish, 50% volume) here? xD
2. 00:17:680 (2) - ...maybe remove the repeat and add another note stacked beneath this slider's start? (uhm idk, although not downbeat 00:18:013 bears a big beat orz, quite weird having that part as a slider end...)
3. 00:24:180 (2,3) - (optional) Won't hurt if (3) is also curved following (2) I think~ Just make sure all three slider ends form a perfect triangle (:
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:30:846 (2,3) - Try to CTRL+G these two for a dynamic jump? (yes, CTRL+G is the new shortcut for CTRL+R :3)
5. 00:31:513 (2,3) - Same as above, if you did previous suggestion~
6. 00:35:680 (7) - (optional) Try slightly tilted slider wave here? Flows better imo:
   

   232,92,35680,2,0,B|183:107|134:84|134:84|89:62|40:75,1,196.80000300293,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0

7. 00:43:013 (2,3,4) - On these three, would be much nicer imo if you focus on slider's end spacing consistency, for example put (3) in ~x:343 y:345 and (4) in ~x:379 y:40 to form a neat triangle with the three slider ends xD
8. 00:49:347 (1,2,3,... onwards) - Uhm, I wonder why don't you use whistles on red tick also (as rrtyui did on his diffs orz ._.)
9. 01:00:013 (3) - Ah... Just move the midpoint to ~x:301 y:185 for neater slider orz :3
10. 01:03:347 (3) - Uhm, are you sure with finish sound on slider's end here? For me soft sampleset with no hitsound fits better here...
11. 01:04:347 (2) - I highly recommend instead of keeping symmetry just stack above 01:05:347 (1)'s end instead, it'll look much fancier in play mode (especially due to the comboburst~)
12. 01:08:013 (1,1) - Err, this is almost impossible to read without snaking slider on orz... (I've tested it) - You can do a manual stacking of course, but I prefer this much more :3
    
    SPOILER

    
13. 01:16:013 (1) - Remove whistle from slider's end here? There's nothing for the whistle to follow imo...
14. 01:27:846 (4) - Minor stuff, move the endpoint to ~x:56 y:244 for a parallel slider?
15. 01:33:180 (1) - Another aesthetic stuff, use this code to have the slider wave's second half encircles (2)'s repeat better:
    

    164,312,93180,6,0,B|223:292|276:325|276:325|332:359|398:332,1,240,12|0,0:0|0:0,0:0

16. 01:37:013 (4) - ...again, somehow I feel uneasy with the whistle here (there's nothing high-pitched here or an outstanding instrument sound orz...) I prefer clap or using no hitsound here, but it's up to you (:

1. 00:08:180 (1) - Uhm, I'd add note on 00:09:346 and start spinner 1/4 after, as used in Hyper :3
2. 00:11:680 (1) - ...are you sure about the 83ms spinner recovery time here? You can just simply end spinner in 00:11:346 orz ._.
3. 00:11:847 (3) - Hmm, I'd remove the whistle here to emphasize your next whistle on (4)
4. 00:11:680 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Also with this, I prefer having something like this though, it's MUCH more structural imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:13:180 (4) - Move to ~x:351 y:363 to form a triangle jump with (3,4,1)? Stack doesn't play that good here imo...
6. 00:15:847 (4) - (optional) Stack above 00:16:680 (3)'s start, to keep the jump's momentum?
7. 00:23:013 (2) - Minor stuff, move the endpoint to ~x:26 y:121 to make it perfectly parallel orz xD
8. 00:24:346 (2) - Hmm, why don't you just put this in the very right (~x:512) while you can? It won't hurt, plus it also increases the flow a bit~
9. 00:34:180 (3) - Erm, please make this slider symmetrical orz ._.
10. 00:40:013 (6) - (optional) Considering your previous 00:39:096 (2,3), would be nice if you pressed CTRL+G (reverse selection, previously CTRL+R) to this slider (:
11. 00:40:347 (1) - Choose different combo color - similar combo color like this is confusing orz...
12. 00:43:347 (1) - This one also, choose different combo color? (well on this one you can just use red here to intensify, and then use blue on the next 00:44:013 (1) xD)
13. 00:44:013 (1,2,3,4,5) - This will be much, MUCH more beautiful if made encircling your blue (3) - it won't hurt, really (:
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 00:46:013 (5,6) - (optional) Move whistle from (6) to (5)? (whistle works on both though, I personally prefer (5) because the melody is more distinguishable there)
15. 00:49:347 (6) - ...move to ~x:325 y:320 perhaps to intensify the jump?
16. 01:04:513 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - Teach me how to read this part orz, I always sliderbreak here >_<
17. 01:05:347 (1) - Minor stuff, move to ~x:369 y:171 orz :3
18. 01:19:180 (1) - (optional) To make it tidier, stack below previous 01:18:430 (2) instead perhaps?
19. 01:28:346 (5) - I HIGHLY recommend to stack this with 01:27:180 (2)'s start instead of (3)'s end - really, it's very beautiful (:
20. 01:35:846 (1) - (optional) For flow, perhaps consider to add a bezier curve like this?
    
    SPOILER

    
21. 01:44:513 (4) - ...just simply stack this perfectly above 01:45:430 (2) orz xD
22. 01:52:680 (1) - Try to move ONLY the slider (not the (2)) to ~y:272? For me it's better if the slider's start isn't covered by spinner's comboburst :3

Niva wrote:

Hi rrtyui, here's my promised mod (BOF2012 yeah~)
Sorry for delay orz >_<

[General]

-> If only the video needs epilepsy warning, just put it in the beatmap's thread (as used in http://osu.ppy.sh/s/42527) though, no need to enable storyboard epilepsy warning in-game (there's no SB here xD_ fix
-> Set audio lead-in manually to 1000? (current one is 1004) no
-> Also, current combo color makes the jumps on Another quite hard to read imo (it's your personal decision though) no

[Beginner]

1. 00:11:680 (1) - (optional) Personal preference, for me it's better if this slider is facing right (: no
2. 00:15:346 (3) - ...make this slider symmetrical by moving the waypoint to ~x:341 y:258? fix
3. 00:25:346 (1,3) - Perhaps try this to avoid overlap with upcoming 00:28:013 (1)? no
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:36:013 (1,2,3) - Err, this one also, to avoid overlap with your green (2) you can just simply do this:
   

   240,96,36013,6,0,B|242:148|222:187|222:187|240:252,1,160,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
   320,304,37013,1,2,0:0
   401,253,37346,2,0,B|420:191|420:191|398:151|400:99,1,160,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:3

5. 00:44:013 (1) - (optional) Put in ~x:166 y:81 instead? Current angle seems forced to me orz... fix
6. 00:52:013 (1) - Hmm, consider to use gradual volume increase (maybe 30% -> 40% -> 50% -> 60) on this spinner, to follow the synth's progression (: fix
7. 01:02:680 (1,2) - Err, no need to force (1) in the center here imo... Would be much better if you placed (1) in ~x:20 y:150 and stack (2) above 01:05:346 (1)'s end~ fix
8. 01:14:680 (3) - Missing whistle on slider's start here? o.o... fix
9. 01:14:680 (3,4,1) - ...uhm, I can guess what you're aiming for here, but I think these three's angle will be better if you put (3) in ~x:80 y:122, encircle (2) and arrange the next like this: no
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:18:680 (5) - New combo should be here (listen to the instrument's progression :3) fix
11. 01:22:013 (2) - Move this to ~x:188 y:300 and the next 01:23:346 (4) to ~x:357 y:119 regardless of the spacing? (it won't be hard to catch, but it avoids overlap~) fix
12. 01:37:013 (4) - Delete this note? It'll sound much more dramatic imo - and if you do this: fix
13. 01:37:346 (1) until 01:40:013 (1) - Arrange like this? They'll look like this: fix
    
    SPOILER

    

    451,150,97346,6,0,B|411:134|371:150,1,79.9999999999999,12|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
    285,190,98013,2,0,B|246:205|206:189,1,79.9999999999999,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
    157,271,98680,1,0,0:0
    180,364,99013,1,0,0:0
    275,353,99347,2,0,B|315:337|360:355,1,80,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0
    437,307,100013,6,8,B|376:248|289:260,2,160

14. 01:50:013 (1) - (optional) Put this slider in ~x:244 y:19 instead? This way, the angle looks less forced imo plus you can put the following (2) in the center if you do this (: no

[Standard]

-> Rename difficulty to Normal? (uhm, most BMS songs use Normal/Hyper/Another as well xD) fix

1. 00:11:680 (1,2,3) - orz, why the beginning is clustering already ._. - Simple straight arrangement like this flows much better though: fix
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:12:346 (3,4,5) - ...and if you do above suggestion, you can just remove a repeat from (3) and adjust the next objects in a symmetry like this, should flow MUCH greater now (: fix
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:18:680 (3,4) - Overlap won't happen if you tilted the slider a bit downward, really xD fix
4. 00:20:013 (2) - (optional) Make this encircle your next (3) instead? no
5. 00:26:680 (2) - ...again, please move to ~x:234 y:198 regardless of the spacing to avoid overlap~ fix
6. 00:28:680 (3,4) - I like how (1) is curved, maybe add a slight curve inward for both like this to compliment the previous (1)'s curve? It won't hurt though no
   

   188,316,28680,2,0,B|135:295|80:319,1,110,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0
   0,184,29346,2,0,B|51:207|109:183,3,110,2|2|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0

7. 00:40:680 (1) - On this pattern, I suggest not to use standard bezier slider, but to use elbow slider instead, as following: fix
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:43:680 (2) - (optional) Put this in ~x:400 y:65 and the next (3) in ~x:256 y:121? (3) is still in the center, and it looks MUCH less forced compared to your current one imo~ fix
9. 00:56:180 (3) - Once more - move to ~x:284 y:349 regardless of the spacing to avoid overlap fix
10. 01:02:679 (1,2,1) - Try to use manual-stacking to the bottom-right for these three, they'll look more beautiful in play mode plus the first (1) won't overlap the previous slider as well (: fix
11. 01:14:680 (1,2,3,4,5) - Uhm, I know you want to stack (4) and (5) to next notes, but without moving (4,5) you can still get a much neater pentagon, really~ fix
    

    202,339,74680,5,8,0:0
    48,328,75013,1,8,0:0
    19,176,75346,1,8,0:0
    152,92,75680,1,8,0:0
    256,204,76013,1,12,0:0

12. 01:20:680 (1) - (optional) Curve it downward instead, to let this slider brings the flow to your next (2)? no
13. 01:36:513 (3) - Put the midpoint in ~x:475 y:303 and the endpoint in ~x:472 y:272, so it'll encircle 01:34:680 (1) from the outside? fix
14. 01:40:013 (1) - (optional) Slider wave flows wonderful here, especially with your red (2)... Really, try it xD fix
    

    340,188,100013,6,8,B|287:212|233:188|233:188|180:161|125:184,2,220

15. 01:50:680 (2) - Eh... I prefer to put it in the center (~x:256 y:296) orz, plays better before the spinner this way I think :3 no

[Another]

1. 00:08:180 (1) - Uhm, I'd add note on 00:09:346 and start spinner 1/4 after, as used in Hyper :3 no
2. 00:11:680 (1) - ...are you sure about the 83ms spinner recovery time here? You can just simply end spinner in 00:11:346 orz ._. no
3. 00:11:847 (3) - Hmm, I'd remove the whistle here to emphasize your next whistle on (4) fix
4. 00:11:680 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Also with this, I prefer having something like this though, it's MUCH more structural imo: fix
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:13:180 (4) - Move to ~x:351 y:363 to form a triangle jump with (3,4,1)? Stack doesn't play that good here imo... fix
6. 00:15:847 (4) - (optional) Stack above 00:16:680 (3)'s start, to keep the jump's momentum? fix
7. 00:23:013 (2) - Minor stuff, move the endpoint to ~x:26 y:121 to make it perfectly parallel orz xD fix
8. 00:24:346 (2) - Hmm, why don't you just put this in the very right (~x:512) while you can? It won't hurt, plus it also increases the flow a bit~ no
9. 00:34:180 (3) - Erm, please make this slider symmetrical orz ._. fix
10. 00:40:013 (6) - (optional) Considering your previous 00:39:096 (2,3), would be nice if you pressed CTRL+G (reverse selection, previously CTRL+R) to this slider (: no
11. 00:40:347 (1) - Choose different combo color - similar combo color like this is confusing orz... fix
12. 00:43:347 (1) - This one also, choose different combo color? (well on this one you can just use red here to intensify, and then use blue on the next 00:44:013 (1) xD) fix
13. 00:44:013 (1,2,3,4,5) - This will be much, MUCH more beautiful if made encircling your blue (3) - it won't hurt, really (: no
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 00:46:013 (5,6) - (optional) Move whistle from (6) to (5)? (whistle works on both though, I personally prefer (5) because the melody is more distinguishable there) fix
15. 00:49:347 (6) - ...move to ~x:325 y:320 perhaps to intensify the jump? fix
16. 01:04:513 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - Teach me how to read this part orz, I always sliderbreak here >_<
17. 01:05:347 (1) - Minor stuff, move to ~x:369 y:171 orz :3 fix
18. 01:19:180 (1) - (optional) To make it tidier, stack below previous 01:18:430 (2) instead perhaps? fix
19. 01:28:346 (5) - I HIGHLY recommend to stack this with 01:27:180 (2)'s start instead of (3)'s end - really, it's very beautiful (: fix
20. 01:35:846 (1) - (optional) For flow, perhaps consider to add a bezier curve like this? no
    
    SPOILER

    
21. 01:44:513 (4) - ...just simply stack this perfectly above 01:45:430 (2) orz xD no
22. 01:52:680 (1) - Try to move ONLY the slider (not the (2)) to ~y:272? For me it's better if the slider's start isn't covered by spinner's comboburst :3 no

It's a very fun map already (: - I think what you need for this map is mods to make your map tidier, especially on Normal difficulty...
Good luck rrtyui :3

Niva wrote:

Hi rrtyui, here's my promised mod (BOF2012 yeah~)
Sorry for delay orz >_<
]
[Hyper]

1. 00:01:347 (1) - Use the new drum sampleset (with finish, 50% volume) here? xD OK~
2. 00:17:680 (2) - ...maybe remove the repeat and add another note stacked beneath this slider's start? (uhm idk, although not downbeat 00:18:013 bears a big beat orz, quite weird having that part as a slider end...) errrr
3. 00:24:180 (2,3) - (optional) Won't hurt if (3) is also curved following (2) I think~ Just make sure all three slider ends form a perfect triangle (: done!
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:30:846 (2,3) - Try to CTRL+G these two for a dynamic jump? (yes, CTRL+G is the new shortcut for CTRL+R :3) I don't want to make it that difficult
5. 00:31:513 (2,3) - Same as above, if you did previous suggestion~ ^
6. 00:35:680 (7) - (optional) Try slightly tilted slider wave here? Flows better imo: Done
   

   232,92,35680,2,0,B|183:107|134:84|134:84|89:62|40:75,1,196.80000300293,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0

7. 00:43:013 (2,3,4) - On these three, would be much nicer imo if you focus on slider's end spacing consistency, for example put (3) in ~x:343 y:345 and (4) in ~x:379 y:40 to form a neat triangle with the three slider ends xD Fixed
8. 00:49:347 (1,2,3,... onwards) - Uhm, I wonder why don't you use whistles on red tick also (as rrtyui did on his diffs orz ._.) err.. I think the hitnormal do fit here...;(
9. 01:00:013 (3) - Ah... Just move the midpoint to ~x:301 y:185 for neater slider orz :3 OK ;3
10. 01:03:347 (3) - Uhm, are you sure with finish sound on slider's end here? For me soft sampleset with no hitsound fits better here... done
11. 01:04:347 (2) - I highly recommend instead of keeping symmetry just stack above 01:05:347 (1)'s end instead, it'll look much fancier in play mode (especially due to the comboburst~) OK~
12. 01:08:013 (1,1) - Err, this is almost impossible to read without snaking slider on orz... (I've tested it) - You can do a manual stacking of course, but I prefer this much more :3 I just moved 01:08:680 (1) apart from 01:08:013 (1) -
    
    SPOILER

    
13. 01:16:013 (1) - Remove whistle from slider's end here? There's nothing for the whistle to follow imo... Ok
14. 01:27:846 (4) - Minor stuff, move the endpoint to ~x:56 y:244 for a parallel slider? Sure
15. 01:33:180 (1) - Another aesthetic stuff, use this code to have the slider wave's second half encircles (2)'s repeat better: Done~
    

    164,312,93180,6,0,B|223:292|276:325|276:325|332:359|398:332,1,240,12|0,0:0|0:0,0:0

16. 01:37:013 (4) - ...again, somehow I feel uneasy with the whistle here (there's nothing high-pitched here or an outstanding instrument sound orz...) I prefer clap or using no hitsound here, but it's up to you (: Removed the whistle

It's a very fun map already (: - I think what you need for this map is mods to make your map tidier, especially on Normal difficulty...
Good luck rrtyui :3

1. 00:11:680 (1) - i don't recommend to use this 1/4 hold slider in easiest diff, players might be confused with this, maybe use 1/1 slider instead?
2. 00:15:346 (3) - move it somewhere to avoid overlapping? you could move it to (296,348)
3. 00:22:013 (3,4) - with the clap sound for 4, i think you'd better combine them as a slider
4. 00:44:013 (1) - y:96, making it parallel with 4 would look better imo

1. 00:12:180 (2) - it was really confusing for me. players would get weird rhythm sense for this imo
2. 00:25:346 (1,2) - can you stick to use either 3-hit slider or 4-hit slider? i'm afraid if players would read this slider properly
3. 01:19:180 (1) - don't stack it plz, it could be read as 1/1 rhythm

1. 00:12:013 (1) - looks hard, maybe curve like this could be easier to play
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:17:680 (2) - offscreen
3. 00:50:513 (1,2,1) - i don't really recommend to make this distance. i'm 90% sure most ppl will miss it. you actually stacked 00:49:347 (1,2) -
4. 00:51:847 (1,2,3) - ^
5. 01:08:680 (1) - this too, do you think players could read it properly?
6. 01:18:013 (3,4,5,6) - put a circle first, make the 3hit beats from 01:18:180 - would be better imo
7. 01:25:513 (1,1,1) - reduce distance plz. remember it's a Hyper
8. 01:32:013 (1) - it was confusing when i play, it looks like 1/2 rhythm for me. can you double the distance
9. 01:46:846 (1,1,1,1) - same as 01:25:513 (1,1,1) -

1. 00:01:347 (1,1,1,1) - plz make break during each blank. it's really hard to pass the first part when play with HR
2. 00:57:513 (9) - NC?
3. 01:02:680 (1,1) - no, your distance doesn't make sense now. you should have made them like 01:04:013 (1,2,3,4) - at least.
4. 01:11:013 (3,5,7) - too difficult to read the distance
5. 01:13:347 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i don't really recommend to increase the stream distance gradually, and the last 1,2,3,4 look crazy
6. 01:16:013 (1) - ~ ^
7. 01:19:180 (1,2,3,4,6) - sudden 2.0x sliders make players crazy, can you at least reduce the SV to 1.5x
8. 01:25:513 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - ADD 1 MORE ARROW FOR EACH SLIDER

Star Stream wrote:

From my queue

[Beginner]

1. 00:11:680 (1) - i don't recommend to use this 1/4 hold slider in easiest diff, players might be confused with this, maybe use 1/1 slider instead? no. For the first pattern, it is okay(maybe...). I follow the sound.
2. 00:15:346 (3) - move it somewhere to avoid overlapping? you could move it to (296,348) no. It is pointed out that those placed by Niva
3. 00:22:013 (3,4) - with the clap sound for 4, i think you'd better combine them as a slider fix
4. 00:44:013 (1) - y:96, making it parallel with 4 would look better imo fix

[Normal]

1. 00:12:180 (2) - it was really confusing for me. players would get weird rhythm sense for this imo
2. 00:25:346 (1,2) - can you stick to use either 3-hit slider or 4-hit slider? i'm afraid if players would read this slider properly
3. 01:19:180 (1) - don't stack it plz, it could be read as 1/1 rhythm All fix o.o

I don't mind making some jumps in Normal diff, but now this diff is pretty harsh to play i'll to be used as a reference...

[Another]

1. 00:01:347 (1,1,1,1) - plz make break during each blank. it's really hard to pass the first part when play with HR fix lol
2. 00:57:513 (9) - NC? no, This difficulty I have not installed a NC intentionally. for clarity 00:59:847 (1,2)
3. 01:02:680 (1,1) - no, your distance doesn't make sense now. you should have made them like 01:04:013 (1,2,3,4) - at least. no. hold
4. 01:11:013 (3,5,7) - too difficult to read the distance no. The player tries to hit it with a certain rhythm of 1/2 to this place...
5. 01:13:347 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i don't really recommend to increase the stream distance gradually, and the last 1,2,3,4 look crazy no. My style
6. 01:16:013 (1) - ~ ^ same
7. 01:19:180 (1,2,3,4,6) - sudden 2.0x sliders make players crazy, can you at least reduce the SV to 1.5x Change to accelerate gradually
8. 01:25:513 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - ADD 1 MORE ARROW FOR EACH SLIDER Was change easy to hit

It's totally and perfectly overmapped, rename it to 'Extra' plz . and to use this diff, you have to make an easier Insane diff ok. add new diff XD I LOVE OVERMAPPING WOOOOOAHH

Good luck for rank

Kanna wrote:

Another: add breaks between each single notes at map's beginning? Drain is pretty quick :/

1. Change BG.png to .jpg? less file size \o/

1. OD+1?
2. 00:11:680 (1) - delete 2 reserves and change to 1/2 slider, 1/4+so many reserve would be hard to beginners >.<
3. 00:40:679 (4) - (begin)No Normal-Whistle? I saw you added on some place that in the same rhythm D:
4. 00:43:346 (4) - ^

1. 00:11:680 (1) - It's up2u to make the same thing as what I wrote in Beginner. o3o
2. 00:19:346 (4) - Spacing? x:352,y:248
3. 00:24:679 (3) - x:304,y:340 is better ;_; (notice on the spacing :3)
4. 00:28:013 (1) - spacing (nazi)
5. 01:19:846 (3,4) - Why change the spacing? I can't understand D:
6. 01:25:680 (3) - clap? I listened this and no sound is weird ;w;
7. 01:38:013 (2,3) - ^^^

1. 00:16:680 (4) - Can you copy (3)'s slider shape to make this?
   What a pro diff, rename to Extra? lol

1. 看來是熱狗做的
2. 00:50:513 (1,2,1,1,2,3) - 這個有1/2的地方能換一下spacing嗎 有點難認...
3. 01:08:013 (1,2,1) - 這個(1)完全蓋到(1)了... 有點難read 移開點吧 放到上面去也可以
4. 01:40:013 (1,2,3) - 你試試note+1/2 slider 聽起來比較順

1. 00:27:346 (3) - I'd like to use 1.2x spacing here to keep these 4 sliders consistency
2. 00:37:846 (2,3) - Same as Rin said. reserve CANNOT be hidden, change it
3. 00:48:680 (4) - Add whistle at the begin & the end?

Flask wrote:

Mod Mod Mod \w\!

[General]

1. Change BG.png to .jpg? less file size \o/ like png lol

[Beginner]

1. OD+1?
2. 00:11:680 (1) - delete 2 reserves and change to 1/2 slider, 1/4+so many reserve would be hard to beginners >.< umm..fix
3. 00:40:679 (4) - (begin)No Normal-Whistle? I saw you added on some place that in the same rhythm D: fix
4. 00:43:346 (4) - ^ fix

[Normal]

1. 00:11:680 (1) - It's up2u to make the same thing as what I wrote in Beginner. o3o fix
2. 00:19:346 (4) - Spacing? x:352,y:248 fix
3. 00:24:679 (3) - x:304,y:340 is better ;_; (notice on the spacing :3) fix
4. 00:28:013 (1) - spacing (nazi) no
5. 01:19:846 (3,4) - Why change the spacing? I can't understand D: fix
6. 01:25:680 (3) - clap? I listened this and no sound is weird ;w; fix
7. 01:38:013 (2,3) - ^^^ ?

[Insane]

1. 00:16:680 (4) - Can you copy (3)'s slider shape to make this? no
   What a pro diff, rename to Extra? lol this is difficulty name of the BMS. and thanks!

[Another]

1. 00:27:346 (3) - I'd like to use 1.2x spacing here to keep these 4 sliders consistency　no
2. 00:37:846 (2,3) - Same as Rin said. reserve CANNOT be hidden, change it fix
3. 00:48:680 (4) - Add whistle at the begin & the end? fix

Good luck!!!!!!! >w<

NatsumeRin wrote:

[Another]
00:37:846 (2,3) - have the reverse arrow hidden is unrankable.

not a mod so no kud.
star.

Flask wrote:

Mod Mod Mod \w\!

[General]

1. Change BG.png to .jpg? less file size \o/

[Hyper]

1. 看來是熱狗做的
2. 00:50:513 (1,2,1,1,2,3) - 這個有1/2的地方能換一下spacing嗎 有點難認 ...故意的
3. 01:08:013 (1,2,1) - 這個(1)完全蓋到(1)了... 有點難read 移開點吧 放到上面去也可以 ^
4. 01:40:013 (1,2,3) - 你試試note+1/2 slider 聽起來比較順 乾脆改成reverse slider了

Good luck!!!!!!! >w<

Star Stream wrote:

From my queue
[Hyper]

1. 00:12:013 (1) - looks hard, maybe curve like this could be easier to play ok
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:17:680 (2) - offscreenfixed
3. 00:50:513 (1,2,1) - i don't really recommend to make this distance. i'm 90% sure most ppl will miss it. you actually stacked 00:49:347 (1,2) -
4. 00:51:847 (1,2,3) - ^
5. 01:08:680 (1) - this too, do you think players could read it properly?
   That's why I add NC.
6. 01:18:013 (3,4,5,6) - put a circle first, make the 3hit beats from 01:18:180 - would be better imo sure
7. 01:25:513 (1,1,1) - reduce distance plz. remember it's a Hyper what, 2.0x spacing isn't that difficult
8. 01:32:013 (1) - it was confusing when i play, it looks like 1/2 rhythm for me. can you double the distance nope
9. 01:46:846 (1,1,1,1) - same as 01:25:513 (1,1,1) - same

Good luck for rank

Kiiwa wrote:

Hi~

Insane
...this difficulty is harder then Another?! Ahahaha
00:06:680 (1,1) - Same with Another, Add break here is cool :3
00:33:346 (1) - Remove new combo.
00:39:096 (2,3) - Move closer together, you can't read that this is 1/4 on first play since the spacing is even more then places like 00:40:013 (6,1) - 01:10:680 (1,2,3) - This type of spacing (just for this combo) is really hard to read! I strongly suggest making it different!

Another
OD+1 would be okay.
00:06:680 (1,1) - You can insert a break here if you want.
00:17:013 (2) - This slider looks better to start underneath the head of 00:16:346 (4) - this slider? (Move to x:76 y:348) only fix it
00:17:346 (3) - Stack this under the end of 00:17:013 (2) - to match music.
00:21:180 (2,3,4,6) - Can add some whistles since you have them on similar sounding sounding parts of the song for the following 15 seconds.
00:48:846 - Better not to have whistle here.

Normal
00:19:846 (1,2) - This new combo is inconsistent with 00:14:513 (6,1) - , 00:15:846 (3,1) - ect... So, 00:19:846 (1) - remove new combo, 00:20:013 (2) - add new combo.

Nothing else,
Good luck!

Deni wrote:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

General

Omg rrtyui! :O I'm a fan xD Thanks XD

Folder seems fine...

Beginner

Fine! ~

Normal

00:12:180 (2) - Delete this circle, it's better to play and fits more to the music. fix
01:16:013 (5) - New Combo no
01:16:346 (1) - Remove if ^ no
01:36:513 (3) - Only use a circle here, it's fits better: Circle at 01:36:513 no

Insane

Fine ! Crazy diff.

Another

Fine!~

If you have any questions contact me ingame or via pm.

Static Noise Bird wrote:

Hi~

[Beginner]
00:15:346 (3) - Slight overlap, you may want to flip the curve around (ugh I don't know how to explain, so check box below) no

yes, this box~

00:22:680 (1) - You could blanket previous circle better, like at 00:28:013 (1) fix
00:24:013 (3) - ^ fix
01:12:013 (3) - IMO too close to previous circle, but not too big problem. Still suggesting to flip it, or move it to right (x:304 y:368 looks fine for me) fix

[Normal]
01:04:013 (3,4,5,6,1) - Use polygon circle no
01:17:680 (3,4) - Spacing looks odd, maybe copy and paste previous sliders since they look fine fix

[Hyper]
Looks fine~

[Insane]
01:45:013 (7,8) - Confusing and sudden jump i think not sudden...

[Another]
Looks fine too~

Very nice song choice, and good luck!

WVS wrote:

hey
it's not ein neuer HEILINGER krieg, it's ein neuer HEILIGER krieg.

no kd

1. 00:05:346 - 00:05:680 - k d k
2. 00:12:013 (1) - D
3. 00:14:013 - 00:14:346 - d k d
4. 00:16:513 (2) - k
5. 00:43:680 (4) - k
6. 01:04:013 (1) - 01:04:346 (2) - D
7. 01:05:346 (7) - K
8. 01:08:013 (2) - d
9. 01:09:346 - 01:10:680 - d d k d d d k d d
10. 01:18:680 (2) - D
11. 01:21:346 (1) - k
12. 01:22:013 (4) - k
13. 01:23:346 (4) - k
14. 01:29:346 (2) - D
15. 01:32:013 (1) - D
16. 01:32:180 (2) - re
17. 01:32:513 (1) - D
18. 01:32:846 (2) - D
19. 01:38:680 (5) - k
20. 01:40:013 (10) - k
21. 01:41:346 (14) - k
22. 01:42:680 (19) - k
23. 01:50:346 (4) - 01:50:513 (5) - k

1. 01:10:555 - Kiai Time → 01:05:346 - change
   　
2. 01:50:346 (6) - 01:50:513 (7) - k
3. 01:50:680 (8) - K
4. 01:52:680 (9) - Slider re
5. 01:52:680 - 01:53:180 - kkddd d
   　
   nice taiko diff

• ♫ Why Muzu has an epilepsy warning?
  ♫ Inconsistency on combo colours: http://puu.sh/1o6Zb

• 01:08:680 (1) - This slider =/

• 01:36:346 (2) - Is this intentional? http://puu.sh/1o77C
  01:49:513 (1) - Still catchable, but a bit far from the previous circle in that really dangerous stream. Just my opinion.

• ♫ So much unsnapped green lines: http://puu.sh/1o7rI
  00:37:513 (1) - This slidertick whistle sounds different than the others (and annoying).
  01:53:430 - You could add a spinner as the other diffs.

Lieselotte wrote:

:P

Pokie wrote:

SPOILER

You have received a private message from "rrtyui".

なっ・・・な・・・
なんだっとーっ！！

るるっちさんファンです、サインをください。

Request from Fo-ramu Puraibe-to Messe-ji

　Hyper

1. Few unsnapped notes: 00:34:180 (2) - , 00:34:680 (4) - Fixed
   00:33:846 (1) - As you've only a single note on previous combo (00:33:346 (1) -), using a new combo here looks unecessary for me, It's better to have a NC to remind people about the SV change as it's just hard diff but not Insane diff...
   00:52:180 (3,1) - Keep the combo pattern to be similar with 00:50:513 (1,2,1) - , swap these new combos?Fixed
   01:01:680 (2) - Don't like much how it performs now, how about spliting them into 1/2 circle + 1/2 slider like this?
   Changed the pattern in some other way
   01:08:680 (1) - This slider is totally unvisible while playing, please do a stacking with previous slider
   
   SPOILER

   
   ok
   01:26:180 (1) - I would count this for hidden repeat, which is one of the rankable stuff :P Tried to change the pattern
   01:47:846 (1) - Same as above ^
   01:50:013 (5) - Just an own favor, how about adding a new combo here?

Changed

Call me back when you've done everything.

Pokie wrote:

SPOILER

You have received a private message from "rrtyui".

なっ・・・な・・・
なんだっとーっ！！

るるっちさんファンです、サインをください。｡ﾟ(ﾟ´ω`ﾟ)ﾟ｡i love pokie!!

Request from Fo-ramu Puraibe-to Messe-ji

　General

1. Taiko Oni is missing both Unicode Artist and Title. fix
2. Current file size of BG.png exceeds 1MB which isn't recommended. Try this jpg version with 200KB? sorry, I always use the PNG format http://puu.sh/22dkV
3. Please remove video from Taiko Muzukashii. fix
4. Please remove TaikoBG.jpg since it's no longer avaliable for ranking. okay

　Taiko Muzukashii

1. I can't mod Taiko So here's an error check.
   00:12:013 (1) - Missing a new combo okay

　Normal

• 00:39:180 (1,3) - , 00:41:846 (1,3) - Comparing with 00:33:846 (1,2,3) - 00:36:513 (1,2,3) - , it lost the consistency on hitsound with wasn't expect to do. Plus there are none of changes in music, is it intentional? fix
  01:50:680 (2) - Since there's a spinner 1/4 later, I'd suggest moving it to a center position. umm..no. pointing out the by saten.
  
  SPOILER

  

　Another

• 00:29:346 (1) - Shape the blanket better? fix
  
  SPOILER

  
  
  

  220,277,29346,6,0,B|164:292|164:292|121:333|50:331|12:271,1,233.999989288331,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

  00:31:346 (3) - Sightly touched HP bar..., it could be fixed by adjusting these sliders 00:31:013 (2,3) - fix
  
  SPOILER

  
  
  00:33:346 (1) - Auto stacking doesn't work here So please stack this circle properly. oops! fix
  00:39:013 (2,4) - 00:41:680 (2,4) - Same stuff that I've mentioned in Normal fix
  01:22:680 (1,2) - These are placed too close to 01:22:346 (4) - , feel much better with these positions. fix
  
  SPOILER

  
  
  

　Insane

• 01:11:347 (5) - New combo here as you did it on 01:12:680 (1) - ? umm... think that can be unity in the current placement.
  01:25:513 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Not sure about these...since you've used 1/6 when the music had 1/8(or even 1/16,32?) obviously :\ i know it, I tried to arrange so as to hit this sound (that is hard to hit but can possible), as a result of well-balanced considering the degree of difficulty, and to keep this arrangement(1/8 five stream*4...etc is VERY HARD or little easy).

Call me back when you've done everything.

Combo1 : 169,128,200
Combo2 : 255,106,34
Combo3 : 120,0,240
Combo4 : 250,37,14
Combo5 : 0,122,181

• 00:21:680 (2,3,4) - picky: these don't build a straight line as intended, move 3 to 257|177 for better placing (you can shape 1 so that it blankets 3, btw)
  00:28:013 (1) - make this blanket 4,2 better? also, delete the reverse arrow, i think there should be a circle at 00:29:346 because that feels more intuitive with the soundpattern
  01:13:346 (1,3) - make these blanket 2,4 better
  01:27:346 (2) - it's hardly audible what this slider is starting on; I suggest removing it and making 1 a slider instead (like you did with 3, let the long slider start on the big white tick as that is where the strong beat is)
  01:32:680 (3) - hardly audible again (also, improve the blanket around 2 please)
  01:44:013 (2) - new combo
  01:45:346 (3) - replace this with 2 1/1 sliders with each a finish on their starts; also, new combo on both of them
  01:46:846 (1,2) - i find these a bit hard for a newby to catch because the whole map is based on white ticks and then you have sliders on reds - they fit but they may be a bit hard?

• I'd rather call this advanced, judging by the star rating and difficulty settings, it's a tad hard for a normal but that's just naming
  
  00:12:346 (2) - this may be a bit hard to explain but the sound this slider starts on is a weaker one than where it ends, thus making this feel a bit unnatural; my suggestion is to replace it with a circle-slider combo to have the impact of the slider start on the strong beat
  00:15:346 (2,3,4) - picky suggestion: you could form an equal triangle with 2's end, 3 and 4's start
  00:19:846 (1) - i suggest putting this to 170|215 as it's a bit hard to notice when stacked on 2; also, you spaced the previous 1/2-combos out so this one will do better when spaced aswell, plus, it leads better into 2 this way
  00:33:013 (5) - this circle feels too close to the previous slider as you placed it further away from the original track in earlier examples (00:30:346 (5) - ); do the same here?
  00:43:346 (1,2) - I'd like normal whistles here
  00:56:180 (3) - why does this slider have 1.46x spacing when the others are around 1.35-1.40x? adjust that please; it may be a minor thing but it bugs me nonetheless
  00:57:513 (1,2,3,4) - this combo looks so wide when compared to the blue one before because you don't build it as much as one unit as with the blue one; do that? (-> make this combo more similar to the blue one)
  01:17:013 (2) - picky: this does not end exactly on where 5 was, fix pls?
  01:19:013 (1) - add a hitsound on the start, whistle maybe?
  01:20:680 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like you should have something to click on these big white ticks here, just letting sliders end on them feels a bit like wasted potential
  01:44:013 (3) - new combo
  01:50:013 (1) - why not use a 1/2-reverseslider? would suit the background beat more

• The soft sample is hardly audible in gameplay, use normal for anything but the very low volume parts - so for everything but the start.
  I will provide suggestions for that.
  This diff has so many dons @_@
  
  00:06:346 (1) - there's no reason for a finish here
  00:11:846 - use 60% normal hitsample from here
  00:22:680 - use 75% normal hitsample from here
  00:30:346 (1) - no reason for a finish note
  00:44:346 (1) - i don't find this spinner very fitting, remove it
  00:45:346 (1) - add k
  00:46:680 (1) - add d
  00:48:013 (1) - add k
  01:00:013 (1,1) - similar, the consistent drumming doesn't fit; just replace them with Ks
  01:02:680 (1,2) - Ks sound better here
  01:04:013 (1,2) - make these ks
  01:04:846 (4,6) - making these Ks will give you more variation in the hitpattern and sounds better to me, though it may be a bit hard?
  01:05:346 - use 90% normal hitsample from here
  01:23:346 (4) - make this a k
  01:24:013 (1) - replace with ddddk
  01:24:680 - add another ddddk pattern here
  01:26:680 - use 75% normal hitsample from here
  01:42:680 (19) - make this k
  01:45:346 (8,9) - replace with ddd k each
  01:50:680 (1) - use 40% normal hitsample for this one
  01:53:346 (1) - use 75% normal hitsample for this one

• Consider lowering nonkiai volume to 80% to let kiai feel more powerful; 80% is fairly enough for the rest of the song.
  
  01:47:902 (2,3) - consider removing these to follow the other suggesting below
  01:48:013 (1,1,2,3,4) - make these K?

• 00:06:763 (1) - I'd start this spinner at 00:08:013 to keep the hit-pause-hit-pause effect; also, the effect I feel this spinner is on starts around there
  00:11:596 - what is this little 5% section for?
  00:18:513 (1,2,3) - these sliders don't feel good to me; the strong beats lie on the ends of them which makes them feel awkward to hit - replace these with something so you hit on the white ticks
  00:23:846 (1,2,3) - same
  00:26:180 (1,2,3) - same
  00:28:346 (2,3,4) - this is better
  00:29:346 (1,2) - these sliderbows feel odd
  00:31:346 (1) - there should be some sort of jump here; stacking it feels bad with the new pattern starting as 1 lies on an outstanding beat
  00:33:846 (1,2) - redtick stuff again, arrange it so you have to click on the white beats
  00:36:180 (1,2) - same
  00:38:846 (1,2) - same
  00:41:347 (1,2,3,4,5) - it's hard to notice this shape when playing with video, just pointing that out
  00:42:180 (6,7) - redtick stuff again
  01:15:847 (5) - feels better when you put it on 3's start
  01:15:596 - this green line makes no sense, remove it
  01:15:638 - same
  01:15:763 - same
  01:15:805 - same
  01:18:513 (6,7) - feels better if you delete 7 (overmapped) and put a jump on 6,1
  01:22:680 (1,2) - this stacking kills the movement, does not feel nice
  01:25:513 (1,1,1) - add finish on end?
  01:46:013 (3) - new combo; CTRL-G maybe to distinguish them more from 1,2?
  01:46:346 (4) - if you go with CTRL-G on 3, do it here too
  01:46:846 (1,1,1) - add finish on end?
  01:50:263 (6,8) - these are not audible and feel overmapped, remove

• 00:11:680 (1) - feels more natural if you remove one arrow and add a circle instead (where the finish is)
  00:14:346 (4,5) - i don't like this stacking, kills the flow
  00:14:680 (1) - this curve feels unbalanced because of how the sliderpoints are set
  00:15:930 (2) - remove, this is overmapped
  00:17:346 (3,4) - don't like this stacking here
  00:26:680 (1,2,3,4) - why not make these have a consistent distance to each other? (right now, 2 and 3 are too far apart)
  00:30:680 (1,2,3,4) - surprising speedup, at least for me
  00:36:180 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I think you should arrange this part; the whistles sound nice but they don't feel fitting to what you mapped - I suggest putting jumps and putting the sliders on sliderstarts (maybe use long sliders?) [also, some overlaps like 00:40:013 (1,3) - are not very nice]
  ^currently, this part disturbs me in playing and I don't like that
  00:56:180 (5) - new combo because here the soundpattern repeats
  00:58:847 (5) - same
  00:59:847 (1) - remove new combo | maybe replace with a tripplet with a new combo on the finish?
  01:04:680 (3,4,5,6) - feels like jumps here, not a stack
  01:10:596 (5) - this is overmapped and doesn't play well, remove please
  01:15:346 (1,2,1,2) - outspaced 1/2 jumps or a square would feel good here
  01:46:013 (3) - new combo as in other diffs
  01:47:180 (2,3,4) - new combo each, you did that in hyper too

• 00:13:180 (4,1) - this was kinda hard to catch; suggesting to lower the spacing from 4 to 1 by redesigning this, example below
  
  
  example

  
  
  00:14:680 (1,2) - still don't like these stacks
  00:21:680 (5) - i don't like this slider, but that is me (edgy-straight-edgy :<)
  00:33:680 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - similar with the whistlepart in Another, can you please adjust the mapping to the hitsounds?
  00:44:013 (1) - add whistle on end?
  00:45:680 (3,5) - swap whistle (add on 3, delete on 5)
  00:46:346 (6) - add whistle
  00:47:013 (3) - add whistle
  00:47:347 (2,3) - remove whistles
  01:01:346 (1,2) - replace these with a circle and tripplet like you did on 01:00:013 (2,1,2,3) - to be more consistent; feels better aswell
  01:04:680 (3,4,5,6) - new combo each
  01:10:680 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part is very hard to play with that spacing; add jumps between 2-3, 5-6, 6-7, 8-1 etc.?
  01:25:346 (9) - new combo
  01:25:513 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - nice idea but i don't think people can sightread this?
  01:25:680 (3,3,3) - add finish each
  01:30:513 (1) - you can easily put a better slider with the new algorhythm, so do that please
  01:31:263 (3) - this is overmapped, remove please
  01:35:180 (2,3) - make these have the same distance to 1's slidertrack
  01:46:680 (1) - this does not make sense; a) remove finish on sliderend, b) why does this end on a 1/8 in the first place?
  01:46:846 (2,3,4,5) - new combo each
  01:53:346 (1) - new combo

Jenny wrote:

There you go, a mod of mine:

First off: Another should be > Insane because that's how it usually is handeled - alternatively, what about custom diff names? no
I'd find custom combo colours better than the defaults on here, what about something like this: Thanks!

• 

Combo1 : 169,128,200
Combo2 : 255,106,34
Combo3 : 120,0,240
Combo4 : 250,37,14
Combo5 : 0,122,181

Beginner:

• 00:21:680 (2,3,4) - picky: these don't build a straight line as intended, move 3 to 257|177 for better placing (you can shape 1 so that it blankets 3, btw)
  00:28:013 (1) - make this blanket 4,2 better? also, delete the reverse arrow, i think there should be a circle at 00:29:346 because that feels more intuitive with the soundpattern no
  01:13:346 (1,3) - make these blanket 2,4 better no
  01:27:346 (2) - it's hardly audible what this slider is starting on; I suggest removing it and making 1 a slider instead (like you did with 3, let the long slider start on the big white tick as that is where the strong beat is) fix
  01:32:680 (3) - hardly audible again (also, improve the blanket around 2 please) fix
  01:44:013 (2) - new combo fix
  01:45:346 (3) - replace this with 2 1/1 sliders with each a finish on their starts; also, new combo on both of them no
  01:46:846 (1,2) - i find these a bit hard for a newby to catch because the whole map is based on white ticks and then you have sliders on reds - they fit but they may be a bit hard? umm..keep

Normal:

• I'd rather call this advanced, judging by the star rating and difficulty settings, it's a tad hard for a normal but that's just naming
  
  00:12:346 (2) - this may be a bit hard to explain but the sound this slider starts on is a weaker one than where it ends, thus making this feel a bit unnatural; my suggestion is to replace it with a circle-slider combo to have the impact of the slider start on the strong beat fix
  00:15:346 (2,3,4) - picky suggestion: you could form an equal triangle with 2's end, 3 and 4's start fix
  00:19:846 (1) - i suggest putting this to 170|215 as it's a bit hard to notice when stacked on 2; also, you spaced the previous 1/2-combos out so this one will do better when spaced aswell, plus, it leads better into 2 this way fix
  00:33:013 (5) - this circle feels too close to the previous slider as you placed it further away from the original track in earlier examples (00:30:346 (5) - ); do the same here? fix
  00:43:346 (1,2) - I'd like normal whistles here no
  00:56:180 (3) - why does this slider have 1.46x spacing when the others are around 1.35-1.40x? adjust that please; it may be a minor thing but it bugs me nonetheless fix
  00:57:513 (1,2,3,4) - this combo looks so wide when compared to the blue one before because you don't build it as much as one unit as with the blue one; do that? (-> make this combo more similar to the blue one) no
  01:17:013 (2) - picky: this does not end exactly on where 5 was, fix pls? fix
  01:19:013 (1) - add a hitsound on the start, whistle maybe? fix
  01:20:680 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like you should have something to click on these big white ticks here, just letting sliders end on them feels a bit like wasted potential no
  01:44:013 (3) - new combo no
  01:50:013 (1) - why not use a 1/2-reverseslider? would suit the background beat more umm..I seem to be good at this

Another:

• 00:11:680 (1) - feels more natural if you remove one arrow and add a circle instead (where the finish is) no
  00:14:346 (4,5) - i don't like this stacking, kills the flow keep
  00:14:680 (1) - this curve feels unbalanced because of how the sliderpoints are set fix
  00:15:930 (2) - remove, this is overmapped delete
  00:17:346 (3,4) - don't like this stacking here keep
  00:26:680 (1,2,3,4) - why not make these have a consistent distance to each other? (right now, 2 and 3 are too far apart) fix
  00:30:680 (1,2,3,4) - surprising speedup, at least for me this is ok
  00:36:180 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I think you should arrange this part; the whistles sound nice but they don't feel fitting to what you mapped - I suggest putting jumps and putting the sliders on sliderstarts (maybe use long sliders?) [also, some overlaps like 00:40:013 (1,3) - are not very nice]
  ^currently, this part disturbs me in playing and I don't like that I like a lot of this part. fix only a portion of the overlaps
  00:56:180 (5) - new combo because here the soundpattern repeats no
  00:58:847 (5) - same no
  00:59:847 (1) - remove new combo | maybe replace with a tripplet with a new combo on the finish? no
  01:04:680 (3,4,5,6) - feels like jumps here, not a stack no
  01:10:596 (5) - this is overmapped and doesn't play well, remove please no
  01:15:346 (1,2,1,2) - outspaced 1/2 jumps or a square would feel good here no
  01:46:013 (3) - new combo as in other diffs no
  01:47:180 (2,3,4) - new combo each, you did that in hyper too no

Insane:

• 00:13:180 (4,1) - this was kinda hard to catch; suggesting to lower the spacing from 4 to 1 by redesigning this, example below fix
  
  
  example

  
  
  00:14:680 (1,2) - still don't like these stacks ?
  00:21:680 (5) - i don't like this slider, but that is me (edgy-straight-edgy :<) keep
  00:33:680 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - similar with the whistlepart in Another, can you please adjust the mapping to the hitsounds?
  00:44:013 (1) - add whistle on end? no
  00:45:680 (3,5) - swap whistle (add on 3, delete on 5) no
  00:46:346 (6) - add whistle no
  00:47:013 (3) - add whistle no
  00:47:347 (2,3) - remove whistles no
  01:01:346 (1,2) - replace these with a circle and tripplet like you did on 01:00:013 (2,1,2,3) - to be more consistent; feels better aswell no
  01:04:680 (3,4,5,6) - new combo each ok
  01:10:680 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part is very hard to play with that spacing; add jumps between 2-3, 5-6, 6-7, 8-1 etc.? no
  01:25:346 (9) - new combo no
  01:25:513 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - nice idea but i don't think people can sightread this? ok
  01:25:680 (3,3,3) - add finish each fix
  01:30:513 (1) - you can easily put a better slider with the new algorhythm, so do that please ok
  01:31:263 (3) - this is overmapped, remove please no
  01:35:180 (2,3) - make these have the same distance to 1's slidertrack fix
  01:46:680 (1) - this does not make sense; a) remove finish on sliderend, b) why does this end on a 1/8 in the first place? fix
  01:46:846 (2,3,4,5) - new combo each no
  01:53:346 (1) - new combo fix

Jenny wrote:

There you go, a mod of mine:

First off: Another should be > Insane because that's how it usually is handeled - alternatively, what about custom diff names?
I'd find custom combo colours better than the defaults on here, what about something like this:

• 

Combo1 : 169,128,200
Combo2 : 255,106,34
Combo3 : 120,0,240
Combo4 : 250,37,14
Combo5 : 0,122,181

Hyper:

• 00:06:763 (1) - I'd start this spinner at 00:08:013 to keep the hit-pause-hit-pause effect; also, the effect I feel this spinner is on starts around there Alright, did it
  00:11:596 - what is this little 5% section for? Deleted
  00:18:513 (1,2,3) - these sliders don't feel good to me; the strong beats lie on the ends of them which makes them feel awkward to hit - replace these with something so you hit on the white ticks
  00:23:846 (1,2,3) - same
  00:26:180 (1,2,3) - same
  They are alright imo...
  00:28:346 (2,3,4) - this is better
  00:29:346 (1,2) - these sliderbows feel odd Errr...not really?
  00:31:346 (1) - there should be some sort of jump here; stacking it feels bad with the new pattern starting as 1 lies on an outstanding beat 2,3,4 also stack on the same pattern so I would like to keep this one...
  00:33:846 (1,2) - redtick stuff again, arrange it so you have to click on the white beats
  00:36:180 (1,2) - same
  00:38:846 (1,2) - same
  Sorry but they acutally play well...
  00:41:347 (1,2,3,4,5) - it's hard to notice this shape when playing with video, just pointing that out
  00:42:180 (6,7) - redtick stuff again
  01:15:847 (5) - feels better when you put it on 3's start Sure
  01:15:596 - this green line makes no sense, remove it
  01:15:638 - same
  01:15:763 - same
  01:15:805 - same
  Removed
  01:18:513 (6,7) - feels better if you delete 7 (overmapped) and put a jump on 6,1 Deleted 7
  01:22:680 (1,2) - this stacking kills the movement, does not feel nice Changed
  01:25:513 (1,1,1) - add finish on end? No need to add so
  01:46:013 (3) - new combo; CTRL-G maybe to distinguish them more from 1,2?
  01:46:346 (4) - if you go with CTRL-G on 3, do it here too
  Sure
  01:46:846 (1,1,1) - add finish on end? nope
  01:50:263 (6,8) - these are not audible and feel overmapped, remove This one isn't overmapped ;___; It follows the music

Jenny wrote:

Taiko Muzukashii:

[list]The soft sample is hardly audible in gameplay, use normal for anything but the very low volume parts - so for everything but the start.
I will provide suggestions for that.
This diff has so many dons @_@

00:06:346 (1) - there's no reason for a finish here fixed
00:11:846 - use 60% normal hitsample from here fixed
00:22:680 - use 75% normal hitsample from here fixed
00:30:346 (1) - no reason for a finish note fixed
00:44:346 (1) - i don't find this spinner very fitting, remove it fixed
00:45:346 (1) - add k fixed
00:46:680 (1) - add d fixed(k)
00:48:013 (1) - add k fixed(d d d)
01:00:013 (1,1) - similar, the consistent drumming doesn't fit; just replace them with Ks fixed
01:02:680 (1,2) - Ks sound better here fixed
01:04:013 (1,2) - make these ks not chenged
01:04:846 (4,6) - making these Ks will give you more variation in the hitpattern and sounds better to me, though it may be a bit hard?fixed(dkdkD)
01:05:346 - use 90% normal hitsample from here fixed
01:23:346 (4) - make this a k fixed
01:24:013 (1) - replace with ddddk not chenged
01:24:680 - add another ddddk pattern here not chenged
01:26:680 - use 75% normal hitsample from here fixed
01:42:680 (19) - make this k fixed
01:45:346 (8,9) - replace with ddd k each not chenged
01:50:680 (1) - use 40% normal hitsample for this one fixed
01:53:346 (1) - use 75% normal hitsample for this one fixed


Thank you modding !!

Pokie wrote:

Let's have a recheck, no kudosu for this post

　Easy

• 01:32:680 (3) - Shape a better blanket along the line of approach circle? fix
  
  SPOILER

  

　Insane

• 01:23:013 (1) - ここちょっと心配してます・・ http://puu.sh/241YE まぁ多分大丈夫なんだろう（震え声 少し向きを変えました！

( ﾉ・ω・)ﾉ 終わったら呼んでね！

Pokie wrote:

Let's have a recheck, no kudosu for this post

　Hyper

• 00:17:680 (2) - How could I missed this one... Invisible slider reverse which is unrankable. Oops, fixed
  00:31:180 (4,1) - Personally I'd like to move (1) to this position, just a suggestion here. Nice, applied
  
  SPOILER

  
  
  
  00:54:346 - It seems like I could heard only hithats from music, is it intentional for leaving a slidertick sound here? Alright, removed
  00:55:847 (3,1) - Swap these new combos? Like you did at 00:56:513 (2,3,4) - , 00:57:513 (1,2,3) - fixed
  01:33:513 - Mute this slidertick. I would like to keep this one as it sounds good ;__;

( ﾉ・ω・)ﾉ 終わったら呼んでね！

1. Timing: Offset seems early. Try offset 1358 (+11).

1. Use default normal hitsounds.
2. OD5 is the best setting for muzukashii.
3. What I didn't like: there is no beat structure, to me this diff seems very unintuitive. You should probably re-think the usage of kats and triple 1/2 rhythms. Also there are no 1/4 patterns anywhere, you could have made a few simple ones where they fit.
   I can't really give you many recommendations because that would be me mapping instead, but I will try to improve this map as much as I can using your style.
4. You really shouldn't use storyboarded hitsounds here. Remove them please.
5. 00:06:680 (2) - This should be D in my opinion, not k. Simply because you start the map with a D.
6. 00:13:346 (2,3,4) - This doesn't make much sense to me, it seems really random. I would suggest to remove the note 3 and make 4 into a kat for at least some sort of a more common pattern.
7. 00:15:346 (1,2,1) - If you change the above, try d k d here instead, it would create variety and make a change before the next rhythm change occurs (the 5 notes that come right after).
8. 00:17:180 - There is a very strong beat in the music here and you didn't map it.
9. 00:20:013 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This buildup makes the the upcoming k d k d ... pattern very bland. You should change this. My suggestion would be http://puu.sh/2bXN6/a103949dc4. Here you keep the rhythm with the kats, and the missing note before the k d k d ... pattern makes it stand out better.
10. 00:23:013 (2) - This should probably be a k. Better rhythm and follows the music better.
11. 00:24:013 (1,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3) - This doesn't really follow anything and the rhythm is very unintuitive. Try d k d d d x k x. x means there is no note. http://puu.sh/2bXR8/dc8293b5a5
12. 00:26:680 (1,2,3,4,5,1,1) - Similarly, this makes no sense. There is no such rhythm in neither the beats or the melody, and your own rhythm does not fit here. Try removing the note at 00:27:513, mapping the beat at 00:27:846 and think of a better kat pattern in the whole section, preferably that fits the music.
13. 00:33:680 (6,1,2,1) - k dkd is better in my opinion, simply because the first note has the high pitch melody.
14. 00:43:180 (1) - Consider removing this. It makes the 5 beats stand out better. That's good.
15. 01:15:180 (2) - Try removing this, it makes the 5 next beats stand out much better.
16. 01:42:680 (1) - This should be a finish. There is a very strong cymbal crash here.
17. 01:44:013 (1) - ^

1. Use 1.40 SV. 1.60 on 180BPM isn't good.
2. Use tickrate 1.
3. There shouldn't be any breaks. If you aren't mapping some parts, the breaks should be manually removed.
4. 00:04:013 - There is a bell sound in the background. I would recommend to map a kat here.
5. 00:09:346 - ^
6. 00:19:680 (1) - Having a don here breaks the consistency. I would recommend a kat here. If you change this, I would recommend a don on 00:20:013 (1) then, just so there is more variety.
7. 00:45:346 - I usually don't like when short maps have very long break periods, so I would recommend a kat here. Also I would recommend you use 60~70% volume here. All the way until the kiai.
8. 00:46:680 - ^
9. 00:48:013 - ^
10. 01:04:180 (1) + 01:04:513 (1) - I would recommend to remove these. Currently there are so many kats that it makes the rhythm seem like the offbeats are actually main beats and it could be hard to track. If you remove these, the finishers around these would have a much better impact along with the next dons just before the kiai, because the rhythm becomes clear. If I would have to describe if how I feel it, it's that I really want to bash dons here instead of kats hehe.

lolcubes wrote:

[Muzukashii]

1. Use default normal hitsounds.fixed
2. OD5 is the best setting for muzukashii.fixed
3. What I didn't like: there is no beat structure, to me this diff seems very unintuitive. You should probably re-think the usage of kats and triple 1/2 rhythms. Also there are no 1/4 patterns anywhere, you could have made a few simple ones where they fit.
   I can't really give you many recommendations because that would be me mapping instead, but I will try to improve this map as much as I can using your style.
4. You really shouldn't use storyboarded hitsounds here. Remove them please.fixed
5. 00:06:680 (2) - This should be D in my opinion, not k. Simply because you start the map with a D.fixed
6. 00:13:346 (2,3,4) - This doesn't make much sense to me, it seems really random. I would suggest to remove the note 3 and make 4 into a kat for at least some sort of a more common pattern.fixed　　Sorry , If I could not understand ,my English is poor
7. 00:15:346 (1,2,1) - If you change the above, try d k d here instead, it would create variety and make a change before the next rhythm change occurs (the 5 notes that come right after).fixed
8. 00:17:180 - There is a very strong beat in the music here and you didn't map it.fixed
9. 00:20:013 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This buildup makes the the upcoming k d k d ... pattern very bland. You should change this. My suggestion would be http://puu.sh/2bXN6/a103949dc4. Here you keep the rhythm with the kats, and the missing note before the k d k d ... pattern makes it stand out better.fixed
10. 00:23:013 (2) - This should probably be a k. Better rhythm and follows the music better.fixed
11. 00:24:013 (1,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3) - This doesn't really follow anything and the rhythm is very unintuitive. Try d k d d d x k x. x means there is no note. http://puu.sh/2bXR8/dc8293b5a5fixed
12. 00:26:680 (1,2,3,4,5,1,1) - Similarly, this makes no sense. There is no such rhythm in neither the beats or the melody, and your own rhythm does not fit here. Try removing the note at 00:27:513, mapping the beat at 00:27:846 and think of a better kat pattern in the whole section, preferably that fits the music.not chenged
13. 00:33:680 (6,1,2,1) - k dkd is better in my opinion, simply because the first note has the high pitch melody.fixed
14. 00:43:180 (1) - Consider removing this. It makes the 5 beats stand out better. That's good.fixed
15. 01:15:180 (2) - Try removing this, it makes the 5 next beats stand out much better.fixed
16. 01:42:680 (1) - This should be a finish. There is a very strong cymbal crash here.not chenged　　Is it not a little difficult?
17. 01:44:013 (1) - ^not chenged　　^

thanks modding ~

http://puu.sh/2czAJ

1. Sampleset N:C1 -> N (default)
2. 00:22:013 (1,1,2,1,1) - d d K - D?
3. 01:21:346 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 後のkdddkdddにつなげるためkdd kddにしてもいいと思います
4. 01:28:680 (1,2,1,1,2) - 後の01:34:013 (2,3,4,1) - とパターンを統一させてください。こちらも01:34:013 (2,3,4,1) - と同じように3/4のパターンで作ったほうがいいです
5. 01:50:680 - このスピンの緑線は消して音量70%のままがいいです。最後の01:53:346 (1) - に向かってむしろ盛り上がるというかみなぎってくる場所のはずなので、ここで音量を落としてソフトな感じにするのはあまりいい感じには聞こえませんでした

1. 00:19:513 - k?
2. 00:33:013 (2,3) - ここの前後に長い1/2や1/4のパターンがきているので、前者にfinishつけて後者を消して、少し余裕を持たせるといいかもしれません

1. 00:27:846 (3) - k
2. 00:33:013 (3) - ^
3. 00:43:680 (3) - ^
4. 00:54:346 - move this slider's end to this point
5. 00:54:680 - add D
6. 01:00:013 (2) - add finish
7. 01:01:346 (1) - ^
8. 01:15:680 (3) - k
9. 01:28:680 (1) - ^
10. 01:29:180 (1) - ^
11. 01:42:680 (1) - add finish
12. 01:44:013 (1) - ^

1. 01:42:691 (1) - add finish
2. 01:44:024 (1) - ^
3. 01:18:857 (2,1,1,2,1,1,1) - add finish

ReySHeL wrote:

[Taiko Muzukashii]

1. 00:27:846 (3) - k not chenged
2. 00:33:013 (3) - ^ not chenged
3. 00:43:680 (3) - ^ not chenged
4. 00:54:346 - move this slider's end to this point fixed
5. 00:54:680 - add D fixed
6. 01:00:013 (2) - add finish fixed
7. 01:01:346 (1) - ^ fixed
8. 01:15:680 (3) - k not chenged
9. 01:28:680 (1) - ^ fixed
10. 01:29:180 (1) - ^ fixed
11. 01:42:680 (1) - add finish fixed
12. 01:44:013 (1) - ^ fixed

Naryuga wrote:

Glad if u also reply to my post, thanks 'o')

Chocopikel wrote:

rankedあるであるでないであるであるであるで

Naryuga wrote:

[Muzu]

1. Sampleset N:C1 -> N (default) fixed
2. 00:22:013 (1,1,2,1,1) - d d K - D? not changed
3. 01:21:346 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 後のkdddkdddにつなげるためkdd kddにしてもいいと思います fixed
4. 01:28:680 (1,2,1,1,2) - 後の01:34:013 (2,3,4,1) - とパターンを統一させてください。こちらも01:34:013 (2,3,4,1) - と同じように3/4のパターンで作ったほうがいいです fixed
5. 01:50:680 - このスピンの緑線は消して音量70%のままがいいです。最後の01:53:346 (1) - に向かってむしろ盛り上がるというかみなぎってくる場所のはずなので、ここで音量を落としてソフトな感じにするのはあまりいい感じには聞こえませんでしたfixed