the spacing is overkill, it's undwhelming on purpose because I decided that the pianos here aren't as significant as 02:16:083 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) -
The curve on the slider is supposed to represent that sound. I don't want to add another note since I don't think it's a substantial enough sound to warrant an active click.
uhhh, basically, I just wanted to make the arrangement of this slider different, since 01:01:002 (5,6,7,8) is a major rhythmic change from the consistent 3/4 sliders. Idk if that helps.
you could just reopen, I don't see a problem with reopening if you find another relevant issue. Anyway, in regards to the spacing, the point of the spacing here wasn't to emphasize sound, but rather contrast the groupings and patterns in accordance with the music. Since there is a very definite contrast in the music here, I wanted to emphasize that contrast if that makes sense
You're not wrong about emphasis, but I'd like to keep the nc on 01:42:921 (1), since this part of the music is uniquely arranged in which the repeating sound starts before the downbeat, so I want to represent that as an exception to the general NC rule I used for the entire map.
Regarding the flow and spacing, I don't think it's all that problematic. I've played it, and it doesn't really play all that differently compared to the previous arrangement (they all had even spacing before), so it fit's to visually represent the music in a way. Thank you for your opinion tho
Since this stream is the first in the entire map to have a really sharp curve on 01:37:569 (13,14,15,16), I wanted to set up the expectation of it visually by having sharper than usual curves every 5th before it got the the really sharp curve. Since all of the curves in streams before this were flowy, I think this arrangement is suitable for contrasting between prior streams and this.
"more aesthetic" isn't really much to go off of since preferences of looks are either subjective, or widely agreed upon. Could you give an example of a more visually pleasant slider shape?
True, I could do that, but this section (00:25:250 - 00:45:683) changes in degrees of intensity through rhythm and spacing and has a consistent sv throughout all of it. Making one exception here doesn't quite fit imo since this part of the music doesn't stand out all that much
The sounds here land on 00:29:466 - 00:29:574 - 00:29:629, 1/6 ticks, but it feels pretty awkward to play, especially for relatively quieter piano sounds. I think keeping it as is should be fine as the timing of the sounds aren't quite noticeable when you play.
01:41:466 (6) - distance snap increase starts on every white tick, so every 5th circle in the stream. Each group of 4 circles is 1 consistently smooth pattern. Every 5th has increasing sv and starts a new group of 4 -> has some sharper than usual curve than before. My intention was to get player used to that kind of movement on 01:36:601 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12), prior to the extremely sharp curve on 01:37:574 (13,14,15,16) -