just skip the voting and crown me the king already
forum
OT Presidential election 2019 -Third phase (Canceled)
posted
Total Posts
59
Who do you want to be the next OT President?
Total votes: 32
Polling ended
I'm calling out OT Crook Ashton for vote manupilation
yea ashton stole 5 votes from me i saw it happen
I'd like to say that Fizzn (KatouMegumi) manupilated votes on OT Executions, and this crook is now doing the same here.
Candidate ASH - *sips tea*
Candidate ZN - "cheater!"
Candidate ACH - "hmm'st."
Candidate ABR - *shrugs*
How's that for a summary? -w-
Candidate ZN - "cheater!"
Candidate ACH - "hmm'st."
Candidate ABR - *shrugs*
How's that for a summary? -w-
I'm shrugging?
Dunno. Feel free to correct me if otherwise!
This is a fair vote. You can't steal, and you can't double vote unless you have two accounts, but then you'd be banned. Y'all are just salty.
Ashton is getting his cronies to vote for him from some discord server
obviously you wouldn't know how to steal votes john
Ashton
Is he? Evidence would be good if that's true.
I'd like to see if there's reason for speculation, not just rumors.
I doubt the accusation.
*cold skeleton stare*
I'd like to see if there's reason for speculation, not just rumors.
I doubt the accusation.
*cold skeleton stare*
abraker wrote:
Ashton is getting his cronies to vote for him from some discord server
Baseless accusations isn’t going paint a good picture for yourself. Make you seem like a sore loser. Maybe that’s why you’re down on votes.
Achromalia wrote:
Candidate ASH - *sips tea*
Candidate ZN - "cheater!"
Candidate ACH - "hmm'st."
Candidate ABR - *shrugs*
How's that for a summary? -w-
ABR is yelling “cheater!”
ZN is basking in confidence.
I know it's possible because I have evidence that Fizzn had his cronies vote for people in OT Executions. I know how the shit works.
abraker wrote:
I know it's possible because I have evidence that Fizzn had his cronies vote for people in OT Executions. I know how the shit works.
Just because it’s possible doesn’t give you a foundation for these allegations. It’s also possible that you’re a cold blooded murderer who feasts on your victims flesh, yet it makes no sense to start calling you a cannibalistic murderer if people start disappearing.
Penguin wrote:
abraker wrote:
I know it's possible because I have evidence that Fizzn had his cronies vote for people in OT Executions. I know how the shit works.
Just because it’s possible doesn’t give you a foundation for these allegations. It’s also possible that you’re a cold blooded murderer who feasts on your victims flesh, yet it makes no sense to start calling you a cannibalistic murderer if people start disappearing.
This. That's why I don't get your reasoning. You see a singular instance of wrongdoing, and attribute that to any similar case. I prefer to have direct evidence before an accusation. It's good to speculate when you have reasonable belief that's directly relevant, not based on a possibility.
Anyone who doesn't vote for Zain will get their dicks cut by the tooth fairy
Meah wrote:
Anyone who doesn't vote for Zain will get their dicks cut by the tooth fairy
Jokes on you, I already lost all my baby teeth!
Jokes on you i already sacrifes my dicks to satan...Meah wrote:
Anyone who doesn't vote for Zain will get their dicks cut by the tooth fairy
Ashton
I guess I’ll make the first speech here.
As the leader of the tea party, I will make sure every citizen of OT is satisfied with my position as president. Even if I will make many of the final decisions, every single person, even people who may have lost against me, will have a say in what happens.
My first act of presidency will be the reformation act. This act will punish any denizen guilty of spreading hate because of the past on one another. This act will ensure everybody gets a second chance at proving their worth as if I becoming president, I will work on taking us to a better future and leaving all of the drama and madness behind us.
As the leader of the tea party, I will make sure every citizen of OT is satisfied with my position as president. Even if I will make many of the final decisions, every single person, even people who may have lost against me, will have a say in what happens.
My first act of presidency will be the reformation act. This act will punish any denizen guilty of spreading hate because of the past on one another. This act will ensure everybody gets a second chance at proving their worth as if I becoming president, I will work on taking us to a better future and leaving all of the drama and madness behind us.
There should be a requirement at the end that requires denizens to confirm that they voted. At the very least, we need to confirm that the elections are not getting more votes than there are denizens here.
Ashton
abraker wrote:
There should be a requirement at the end that requires denizens to confirm that they voted. At the very least, we need to confirm that the elections are not getting more votes than there are denizens here.
Everyone and anyone should be allowed to vote here. They could be future denziens and as such, we need to make sure everyone feels included. Adding a rule that restricts too many people is hurtful to this society and will only isolate us further from the overall community.
I don't think it's a good idea to let anyone vote, especially if they don't know what this is and the culture behind OT. Otherwise, what was even the point of the debates?
Ashton
abraker wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea to let anyone vote, especially if they don't know what this is and the culture behind OT. Otherwise, what was even the point of the debates?
Here at the tea party we allow everyone, and exclude no one. That is one of our values; inclusivity.
Another better alternative is to simply ask people who voted to message one reason as to why they voted, however, unless you can prove how I’ve been rigging the votes there should really be no need for that.
I'm not saying you are rigging any the votes anymore. I am saying I want confirmation the votes can be trusted in general.
The point of the debates is to address DENIZEN concerns. Those who are not denizens of OT know little of what issues the candidates are aiming to solve, much less be affected by them. If they want to be part of OT, great! They can certainly vote in the next elections after they become part of OT.
The point of the debates is to address DENIZEN concerns. Those who are not denizens of OT know little of what issues the candidates are aiming to solve, much less be affected by them. If they want to be part of OT, great! They can certainly vote in the next elections after they become part of OT.
Ashton
abraker wrote:
I'm not saying you are rigging any the votes anymore. I am saying I want confirmation the votes can be trusted in general.
The point of the debates is to address DENIZEN concerns. Those who are not denizens of OT know little of what issues the candidates are aiming to solve, much less be affected by them. If they want to be part of OT, great! They can certainly vote in the next elections after they become part of OT.
People who vote do not need an extensive history lesson or even much experience in ot to know who they would like to vote for.
They want to join a community, and they want a good leader. Even if I lose, I still believe heavily in allowing new users to vote. Otherwise, they feel left out and neglected.
Letting external entities choose a leader for a community they are not part of is sabotaging the community for those who are part of it.
I call forth every denizen of OT, are you ok with this?
I call forth every denizen of OT, are you ok with this?
Ashton
Them joining may not change the culture of OT, but them voting before joining will certainly influence the votes in a negative way because there is NO guarantee they WILL join OT after voting.
I think trying to control who is part of the OT community and who is not is harmful to it as a whole. The only reason that the OT community is as crazy and active as it is now is because people are free to do (nearly) anything they pleased, and that includes joining and leaving on a whim. Restricting that would ruin this freedom, and therefore the craziness that makes OT fun.
I agree that a forum vote was probably not the best idea, but I wouldn't make everyone validate their vote. Perhaps a strawpoll would suffice.
I agree that a forum vote was probably not the best idea, but I wouldn't make everyone validate their vote. Perhaps a strawpoll would suffice.
This time, I'm a bit perplexed.
I'll try my hand at some arguments.
It's fairly unlikely a whole crowd of new people show up, and it's just as unlikely that a more controlled method of voting will truly influence their decision in sticking around in OT.
OT as a whole, in my eyes, ideally should be open.
The OT elections, however, are at a strange point here. The legitimacy of votes won't really be clear unless we figure out a proper way to vote.
I'm not certain on what my position is with abraker's thoughts. But I have this to say, at least.
Even then, there's some familiar things in this sort of situation.
...maybe...
Well, it'll take some debating, I suppose.
With that, I guess I'll have to say I'm just not okay with it.
That isn't to say I'd be sure of that happening right now. I frankly have no idea if this sort of thing is what's happening, and though it's something I'm doubtful of, it's always possible. But if that's all we've got, I can't just accuse someone out of that possibility.
I'll try my hand at some arguments.
The difference is, we're primarily speaking of the candidate campaign. Not OT as a whole. Though being inclusive is pretty often a beneficial thing, I believe Abraker is talking specifically about this election. Lets try not to get these switched up, please.johnmedina999 wrote:
I think trying to control who is part of the OT community and who is not is harmful to it as a whole. The only reason that the OT community is as crazy and active as it is now is because people are free to do (nearly) anything they pleased, and that includes joining and leaving on a whim. Restricting that would ruin this freedom, and therefore the craziness that makes OT fun.
It's fairly unlikely a whole crowd of new people show up, and it's just as unlikely that a more controlled method of voting will truly influence their decision in sticking around in OT.
OT as a whole, in my eyes, ideally should be open.
The OT elections, however, are at a strange point here. The legitimacy of votes won't really be clear unless we figure out a proper way to vote.
I'm not certain on what my position is with abraker's thoughts. But I have this to say, at least.
Even then, there's some familiar things in this sort of situation.
...maybe...
Well, it'll take some debating, I suppose.
I'm wary of that decision. It's somewhat akin to letting people outside of your country and citizenship to vote for your next president. It's very difficult to trust.abraker wrote:
Letting external entities choose a leader for a community they are not part of is sabotaging the community for those who are part of it.
I call forth every denizen of OT, are you ok with this?
With that, I guess I'll have to say I'm just not okay with it.
That isn't to say I'd be sure of that happening right now. I frankly have no idea if this sort of thing is what's happening, and though it's something I'm doubtful of, it's always possible. But if that's all we've got, I can't just accuse someone out of that possibility.
can't believe this is a thing lmao..
i'm not gonna vote, but i'll be watching..
i'm not gonna vote, but i'll be watching..
Topic Starter
Whoa, I just woke up to 3 forum pages.
About the legitimacy of the votes, I agree that it's pretty hard to make sure that everything is legitimate.
So I'm willing to reset this phase and use another better voting method if you guys want.
If most of the candidates and denizens would agree, I'll reset the whole phase.
About the legitimacy of the votes, I agree that it's pretty hard to make sure that everything is legitimate.
So I'm willing to reset this phase and use another better voting method if you guys want.
If most of the candidates and denizens would agree, I'll reset the whole phase.
Hmm.
I wonder if we should debate on what voting method we should use before we do anything.
But I'd still somewhat consider the possibility of just continuing this phase instead, it kinda depends.
I think we need a way to identify who has voted. I'm assuming we're still doing an anonymous vote, but would it be possible to just state we've voted for Candidate A, B, C, or D? How would that play out, and for what reasons would any method be any better?
What does everyone think?
I wonder if we should debate on what voting method we should use before we do anything.
But I'd still somewhat consider the possibility of just continuing this phase instead, it kinda depends.
I think we need a way to identify who has voted. I'm assuming we're still doing an anonymous vote, but would it be possible to just state we've voted for Candidate A, B, C, or D? How would that play out, and for what reasons would any method be any better?
What does everyone think?
Topic Starter
I'm thinking if we'd reset this phase, this time we'll use a 3rd party site to manage the voting. I am thinking of using a Google docs form where voters have to leave their username and their vote in it. That would make identifying voters much easier, making double checking for legitimacy easier and keep the voting numbers confidential until the end of the election where I'll announce the statistics.
ashton's a fucking libtard
Or, you could just use the private messaging system instead of using a third party site in which you have no way of verifying that people are who they say they are except for asking them on the native site.
Okay but why do we even do this without an OT Constitution though? The OT bazaar and Cider supports whomever supports them btw
you need the first president to sign the constitution obviously