01:38:960 (98960|3,99834|3,100271|2,100562|0) - these could be doubles as those notes are accented the same way as 01:38:523 (98523|1,98523|0,99397|5,99397|6) - these ones
00:32:334 (32334|2,32334|1,32534|1,32534|2) - u can try moving these to one column to the right and then move 00:32:734 (32734|0,32734|1) - to the 2 most outer columns on the left so it follows the pitch better
00:27:341 - yep
01:18:607 - damn do I need to get rid of this? : (
02:05:506 - fixed
02:39:398 (159398|1) - fixed
02:39:493 (159493|2) - fixed
It's meant to be for the start of the consecutive 1/16th note snares like at 02:38:734 - and 02:39:113 - . I didn't do it for 02:39:683 - and 02:39:968 - because I determined that the snares were too close to each other, hence why I opted for a repeated pattern like so 02:39:588 (159588|3,159683|1,159778|0,159873|3,159968|1,160063|0) - to represent the snares instead.
I understand if my consistency here is a bit messy, and I am willing to change things up if you want me to
yes but in the overall rhythm starting from 02:42:721 (162721|2,162721|3) - to 02:43:291 - , it's appropriate to emphasise the half beats in my opinion, and i didn't want to put a jump on the 1/16th measure because it would be out of place in this section.