00:01:305 - I mean the piano is playing a 1/8 run there, so I feel like it makes sense? I removed the double at the start because it's sorta pointless, but is 1/8 really that dense for this diff? It's not really a difficult pattern to hit either and I'm not sure how LN would express it better?
00:01:870 - I do agree that the jumpstream is unnecessarily dense and made it single stream, but not sure if it should just be lighter jumpstream instead?
00:09:508 (9508|2,9578|1,9649|2,9720|1,9790|2,9861|1,9932|2,10003|1) - The difference is that the piano is actually playing a trill there, which it does not at 00:08:376.
00:10:073 (10073|3,10144|2,10215|1,10285|0,10356|1,10427|2,10498|0,10568|1) - Ok I made that a trill as well since the piano is playing one, just at a higher octave, but how is it stronger than 00:09:508? There it's layered with the kick and supersaw, giving a much stronger impact in my opinion.
00:15:165 (15165|3,16296|3) - What 1/8 are you referring to here? Did you mark the wrong place?
You say there's room for improvement in the expression of the music, but I feel some of your feedback removes that expression, especially with the trills that are actually being played by the piano.
Both should be triple, but the jack would become too dense in my opinion. I also wanna keep the double at 01:29:639 (89639|2,89639|3) since it feels really satisfying. If others also think it should be changed, I'll do it, but I don't think it's too critical since it still feels nice to play?