00:28:027 (6,7,8,9) - patterns like these are better reserved when you actually have something to emphasise on 00:28:250 (8)

a simpler stream would be more fitting for context here

00:51:361 (3,1) - separating these could be cool for emphasis into downbeat - currently treats 00:50:916 (1,2,3,1) - as a single pattern when 00:51:583 (1) - should be isolated for emphasis

01:11:583 (3,1) - jump feels a little underwhelming for the finish, 01:10:694 (5,1) - works cause it stops flow but 01:11:583 (3,1) - feels like ordinary movement. could try stack as well or space much further

01:15:028 (2,3) - could try have 3 positioned higher so the slider leads into the circle better // https://i.imgur.com/sFyqFIs.png similar to how 01:14:028 (1,2,3) - works

01:46:028 (1,1,1,1) - this is pretty much the same instruments as 00:38:472 (1,2,3) - yet with a different rhythm mapped. id try do something similar for consistency

same for other diffs

01:47:805 - worthwhile to map the hihats here to highlight them since usually there is a pause in the instruments here. doing something basic like https://i.imgur.com/ICdCHZK.png shows that contrast

02:51:472 (4,5,6,7,8) - doing a decelerating stream then following that with a large jump is usually really awkward to play - better to pick one or the other by either constantly increasing or constantly decreasing spacing

03:26:250 (1,1) - would try arrange these objects a bit closer so the feel more connected - that way you can contrast with the jump on 03:28:028 (2) - better. maybe stacking 03:26:250 (1,1) - can work

01:19:361 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - could fix up shape a bit, looks a little wonky at the end

02:12:028 (3) - would make this the 1/4 slider of choice for the finish emphasis, otherwise it feels like a regular pattern

02:42:694 (1) - probably doesn't need to be nc'ed if the next slider is nced anyway

02:41:805 (1,2,3,4,5,1,1,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - would try balance density a bit here as it gets really 1/4 heavy and then really sparse at 02:44:250 (1,2,3) - cause it all becomes 1/2

intensity is fairly even throughout so should map with an even density

00:15:361 (6,7) - 00:18:916 (6,7) - for patterns like these u want the active notes to be on the most obvious sounds, here it would be the snare on 00:15:583 - yet is mapped passively. better rhythm would be https://i.imgur.com/dZcsVTx.png

01:22:916 (6,7) - etc.

00:21:361 (1,2) - think using 3/4 repeats is much better here given your two higher diffs do that

00:54:472 (3,4,5) - 01:08:694 (3,4,5) - etc. would avoid any instances of jumps that cross over in flow, particularly for a hard as it becomes difficult to follow which circle should be next when all equally spaced. try more linear flowing jumps for these, same for other kiais

01:41:694 (2) - avoid rhythms like this in hard cause it is usually unintuitive for target audience, having this as a 1/2 slider is more fitting // https://i.imgur.com/sCpHJno.png

02:05:805 (5,6) - doesnt really follow what music is doing. circle into triple from red tick follows this much better imo // https://i.imgur.com/d7ptzyR.png

00:31:583 (6,7,1,2) - rhythm feels a bit awkward here as you suddenly prioritise only vocals, while previous rhythms attempted to keep the 1/1 kicks going by mapping downbeats 00:32:027

could probably reconsider the rhythms here to be more consistent in what ur following

same for 01:39:139 - and any other parts

00:48:472 (1) - spinner feels a lot nicer to have finish at 00:49:805 - that way you can separate the build up and can emphasise the transition to it on 00:49:805

(kinda like how you handled the spinner on 01:56:027 (1) - )

02:38:027 - extra circle here would be nice to follow the higher intensity

00:21:361 (1,2) - imo replacing some of these with 3/2 repeats would give a bit of variation in rhythm to this section. feels a bit repetitive atm

00:39:139 (3,1) - swapping ncs would be better here to follow music phrases

01:46:694 (3,1) - etc.

check aimod u have some duplicate timing points

00:46:402 (1,2,1,2) - think using extended sliders for 00:46:402 (1) - and 00:47:041 (1) - accents the beats much better. otherwise just feels like regular 1/2

same for 01:52:785 (1,2,1,2)

01:28:690 (1) - stacking/overlapping on previous slider 01:28:211 (2) - seems nicer to stop movement after the jumps. current pattern is kinda unintuitive too cause it looks like 1/2 spacing

00:06:030 (1,2,3) - makes more sense to shift this 1/2 forward and start triple on red tick as the guitar peaks around 00:06:349

00:08:344 (1) - seems super awkward to begin the jump pattern on a spinner end, would either remove 00:09:700 (1) - to begin jumps on the next kick drum 00:09:860 (2) - or end the spinner early and do https://i.imgur.com/oMB4AqH.png

00:28:051 (5) - should follow the 3/4 guitar here too given you follow it later 00:30:605 (3) - rhythms feel inconsistent otherwise

00:45:764 (2) - 3/4 slider doesn't really fit cause u skip over a strong kick 00:45:924

1/2 seems much more appropriate

01:52:147 (4) - etc.

01:28:690 - section is far too dense imo - just cause the 1/4 sounds are present doesn't mean they need to be mapped

section here is much less intense than the rest of the song yet is really 1/4 heavy. try focus more on passive 1/4 similar to what top diff does so this section doesn't feel harder than the rest

03:01:083 (3) - emphasis feels off cause slider isn't clicked to anything important, would ctrl g 03:00:924 (2,3)

03:19:115 (4) - check slider points, currently goes back on itself

capitals for diff name?

off screen stuff:
00:06:688 (1) - 01:07:747 (1) - 01:34:130 (3)

00:02:453 (1,2) - worthwhile to use a separate means of visually indicating rhythms here. these are 1/3 but follow similar spacing ideas to 1/4 patterns 00:03:247 (1,2)

can try using a different way to space 1/3 visually compared to other rhythms

00:05:277 (1) - would expect to end on blue tick or have the blue tick mapped given it follows similar ideas to 00:02:718 (3)

1/2 gap there feels a little random when there is constant 1/4

00:09:512 (5) - 1/4 double could work well here for the wub that was followed previously. also helps fill in the hi hats on 00:09:777 - https://i.imgur.com/M10Nwd6.png

00:11:453 (2,3,4,5) - kinda tries to do two things at once that conflict with each other. rhythms are focused on 1/2 priority but the stream jump into 00:11:541 (3) - attempts to emphasise the kicks on 3/4 rhythms. better idea imo would be to stick to 3/4 rhythms by ctrl g'ing 00:11:541 (3,4) - https://i.imgur.com/UZsfBoT.png

00:18:335 (1) - would work a whole lot better as 1/8 imo. 1/4 feels underwhelming for how many sounds are present here

00:45:630 (1,1,1) - feel like this is a bit too much of a diff spike especially being the pause between more intense sections. can try something a little less spaced

00:50:453 (1,2,3,4) - spacing seems to come out of nowhere, would be more appropriate to have this concept used at 00:51:865 (1,2,3,4) - being the transition between sections

same for 01:05:365 (1,2,3,4)

01:08:806 - fairly prominent beat thats worth mapping - skipping 01:14:453 - makes sense cause in comparison the percussion stops

01:40:453 (2) - would be better to simplify to blue tick as the 1/6 is more harmful than beneficial in gameplay and isnt used elsewhere 01:46:130

00:05:982 (5,1,2) - 00:17:277 (5,1,2) - etc. grouping feels off with these, as the synths are organised in 4's yet the patterning isolates 00:06:159 (1,2)

rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/7l3zkAB.png is more sensible and similar to what top diff does

00:18:335 (1) - could potentially use 1/8 as well instead of 1/4

01:27:247 (2) - should be on the following red tick i presume

00:02:453 (1,2) - 00:08:100 (1,2) - similar to top diff these need to be a bit more intuitive especially since this is an insane, alternatively can make the 1/3s here passive by using sliders or ignore them all together

01:40:453 (1) - 01:46:100 (1) - would definitely avoid the 1/6 here as its too obscure to include in an insane. either skipping or simplifying to the blue tick would be more fitting

00:22:571 (1,2,3) - spacing should be a bit more intuitive here, as target audience will assume a similar rhythm to 00:16:924 (1,2,3) - from the spacing used

imo using a 1/2 slider in place of 00:22:835 (2) - also helps differentiate the two

00:46:571 - section here feels a bit too complex in context with the rest of the map. density is already quite high from the constant use of 1/4 doubles and 1/4 sliders, plus when paired with varied spacing concepts 00:50:012 (3,4,5,6) - makes this section overbearing

can try reduce active rhythms here by replacing 1/4 sliders with repeats instead

01:08:806 - worthwhile to map this too for the percussion given its mapped in extra and insane

01:19:482 (2,1) - 3/4 rhythm is hard to identify here for target audience when the objects are stacked, should try space more intuitively

01:25:394 (7) - 1/1 slider would seem more fitting here to map 01:25:747

01:34:571 (1,2,3) - also related to readability, the stack here appears misleading and makes it hard to read the 3/4

00:45:159 (1,2,1) - should avoid this patterning in a normal as 00:46:571 (1) - is faded in before you leave the first slider 00:45:159 (1) - making it ambiguous as to which object is next

01:09:159 (1) - flowing back to the previous slider makes the visual spacing appear less than it actually is. should go for something like https://i.imgur.com/9jx9kWA.png that properly indicates time-distance snap

01:27:335 (4) - 01:30:159 (4) - etc. misleading for target audience to have the downbeat on a slider end. rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/3jA7Kga.png is much more fitting to what players would expect

01:48:688 - seems underwhelming to skip the last downbeat of the song :(

there are a few additive red tick triples in the map that dont follow music structure so end up feeling real forced. ideally you want to prioritise what the music offers first then put in triples to fill the gaps

additive triples like 00:20:197 (4,5,6) - 00:50:733 (2,3,4) - are good cause they lead into the stronger sound, but then triples like 00:32:876 (1,2,3) - feel weird to play cause both 1 and 3 have relevant sounds

should check through the map and look for triples that dont really make sense and reconsider them 01:06:805 (3,4,5) - 01:09:126 (4,5,6) - etc.

would take a look at contrast between first 00:50:555 - and second 01:01:983 - half of the kiais

when u do patterning like 00:50:554 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2) - for individual vocals in the first half, then 01:01:983 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - in the second half comes off as barely any different despite the song doubling the amount of snares in the second half

kinda need to start lower in spacing/density so you have more to contrast with, at the moment if everything is just big spacing and the density change isn't immediately obvious then it limits the contrast of the two halves

00:22:519 - seemed odd to skip the kick drum here entirely - yes the vocal begins on white but there are ways around emphasising that without skipping the prior kick

01:38:233 - also applies here

00:29:126 (2,3,4) - use of triple here would imply same triple use at 00:30:555 (2,1) - for the growl sound yet this isn't possible cause of 00:31:090 (1,2,3)

better spot for a triple would be on 00:29:037 - which leads into the downbeat better

01:44:840 (2,3,4) - same

00:29:840 (1,2,1) - 00:31:269 (3,4,1) - patterning feels too tame to provide contrast imo, does same sv as everything else 00:28:055 (3) - without much additional movement

the strings here are fairly powerful and deserve to stand out a bit better from everything else

01:45:555 - etc.

00:33:769 (2,1,2,3) - doing something similar to 00:35:197 (1,2,3) - seems more appropriate to map the double better instead of forcing triples

01:49:483 (2,1,2,3) - same

00:36:894 (1,2) - 00:39:751 (1,2) - don't really think these require nc's, also this is the only time you nc the blue tick over the white 00:53:055 (4,5,1)

01:52:608 - same

00:50:108 - good spot for a triple as its supported by that kick and leads into 00:50:197 (1)

01:04:840 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - could opt for a rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/pvIEWMZ.png

emphasis into 01:05:376 (1) - is limited by just 1/2 spacing when everything else is fairly spacing so the 1/4 slider helps with that, and 01:06:090 (4) - works better as a 3/4 to match the held vocal like 01:05:376 (1)

01:08:233 (1) - also worth extending imo to give the finish more priority similar to what was done at 01:09:662 (1,2) . you can use sv to contrast the two

01:56:090 (1,2,3) - can maybe do something similar to 00:40:376 (5,6) - again for consistency otherwise that pattern becomes a one-off thing

02:04:126 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - could try organise this with emphasis on 3/4 rhythms since 02:04:394 (4) - stands out here with the kicks

02:05:733 (1,2,3) - spacing feels really underwhelming for a build-up imo

03:11:983 (1,2) - think just a 1/4 slider from 03:11:983 - would suit your previous patterning better, this is basically just 03:10:555 (1,2) - except with the second note removed

03:16:626 (1) - circle doesn't really cut it to represent the finish imo, 1/2 slider would work better

03:19:126 (3,1,1,2,3) - keeping these either stacked or placed close together represents the stop-start movement better imo. by having too much spacing between each there is less focus on the rhythm and more on movement

03:41:983 - vocal priority here makes this a bit too dense imo, instruments have slowed considerable to like 1 snare 1 kick per measure so your rhythms can represent that

density can then be increased for 03:43:947 (3,4,1,2) - and then reduced again afterward 03:44:840

03:47:698 - feels a bit too easy when this is on par intensity wise with sections like 03:21:983 - cause of the double bpm drums. spacing like 03:48:769 (2,3) - is too underwhelming for that

good that you went for contrast at 03:53:055 - although the drums don't really change there its just a change of key. think u should aim for similar spacing as 03:21:983 - and then increasing density at 03:53:412

03:57:162 (2,3,4) - could do with more spacing as well since its the climax

00:22:519 - 01:38:233 - worth mapping kick here as well imo - still able to emphasise vocals without skipping this

00:39:483 (3,1) - seems super unintuitive to use what looks like 1/2 visual spacing and ncing blue tick, should space to represent rhythms or change comboing

00:48:501 (1,1,2,3,1) - having a passive downbeat here 00:49:126 - makes it hard to tell you're aiming to represent guitar. would try have it actively mapped as it starts ur phrase or otherwise stick to the more obvious drum 1/2s

00:50:376 (5,1) - antijump is fine but the entire combo afterward feels underwhelming 00:50:555 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - to have as the entrance to the kiai. should try space more or work with a higher density so u get better contrast with the buildup

01:03:947 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 02:21:090 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 03:23:947 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - recheck hs here - some are missing 01:04:037 (2,3,4) - while others drop snares 01:04:305 (5,7)

02:04:126 (1,2,3,4,5) - would try emphasis 3/4 kicks 02:04:394 - better here since those rhythms are highlighted a lot in this diff

02:07:697 - kiai unsnap

03:00:197 (7,1) - 03:00:912 (2,3) - could do with better spacing emphasis for finishes, doesn't have much additional movement atm

03:32:876 (2) - nc for consistency with prior kiais

01:04:126 (4,5) - reasonable to start introducing passive 1/4 for the violin here since later diffs do so, you also introduce it at 01:22:697 (3,4)

01:04:840 (1,2,3) - barely any spacing/rhythm emphasis here - should break the habit of trying to distance snap everything, though doing 01:04:840 (1) - as a 3/4 + circle would work as well to provide increased density

02:21:983 (1,2,3) - etc.

03:03:590 (2,3,4,5) - triples feel really forced here when this is regular 1/2. the first note of each triple 03:03:590 (2) - loses its emphasis when done this way

03:12:162 (2) - would be better to remove for contrast as the sound here isn't as significant as 03:10:733 (2)

00:52:836 (1) - 1/6 snap seems more appropriate - also have the cymbal on the prior 1/6 00:52:752 - that could also be mapped

01:54:228 (5) - might be worthwhile using 1/4 or a 1/2 slider here so u reserve the 1/2 gap for moments where theres a held vocal 01:51:943 (4,1)

most of the time anyway you do something like 02:10:228 (4) - so could also try implementing the 1/2 gap elsewhere

01:57:943 (1,2) - extended slider feels a little random given its the only time you really do something like this

02:50:086 (1,2) - 02:54:657 (1,2) - etc. sounds like some potential 1/6 action with these if you wish to follow that. could be a good follow up to 00:52:836 (1,2)

03:07:228 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - going from bigger ds to smaller seems more sensible cause stream transitions from the louder snares to toms

00:26:428 (1) - 00:37:337 (1) - etc. cant really hear anything to justify the 1/3, vocals sound very much 1/4 here

00:32:564 (1,2,1) - should keep consistent rhythm between these by snapping 00:33:075 (1) - to the 1/3 similar to what you did at 00:45:292 (1)

00:19:269 (1,2) - 00:29:837 (1,2,3) - etc. try make rhythm changes more intuitive by using visuals to indicate that. compare the spacing between 00:19:098 (2,1) - vs 00:19:269 (1,2) - where both look visually similar yet the latter uses a 1/2 rhythm

stacking like youve done at 00:21:655 (1,2) - or spacing further so its visually apparent makes this much more intuitive to read. alternatively can avoid the 1/2 gap all together by using 1/4 rhythms

00:38:700 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - ends up feeling quite dense cause of the consecutive circles while the song here is still fairly calm. can substitute out less prominent beats eg. making 00:39:724 (4,5) - a slider to control density better

00:28:985 (6,7) - 00:39:894 (6,7) - rhythms here put the stronger white tick on a slider end 00:29:155 - while clicking the weaker blue tick

both beats have vocals so you can do something like https://i.imgur.com/BVydETX.png which follows ur intent

00:44:155 (1) - nc isn't really necessary here since you dont nc prior repeats 00:40:405 (8)

00:51:656 (1,2) - spacing feels a little weak for such a strong vocal, should aim for similar spacing to 00:49:440 (2,3,4,5) - that matches intensity better

00:55:065 (3,4) - switching rhythm so slider starts on white tick works better with vocal groupings here. each phrase starts on 00:55:064 - and 00:55:405 - but the blue tick slider ignores that

try have some better progression between difficulties, at the moment the rhythms in the intro 00:02:532 - are pretty much identical to insane which doesn't make for a great spread

remember not every sounds needs to be mapped, look for areas where you can reduce density eg. https://i.imgur.com/p52xbc0.png for the intro

avoid consecutive nc's as well 00:10:269 (1,1) - 00:16:201 (1,1,1) - 00:18:246 (1,1) - as they dont really achieve anything. use combing to separate patterning and not to indicate different rhythms as it should already be intuitive

00:17:564 (1,2) - would reserve active 1/3 for later diffs, since this is the only instance you have clickable 1/3 too id just keep this as a repeat like 00:16:883 (1)

00:48:247 (2,1) - would aim to stack this so more attention is paid to the approach circle, right now it could easily be mistaken as a 1/4th rhythm

00:52:678 (4) - 00:58:814 (2) - etc. 1/8 sliders are better kept for the insane, you can replace these with circles and keep these are triples which works well with spread

01:17:394 (4,1,2,3) - spacing needs to indicate the rhythm change here, currently 01:17:906 (1,2) - is the exact same visual spacing as 01:17:394 (4,1) - yet is a different rhythm

should avoid mapping stronger downbeats to slider ends as it makes it difficult to follow the phrasing of the song 00:08:049 - 00:10:765 - 00:27:110 - 00:29:837 - etc.

sticking to circles on downbeats like 00:02:532 (1) - 00:05:290 (5) - makes the rhythm a lot more solid

00:48:928 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the kiai rhythms start off really dense and is then followed by emptiness right after 00:50:633 (6,7) - while the song is at the same intensity throughout

would try make density more uniform or else difficulty feels very spiked, a rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/ldgRTQt.png can support this better

same for parts like 00:59:837

01:12:792 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - similar to the other point on density, following purely vocals makes the density really concentrated

beats like 01:13:985 (2) - can be skipped in favour of including extra beats like 01:15:178 - to even out density