I know, just about whether someone would happen to end up looking at this in the relevant case :D

it follows the phrase from the woodwinds in this part

or maybe you meant to link 10:27:599 (1,1) - ? Where I basically break the violin sound into half with the "additional" slider, but that's because the part / beat where the woodwinds come in at 10:27:757 (1) - is so important that it feels awkward skipping it, especially at playing speeds, so it took priority over the violin line which just sounds like it's a bit misaligned from the measure there

mm true, did some adjusting to buff the spacing, kind of between current stacking and ctrl+g (basically, the following heads now branch from around the middle of the short sliders instead of the head - or tail). Results in a small burst of movement, but not a lot (but anything is a lot more than nothing)

I think that's fine now, considering the previous stacks and also that it's basically 185bpm 1/4

did same at 30:15:315 (6) -

while I wasn't able to get that much feedback from players, I got couple runaway comments along the lines of "it's cheesable", "bit surprising but manageable" and such. Don't think players are big fans of it, but they also don't seem to think it's terrible or undoable (maybe)

With those in mind, and the comments here leaning slightly towards "well, it's okay" in numbers, I would like to keep it for the thematics. Hopefully that's alright

to add here for what it's worth, the file is directly ripped from my CD so as high quality as you can get for this (other than making it ogg but hey it's from 2017 cut me some slack)

did some additional processing while downgrading (like a bit of compression) because the high dynamic range is otherwise not ideal for osu! gameplay. Has no bearing on the frequency range itself though, but just for anyone's information

one additional comment on the level of expected SV that Mattay mentioned

while it does not have a immediate predecessor like the 1st movement example, phrase-wise 33:54:615 (1) - directly corresponds to 33:50:235 (1) - and 33:52:248 (1) - , both of which are fast sliders (SV 6), so it should be very expected to face a very fast slider in here. Of course 10 is a clear increase over something like 6-7 still, but I don't think it's excessive enough to cause jumpscares so to say

I think playing just the 3rd movement would be sufficient context for this, so I'll try to maybe nab couple players to play it via editor for opinions on that last slider. Also I'd imagine one more BN opinion incoming when maxie mods this next weekend

if nothing else, I'll do something else here when resolving stuff at that point then

(in the meanwhile, if anyone has any comments feel free to share of course)

mm sure

oh good catch, it's from few days back when I fixed some MV stuff like some sliders around here being potentially offscreen lol

alr