2017-05-23 21:43 Protastic101: ok
2017-05-23 21:43 Protastic101: rip me lol
2017-05-23 21:43 Protastic101: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1130164 remixed by DJ TOTTO - The 4th KAC DJ TOTTO's SELECTION [WINTER SOLSTICE]]
2017-05-23 21:43 Protastic101: 01:37:174 -
2017-05-23 21:44 Protastic101: SV sequence here averages 0.86x
2017-05-23 21:44 Protastic101: so uhhh
2017-05-23 21:45 Rivals_7: so reduce that or whta? xd
2017-05-23 21:45 Rivals_7: the first SV i mean
2017-05-23 21:45 Protastic101: idk, Im thinking
2017-05-23 21:46 Protastic101: cause currently, everything adds to 6.9, so you need to somehow add an extra 1.1 somewhere to get 8
2017-05-23 21:47 Protastic101: 01:37:174 - you could just do generic 0.4x, 0.8x, 1.2x, 1.6x speed up instead at 01:37:174 - 01:37:327 - 01:37:480 - 01:37:633 - respectively
2017-05-23 21:48 Protastic101: someday I'll figure out how to do others like that, but not today cuz im dumb
2017-05-23 21:48 Protastic101: let's see, what else
2017-05-23 21:49 Rivals_7: okay wait lemme do that first
2017-05-23 21:49 Protastic101: you just gonna do that?
2017-05-23 21:50 Rivals_7: oh emm doesnt sounds fit. i cant read that properly because speedup xd
2017-05-23 21:51 Rivals_7: lemme find out other way
2017-05-23 21:52 Protastic101: you could just do a generic bump, like 0.6x at 01:37:174 - , then 01:37:633 - 2.2x here to average to 1x
2017-05-23 21:54 Rivals_7: i was thinking up to smoothing it rather than a bump becuase that was maxus was concerned for
2017-05-23 21:54 Protastic101: ah yeah
2017-05-23 21:54 Protastic101: that's the thing I struggle with is figuring out a gradual SV change that isn't too sudden
2017-05-23 21:54 Protastic101: D:
2017-05-23 21:55 Rivals_7: rrrr math
2017-05-23 21:58 Protastic101: I'm stumped
2017-05-23 21:58 Protastic101: I really don't know how you could smooth out the SVs in a way with even intervals D:
2017-05-23 21:59 Rivals_7: so - 01:37:174 - i use 0,5 and then i change the gradual speedup at - 01:37:480 - to 1 -> 1,25 -> 1,5 -> 1,75
2017-05-23 21:59 Rivals_7: is that good enough xd
2017-05-23 22:00 Protastic101: that makes 7.5/8 which means the average is still 0.94x
2017-05-23 22:00 Protastic101: but wait
2017-05-23 22:00 Rivals_7: its quite close to 1 so uhh
2017-05-23 22:01 Protastic101: if you make the 0.5 at 01:37:174 - 0.63x instead, it'll average out
2017-05-23 22:01 Rivals_7: oh do i need to average the other by x0,92?
2017-05-23 22:02 Rivals_7: the gradual speedup svs
2017-05-23 22:03 Protastic101: uh
2017-05-23 22:03 Protastic101: which ones you mean? The ones like at 01:38:775 - ?
2017-05-23 22:03 Rivals_7: uh no. i mean at - 01:37:480 - the base is still 0,92 right?
2017-05-23 22:04 Protastic101: well no. I'm taking 01:37:174 - to 01:37:786 - as an entire sequence
2017-05-23 22:04 Rivals_7: ah
2017-05-23 22:05 Rivals_7: so 1 -> 1,25 thing is good?
2017-05-23 22:05 Protastic101: so basically, 01:37:174 - to 01:37:480 - is the 0.63x SV, then 01:37:480 - is 1, 01:37:557 - 1.25, -01:37:633 - 1.5, 01:37:710 - 1.75
2017-05-23 22:05 Protastic101: Yeah because (0.63 x 4) + 1 + 1.25 + 1.5 + 1.75 = very close to 8 which is the total number of units
2017-05-23 22:06 Rivals_7:
2017-05-23 22:07 Protastic101: oh my god, I am so stupid
2017-05-23 22:07 Protastic101: yes, you need to multiply all those values by 0.92x because it's still within the 196 bpm section
2017-05-23 22:08 Rivals_7: lel
2017-05-23 22:08 Rivals_7: oke then xD
2017-05-23 22:08 Protastic101: Im so sorry lol
2017-05-23 22:08 Rivals_7: its understandable. judging by your time right now xd
2017-05-23 22:09 Protastic101: lol, it's not even that late, im just ded
2017-05-23 22:09 Protastic101: 01:16:511 - ok, regarding the SVs here
2017-05-23 22:10 Protastic101: 01:16:587 - 01:16:893 - 01:17:199 - these should be 0.77x instead since the base SV is 1.5 (1.38 when affected by the normalizing one)
2017-05-23 22:11 Protastic101: four units total between each note, so (4 - 1.5) / 3 = 0.83, then multiply by the normalizing SV, 0.92x to get 0.77x
2017-05-23 22:12 Protastic101: that should also be changed for the special diff too
2017-05-23 22:13 Rivals_7: hm its kinda close to the normalizing sv
2017-05-23 22:14 Protastic101: 00:10:905 - 00:11:224 - should be 0.72x because math (pls no ask for work, too lazy to show)
2017-05-23 22:14 Rivals_7: could it be a little bit slower
2017-05-23 22:14 Protastic101: you could increase the strength of the first sv?
2017-05-23 22:14 Rivals_7: the 1,38?
2017-05-23 22:14 Protastic101: yeah
2017-05-23 22:15 Protastic101: that'd change the second SV and make it smaller if you increased the first one
2017-05-23 22:15 Protastic101: like uhm, say you use 1.9x as the base instead
2017-05-23 22:15 Protastic101: then it'd become 01:16:511 - 01:16:817 - 01:17:123 - 1.75x
2017-05-23 22:16 Protastic101: 01:16:587 - 01:16:893 - 01:17:199 - 0.64x
2017-05-23 22:18 Protastic101: ask me if you want work, too lazy to write it out since you understand the process already
2017-05-23 22:18 Rivals_7: hmm okey. btw how do you think about this section - 01:17:429 (77429|3,77429|2,77429|1) -
2017-05-23 22:18 Rivals_7: svs
2017-05-23 22:19 Protastic101: oh, assuming you make 01:17:429 - 1.75x (1.9x base), then 01:17:506 - is just 0.09x SV, which is unrankable. So uh, keep the current 1.38x and 0.46x cause it works well for it and averages to 1x
2017-05-23 22:21 Rivals_7: hmm oke then back xd
2017-05-23 22:21 Rivals_7: (i'm too dumb for this :u)
2017-05-23 22:22 Protastic101: 01:17:735 - here and 01:17:812 - i gotta ask that you flip the SVs though, cause the next sequence's starting SV should be greater than 1 if the previous sequence's SV was greater than 1. Basically, dont put a bump and reverse bump back to back
2017-05-23 22:24 Rivals_7: hmmm looks weird rrrrr
2017-05-23 22:24 Rivals_7: i think i just do 0,92 on that
2017-05-23 22:24 Protastic101: actually, what's the base SV for the 0.69 answer? Cause when I multiply by the reciprocal, it gets me .738
2017-05-23 22:24 Rivals_7: no bump
2017-05-23 22:24 Protastic101: ok
2017-05-23 22:25 Rivals_7: ok done
2017-05-23 22:25 Protastic101: did you fix the SVs at 01:16:511 - in the special diff too?
2017-05-23 22:26 Rivals_7: yeah
2017-05-23 22:27 Protastic101: k, that's all my complaints then
2017-05-23 22:27 Protastic101: update and Ill rebub
2017-05-23 22:29 Rivals_7: btw i change something at 01:46:604 (106604|3,106604|2) -
2017-05-23 22:29 Rivals_7: how do you think?
2017-05-23 22:29 Rivals_7: in winter
2017-05-23 22:30 Rivals_7: o ye btw already updated
2017-05-23 22:31 Protastic101: I dont notice a difference lol
2017-05-23 22:31 Protastic101: seems cool to me
2017-05-23 22:31 Rivals_7: ah ok lmao so yea hopefully thats all
2017-05-23 22:33 Protastic101: 00:10:905 - and 00:11:224 - o, u never responded to this lol. I said the SV should be 0.72x cause averages
2017-05-23 22:33 Rivals_7: o fug
2017-05-23 22:34 Rivals_7: but uh 0,72 sounds too close to normalize :u
2017-05-23 22:34 Protastic101: but then that means i have to suggest a different starting SV to make the difference more noticeable
2017-05-23 22:34 Protastic101: aaaa
2017-05-23 22:34 Protastic101: ACTION aaaas away
2017-05-23 22:35 Rivals_7: o o wait thats
2017-05-23 22:35 Rivals_7: okay i guess
2017-05-23 22:35 Protastic101: tfw am sad potato
2017-05-23 22:35 Rivals_7: same tbh
2017-05-23 22:36 Rivals_7: reupdated
2017-05-23 22:36 Protastic101: ok
2017-05-23 22:37 Protastic101: cool stuff then