D o t wrote:

late

[Muzukashii]
00:05:834 (20) - remove finish? 感覺這邊沒必要的finish放多了 我觉得就这样四个小节一个还挺好的 鼓音本身也有 后面相似的都没改
00:08:726 (34) - ^
00:11:617 (48) - ^
00:25:714 (101) - 把finish移到小節線的note上應該會比較好 后面连续k 中间加finish感觉太难
00:43:334 - 加個note, 應該和00:40:172 (165,166,167,168) - 一樣 我觉得这里finish比较重要
00:43:424 (179) - remove finish 同上
00:52:099 (217) - ^
00:54:991 (231) - ^
00:57:882 (244) - ^
01:00:774 (255) - 這裡可以加個finish, 達到結束kiai的效果 再考虑一下 看看有没有人别人提到
01:03:575 (267) - 刪掉, 然後01:03:666 (268) - 加finish, 01:03:485 (266) - 改成d, 跟後面的pattern一樣, 而且這裡加finish可以達到分段的效果, 跟上面一樣 这个不错 后面段的也改了
01:06:557 (282) - 還是刪掉finish吧
01:09:449 (296) - ^
01:12:340 (310) - ^
01:44:147 (442) - ^, 然後01:44:057 - 加note
01:52:822 (480) - ^
01:55:714 (494) - ^
01:58:605 (507) - ^
02:12:340 (556,557) - 沒必要finish, 如果跟音的話無視 我觉得这里的鼓就是这样的
02:13:063 (558) - 加finish 考虑到后面的二连感觉会有点难了
02:24:178 (608) - 沒必要finish
02:28:244 (628) - ^
02:33:123 (654) - ^
02:34:750 (662) - ^
02:36:105 (670) - 建議刪掉 删了 后面finish
02:54:268 (740) - 可以加個finish 这段特殊的节奏里面再finish感觉有点太难
02:59:961 (764) - 刪掉, 然後03:00:051 (765) - finish 改了
03:02:942 (779) - remove finish
03:05:834 (793) - ^

[Oni]
00:25:714 (135) - 同muzu, 但是不建議把finish放在1/4尾 放在这个重的地鼓挺好的
00:45:955 (237) - remove finish
00:52:822 (283) - finish刪掉應該會比較好, 跟音的話無視
00:54:991 (300) - 不建議把finish放在1/4尾, 可以刪掉或者改成1/2 前面纯色这里放个异色finish没事的吧
01:20:834 (452) - 刪掉finish, 或者01:20:292 (450,451) - 加finish 感觉后面的拍子更重
01:55:714 (645) - 不建議把finish放在1/4尾
01:59:328 (668) - 既然你這裡沒放finish為甚麼前面要放呢 这是意外 还是应该finish一下保持一致
02:12:340 (725) - 刪掉finish會比較好 同muzu
02:22:280 (794) - ^也沒必要
02:24:178 (806) - 既然02:24:449 (807) - 這裡沒放的話806也不應該放finish 感觉806的高音很合适
02:33:123 (865) - 和794一樣
02:46:316 (928) - 和283一樣
02:59:328 (1011) - 後面的小節線不能加的話這裡加finish應該會好點 这个很好
03:10:171 (1080) - 刪掉finish, 或者03:08:726 (1070,1075) - 加finish 1070开始是音乐变弱了 果断不加 1080又变强回来

不知道你是不是把std的finish音效用到taiko上了= =感覺有些地方很彆扭
That's all. Good Luck!

Kisses wrote:

Normal

1. 00:02:220 (1) - Deleting this would be nice. It would give more emphasis to the downbeat 00:02:943 (2) - instead of considering this, I rather want keep the starting time to be consistent in all diffs
2. 00:46:497 (1,2) - How about using circles instead of sliders? Would be nice to show the intensity imho https://i.imgur.com/9pR5ggk.png . Same for 01:46:678 (6,1,2) - I tried this earlier when I mapped this, but it seems too difficult for this diff so I refrained from using those
3. 01:00:774 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I think this rhythm is very hard to play as well as hard to read because of the snaps and spacing. https://i.imgur.com/hEhpLjp.png . Same for this section too 02:54:268 (1) - ok changed
4. 02:22:280 - skipping this drum beat feels empty. Same with 02:23:003 adding those feels kinda too much for me, and it kinda ruin the pattern
5. 03:08:726 (1,2) - Circles for rhythm variation and intensity? prefer to keep it simple like former ones

Hard

1. 00:02:220 (1,2) - Different number of repeats can make this pattern really hard to read. merged into one
2. 00:02:581 (2,1) - Also I recommend not to have such a big jump earlier on in the map and lowered spacing
3. 00:46:497 (1,2) and 00:47:039 (3,4) - stacking these would be better imho. Imo it fits the music better but it would also emphasis between parts like 00:47:220 (4,1) reasonable
4. 01:47:220 (1,2,3,4) - ^ yes
5. 03:08:726 (1,2,3,4) - ^ not really similar to above, I prefer to keep it here
6. 00:59:147 (4) - jump like 00:54:268 (3) ? circle jumps can be a bit harder, so I only made it a little bit bigger, also to the following
7. 01:59:870 (4) - ^
8. 02:52:641 (4) - ^
9. 01:00:774 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4) - might be a good idea to decrease spacing to 1.1x ~ . The amount of clicking makes the spacing quite hard. Same for this section 02:54:268 (1) - seeing the distance snap, I was only using the average 1.3x spacing for 01:00:774 (1,2,3,4,1) - which should not be taken as overdone at all, and in another way, when a rhythm is kinda hard to grab, like this, I think one of the most intuitive way to make things clear is to keep the distance snap, making the spacing smaller could make players think they were 1/2 beats and click earlier so I don't prefer it that way. same for the latter part
10. 02:11:617 (4,5,6,7) - smaller spacing would be better for the calm section imo 02:11:617 (4,5) - is the average spacing in this part, and 02:12:340 (6,7) - is a little bit bigger to express the higher pitch of vocal and the pace which is becoming faster. I think it's pretty reasonable as it is
11. 02:35:473 (3,4,5,6,7) - These 2 patterns feel like they would cause a lot of reading difficulty for players at this level. How about delete 02:35:834 (4) - and extend the slider 02:35:473 (3) ? I removed 6 instead
12. 02:42:340 (1,2) - stack these? It's still calm here for these 2 notes so not using big spacing like the kiai would fit better imo ok then
13. 02:47:762 (3) - Jump is smaller here than other diffs fixed
    

Insane

1. 1. 00:02:943 (1) - big jump after a stream is a bit hard to be exact, it's not a stream jump but rather a slider jump though, I made jump a bit smaller, 2.0 -> 1.8
   2. 00:16:497 (2,3) - is the weird stack intentional? yes, to avoid stack leniecy ruining the blanket
   3. 03:11:165 (3) - I feel it would be better to delete this note. If you delete this note it would follow the piano better and that's the feeling i got when playing this section. Same like you did in top diff ok then。 it's the japanese traditional shamisen, not piano though :3

Ikusa

1. 00:05:111 (6,7) - No doubles? 01:05:834 (6,7) - 03:02:220 (6,7) - I don't want the doubles be too sudden for players so I made the rhythm gradually harder, and it's consistent throughout different parts as you can see

[]w ~

[R] wrote:

yo

[Muzukashii]
00:06:196 - change kat, to give variety nice
00:11:979 - ^ sure
00:30:413 - ddkdd change ddkkd to unify part with 00:27:521 - good idea
00:41:798 - change don, sound are drop in 00:41:617 - reasonable
00:42:340 - change don ? want to keep it for the melody

00:45:955 - kkdKK change kd KK to make 00:46:497 - sound clear really good
00:52:461 - change kat to give variety good
00:58:605 - delete ?? to follow the vocal sound seems nice
01:02:491 - change don I think the pitch is higher than first half so I keep kat

01:06:919 - kdd make dkd sure
01:12:702 - ^ yay
01:19:388 - delete and 01:19:750 - add kat to follow the vocal that'd be inconsistent with the rhythm of the former part, kept this one
01:46:678 - kkdKK make kd KK agreed
01:59:328 - delete yes same as first part
03:03:304 - change kat yes
03:10:171 - change dong to emphasize triplet forward nice idea

[Oni]
00:42:702 - change don to emphasize 00:43:063 - good
00:48:033 - | 00:48:394 - | 00:48:937 - delete, this pattern feels like inner oni agreed
00:53:545 - kkdddddk change ddkkd k , pattern will more easy to hit used kkddd k
01:02:491 - change dd ? prefer to keep it for the higher pitch
01:48:666 - reduce some note in this part (like 00:48:033 - mods) did so
02:57:430 - change dd ? no change like above
02:59:961 - change don cool

that's all from me
good luck

1. 02:57:430 (2,4) - Delete clap and finish and replace with whistle? Like 02:54:539 (2,4,2,4) . I'm guessing you did this for emphasis but I'm not 100% sure

1. 01:02:220 (1) - This NC isn't necessary but it's up to you if you want to delete it or keep it. Same with 02:55:714 (1) - 02:58:605 (1) - 02:59:689 (1) -
2. 02:23:184 (3) - How about splitting this slider up into 2 circles? To show some contrast between 02:21:738 (1,2)
3. 02:35:473 (4,5) - The sharp angles might be a bit too weird for noobs. Could be worthwhile to structure them like your curved sliders, for example 00:36:196 (4,5)

1. 01:25:352 (1,2,3) - small thing but space this out like 02:04:298 (6,1) - 02:10:081 (6,1) - 02:30:684 (2,3) - etc maybe?

Zero__wind wrote:

Kisses wrote:

Insane

1. 00:16:497 (2,3) - is the weird stack intentional? yes, to avoid stack leniecy ruining the blanket

1. This diff is quite hard so hp 6.5 might make it a bit too hard for HR players to pass. Would 6 be ok for you?

Stefan wrote:

[Inner Oni]
Resnap the notes in the beatmap, some such as 01:49:026 (623,624,626) - are unsnapped by one ms and therefore the SV changes doesn't apply. -> Oops, fixed.

00:13:425 (78,79,80) - you could swap the colours for these three notes since 00:13:425 (78) - has the lighter instrument sound while 00:13:605 (80) - provides the drum hit that also got mapped with kat. 00:13:515 (79) - is the calm note here and therefore should be deeper. Remain unchanged as 00:13:244 (76,77,78) and 00:13:605 (80,81,82) - are mapped as kkd and ddk respectively to follow the pitch changes of the instrument.
01:14:148 (431,432,433) - same story same as ^

Happy with the rest.

Lasse wrote:

looked over the set and it seems fine to me, could just consider ar5 on normal since that's nicer to read for new players and density supports it too
let me know if you need someone to qualify

Lasse wrote:

yes