02:00:150 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This placement is very sudden and a little difficult to follow because it comes so soon after the spinner. Maybe end the spinner a beat early.
01:31:033 (6,7,8) - personal suggestion. These triples are a little hard to read because of how its hidden behind a previous placed note as well as the fact that previous sections similar this this part aren't mapped with triples ether.
00:55:258 (6) - this note is spaced the exact same as the previous notes even though it is played twice as slow
00:01:996 (1) - the way the sliders are spaced differ from the ones at the timestamp: 00:07:129 (1) even though the music in both sections are the exact same. Maybe have the spacing be the same.
I believe the kiai should start at 00:33:118 (2) instead of where it originally is because this is where the first hard beat of the chorus begins.
A little unsure of what the other suggestion means. Clarifing would help a lot. :)
Examples:
00:32:798 (1) - 00:35:364 (2)
01:06:808 (1) - 01:09:054 (1)
As of right now, it's a little hard to find a pattern that would not make the section feel overly slow for the chorus. Will leave open until I find a good pattern, or an opinion from someone else.
Sorry, I dont fully understand what you mean. For the last four timestamps, they are all in the middle of the chorus where almost every beat is mapped on 1/4's. Did you mean for these sections to be slower to match the pace of the lyrics? I just need a little clarification cause I'm a little confused.
Btw, there was already a slider previously on the timestamp you suggested. (I dont know if it was a glitch on my part or something else)