(This modding just feels like a note(?), so don't need to kudosu.)
Sorry for posting this late.
This mp3 file is 128kbps/16khz.
Spek
If you find a better quality mp3 (or ogg) than the one you are currently using, it is recommended to change the mp3 under this guideline.
<...have an average bit rate no lower than 128 kbps, if such a source exists. Otherwise, use the highest quality available.>
+++ Also i suggest add tags in "ランプオブシュガー".
this is game company's name in jp.
General
I suggest adding a whistle to the triple (for example in last diff, like 00:15:514 (1,2) - 00:48:428 (1,2) - 01:25:457 (1,2) - etc) to give feedback to the player.
All diff (Exclude normal), 00:22:542 - 00:32:142 - I think, sould nerf the SV of this section to 0.8.
The intensity of the music is similar to 00:41:742 - ~ 00:47:228 - this section, also you use sv0.9 in 00:32:142 - for emphasis, but It's just not working right now.
I think if you fix this, it would fit in better with the music.
Normal
Please check the parts where some DS incorrect.
A different DS is being used for no particular reason.
00:11:228 (2,3) - 00:16:028 (5) - 00:21:514 (6) - 00:30:428 (6) - etc.
Nothing is abnormally wide, but it's good to stick to the guidelines.
I think the rhythm choice needs to be adjusted overall the map.
00:22:542 - ~ 00:33:514 -
same reason to sparkling diff.
You should definitely follow the vocal or drum throughout this section
00:23:571 (4) - The red tick is empty except for this slider.
00:33:514 - ~ 00:41:742 -
00:33:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The rhythm gets a little density here, but again 00:36:257 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - rhythm density is weakened, it's same to 00:26:657 (5,6,7) - etc.
It's not unlike a calm 00:22:542 - ~ 00:33:514 - this part.
There is a distinct difference in the music, so the rhythm should also be change.
00:41:742 - ~ 00:51:685 -
00:41:742 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - flow drum, but 00:45:857 (3,4,5,6) - focus change to the vocal suddenly.
00:47:228 (1,2) - flow drum > 00:48:600 (3,4,5) - flow vocal.
also, 00:49:285 - strong drums are present but ignored.
In kiai, 00:52:714 - ~ 01:14:657 -
00:54:085 (4,5,6) - 00:56:828 (4,5,6) - etc.
These rhythms are the same rhythms used in the calm section(like 00:22:542 - ~ 00:33:514 -), so they don't emphasize that they are kiai section.
Also, 00:58:200 (1,2,3,4) - 01:09:171 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - These rhythms are easily felt in contrast to the other sections.
For this reason, i think it needs to be fix overall.
00:01:971 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Avoid slider-only sections.
I suggest change some slider to circle.
00:11:571 (3) - NC is necessary because the music changes.
Also 00:10:200 (1) - for consistency, you can dissolve the NC.
00:20:314 (2) - This circle works in silence, so it's better to delete this.
Hard
I think it would be nice to increase the frequency of circles in kiai.
Example, 00:53:742 (5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - In a long time, circle was only used 2 time.
it's not much different from 00:12:257 - or 01:17:400 - in terms of rhythmic density.
It only feels like the spacing(DS) is slightly wider.
I would suggest increasing the rhythm density a bit more.
Exsample 00:55:457 (1) - like this.
00:41:742 - ~ 00:49:971 - The spacing(DS) in this section should be lower overall.
Because the slider slowed down, and compared to 00:22:542 - ~ 00:32:142 - here, the intensity of the music is similar.
But the spacing feels similar to 00:15:171 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 01:16:885 (3,4,1,2,3) - something like that.
It's good to make some adjustments.
I think, the NCing feels relatively inconsistent.
00:12:257 (1) - 00:59:571 (1) - 01:05:057 (1) - 01:07:800 (1) - 01:27:000 (1) - They can remove the NC.
01:06:428 (4) - fixing the timeline above, need NC here.
01:14:657 (4) - Since SV changes, so can give NC here.
00:22:542 - ~ 00:32:142 - I suggest adjustment to this section for same reason to sparkling
00:23:742 - 00:25:114 - etc, You leave it blank and 00:27:685 (6) - 00:30:428 (7) - 00:31:800 (3) - suddenly use the 1/2 slider.
00:28:542 (2,3,4) - Suddenly, the rhythm changes to 1/2 slider - circle - circle.
Also, 00:22:542 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - etc, for the same reason, it's a good to change the rhythm.
It would be great if you could make some adjustments.
00:34:714 - In this whole section, I think it's awkward to just empty it here.
also this section following the vocal, so 00:34:028 (2,3,4) - this rhythm should change to something like 00:36:257 (1,2,3,4) - here.
Insane
In my opinion, contrast is not good overall the map.
Musically the same 00:11:571 - 00:22:542 - vs 01:17:400 - ~ 01:28:371 -.
00:19:457 (6,1) - vs 01:22:542 (7,1) -
00:14:314 (1,2,3) - vs 01:20:142 (1,2,3) -
00:21:685 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 01:27:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
00:33:514 - ~ 00:41:400 - this section, overall the spacing is too wide.
example, 00:36:257 (1,2,3,4) - 00:37:628 (1,2,3,4) - 00:39:000 (1,2,3,4) - 00:40:714 (2,3,4,5) - etc, These are more difficult, even compared to kiai.
There are other sections where the music is stronger than here, but this feels like the widest spacing.
Also, kiai doesn't seem to be emphasized enough.
In my opinion, 00:55:971 (2,3,4,5) - 00:56:828 (1,2) - 01:00:085 (2,3,4) - 01:05:057 (1,2,3,4,5) - etc, the kiai is less spacing than other sections.
I suggest recommend adjusting the map as a whole.
00:00:600 (1,2) - vs 00:01:971 (3,4) - The spacing of 1/1 and 1/2 is similar, so It's easy to get confused.
i recommend 1/2 like 00:02:485 (4) - 00:05:228 (4) - narrow the spacing like this
00:07:114 (2,3) - i think this is too far than 00:04:371 (2,3) -.
ctrl + g 00:07:457 (3) - this slider, and 00:08:142 (4) - adjusting the position of this circle (or 00:08:485 (5) - including this one) would make this fit better as this section.
00:40:885 (3,4,5) - circle 3, 4, sliderhead are missing hs.
00:43:114 (3,4,5) - I think, rhythm don't follows music well.
Because 00:43:800 - Strong drums are ignored, but 00:44:142 - This is represented by a circle.
How about change rhythm like this?
00:51:342 (5,6,7) - I think they're to strong, so it could be a little more emphasis like 01:14:142 (1,2,3) -.
01:06:428 (1,1) - i think it's inconsistent use of NC.
01:06:942 (1) - remove nc here, and nc 01:07:800 (5) - here.
01:16:714 (1) - i think this circle feels unnecessary.
cuz piano sound is weak, and you mostly following the drum.
(+ also left it blank for the other difficulties.)
Sparkling
In my opinion, the music is the same, but the contrast is not good at 00:11:571 - ~ 00:22:542 - vs 01:17:400 - ~ 01:28:371 -.
00:15:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - vs 01:21:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
00:16:885 (9,1) - vs 01:22:542 (8,1) -
00:21:171 (1,2,3,4,5) - vs 01:27:000 (1,2,3,4,5) -
Etc, they're all musically the same, but spacing and expressive difference, so it feels completely different.
I think it would be good to adjust them for consistency.
00:22:542 - ~ 00:32:142 - the rhythm density is too low, and rhythm choice is feels awkward.
00:22:542 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i think this rhythm is not following the vocal/drums very well.
cuz 00:23:742 - here have drum, 00:23:400 - vocal and drum are present, but they are not clickable, so they are not emphasized.
00:23:742 - 00:25:114 - 00:26:485 - etc, keep blank red tick, but 00:27:857 (1) - 00:30:600 (1) - suddenly using circle.
00:28:885 (5) - Only here used a 1/1 slider.
I think it would be better to follow a vocal or drum with certainty.ex
00:33:000 (5,1) - I think the spacing could be wider.
Because song is strong, so it's good to emphasize it as much as these guys 00:32:142 (1,2,3,4,5) -.
00:39:000 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - rhythm suddenly following a drum, so i think it's awkward.
It would be nice to focus on the vocal like 00:33:514 - ~ 00:38:828 - this section.
ex
01:10:542 (1) - How about use this 3/4 as 01:10:200 (4) - here?
01:10:800 - the breaks the vocal, but 01:10:457 - here doesn't break the vocal, so i think it's a better fit.
Continue modding from 2097817#4090315
General
Hard
00:01:036 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1) - In my opinion, rhythm density is high.
In terms of rhythm density, it's pretty much the same as 00:34:765 - ~ 00:43:684 -.
In my opinion, you should use 1/2 less often like this..
01:27:954 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - the flow continues clockwise.
That can feel monotonous to the player.
i suggest chang the flow at the start of a section (01:31:846 - 01:37:035 -) makes it feel less monotonous.
NC setting is not consistent.
00:16:279 (1,1,1) - 01:31:522 (1,1,1) - I don't think there's any reason to add NC.
00:19:198 (5) - 00:32:171 (3) - 00:38:495 (4) - 00:42:549 (5) - 00:56:657 (5) - 01:14:819 (5) - 01:22:765 (6) - 01:24:063 (4) - you must do NC.
01:23:252 (1) - you need to dissolve the NC.
00:07:522 (1,2,3,4,5) - It feels awkward because 00:07:846 - transition from on beat to off beat.
How about fixing it this way? ex
00:23:738 (1,2,3,4) - 01:38:981 (1,2,3,4) - The music is the same, so the expression should be the same.
And I think it should be more impact.
How about change pattern like this for emphasis.
00:28:765 (1,2,3) - this doesn't fit with vocal so feels too awkward.
how about fix this for vocal like this?
00:34:117 (1,2,3) - It would be nice to have more spacing, because music is strong than 00:32:981 (5,6) - etc.
00:38:333 (3,4) - 00:43:522 (7,1) - etc.
Finish is strong but it's stacked, it's not emphasized. so you should make spacing like 01:23:900 (5,1) - just like you did with the other finishes.
00:53:576 (3,4,5,1) - In my opinion, 00:53:738 (4,5) - rather than stack here, 00:53:576 (3,4) - It looks better expressively to do it here, 00:53:900 - Because the vocals are more emphasis.
00:57:306 (7,8,9) - I think it would be more fit better for the slider to start on a white tick, so rhythm should change like this or something.
Similar reasons, 01:07:684 (3) - change this like screenshot.
00:58:927 (4,1) - The spacing is too narrow compared to other places. fix here like this 01:09:306 (4,1) - the emphasis on drum.
01:00:711 (1,2) - 01:11:090 (1,2) - i think it's feels so random, you didn't use 3/4 overall and It's not even musically special.
So i think, need to fix rhythm like thisor something.
01:15:630 (1,2,3,1) - how about disable stack 01:15:630 (1,2) - this for emphasis?
like 00:34:117 (1,2,3) -.
Also you can use jump here same reason.
Kuru's Normal
In some sections, the flow doesn't change.
00:34:117 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - only flow clockwise for about 10 seconds.
00:54:063 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
It only flows counterclockwise for about 15 seconds.
That can feel monotonous to the player.
Change the flow sometime, so it doesn't feel monotonous to the player.
Don't keep the same flow too long.
00:20:333 (1) - remove nc or 00:15:144 (4) - add nc for consistant.
01:30:387 (4) - 01:35:576 (1) - same issue.
00:26:008 (5) - 00:36:387 (4) - it's feels awkward cuz vocal break here 00:26:333 -.
Also 00:38:495 (4) - same reason, I think this should be fix.
I suggest changing the rhythm.
00:26:008 (5) - 00:36:387 (4) - 00:38:495 (4) -
01:20:171 (4,5) - vocal are 3/4, so it's feel too awkward, use 3/4 reverse slider like 01:25:360 (1) - just as you followed the vocal.
01:39:468 (5) - In my opinion, NC is necessary.
Drum doesn't end at the white tick, this means bar is not yet finished.
00:01:036 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1) - In my opinion, rhythm density is high.
In terms of rhythm density, it's pretty much the same as 00:34:765 - ~ 00:43:684 -.
In my opinion, you should use 1/2 less often like this..
01:27:954 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - the flow continues clockwise.
That can feel monotonous to the player.
i suggest chang the flow at the start of a section (01:31:846 - 01:37:035 -) makes it feel less monotonous.
NC setting is not consistent.
00:16:279 (1,1,1) - 01:31:522 (1,1,1) - I don't think there's any reason to add NC.
00:19:198 (5) - 00:32:171 (3) - 00:38:495 (4) - 00:42:549 (5) - 00:56:657 (5) - 01:14:819 (5) - 01:22:765 (6) - 01:24:063 (4) - you must do NC.
01:23:252 (1) - you need to dissolve the NC.
00:07:522 (1,2,3,4,5) - It feels awkward because 00:07:846 - transition from on beat to off beat.
How about fixing it this way? ex
00:23:738 (1,2,3,4) - 01:38:981 (1,2,3,4) - The music is the same, so the expression should be the same.
And I think it should be more impact.
How about change pattern like this for emphasis.
00:28:765 (1,2,3) - this doesn't fit with vocal so feels too awkward.
how about fix this for vocal like this?
00:34:117 (1,2,3) - It would be nice to have more spacing, because music is strong than 00:32:981 (5,6) - etc.
00:38:333 (3,4) - 00:43:522 (7,1) - etc.
Finish is strong but it's stacked, it's not emphasized. so you should make spacing like 01:23:900 (5,1) - just like you did with the other finishes.
00:53:576 (3,4,5,1) - In my opinion, 00:53:738 (4,5) - rather than stack here, 00:53:576 (3,4) - It looks better expressively to do it here, 00:53:900 - Because the vocals are more emphasis.
00:57:306 (7,8,9) - I think it would be more fit better for the slider to start on a white tick, so rhythm should change like this or something.
Similar reasons, 01:07:684 (3) - change this like screenshot.
00:58:927 (4,1) - The spacing is too narrow compared to other places. fix here like this 01:09:306 (4,1) - the emphasis on drum.
01:00:711 (1,2) - 01:11:090 (1,2) - i think it's feels so random, you didn't use 3/4 overall and It's not even musically special.
So i think, need to fix rhythm like thisor something.
01:15:630 (1,2,3,1) - how about disable stack 01:15:630 (1,2) - this for emphasis?
like 00:34:117 (1,2,3) -.
Also you can use jump here same reason.
In some sections, the flow doesn't change.
00:34:117 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - only flow clockwise for about 10 seconds.
00:54:063 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
It only flows counterclockwise for about 15 seconds.
That can feel monotonous to the player.
Change the flow sometime, so it doesn't feel monotonous to the player.
Don't keep the same flow too long.
00:20:333 (1) - remove nc or 00:15:144 (4) - add nc for consistant.
01:30:387 (4) - 01:35:576 (1) - same issue.
00:26:008 (5) - 00:36:387 (4) - it's feels awkward cuz vocal break here 00:26:333 -.
Also 00:38:495 (4) - same reason, I think this should be fix.
I suggest changing the rhythm.
00:26:008 (5) - 00:36:387 (4) - 00:38:495 (4) -
01:20:171 (4,5) - vocal are 3/4, so it's feel too awkward, use 3/4 reverse slider like 01:25:360 (1) - just as you followed the vocal.
01:39:468 (5) - In my opinion, NC is necessary.
Drum doesn't end at the white tick, this means bar is not yet finished.
I suggest adding a whistle to the triple (for example in last diff, like 00:15:514 (1,2) - 00:48:428 (1,2) - 01:25:457 (1,2) - etc) to give feedback to the player.
I suggest replace to "pop rock" with "jrock j-rock jpop j-pop" in the tags.
and you can also add a "female vocal vocalist".
All diff (Exclude normal), 00:22:542 - 00:32:142 - I think, sould nerf the SV of this section to 0.8.
The intensity of the music is similar to 00:41:742 - ~ 00:47:228 - this section, also you use sv0.9 in 00:32:142 - for emphasis, but It's just not working right now.
I think if you fix this, it would fit in better with the music.
Please check the parts where some DS incorrect.
A different DS is being used for no particular reason.
00:11:228 (2,3) - 00:16:028 (5) - 00:21:514 (6) - 00:30:428 (6) - etc.
Nothing is abnormally wide, but it's good to stick to the guidelines.
I think the rhythm choice needs to be adjusted overall the map.
00:22:542 - ~ 00:33:514 -
same reason to sparkling diff.
You should definitely follow the vocal or drum throughout this section
00:23:571 (4) - The red tick is empty except for this slider.
00:33:514 - ~ 00:41:742 -
00:33:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The rhythm gets a little density here, but again 00:36:257 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - rhythm density is weakened, it's same to 00:26:657 (5,6,7) - etc.
It's not unlike a calm 00:22:542 - ~ 00:33:514 - this part.
There is a distinct difference in the music, so the rhythm should also be change.
00:41:742 - ~ 00:51:685 -
00:41:742 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - flow drum, but 00:45:857 (3,4,5,6) - focus change to the vocal suddenly.
00:47:228 (1,2) - flow drum > 00:48:600 (3,4,5) - flow vocal.
also, 00:49:285 - strong drums are present but ignored.
In kiai, 00:52:714 - ~ 01:14:657 -
00:54:085 (4,5,6) - 00:56:828 (4,5,6) - etc.
These rhythms are the same rhythms used in the calm section(like 00:22:542 - ~ 00:33:514 -), so they don't emphasize that they are kiai section.
Also, 00:58:200 (1,2,3,4) - 01:09:171 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - These rhythms are easily felt in contrast to the other sections.
For this reason, i think it needs to be fix overall.
00:01:971 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Avoid slider-only sections.
I suggest change some slider to circle.
00:11:571 (3) - NC is necessary because the music changes.
Also 00:10:200 (1) - for consistency, you can dissolve the NC.
00:20:314 (2) - This circle works in silence, so it's better to delete this.
I think it would be nice to increase the frequency of circles in kiai.
Example, 00:53:742 (5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - In a long time, circle was only used 2 time.
it's not much different from 00:12:257 - or 01:17:400 - in terms of rhythmic density.
It only feels like the spacing(DS) is slightly wider.
I would suggest increasing the rhythm density a bit more.
Exsample 00:55:457 (1) - like this.
00:41:742 - ~ 00:49:971 - The spacing(DS) in this section should be lower overall.
Because the slider slowed down, and compared to 00:22:542 - ~ 00:32:142 - here, the intensity of the music is similar.
But the spacing feels similar to 00:15:171 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 01:16:885 (3,4,1,2,3) - something like that.
It's good to make some adjustments.
I think, the NCing feels relatively inconsistent.
00:12:257 (1) - 00:59:571 (1) - 01:05:057 (1) - 01:07:800 (1) - 01:27:000 (1) - They can remove the NC.
01:06:428 (4) - fixing the timeline above, need NC here.
01:14:657 (4) - Since SV changes, so can give NC here.
00:22:542 - ~ 00:32:142 - I suggest adjustment to this section for same reason to sparkling
00:23:742 - 00:25:114 - etc, You leave it blank and 00:27:685 (6) - 00:30:428 (7) - 00:31:800 (3) - suddenly use the 1/2 slider.
00:28:542 (2,3,4) - Suddenly, the rhythm changes to 1/2 slider - circle - circle.
Also, 00:22:542 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - etc, for the same reason, it's a good to change the rhythm.
It would be great if you could make some adjustments.
00:34:714 - In this whole section, I think it's awkward to just empty it here.
also this section following the vocal, so 00:34:028 (2,3,4) - this rhythm should change to something like 00:36:257 (1,2,3,4) - here.
In my opinion, contrast is not good overall the map.
Musically the same 00:11:571 - 00:22:542 - vs 01:17:400 - ~ 01:28:371 -.
00:19:457 (6,1) - vs 01:22:542 (7,1) -
00:14:314 (1,2,3) - vs 01:20:142 (1,2,3) -
00:21:685 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 01:27:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
00:33:514 - ~ 00:41:400 - this section, overall the spacing is too wide.
example, 00:36:257 (1,2,3,4) - 00:37:628 (1,2,3,4) - 00:39:000 (1,2,3,4) - 00:40:714 (2,3,4,5) - etc, These are more difficult, even compared to kiai.
There are other sections where the music is stronger than here, but this feels like the widest spacing.
Also, kiai doesn't seem to be emphasized enough.
In my opinion, 00:55:971 (2,3,4,5) - 00:56:828 (1,2) - 01:00:085 (2,3,4) - 01:05:057 (1,2,3,4,5) - etc, the kiai is less spacing than other sections.
I suggest recommend adjusting the map as a whole.
00:00:600 (1,2) - vs 00:01:971 (3,4) - The spacing of 1/1 and 1/2 is similar, so It's easy to get confused.
i recommend 1/2 like 00:02:485 (4) - 00:05:228 (4) - narrow the spacing like this
00:07:114 (2,3) - i think this is too far than 00:04:371 (2,3) -.
ctrl + g 00:07:457 (3) - this slider, and 00:08:142 (4) - adjusting the position of this circle (or 00:08:485 (5) - including this one) would make this fit better as this section.
00:40:885 (3,4,5) - circle 3, 4, sliderhead are missing hs.
00:43:114 (3,4,5) - I think, rhythm don't follows music well.
Because 00:43:800 - Strong drums are ignored, but 00:44:142 - This is represented by a circle.
How about change rhythm like this?
00:51:342 (5,6,7) - I think they're to strong, so it could be a little more emphasis like 01:14:142 (1,2,3) -.
01:06:428 (1,1) - i think it's inconsistent use of NC.
01:06:942 (1) - remove nc here, and nc 01:07:800 (5) - here.
01:16:714 (1) - i think this circle feels unnecessary.
cuz piano sound is weak, and you mostly following the drum.
(+ also left it blank for the other difficulties.)
In my opinion, the music is the same, but the contrast is not good at 00:11:571 - ~ 00:22:542 - vs 01:17:400 - ~ 01:28:371 -.
00:15:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - vs 01:21:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
00:16:885 (9,1) - vs 01:22:542 (8,1) -
00:21:171 (1,2,3,4,5) - vs 01:27:000 (1,2,3,4,5) -
Etc, they're all musically the same, but spacing and expressive difference, so it feels completely different.
I think it would be good to adjust them for consistency.
00:22:542 - ~ 00:32:142 - the rhythm density is too low, and rhythm choice is feels awkward.
00:22:542 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i think this rhythm is not following the vocal/drums very well.
cuz 00:23:742 - here have drum, 00:23:400 - vocal and drum are present, but they are not clickable, so they are not emphasized.
00:23:742 - 00:25:114 - 00:26:485 - etc, keep blank red tick, but 00:27:857 (1) - 00:30:600 (1) - suddenly using circle.
00:28:885 (5) - Only here used a 1/1 slider.
I think it would be better to follow a vocal or drum with certainty.ex
00:33:000 (5,1) - I think the spacing could be wider.
Because song is strong, so it's good to emphasize it as much as these guys 00:32:142 (1,2,3,4,5) -.
00:39:000 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - rhythm suddenly following a drum, so i think it's awkward.
It would be nice to focus on the vocal like 00:33:514 - ~ 00:38:828 - this section.
ex
01:10:542 (1) - How about use this 3/4 as 01:10:200 (4) - here?
01:10:800 - the breaks the vocal, but 01:10:457 - here doesn't break the vocal, so i think it's a better fit.