00:04:866 (2,3) - fix, lengthened first slider and 2nd now not reversed
00:08:867 (1) - fix
00:09:534 (3,4) - fix
00:21:036 (2,3) - fix
00:26:537 (1) - fix
00:32:038 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I don't agree with you here. The pattern may be complex, but this is not a problem, it fits well in music, 00:32:038 (1,2,3) - their notes have just 3 bits, and here you need a stream, not jumps, and then there are 3 bit but more sparse, which fits well with more spaced notes. So far your arguments haven’t convinced me, I’ll leave it as it is, I like it here)
00:34:039 (2,3) - ok, I removed the first note of the jump part under the slider, it seems better now
00:36:373 (4) - fix
00:21:036 (2,3) - change to two notes
00:40:040 (1,2,3,4,5) - I like how such patterns work, this place is not suitable for jumps or streams, but because of the sound of the song in this place I want to stretch out the notes like a “stream”, but more sparse and spaced
00:41:207 (2,1) - fix
00:42:040 (1,2,3) - fix combo
00:43:457 (6,1) - in terms of sound, I want to leave it as it is, but I reduced the spacing a little to make it easier to get in
00:47:542 (2,1,2,3) - fix
00:53:543 (1) - I still haven’t figured out what can be done here. As a result, I shortened the slider (you still can’t reach the end of the voice, and there are no further hits), it seems that it turned out okay
01:02:711 (5) - fix
01:05:879 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - at this point the song sounds somewhat monotonous (due to the drawn-out male vocals in the background), so I want to make jumps here, but I deliberately made them lighter structurally and with a little spacing, compared to the end of the song. Since there are no convincing arguments why this is out of place here, I’ll leave it as is)
01:08:212 (3) - is this the end of vocals? the vocalist drags out the word “hikari” until 01:08:379 (4) - and from 01:08:546 (1) - “mi” begins, it seems to me that everything is ok
01:09:379 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - here the words are very fast and viscous, as in 00:40:040 (1,2,3,4,5) - but for me it doesn’t lend itself to such a “stream” because of the slightly different nature of the melody
01:15:381 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - see above
01:15:381 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - here I wanted to break up the too-long jump part with something simpler, but at the same time without losing the rhythm. Formally the song doesn't change much, but the rhythm of the notes doesn't change either due to the speed of the slider, I like the current version. In addition, a too long jump part would turn out to be very monotonous, do sliders make it different from the part before and after adding interest?
01:23:549 (1,2,3,4) - see above))
01:28:633 (1,2,3) - I changed it to 1/4, but I’m sure, it seems that 1/8 would be more suitable there? although it was too complicated and there were too many notes
About "on paper here isn't done right". Let's not forget that others may see some things differently) This, of course, does not apply to moments where I made a technical mistake (missed it or mapped it incorrectly). But I take changing the general concept of the map very seriously and solid arguments are required for me to change something, because that’s how I usually felt about the song) In any case, thanks for the modding, it was very useful :3