03:31:129 (8,9,1) - could you buff this so that it's contrasting from 03:30:415 (3,4,5) - since these are snares and the previous ones are kicks? I'm a big fan of 03:36:843 (5,6,1) - so maybe smth like that will do
03:15:951 (4,5) - possibly make this movement harsher to reflect the high note in the vocals? rn it's a bit too smooth/comfortable imo
02:52:737 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - would be v nice if u buffed this, not quite to 02:41:308 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 's DS but still think 02:53:094 (1,2,3) - should be larger than 02:52:737 (1,2,3) - to match buildup in song
01:20:058 (2,3,4) - bit odd that this is the only non-uniform DS 1/4 you have in this section. tbh I'd actually like you to keep this but I think it'd only work if it's consistent by making at least one more burst accel/decel as well like 01:24:166 (1,2,3,4,5) - or 01:22:558 (4,5,6,7,8) -
00:53:452 (1,2) - this big 1/4 gap kinda makes 01:03:095 (4,5,1) - less effective imo, shouldn't be as big as the second one for sure
00:15:952 (5,6,7) - slightly toxic to make this so similar to 00:13:095 (4,5,1) - imo, esp when this is the only 1/4 in this section. maybe space differently or just make it 1/2 since there isn't actual 1/4 in the song (think rhythm is fine tho, just jarring visually)
03:44:254 (1) - no reason to use 30% hs for this section when rest of map is 80%, although tbh I think as the song is generally p chill using 65-70 overall is best