Hi, thought I'd leave some suggestions to improve your map :)
This pretty much says that exact same thing as the above post, but this is the original one I wrote first. Sorry if this is a bit confusing.
00:35:152 (1,1,1) - If you're trying to map to the prominent vocals here, this rhythm choice doesn't seem to fit the song since each of the 3 vocals is on each white tick and not on 00:35:543 or 00:35:935. It would make more sense to have 1/2 beat or 3/4 beat sliders that occur on each of the white ticks at 00:35:152, 00:35:674, and 00:36:195. You could also increase the distance between the sliderend and the head of the next slider if you plan to use 1/2 beat sliders since this section seems to have 1/4 gaps between each sliderend and the next clickable object.
00:43:500 (1,1,1,2) - The rhythm from the last suggestion seems perfect here instead since each important sound is separated by a 3/4 beat gap instead a full beat gap so nice job! Also cool triangle.
00:48:456 (3) - This dramatic change in sv (slider velocity) could be more readable by making it a new combo.
01:21:065 (1,2) - This seems pretty hard to read as a 3/4 beat gap especially when this type of rhythmic spacing isn't used anywhere prior and also uses smaller spacing than what's used for spacing between 1/2 beat gaps. Also, the 1/2 beat gap after that uses very similar spacing also becomes difficult to read. In order to make this easier for players to read, I recommend placing a circle at 01:21:587 so that it overlaps 01:21:065 (1) - using the same spacing you used between 1/4 beat gaps such as at 01:20:283 (2,3) - . This makes it so the 3/4 beat gap becomes a 1/2 beat gap and easier to read, but also because it represents the low pitched sound on every offbeat.
01:30:456 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Neat pattern. I like it :)
01:35:674 (1,2,3) - Not a big issue, but you could be more consistent by using larger spacing between these objects like you do throughout the rest of the kiai section. This is because it uses the exact same rhythm for the exact same kind of sounds.
01:49:239 (1) - Whoa it's a cane!
Anyways, that's all. Other than that, I think your map is kinda nice. :D
Wait, do you mean just this part:
02:07:522 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) -
or does that also include other parts like:
03:40:779 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -
or the spacing in this entire section:
02:25:350-02:36:322
Okay, after listening to 00:35:152 (1,1,1,2) again. I see the problem. I addressed this rhythm choice as problematic because I thought you were focusing on the vocals and not the instrument in the background. This rhythm is actually fine, I was just confused because those are the sounds I was following when I was mapping this part. Looks good!