06:57:233 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - dont know if its just me but i hear a slight increase in intensity in this part and if you spaced these out a bit more it would fit better
06:31:995 (1,2,3,4) - space these out a little more to maintain consistency with the section
05:41:520 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - no reason to nc every note it creates a reading issue almost 6 minutes into the map... i suggest nc'ing in groups of 4
02:13:307 (1,2,3) - make these jumps sharper as to maintain the pattern concept of sharp sharp wide wide with the jumps in this little section
01:26:402 (5) - nc
01:26:640 (3) - nc
01:26:759 (3) - un-nc
01:26:997 (1) - nc
these will separate the patterns as to differentiate the rhythm and maintain the nc pattern as seen here 01:25:331 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
00:46:647 (2) - maybe ctrl g for better movement into the 00:46:885 (3) - and it would also fit the little back and forth fast slider to slower slider concept in this section
00:47:838 (3) - same
00:21:052 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - make these sharp angle jumps as to continue the jumpiness of the more intense section if that makes sense :skull:
00:20:814 (3,4,1) - put the 4 and 1 closer to the 3 slider (reduce spacing) as theres no specific sound that really calls for that big of spacing and its just overmapped for grandfinals reasons
same thing at 00:22:719 (3,4,1) - and 00:24:623 (3,4,1) -
this suggested rhythm change also stays consistent with the rhythm when you look at 00:12:955 (4,5,1) and 00:18:409 (4,5,1)
I agree with my BNs here plus I played with both timings and I felt almost no difference in the timing. I also agrrr with Peter... players won't be able to tell the small difference in timing. It felt fine to play with both timings so I'll keep the current timing. Unless there is something that SIGNIFICANTLY changes the feeling of the map then I will change.