04:08:962 (2,3,4) - this is not consistent with the other two; 00:13:053 (2,3,4) and 01:22:598 (2,3,4)
also does this seem much more appropriate?
https://imgur.com/3Bbrr20
at 04:23:380 exactly, i dont hear any beats at this time so im quite skeptical on that.
(this is just a suggestion tho, dont take it to heart)
https://imgur.com/a/ayMYx16
sry for the broken link. here what i was talking about.
it just felt weird to me, there's nothing wrong with putting it there but it sounds a lot better if it's a triple instead of quintuple, for me at least.
pay it no mind though