1. Doormat's Insane (4.25 stars, 311 notes)
2. Hard (3.06 stars, 242 notes)
3. Mk's Easy (1.47 stars, 100 notes)
4. Normal (1.88 stars, 156 notes)

pkhg wrote:

me avisas cuando el doormat termine su diff

1. 00:51:044 - It's pretty weird to have an object here while the stronger beat in the song exists at 00:50:856. You may want to consider a rhythm rework.
2. 00:51:794 - Since the volume already increased to 70% here, the shift towards the kiai section wasn't powerful compared to the song.

1. 00:23:856 (4) - I'm not pretty sure what this rhythm is for. If this is following the melody, leaving 00:24:231 empty while expressing 00:23:856 felt weird. Just using a note at 00:24:044 will feel more natural imo.
2. 00:37:544 (1,2) - Why is the spacing so large?
3. 00:39:606 - I understand the usage of the default soft-whistle, but 60% felt too high in volume.
4. 00:43:544 - Music kinda changes here. Mind setting the volume higher?
5. 01:02:481 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - There were too much 1/2 here imo. With that in mind, changing 01:03:794 (3,4) to a 1/2 reverse slider would settle the rhythm better.

1. 00:03:044 (1) - Unnecesary new combo.
2. 00:15:606 (2,3) - These could be a better parallel.
3. 00:50:856 (1,2) - Starting the new combo from (2) will fit the song better.

1. 00:13:169 (5,6) - Inconsistent spacing. Was this intended? Then it wasn't effective.
2. 00:20:481 - I can understand you wanted to follow the vocals, but completely ignoring this beat didn't reflected the difference of 00:20:294 (1,2) each.
3. 00:35:481 - Maybe you wanted to focus the melody, but ignoring this strong drum beat wasn't natural. Leaving both here and 00:35:106 didn't reflected those difference properly.
4. 01:11:856 (5,1) - The design is really awkward here. Visual isn't indicating the rhythm of (5,1,2) properly, and the flow isn't even natural.

Sonnyc wrote:

Not bad, but Insane seems to need much more work to get this considered being ranked. It currently lacks technique skill too much in my view.

Atamare wrote:

why nobody maps the full ver? :c

Underforest wrote:

Atamare wrote:

why nobody maps the full ver? :c

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/440169

• 
  01:05:106 (2) - this feels strange, try to change... I suggest something like this http://puu.sh/pVSlp/4cc74d563c.jpg
  01:23:294 (2,3) - Blanket
  01:26:106 (3,4) - ^

• 
  00:05:106 (3,4) - This does not sound quite right. For me 00:05:481 (4) - should be clickable, so you have better pace, do something like this: http://puu.sh/pVPxy/4d5fa58fda.jpg
  00:06:044 (1,2,3,4,5) - Same, do 3 and 4 like this: http://puu.sh/pVQ4r/1ac85fa902.jpg and then 5 and 00:07:544 (1) - : http://puu.sh/pVQeD/a073de5183.jpg
  00:11:669 (5,1) - Blanket
  00:14:294 (3,4) - ^
  00:15:044 (1,2,3) - These sliders should be parallel and have a distance as close as possible to each other (for me). something like that: http://puu.sh/pVQy1/6cbc28698b.jpg
  00:24:606 (3,4) - Blanket
  00:53:856 (4,1) - Blanket?
  00:54:419 (2,3) - Blanket?
  00:58:919 (2,3) - ^
  01:10:919 (2,3) - Blanket

• 
  00:29:856 (1,2) - Blanket
  00:32:294 (1) - Should be clickable, instead, make a long but simple slider, starting at 00:31:544 (1) - and ends in 00:32:106 - then add a note on the white tick
  00:58:169 (5,1) - Blanket

• 
  00:20:294 (1) - Should be clickable, as before, make a long slide that has no reverse, it starts in 00:19:544 (1) - and ends in 00:20:106 - then add a note on the white tick
  00:31:544 (1) - ^
  00:41:106 (4,5) - Blanket

1. 01:25:544 (1,2) - http://puu.sh/pWw84/1731169c99.jpg so you dont skip the last cymbal
   

1. 01:02:481 (3,4,1) - no creo que sea buena idea stackar tantas notas xd
2. 01:04:544 (1,2) - triggered http://puu.sh/pWwfH/f4944b81a7.jpg
   no me gusto que tuviera tanto spacing
   

1. 00:17:294 (3,4) - es mejor si la nota siguiente esta hacia adonde apunta el slider :p
2. 00:20:294 (3,4) - same
3. 00:45:606 (3) - te falto una clap a principio
4. 00:54:044 (1) - 00:57:044 (1) - 00:57:044 (1) - 01:00:794 (3) - 01:06:044 (1) - 01:12:044 (1) - a estos les falta whistle
   lo haces en hartas partes xd no me gusta mucho eso igual esta mucho mejor que el map de neko :p
   

1. 00:10:544 (1,2,3,4,5) - the 3/4 sliders dont fit here everything lands on the white ticks.
2. 00:12:606 (2,3,4,5,6) - looks weird. do it like doormat and increase spacing gradually
3. 00:20:294 (1,2) - its better if you stick to 1/2. maybe it kinda fits for vocals but there are sounds in the red ticks too
4. 00:36:231 (2,3) - why
5. 00:36:981 (5) - this is more understandable but i dont really like extended sliders. theres a lot more
6. 00:42:606 (2,3) - things covered by sliderbodies looks uglyyy
7. 00:52:544 (1) - sv goes nuts from here. its even higher than doormats also random change to 1x here01:04:169 (5) - luLz. 1.1x seems better
   and yes i dont like extended sliders i suggest to not use them looks like you overused them also theyre dqable without a really god reason.

1. 00:35:950 (8) - overmap makes me cry
2. 00:13:450 - as much as ignoring strong beats
3. 00:45:419 (3) - clap on tail
4. 00:53:481 (4) - remove clap
5. 01:15:794 (1,2,3,4) - pls
6. 01:21:419 (5) - clap on head
7. 01:22:169 (7) - same
8. 01:26:669 (5) - i really prefer clap instead of these whistles. they arent even consistent so it feels really random and unfitting
   00:57:231 (2) - 00:19:356 (5) - ^ more of these
   

1. Okay.

1. 00:32:669 - add note? 00:31:544 ~ 00:36:794 - I think that it is better to align the pattern.
   ummm,good.
   
   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
   
   
   [ Normal]
   1. 00:24:231 - add note? Comprehensible sound is ringing.
   2. 01:26:669 - change circle,and spinner start 01:26:856 - ? I think that is better tailored to the growth of the vocal.
   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
   
   
   [ Hard]
   1. 00:05:106 (3,4) - blanket?
   2. 00:08:106 (2,3) - I think well with a certain ds
2. 00:15:044 (1) - like this? I think it looks beautiful
   

   402,288,15044,6,0,B|442:247|424:176|424:176|484:163,1,150,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:15:981 (3) - Improve up a little end point?
   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
   
   
   [ Doormat's Symphony]
   1. umm,,I think that good map.

Underforest wrote:

BN finding delayed 1 week cause the qualification for other map of the same song, rip

captainlatias wrote:

Hi.

[Normal]00:05:294 could turn to the left to make it look better DS will mess with overlaps :p no
00:16:169 note sounds like it shouldn't be here, try extending the slider to where the note was I'm following drums
01:04:169 to 01:04:544 interesting thanks so much c: I take a lot of effort to do it

[Hard]
00:06:044 could turn the slider down to make it look nicer I don't want to mess the flow

Hope this mod helps !

captainlatias wrote:

Doormat's Symphony

00:10:544(1,2,1,2) uneven jumps uneven here creates some nice emphasis imo. making them equal distance would make the jump feel like it has less impact imo
00:19:356 can make it more to left to create blanket not intended to be a blanket
00:29:106(2,3,4,5) more uneven jumps jumps here are increasing in distance to show an increase in intensity since the vocals here are slightly more powerful than the previous parts of the song

i have this feeling that the ar is a little to high. Maybe put it to around 8.8 or 8.9 ? i agree; lowered to 8.5

Hope this mod helps !

1. 00:05:106 (3,4) - fix blanket
2. 00:06:606 (3,4) - ^
3. 00:08:106 (2,3) - make these identical
4. 00:11:669 (5,1) - fix blanket
5. 00:15:606 (2,3) - make these identical
6. 00:44:294 (3) - Ctrl+g would make the flow and reading a lot easier here
7. 00:54:419 (2,3) - blanket?
8. 01:06:794 (3,4) - ^
9. 01:12:044 - remove the clap, replace it with a whistle

1. 00:13:544 (1,2) -
2. 00:33:794 (4,1) -
3. 00:38:669 (2,3) -
4. 00:43:544 (1,2) -
5. 00:55:544 (1,2) -

1. 00:14:294 (2,3) - make this into 2 circles for emphasis on 00:14:669 - this strong vocal
2. 00:20:294 (2) - ^
3. 00:39:044 (3,4) - fix the polarity like this maybe
   and fix the polarity in other places if you do

1. 00:34:544 (1,2) - This looks like a really wide open blanket. I recommend you make it a real blanket so it looks less strange.
2. 01:25:544 (1,2) - fix blanket

1. 00:08:669 (3) - slightly off-track, but probably fine. Fix this if you want to.
2. 00:11:106 (3) - It might be a better idea to change this into 2 circles. Contrast between 00:09:794 (5) - and 00:10:544 (1,2) - will highlight the trumpet(I think) and the drum. It's won't be too hard imo.
3. 00:14:294 (2,3) - maybe it's just me but I think this is really awkward. Some zigzags or curving them will do.
4. 00:17:669 (2,3,4) - no. not in Normal. too hard to read.
5. The 1/2 triplets or doubles worry me. Try to keep them consistent: stack, or spread, unless there's something that signifies otherwise such as 00:35:856 (3,4,5) - .
   Although this is not the easiest diff, but it's still Normal. Please make it friendly to beginners.
6. 00:41:669 (3,4,5,6) - Try something like this so as to make 00:41:669 (3,4) - more comfortable to play and some emphasis to 00:42:419 (5,6) - .
7. 00:50:106 (3,4) - separate them into circles? emphasis. check point 2. it's something similar
8. 01:25:169 (4,5,1) - same reason, but I think this one is fine for they put nice emphasis on 01:25:544 (1) -
   About the kiai, I don't see anything really wrong with it, but something can be improved.
   00:52:544 (1,2,3,4) - and similar points like 00:58:544 (1,2,3) - 01:04:544 (1,2,3) - don't quite live up to the music. I expect so much more than a series of 1/1 sliders orz. Here's my idea but please, don't copy them. I don't want to turn this into Crystilz's Normal
   
   Just be creative XD
   Remember, these are suggestions and you don't need to fix according to them. Just do things that make the map more enjoyable and fit with your style and preference.

1. 00:00:044 (1,2,3,4) - wat
2. 00:02:856 (1,2,3,4,5) - something like this should flow better
3. 00:11:669 (5,1) - stacking will make the pattern feel more as a whole, but this is also fine.
4. 00:12:794 (3,4,5) - I don't see any reason for the flow break here besides you ran out of space lol.
5. After you fix (or not) ^, try making 00:13:169 (4,5) - exciting. Something like accelerating motion will do.
6. 00:20:294 (3,4) - blanket them, or continue the pattern.
7. 01:04:169 (5,6) - I feel like they shouldn't be stacked. The trumpet calls for them being spread lol.
   

1. 00:12:606 (3,4,5,6,7) - I get the accelerating idea here, but try making it more obvious maybe? It's so subtle that the effect is somehow lost. Slow 00:11:856 (2,3) - more and make the DS differences more noticable.
2. 00:21:044 (1) - I think this one deserves a jump. The reason is pretty obvious.
3. 00:27:044 (1) - ^
4. 00:36:981 (5,6) - why does the spacing drop here? I think just continue 2.xx spacing like 00:36:231 (2,3) - will be better. Sharp drop at 00:37:544 (1) - will provide a great emphasis.
5. 01:15:794 (1,2,3,4) - lol wtf

CrystilonZ wrote:

As promised.

[Mk's Easy]
This diff is probably fine, though I have some concerns about the flow and structural stuff.
But the mapper isn't here, so I guess there's no point asking orz lol

[Normal]

1. 00:08:669 (3) - slightly off-track, but probably fine. Fix this if you want to. nope isn't off-track
2. 00:11:106 (3) - It might be a better idea to change this into 2 circles. Contrast between 00:09:794 (5) - and 00:10:544 (1,2) - will highlight the trumpet(I think) and the drum. It's won't be too hard imo. ok
3. 00:14:294 (2,3) - maybe it's just me but I think this is really awkward. Some zigzags or curving them will do. I'm trying to do a good flow here
4. 00:17:669 (2,3,4) - no. not in Normal. too hard to read. isn't xD
5. The 1/2 triplets or doubles worry me. Try to keep them consistent: stack, or spread, unless there's something that signifies otherwise such as 00:35:856 (3,4,5) - .
   Although is not the easiest diff, but it's still Normal. Please make it friendly to beginners. For those patterns, it follows perfectly the rhythm, it won't hurt cause it's only 160 BPM xD
6. 00:41:669 (3,4,5,6) - Try something like this so as to make 00:41:669 (3,4) - more comfortable to play and some emphasis to 00:42:419 (5,6) - . tried something better
7. 00:50:106 (3,4) - separate them into circles? emphasis. check point 2. it's something similar not for this part, I found it hard
8. 01:25:169 (4,5,1) - same reason, but I think this one is fine for they put nice emphasis on 01:25:544 (1) - c:
   About the kiai, I don't see anything really wrong with it, but something can be improved.
   00:52:544 (1,2,3,4) - and similar points like 00:58:544 (1,2,3) - 01:04:544 (1,2,3) - don't quite live up to the music. I expect so much more than a series of 1/1 sliders orz. Here's my idea but please, don't copy them. I don't want to turn this into Crystilz's Normal lmao I'm copying rhythm for vocals and rhythm
   
   Just be creative XD
   Remember, these are suggestions and you don't need to fix according to them. Just do things that make the map more enjoyable and fit with your style and preference.

[Hard]

1. 00:00:044 (1,2,3,4) - wat
2. 00:02:856 (1,2,3,4,5) - something like this should flow better fixed
3. 00:11:669 (5,1) - stacking will make the pattern feel more as a whole, but this is also fine. This is supposed to be a blanket and a jump at the same time
4. 00:12:794 (3,4,5) - I don't see any reason for the flow break here besides you ran out of space lol. It's a jump too
5. After you fix (or not) ^, try making 00:13:169 (4,5) - exciting. Something like accelerating motion will do. I'll think on it
6. 00:20:294 (3,4) - blanket them, or continue the pattern. blanketted them a bit
7. 01:04:169 (5,6) - I feel like they shouldn't be stacked. The trumpet calls for them being spread lol. I don't want to ruin this blanket
   

Also, lack of spinners, especially is lower diffs, is not very good. Try adding spinners for score variation.

Underforest wrote:

deleted spinner in all diffs, I feel part is too quick

Good luck!~

1. i would highly recommend adding a spinner at the end of the map, it's totally doable and there's no reason to don't have it, otherwise the scores will be all the same

1. 00:03:419 (1,1) - i don't really agree with the combo usage here, i guess you used this for "readability" but there's nothing tricky, the jumps are really intuitive and the rhythm doesn't really change so the NC is pointless imo
2. 00:05:856 - from what i can see, you were following the synth with stuff like 00:05:106 (3,4) - so i think you could change this 00:05:856 (5,1) - for a 1/1 slider since it's more intuitive, you could also use more spacing for this note, since the beat is pretty strong o.o (i'd say the same for spots like 00:07:356 - ,00:08:856 - etc)
3. 00:35:856 (7,8,1) - are you sure about the triplet? i can't really hear an 1/4 note here, sounds out of place :'(
4. 00:45:044 - seems to be an stronger beat than 00:44:856 - , i guess you were trying to follow the voice but i think if that's your intention, then you should extend 00:44:856 (1) - to the red tick
5. 00:46:169 - this plays kinda odd, it lacks of emphasis and also the transition from the previous objects makes it unintuitive due the angles between the objects, i think something like this represents the music much better and also it's nicer to play
6. 01:03:044 - you could have used more clickable objects for this phrase, i didn't really like how the snares were put on slider tails, since they are really noisy
7. 01:08:950 (7) - overmapped?
8. 01:15:981 (2,4) - i think you could use hitsounds to represent the drums on these objects, can also add some whistles to represent the piano xd

Kagetsu wrote:

this song again

Xinely wrote:

00:56:856 (3,4) - 2 of 1/2 sliders give better feedback to the map imo, 00:57:231 - 00:57:419 - are strong and different music so you have to map them w/o follow other (00:57:044 - ) in a note I think it's fine because follows music
- 01:14:481 - can add note here if follow vocal (i guess you're following vocal too) in this part i'm following drum

ok for me spread from normal to hard is a bit too far. normal in here imo should have SR around 2 to make better spread (your hard contains 2 of triplets when normal barely can see the 1/2), imo my suggestions will make this better so yea Unfortunately, I need to disagree with your idea, because this will alter the spread gap I keep
Distance between Insane and Hard: 1.18
Distance between Hard and Normal: 1.18
It's fine for now, so don't worry about it ^w^

Hard :
- 00:00:044 (1,2,3,4) - more symmetrical? XD already symmetrical, I created this with CTRL+SHIFT+D
- 00:03:044 (3) - you emphasis those strong musics with slider's repeat? poor :C I feel it's fine
- 00:29:294 (3,4) - symmetrical pls already symmetrical

honestly i dislike normal and hard flow, feel like unsmooth not fit with my taste so good luck >< </3

Kagetsu wrote:

queue

[Doormat's Symphony]

1. 00:03:419 (1,1) - i don't really agree with the combo usage here, i guess you used this for "readability" but there's nothing tricky, the jumps are really intuitive and the rhythm doesn't really change so the NC is pointless imo i disagree; new combos can also be used to emphasize certain parts of the song as well; they aren't used exclusively for helping with readability or ensuring that the combo count doesn't get too long. in this case, the new combos are to emphasize the high pitched piano notes that come into play here
2. 00:05:856 - from what i can see, you were following the synth with stuff like 00:05:106 (3,4) - so i think you could change this 00:05:856 (5,1) - for a 1/1 slider since it's more intuitive, you could also use more spacing for this note, since the beat is pretty strong o.o (i'd say the same for spots like 00:07:356 - ,00:08:856 - etc) there's a kick on the downbeat that i wanted to emphasize, hence why this is divided up like this
3. 00:35:856 (7,8,1) - are you sure about the triplet? i can't really hear an 1/4 note here, sounds out of place :'( the triple is to accentuate the pitch change in the vocals, although i've gotten this comment before. will change if it comes up again in the future
4. 00:45:044 - seems to be an stronger beat than 00:44:856 - , i guess you were trying to follow the voice but i think if that's your intention, then you should extend 00:44:856 (1) - to the red tick yeah you're right; changed up rhythm here to make downbeat clickable
5. 00:46:169 - this plays kinda odd, it lacks of emphasis and also the transition from the previous objects makes it unintuitive due the angles between the objects, i think something like this represents the music much better and also it's nicer to play changed pattern here when i changed the above; hopefully it's better now?
6. 01:03:044 - you could have used more clickable objects for this phrase, i didn't really like how the snares were put on slider tails, since they are really noisy i think the instruments take more precedent than the drums here
7. 01:08:950 (7) - overmapped? again, it's to help accentuate the pitch change in the vocals. this one is more noticeable than the other so i don't think this one needs to be changed
8. 01:15:981 (2,4) - i think you could use hitsounds to represent the drums on these objects, can also add some whistles to represent the piano xd i don't think hitsounds are necessary here; it'd make the slider stream sound too busy imo

this song again

Xinely wrote:

Easy :
- 00:22:544 (1,2,3) - try blanket please I think he wants to keep this to follow music
- 00:28:544 (1,3) - not recommended for easy, the combo (300 or 100 or 50) covers the (3)'s head which makes hard to read for newbies is not that hard tho but let's see the opinion of bns
- 00:34:544 (1,2) - can try better blanket same as second 22 and also to keep consistency
- 00:50:856 - should be mapped 8(, try http://puu.sh/qlqt7/b4378f2272.jpg he also wants to follow music and do this easy for beginners