forum

Lucky Star no Minna - Kumikyoku "Lucky Star Douga" [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
27
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Sunday, April 28, 2019 at 11:36:17 PM

Artist: Lucky Star no Minna
Title: Kumikyoku "Lucky Star Douga"
Source: らき☆すた
Tags: raki suta konata izumi and friends
BPM: 172
Filesize: 22810kb
Play Time: 15:24
Difficulties Available:
  1. Lucky (4.43 stars, 4587 notes)
Download: Lucky Star no Minna - Kumikyoku "Lucky Star Douga"
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
happy burfday konata


This will be sung btw.
Yuzeyun
finish your map fucker
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock

_Gezo_ wrote:

finish your map fucker
heyyy i did
Aldwych
Wow
Evil mod #1 IN FRENCH

[Testplay]

Oui Oui Le Tesplay

Je me suis bien amusé, au final ce qui m'a le plus posé problème les les stream full d ou ce genre de trucs
Et quelques shitmiss à la timmy mais w/e
[General]

AImod est pas content

PREVIEW POINT WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Même si c'est un medley, j'aurais bien vu quelques kiai, j'ai pas trop checké sur le coup ou les mettre (j'y ai pensé en plein mod :V)

J'ai un peu peur du HP ici, vu que c'est du 15 minutes, c'est ptet un peu élevé, a voir.

[Lycky]

00:13:238 : Pour tous ces kats, je vois pas l'intérêt, ils ne suivent pas la main mélodie de lucky star et sont pas utiles, c'est un peu comme un filler pour pas grand chose imo, go go delete? Surtout que tu as pas mal de vide après alors que la musique est plus intense, donc je pense que c'est mieux si ces kats sont pas présent.

00:28:586 : Je pense que tu devrais étendre le stream en ajoutant un d, c'est un peu pointless mais c'est plus en accord avec la batterie

00:30:680 : Je suis assez surpris que t'as pas mis de stream ici, p'tet un truc comme ça? :



00:35:389 : Si on suit la mélodie, ça devrait être un k plutôt (la même chose pour les patterns similaires :V)

00:40:970 : Idem, mais comme tu utilise des triples, je verrais un triple k ici.

00:58:935 : En regardant les patterns précédents (00:57:017), ce d ne devrait pas exister, en fait c'est un peu bizzare d'avoir un d ici et pas un autre 1/1 plus tôt (same for 01:04:517, 01:10:098).

01:40:621 : Imo tu suit pas mal les vocals dans cette map et ne pas avoir un d à 01:40:447 (pour le "desu") est un peu bizzare, so j'aurais déplacé ce d 1/2 plus tôt. (Same for 01:43:412 etc...)

01:46:726 : Full d stream is so meh when you have vocals :/ how about something like :



01:50:912 : J'aurrais commencé le triplé ici si on suit les vocals (like at 01:51:610).

02:25:098 : Double doublé comme tu as fait sur le next pattern?

02:53:354 : Imo kddk or dkkd est mieux et met les contrastes là où ils devraient être. (Same for 02:58:936).

03:48:470 : Sur ce stream j'aurais bien mis des k au niveau des "beep", personnal opinion.

04:23:005 : Spinner ou Sliders? Ca fait un peu trop vide pour un solo guitare :/

05:01:377 : Si on suit la logique de tes patterns, ce k devrait être à 04:59:982

05:14:633 : Genre ici c'est un bon endroit pour un kiai :o

05:41:668 : Ici ca devrait être kd d plutôt, ça sonne mieux.

06:24:052 : Plutôt d ici si on suit la mélodie. En fait je dirais même ddkkd pour avoir un meilleur contraste avec 06:24:400 via la guitare en background. (Et parce que c'est très la consistance avec 06:35:214)

07:31:203 : Swap pour faire k d? C'est plus logique via le piano et parce que beats à 07:31:377 (Idem pour 07:36:784)

08:12:718 : Le 1/8 ici est legit, après c'est comme tu veux.

08:17:249 : Actually, je pense que faire 2x kdk ici est beaucoup mieux et ensuite kdkdk sur le quintuple (08:18:645).

08:36:784 : Personellement j'enlèverai le triplé ici pour avoir un finisher à 08:38:959, puis un d à 08:37:133 pour combler le vide.

09:10:098 : Imo, un rythme en 4 1 2, c'est assez tard (meaning dumb not late lol) et complexe, et vu que y'a un beat ici, je pense que c'est mieux d'avoir un d ici que rien du tout. (Pareil pour 09:11:493 et les autres olala).

10:41:121 : Mfw je vois ca et le SR, please xD. C'est so 1512, ceci dit t'as pas vraiment le choix. Rip in pain perdu

11:32:772 : Dans ce genre d'endroit j'ajouterais bien un k, contrairement aux autres endroit ou on sent que des sons s’arrêtent (Comme à 11:31:377 par exemple) ici y'a pas d'arret et je pense pas un break sois la meilleure solution (pareil pour 11:35:563), après tu peux utiliser des dons si tu préfère dû aux beats.

Pour le reste ça me va, j'ai pas forcément de points qui m'ont réellement choqué, juste que tu as parfois un peu trop violé le finisher mais ça va.
Prends cette lucky star! ayy ayy lmao
Skylish
Hi, Ozzy, from your evil,awful and sorrowful BN queue.

[General]
- Uncheck Widescreen Supp.

[Lucky]

> 01:38:180 - add d? The vocal actually ends at this timing.

> 02:45:854 (778,779) - move 1/2 backwards? Although it is matching the drum..., it sounds weird because it is 1/2 forward the vocal.

> 02:47:249 (782,783,784,785,786,787,788) - try this? I don't think that those kkkkkkk fit neither the drum nor the vocal. There is no need to add a stream, in addition.


> 03:06:086 (865) - change to k, higher vocal sound and k can lead to the vocal sound at 03:06:261 (866) -

> 03:07:831 (867) - change to d, 03:08:005 (868,869) - are more outstanding, using d to emphasize them.

> 03:21:261 (915) - change to k, sounds better.

> 03:35:563 (974,975,976,977,978,979,980,981,982,983,984,985,986) - The patterns sound too clumsy (for me?) try this:


> 03:48:121 (1043) - use a slider to replace those monochrome stream? Those d are ... annoying lol.

> 03:51:086 (1062,1064,1065) - / 03:53:876 (1072,1074) - K?

> 04:22:307 (1237) - well... simply I think that streaming as a long vocal note is an annoying way... slider replacement here.

> 04:53:005 - you are matching the bell in this session. Did you miss a note (d) here? There is a bell at this timing.

> 04:53:703 (55,57) - / 04:57:889 (60) - / 05:01:377 (63) - / change to d. I think that mapping the bell with all k is a bit boring. Besides, there are pitches in the bell, I think you can follow the pitches. (But if you say that you do not want to cause any conflicts with vocal, then fine, just use k.)

> 05:04:866 (70,76) - / 05:09:052 (87) - / change to D , same reason as above (In fact, my advice is as same as how you map in the upcoming more complicated session accidentally lol)

> 05:12:540 (103,104,105,106) - change to kkkk due to the background bell. There is the highest pitch at 05:12:540 - .

> 06:14:807 (20,21) - chagne to k, a mirror of 06:13:761 (13,14) -

> 06:15:680 (27) - change to k, this note stands out.

> 06:24:226 (10) - change to d?

> 06:50:912 (53) - change to K (In this session, I think mono-k is fine because of the calm airs)

> 08:17:249 (175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183) - these notes are completely fine. I still list it out because I feel weird because I am tapping along the vocal / synth (idk). It is okay.

> 08:41:145 (58) - change to d? d can emphasize the k on
08:41:494 (61) -

> 13:22:307 (160) - change to d?

> 13:25:795 (184,185) - add k between these two notes to form kkkkk ?

> 13:47:598 (322,323,324,325,326,327,328,329,330) -
again... I do not like monochrome Finish when there are different pitches (I know this is subjective and not a proper mod :() : KDD KKD DKD ?

> 14:24:923 (493,494) - ctrl+G, sounds better

I am dead. (and 1 more 1 mintute hell map to go)
Nishizumi
Hi evil BN, from your queue

[Lucky]

wtf that diff name (?)

  1. 00:56:145 (141,142) swap these ? since the "cha" sound on (141) is similar as 00:54:749 - also it's looks better with the flows
  2. 01:13:412 - why is this only one kk on 2-plet ? change it to dk for consistent pattern with other
  3. 01:28:412 - wut de finisher ?? did you misplace it ? since at 01:17:249 doesn't have finisher, but they're same
  4. 01:31:377 - same as above, this similar like 01:20:214
  5. 01:49:517 - add finish ? this is peak from 01:46:726 -
  6. 02:14:284 (586,587,588) - change these to k ? for better structure pattern, from 02:11:842 - they have same two consecutive triplets
  7. 02:19:866 (629,630,631) - same as above
  8. 02:22:482 - here is kinda many of constructive k, maybe you can change this to k for better flows
  9. 02:24:924 to 02:25:273 - change this to kd dk instead of kkd d, the vocals is stopped at 02:25:011 - like 02:27:802
  10. 02:36:086 - same as above
  11. 03:05:912 - this vocals pitch goes up, maybe you can change here to k
  12. 03:40:098 (1000,1001) - swap these ? on 03:40:447 - this is inconsistent with other
  13. 03:46:552 - add d for following the drums sound ?
  14. 03:54:749 - why is this only one K sound ?? change it to D or change them to K (from 03:52:307 - to 03:54:749 -)
  15. 04:23:005 - add spinner instead of blank ?
  16. 05:14:633 - add finish here ? for emphasis the vocals like (05:25:796)
  17. 07:16:726 - here is kinda many of constructive d, change this to k ?
  18. 07:41:145 - add D here ? there is piano sound
  19. 08:11:493 - change this triplet to ddd for better flows
  20. 08:28:935 - change this to k ? to avoid d sequential excessive
  21. 09:06:435 - added spinner or slider instead of blank ?
  22. 10:24:400 - add finish here ? this is similar as 10:13:238
  23. 10:41:294 - wow that long repetitive pattern :o but this seems good
  24. 12:57:191 (35,36,37,38,39) - change to k d d d k instead of d k d k d ? seems randomly if d k d k d
  25. 13:09:051 (76,77) - move (76) to 13:07:877 - and (77) to 13:09:051 - ? 13:09:226 - should be blank like 13:06:435
hope it would help you, good luck :)
_handholding
hi from your modding queue

Lucky
  1. 00:41:493 - Add a don here? adds for a nicer build up imo
  2. 00:58:935 (157) - I find deleting this don emphasizes the adjacent kats. If you choose to follow this then do the same for 01:10:098 (232)
  3. 02:27:976 (675) - move to 02:27:889
  4. 03:13:412 (889,890,891,892,893,894,895) - This is the only pattern in the section that uses blue ticks and imho it feels awkward to play.
  5. 05:05:563 (72) - delete
  6. 05:39:400 - add a don here? feels kinda empty to skip this beat
  7. 05:47:075 - add k here? I here a triplet soo...
  8. 10:09:226 (468) - change to d
  9. 12:40:272 (615,616) - change to kats
I coudlnt really find anymore after a certain point, my brain just exploded after hearing 10000 dons and kats. This mp3 is made from several right? If so I think it would be good to replace the male singers for the female counterpart :3 this is a joke but not a joke at the same time

I hope this mod was was useful to you in anyway, GL!
Surono
Hi Aniki
yeah, I am here for Konata n Freenss. dem

>General
choose preview on nice epik part?

>Badluck brian
* 01:45:331 - change this kat and 01:45:505 - fill this don, I think if theres empty looks akward cus a drum. also the sugest for change kat is variation
* 02:06:086 - change to don and move 02:05:563 - here? I think is better emphasize sounds at Important sound
* 02:32:773 (705,706,707) - KATKAT DON!, bcus Don is nice for deep vocal, and kat for clear vocal imo
* 02:39:400 - want this be kat?
* 02:52:307 - dem noooh, from here is singer dem :\/
* 03:49:517 - demmm
* 04:22:307 - oh gladly this seen a longgg cat!
* 04:42:366 - heu3ehu3heuh3e
* 04:52:307 - I think is strong sounds for turnover of song, change kat finisher? listen de song sir, 04:50:912 (41,44,47,50) - differ with de this cymbal
* 08:19:517 - dem
* 13:06:261 - same above on 4:52
* 14:50:912 - ? but I think is fine since left kat notes is for that every sounds

wtf, :U you mapped this song with de fun style. this 2k16 but this awsome :\____/
sorry for the mod and if theres just mostly comment for song.. bcus this map is Gooodddd :lol:
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock

Aldwych wrote:

[General]

AImod est pas content FIXED

PREVIEW POINT WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW AAAAAAA

Même si c'est un medley, j'aurais bien vu quelques kiai, j'ai pas trop checké sur le coup ou les mettre (j'y ai pensé en plein mod :V) SHIT

J'ai un peu peur du HP ici, vu que c'est du 15 minutes, c'est ptet un peu élevé, a voir. HHHHHHHHHH

[Lycky]

00:13:238 : Pour tous ces kats, je vois pas l'intérêt, ils ne suivent pas la main mélodie de lucky star et sont pas utiles, c'est un peu comme un filler pour pas grand chose imo, go go delete? Surtout que tu as pas mal de vide après alors que la musique est plus intense, donc je pense que c'est mieux si ces kats sont pas présent. Fixed to match some rhythm.

00:28:586 : Je pense que tu devrais étendre le stream en ajoutant un d, c'est un peu pointless mais c'est plus en accord avec la batterie NO, SPINNER FINISH IS BEST STREAM

00:30:680 : Je suis assez surpris que t'as pas mis de stream ici, p'tet un truc comme ça? Then I can't make a finisher :(



00:35:389 : Si on suit la mélodie, ça devrait être un k plutôt (la même chose pour les patterns similaires :V) OMG YOU HAVE GOOD PITCH <3

00:40:970 : Idem, mais comme tu utilise des triples, je verrais un triple k ici. Great idea, but I don't like how kkk looks there.

00:58:935 : En regardant les patterns précédents (00:57:017), ce d ne devrait pas exister, en fait c'est un peu bizzare d'avoir un d ici et pas un autre 1/1 plus tôt (same for 01:04:517, 01:10:098). OH DAMN DELETED

01:40:621 : Imo tu suit pas mal les vocals dans cette map et ne pas avoir un d à 01:40:447 (pour le "desu") est un peu bizzare, so j'aurais déplacé ce d 1/2 plus tôt. (Same for 01:43:412 etc...) nah it's drum only here

01:46:726 : Full d stream is so meh when you have vocals :/ how about something like : ca c'est poubelle.........



01:50:912 : J'aurrais commencé le triplé ici si on suit les vocals (like at 01:51:610). Good idea, but I'm going for more traditional drum patterns.

02:25:098 : Double doublé comme tu as fait sur le next pattern? YEAAAH

02:53:354 : Imo kddk or dkkd est mieux et met les contrastes là où ils devraient être. (Same for 02:58:936). MMMMM....nnn...

03:48:470 : Sur ce stream j'aurais bien mis des k au niveau des "beep", personnal opinion. Naah focus switches to pure drums.

04:23:005 : Spinner ou Sliders? Ca fait un peu trop vide pour un solo guitare :/ Spinner and D added for the OUUH

05:01:377 : Si on suit la logique de tes patterns, ce k devrait être à 04:59:982 Nope! The ding sound moves to where I mapped it.

05:14:633 : Genre ici c'est un bon endroit pour un kiai :o I plan on making each vocal section have a kiai.

05:41:668 : Ici ca devrait être kd d plutôt, ça sonne mieux. Ooooh changed

06:24:052 : Plutôt d ici si on suit la mélodie. En fait je dirais même ddkkd pour avoir un meilleur contraste avec 06:24:400 via la guitare en background. (Et parce que c'est très la consistance avec 06:35:214) OOPS Changed

07:31:203 : Swap pour faire k d? C'est plus logique via le piano et parce que beats à 07:31:377 (Idem pour 07:36:784) GOOD EAR

08:12:718 : Le 1/8 ici est legit, après c'est comme tu veux. LMAO

08:17:249 : Actually, je pense que faire 2x kdk ici est beaucoup mieux et ensuite kdkdk sur le quintuple (08:18:645). Deleted the echo k, and only drums are left to be emphasized.

08:36:784 : Personellement j'enlèverai le triplé ici pour avoir un finisher à 08:38:959, puis un d à 08:37:133 pour combler le vide. I don't feel it needs THAT much emphasis

09:10:098 : Imo, un rythme en 4 1 2, c'est assez tard (meaning dumb not late lol) et complexe, et vu que y'a un beat ici, je pense que c'est mieux d'avoir un d ici que rien du tout. (Pareil pour 09:11:493 et les autres olala). I'll see if I change it later.

10:41:121 : Mfw je vois ca et le SR, please xD. C'est so 1512, ceci dit t'as pas vraiment le choix. Rip in pain perdu IKR

11:32:772 : Dans ce genre d'endroit j'ajouterais bien un k, contrairement aux autres endroit ou on sent que des sons s’arrêtent (Comme à 11:31:377 par exemple) ici y'a pas d'arret et je pense pas un break sois la meilleure solution (pareil pour 11:35:563), après tu peux utiliser des dons si tu préfère dû aux beats. Ok this was the only one hard to understand, but either way I purposely start to vary the dons in the second repeat
YOU HAVE A GOOD EAR, NICE MOD!!! J'TAIME!!!

Skylish wrote:

Hi, Ozzy, from your evil,awful and sorrowful BN queue.

[General]
- Uncheck Widescreen Supp. No, a SB will likely show up.

[Lucky]

> 01:38:180 - add d? The vocal actually ends at this timing. Adjusted

> 02:45:854 (778,779) - move 1/2 backwards? Although it is matching the drum..., it sounds weird because it is 1/2 forward the vocal. Nope, this switches focus solely to drums, as the song itself makes a big change.

> 02:47:249 (782,783,784,785,786,787,788) - try this? I don't think that those kkkkkkk fit neither the drum nor the vocal. There is no need to add a stream, in addition. No change, the stream exists in the song for a reason.


> 03:06:086 (865) - change to k, higher vocal sound and k can lead to the vocal sound at 03:06:261 (866) - No change, patterns used here are more for variation.

> 03:07:831 (867) - change to d, 03:08:005 (868,869) - are more outstanding, using d to emphasize them. ^

> 03:21:261 (915) - change to k, sounds better. Adjusted another pattern so this could be k.

> 03:35:563 (974,975,976,977,978,979,980,981,982,983,984,985,986) - The patterns sound too clumsy (for me?) try this: Seems innacurate.


> 03:48:121 (1043) - use a slider to replace those monochrome stream? Those d are ... annoying lol. They build good emphasis to empty parts IMO.

> 03:51:086 (1062,1064,1065) - / 03:53:876 (1072,1074) - K? Don't see it necessary.

> 04:22:307 (1237) - well... simply I think that streaming as a long vocal note is an annoying way... slider replacement here. Sliders are not the kind of thing to put at 1/4 drum hits, surprisingly.

> 04:53:005 - you are matching the bell in this session. Did you miss a note (d) here? There is a bell at this timing. No, it is hardly as loud.

> 04:53:703 (55,57) - / 04:57:889 (60) - / 05:01:377 (63) - / change to d. I think that mapping the bell with all k is a bit boring. Besides, there are pitches in the bell, I think you can follow the pitches. (But if you say that you do not want to cause any conflicts with vocal, then fine, just use k.) k is a lot less ugly.

> 05:04:866 (70,76) - / 05:09:052 (87) - / change to D , same reason as above (In fact, my advice is as same as how you map in the upcoming more complicated session accidentally lol) Don't like the sound D makes for this section.

> 05:12:540 (103,104,105,106) - change to kkkk due to the background bell. There is the highest pitch at 05:12:540 - . I don't think that'd be too good.

> 06:14:807 (20,21) - chagne to k, a mirror of 06:13:761 (13,14) - I prefer to switch focus to drums.

> 06:15:680 (27) - change to k, this note stands out. Not really.

> 06:24:226 (10) - change to d? Done in Aldwych's mod!

> 06:50:912 (53) - change to K (In this session, I think mono-k is fine because of the calm airs) Doesn't seem to need that much emphasis.

> 08:17:249 (175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183) - these notes are completely fine. I still list it out because I feel weird because I am tapping along the vocal / synth (idk). It is okay. O

> 08:41:145 (58) - change to d? d can emphasize the k on I think it'd look to repetetive to have that
08:41:494 (61) -

> 13:22:307 (160) - change to d? No, that wouldn't map to what I'm mapping to.

> 13:25:795 (184,185) - add k between these two notes to form kkkkk ? No change.

> 13:47:598 (322,323,324,325,326,327,328,329,330) -
again... I do not like monochrome Finish when there are different pitches (I know this is subjective and not a proper mod :() : KDD KKD DKD ? It's a lot more akin to authentic style to use monochrome this way, so nope.

> 14:24:923 (493,494) - ctrl+G, sounds better Done!
Thanks a lot! A lot of stuff was denied because I don't particularly map more than one instrument at once
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock

Nishizumi wrote:

Hi evil BN, from your queue

[Lucky]

wtf that diff name (?) IT'S LEGAL OK I'LL FIGHT YOU

  1. 00:56:145 (141,142) swap these ? since the "cha" sound on (141) is similar as 00:54:749 - also it's looks better with the flows This is one of the only cases where I like the sound a lot more than keeping flow, since another ddk or kdd pattern looks kinda bad.
  2. 01:13:412 - why is this only one kk on 2-plet ? change it to dk for consistent pattern with other OOPS
  3. 01:28:412 - wut de finisher ?? did you misplace it ? since at 01:17:249 doesn't have finisher, but they're same The second verse has more finishers as a difficulty spike. I'm weird.
  4. 01:31:377 - same as above, this similar like 01:20:214 ^
  5. 01:49:517 - add finish ? this is peak from 01:46:726 - The song doesn't support it ;_;
  6. 02:14:284 (586,587,588) - change these to k ? for better structure pattern, from 02:11:842 - they have same two consecutive triplets I'd consider kkk ddd to be similarly structured.
  7. 02:19:866 (629,630,631) - same as above ^
  8. 02:22:482 - here is kinda many of constructive k, maybe you can change this to k for better flows It IS k, maybe an error?
  9. 02:24:924 to 02:25:273 - change this to kd dk instead of kkd d, the vocals is stopped at 02:25:011 - like 02:27:802 Changed in Aldwych's post.
  10. 02:36:086 - same as above ^
  11. 03:05:912 - this vocals pitch goes up, maybe you can change here to k This part's patterns are mainly just to be varied, not to follow pitch perfectly every time. But maybe!
  12. 03:40:098 (1000,1001) - swap these ? on 03:40:447 - this is inconsistent with other This one works to follow vocals, to vary it.
  13. 03:46:552 - add d for following the drums sound ? I prefer the dense part to start on the onbeat
  14. 03:54:749 - why is this only one K sound ?? change it to D or change them to K (from 03:52:307 - to 03:54:749 -) BECAUSE IT'S AN "OW"
  15. 04:23:005 - add spinner instead of blank ? Added in Aldwych's mod!
  16. 05:14:633 - add finish here ? for emphasis the vocals like (05:25:796) Song doesn't support it :( Maybe tho...
  17. 07:16:726 - here is kinda many of constructive d, change this to k ? Ah! It was a mistake. Fixed.
  18. 07:41:145 - add D here ? there is piano sound NO!?
  19. 08:11:493 - change this triplet to ddd for better flows But sounds :(
  20. 08:28:935 - change this to k ? to avoid d sequential excessive It's not that bad, and drums call for it.
  21. 09:06:435 - added spinner or slider instead of blank ? Nah because the song is super blank LOL
  22. 10:24:400 - add finish here ? this is similar as 10:13:238 Done!
  23. 10:41:294 - wow that long repetitive pattern :o but this seems good I HAVE NO CHOICE I'VE TRIED LOL
  24. 12:57:191 (35,36,37,38,39) - change to k d d d k instead of d k d k d ? seems randomly if d k d k d I'm trying to follow the low piano notes, but k d d d k really does fit more.
  25. 13:09:051 (76,77) - move (76) to 13:07:877 - and (77) to 13:09:051 - ? 13:09:226 - should be blank like 13:06:435 That one was blank because I
hope it would help you, good luck :)
NICE MOD TY!!!

Kisses wrote:

hi from your modding queue

Lucky
  1. 00:41:493 - Add a don here? adds for a nicer build up imo The sound is just unnoticeable enough that I can get away with just following the synth.
  2. 00:58:935 (157) - I find deleting this don emphasizes the adjacent kats. If you choose to follow this then do the same for 01:10:098 (232) I think it helps lead into them better. Plus they kinda emphasize themselves.
  3. 02:27:976 (675) - move to 02:27:889 Done in Aldwych's mod!
  4. 03:13:412 (889,890,891,892,893,894,895) - This is the only pattern in the section that uses blue ticks and imho it feels awkward to play. YELL AT MINORU. It may change.
  5. 05:05:563 (72) - delete WHA!?
  6. 05:39:400 - add a don here? feels kinda empty to skip this beat Tell that to the song 8-)
  7. 05:47:075 - add k here? I here a triplet soo... Definitely the slight echo effect.
  8. 10:09:226 (468) - change to d Nah, d k k was used previously for a lower pitch.
  9. 12:40:272 (615,616) - change to kats Kinda fits less.
I hope this mod was was useful to you in anyway, GL!
Thanks for the mod! Your opinions are noted for the future. And no, the MP3 is one big medley made by someone else.

Surono wrote:

Hi Aniki
yeah, I am here for Konata n Freenss. dem

>General
choose preview on nice epik part? dem epik high beatmap?!?!?

>Badluck brian
* 01:45:331 - change this kat and 01:45:505 - fill this don, I think if theres empty looks akward cus a drum. also the sugest for change kat is variation Filled!
* 02:06:086 - change to don and move 02:05:563 - here? I think is better emphasize sounds at Important sound dem no... vocal priority...
* 02:32:773 (705,706,707) - KATKAT DON!, bcus Don is nice for deep vocal, and kat for clear vocal imo BUT DE PITCH
* 02:39:400 - want this be kat? changed to... don `L_`
* 02:52:307 - dem noooh, from here is singer dem :\/ :VVVV
* 03:49:517 - demmm MI MI MINOKURUN
* 04:22:307 - oh gladly this seen a longgg cat! longcat = tacgnol
* 04:42:366 - heu3ehu3heuh3e FUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
* 04:52:307 - I think is strong sounds for turnover of song, change kat finisher? listen de song sir, 04:50:912 (41,44,47,50) - differ with de this cymbal DEM NICE!!
* 08:19:517 - dem ( __________ )
* 13:06:261 - same above on 4:52 dem!?!?
* 14:50:912 - ? but I think is fine since left kat notes is for that every sounds maybe later change.,...

wtf, :U you mapped this song with de fun style. this 2k16 but this awsome :\____/
sorry for the mod and if theres just mostly comment for song.. bcus this map is Gooodddd :lol:
NICE MOD I CRY DEM `_J`
Shinzo-
[General]
  1. 11:05:887 - preview point better be here imo
  2. maybe add marathon to the Tags
  3. Uncheck widescreen support

[Lucky]
00:19:342 (4) - 00:22:133 (9) - change to d ? for pitch maybe
00:36:959 (30) - remove the finish ? since it's not really a loud sound ? also no finish sound there
00:54:313 (124) - delete for consistency with 00:56:057 - and the others? all part is like that tho
01:23:180 (309) - change to k ? better imo
01:28:761 (334) - change to k for pitch ?
01:37:656 - well inb4 it's a 1/4 d in this kind of sound
01:43:761 (403) - maybe change tis to d since it's a kick not snare ?
02:11:145 (564) - change to K ?
02:20:563 (634,635) - inb4 dd? maybe change 02:20:563 (634,635) - to d and change 02:21:435 (641) - to d
02:28:935 (681,682) - swap for pitch
02:33:645 (709,710) - Ctrl G for pitch ?
03:02:598 (855,856) - maybe swap for pitch ?
03:09:226 (876,877,878,879) - maybe ctrl G and change 03:09:924 (880) - to d for pitch
03:20:389 (912,913,914,915,916,917,918) - waht about making a reverse pattern of 03:18:993 (905,906,907,908,909,910,911) - ? it's really fit imo
03:23:354 (926) - change to k for snare and vary ?
03:24:924 (932,933,934) - ddk ?
04:11:493 (1180) - change to d for pitch ?
04:21:261 (1236) - change to d ? so it'll be same with 04:19:517 (1229,1230,1231,1232,1233) - ? also better for pitch
04:51:435 (45,46,47) - kkk ? just suggestion ._.
05:11:145 - add k for consistency ? maybe
05:14:633 (111) - add finish ? (D)
05:24:749 (172) - change to D ?
05:47:773 (68) - maybe change to d since it has a same pitch with 05:47:424 (67) -
06:14:284 (17) - change to d for reverse patern of 06:13:412 (10,11,12) - ?
06:36:959 (17) - change to D ? since there's a finish sound
07:44:459 (20) - change to d is better for pitch imo
07:45:156 (24) - better delete ? since there's no piano
07:47:773 (37,38) - swap is better imo also consistency with 07:49:517 (45,46,47,48,49,50,51) -
07:53:354 (63,64) - this one too
08:15:592 - add d ? maybe hehehe
08:17:424 (175,177) - add finish ?
08:18:819 (179,181) - this one too ? (add finish) to make diffrences with the others that don't have a finish sound
08:20:214 (183) - change to D ?
09:06:348 - mabe add spinner on this part ? since the previous part isn't really exhausting ? i mean there's a lot of break
09:28:935 (224,225) - swap ?
09:58:412 - well i think the stream is starts here ? ._.
10:09:226 (468) - change to d for pitch
10:15:680 (501,502) - change to d for pitch ?
10:17:947 (512,513) - maybe swap for pitch
11:30:156 (199,201) - swap ? better for pitch imo
12:12:540 (462,463) - swap for pitch
13:24:923 (178) - change to d ? since no snare/piano
13:36:609 (254,257) - swap this ?
13:47:772 (323,326,329) - also this ?
13:54:400 - just add a d ?
14:08:702 (440,441) - swap for pitch also better patten
14:50:476 (159) - change to d?
15:20:214 (201) - change to d ? maybe ? for pitch?
15:21:784 (1) - end the spin 15:24:749 - here ? idk just a suggestion

im ded zz

Well ok im sorry if it's not helpfull x..x
and Good Luck >w<)~
Surono
dem just che- dem konata n fren..

05:03:470 - , teh reason is 04:52:307 - stronk dem.

05:04:866 (69) - dem style finisher vocal!!. not try to follow just cymbal? but yeah change every kat to don for normal sounds and some cymbal. but.. idea.., 05:05:563 - kat, 05:04:866 (69,75) - don finisher, 05:07:656 (80) - don, 05:08:354 - kat. 05:09:052 (86,91) - and then this don finisher. looks emphasize is more to works imo. why I suggest like this bcus theres sound is have differ at cymbal and varies vocal. the same sound just on every red tick

05:13:238 - cat, -> 04:52:307 -stey stlong

06:53:354 - and dem, from I saw the patterns catCORNcat

10:52:195 - kat? vocal sound good and instrument.. and I say if this still keep. too overmuch long ddk ddd.. boring. So I think is needed emphasize on instrument ( and maybe some vocal sounds is fit with instrument )
10:53:504 - kkd, vocal and instrument, seems pattern fit with vocal
10:55:073 - kat? for follow 10:55:422 - this edit: I think dkk dkk would better as varies pattern, and vocal flow is stronk as dkk I just think if ddk ddk ddk ddk ddk dd-- kwek, just make monotone pattern and emphasize de song. really dkk dkk is dem. ( actually.. you is consistent with "tak" drum.. we think same.. tak pak cetak is must kat.. if sounds dun du dud dus.. is donnss and waaah. teessss Finizerrrz
10:56:381 - kat? dkd for this vocal
10:57:690 - kkd? and this last.

12:37:917 - fill don as 5plet? for thats flow.. ciuuwww. 12:37:656 - flow stronk from here. so that have emphasized as 5plet for flow and 12:39:051 - this has 3plet

okay just it maybe for like re-mod. cus my mod before is like " dem this is nice stye map :U I just enjoy this gyud "
but I forget to check if them like have varies on music and must given suggestion to more interesting or avoid.... boring :U

bye bye.

eitd:
laasstt: 00:41:842 - this, and 00:30:680 - here is dem!??! make some bit similar or consistent?. I think you can do somethink with dududurrururu.
Backfire
[General]
Everything on the general front looks fine. I was thinking "this is an OD 5.5 map" and then you put it at 5.5 so that's cool we think on da same wave-length ya know? I was thinking there could be a lot more SV usage, but that's up to you. There is a coupld sections were you could definitely add slow downs, especially when the note-density goes down.

[Lucky]
00:56:319 - I think this should be kkd to be consistent with the part right after. Just one being dkd is kinda weird.

01:03:296 - Same here honestly

01:07:482 - I am okay with this being different because it's a different sounding part

01:26:319 - I think something like ddddk would be better here, it fits the music and the map a little better. I'm not really sure.

01:46:726 - I think this could be changed from just a normal ddddd stream. maybe try ddddkdkdddddkdk for a little bit of flavor.

02:28:586 (680,688) - Finishers mayne...tbh...fam.

02:39:749 (738,746) -02:45:331 - ^^^^^?

03:48:470 - Maybe you could do kdddkdddkdd? I think the music had a little bit of stuff in there for that.

04:51:261 (44,47,50) - k k k for sure here, it fits how the vocals are going up

06:14:807 (20,22) - I think these could be k as well

07:09:400 - I don't like all the empty space around this section. You should add like 1/1 don's or something? idk

08:17:424 (175,177,179,181,183) - Where are the finishers ozzy...pls u killin me man. They would be good here!

09:15:941 - dk here? I think there is still some stuff under there to map.

09:28:586 - ay man u miss a finisha....

09:42:540 (310,318) - 09:53:703 (385,393) - when she goes "EEE" it would be dope with some finishers...imo.

10:52:108 - Theres kind of a little transition in music, maybe go kkd?

11:39:749 - https://osu.ppy.sh/s/382167 ayyyyyyy

11:53:702 (344,363) - Definitely need finishers!

12:04:865 (415,434) - ^^^

13:10:098 - Going with your kat placement, this shouldnt be a kat right? I guess you kind of change it in the other parts later, I dunno, it's up to you.

14:26:493 (498) - 14:27:540 - did u miss a finisher bud

100 sign ok sign 100 sign ok sign tbh fam, this map was good as fuck but you know there's not gonna be many mods with such a consistent style like yours. Only changes I suggested was some stuff I think that could improve the map.
Intelli
Hi, 2nd mod for your queue thingy (which, like I said on the Feel Better mod, I'll wait to post in)

Lucky:
  1. 01:17:598 (280) - This could be structured to fit the song better imo, maybe something like d k d kkd d k K ?

  2. 01:20:738 (297) - k (or change this 2 note pattern to d k to match 01:31:726)

  3. 02:15:680 (598) - dkk

  4. 02:20:563 (634) - ^ (same for 2:21:261)

  5. 03:25:796 (941) - k (It works 100% fine as d or k, i just prefer k. Do whatever you like better :D )

  6. 03:31:028 (960) - I would try to rework this tiny bit some to work in the vocal line that is left out here (maybe kkd kd dkd ?)

  7. 03:36:784 (986) - dkk

  8. 03:47:947 (1043) - ^

  9. 04:54:400 (55) - d (same with 04:57:191 and 05:01:377)

  10. 05:26:145 (176) - I think these 2 finishes (and all the ones like them throughout this section) are kinda unnecessary, but that's just me :/

  11. 06:14:982 (21) - k

  12. 06:50:912 (53) - d

  13. 08:30:505 (7) - This stream seems a bit too monochrome to the wavy up and down shifty noise going on in the background, maybe something like dkdkkkddkkd ?

  14. 10:05:738 (454) - dkk ddk

  15. 10:09:226 (468) - dkk (i might just be hearing things tho xd)

  16. 10:15:156 (499) - k

  17. 10:41:120 (604) - Kinda like what Backfire said, but at more than just the one place (i.e. 10:45:306)

  18. 14:50:737 (162) - k

  19. 15:06:958 (183) - d?
Sorry I didn't have anything to say between 11 minutes and 14:50 that hadn't been said yet in Sur/Backfire's mods :P

Fun map, glhf with ranking <3
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
It's 1 AM so no responses but you can look through and check if I did it.

Declined ones are probably because I prefer structure over pitch at that part, I prefer emphasis on transitional drums over 1 second of a 'not boring' stream, that I'm following vocals as temporary variation rather than for the whole section, or that I don't want to overemphasize certain parts.

But a bunch of stuff was added, TY ALL!
bank78952
hi
[General]
Uncheck Widescreen support :3
[(Un)lucky]
02:46:900 (780) - k to follow vocal?
03:05:912 (866) - k ?
04:54:400 (55) - d ?
04:56:493 (57) - d ?
09:14:284 (139) - k ?
12:16:900 (480) - d is better?
12:18:295 (488) - ^
12:45:330 (19) - k ?
12:57:540 (36) - ^
im noob modder my mod is bad D:
gl :3
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
No change (also, there will be an SB so widescreen is needed lol..)

Try to give more explanations when you make suggestions :D
Ascendance

OzzyOzrock wrote:

It's 1 AM and im feeding my ass off in league so no responses
Oui
00:45:331 (73) - d
00:45:505 (74) - k
01:49:517 - to 02:11:842 - kiai
04:03:121 (327) - k
04:03:296 (328) - d
04:07:133 (349) - k
04:24:400 - to 04:46:726 - kiai
04:51:261 (44) - k
04:51:610 (47) - k
04:51:959 (50) - k
05:13:238 (110) - k
05:14:633 - to 05:36:959 - kiai
05:50:040 (80) - k
05:55:970 (110) - k
05:56:842 (115) - k
07:24:400 (25) - d
09:09:052 - to 09:32:773 - kiai
09:34:168 - to 10:01:726 - kiai
11:35:737 (224) - k
11:35:912 (225) - k
13:06:261 (61) - k
14:28:586 - to 14:50:912 - kiai
DeletedUser_6637817
Lets do. dis ;w;

either this map is well mapped or this modders are cheapskates ;w;

yep this looks good from the getgo.

-Lucky-

01:07:133 (95) - this be d? you mapped d onto 01:05:912 (85) - and its almost the same vocal pitch, and if you look at it, it gives the next k a bit more emphasis
01:31:726 (232,233) - i know you mentioned that you prefer pitch over structure sometimes blah blah but i think this is a bit off throwing since the k you used on the previous and on the next pattern was a k too, and throwing in vocal like this is not really reasonable :v
02:13:935 (19,20,21) - pitch identified. this sounds like a rather low pitch to me, and at about the pitch of 02:15:331 (31,32,33,37,38,39) - it should be k, but i think its not like k, so ddd maybe?
02:19:517 (62,63,64) - ^
03:24:924 (120,121,122) - ddk for the instruments sake? you mapped same with the instruments at the next pattern sooooo...
06:35:389 (12) - i honestly prefer this as a k because the pitch rise between this and the prev note were similar to 06:31:028 (29,30) - so ye.
07:12:889 (139) - d? the ding sounds dont really differ so much from the pitch from 07:11:842 (137,138) - that much that it should be k


This mod was overwhelming, i testplayed this twice, saw nothing big issuewise, which made me salty and wasted more time than ever needed, so i think ill stop here.
Sorry for being a lazy bum
HimemiyaChikane
Hi for BN check.

It's a serious challenge for me to mod this map,but I'll try it hard to give a good mod!

[Lucky]
01:08:877 (104) - change to d?
01:18:209 (166) - change to k?
01:51:435 (74) - change to k?
01:53:877 (88) - K may better?
01:54:575 (91) - change to D?
02:14:023 (20) - sounds like a d?
02:19:604 (63) - ^
02:24:924 (8,9,10,11) - kd dk?
02:36:086 (66,67,68,69) - dk kd?
03:20:912 (103,104,105,106) - ddkd?
03:25:534 (126) - change to k?
03:42:278 (198) - ^
03:45:069 (213) - ^
04:47:773 (19) - change to d.
04:50:563 (39) - ^
06:14:807 (20) - change to k.
08:30:680 (9,10,11) - I think there has a 1/6 kddd.
09:33:645 (250,251,252,253,254) - ddkdd?
13:27:191 (191,192,193,194,195,196) - ddkd kd?
13:57:191 - add d.
13:59:284 - ^
13:59:633 - ^
14:01:377 - ^
14:02:423 - ^

I hope my mod can help you a little.I'm sorry if my mod is in low quality.

Good luck for approved!
Q____X
Here's my shit mod ;w;

Lucky

00:12:540 - k
00:13:412 - 00:14:807 - 00:16:203 - d
00:16:900 - 00:17:075 - 00:17:249 - d
01:53:703 (87) - delete
04:36:435 (72,73) - ctrl g sounds better for me
09:32:947 - to 09:33:993 - try this?

I love this map <3
Sorry for the short mod, the map it's perfect :o
Akiyama Mizuki
placeholder #1

ayy lmao

01:01:726 (59) - kinda weird to not have k here like 00:59:633 (42,47,53) -
01:31:726 (232) - ^
01:49:517 (61) - sounds like an appropriate place for finisher
02:24:924 (8) - would have been better if there was doublet for 02:25:011 (9) - and 02:25:098 - , this pattern feels weird
02:36:086 (66,67,68,69) - ^
04:48:121 (21) - 04:49:517 (31) - 04:50:912 (41) - no finishers? :V
10:41:120 ~ 11:00:480 - whoa whoa too much there, definitely forced considering it's calm part in the song. Please reduce density
13:59:633 - pattern continuosly has 1/2 gap between ---plets but here has 3/4, mind putting a note here
14:02:772 (430) - A slider that has to be played as kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk hahaha lolo end me

my goodness it was pretty nostalgic. now i feel like playing some lucky star maps that I played back in 2009 or 2010
Surono

bbj0920 wrote:

my goodness it was pretty nostalgic. now i feel like playing some lucky star maps that I played back in 2009 or 2010
m(_ _ )m dem sir.. I feels dem to see you wrote that wwwwww
Aldwych

Ascendance wrote:

OzzyOzrock wrote:

It's 1 AM and im feeding my ass off in league so no responses
i'm ded
KcHecKa
CAN I GD A MANIA??
Volta
when will you finish the sb :c
11:06:236 - add redline and omit the barline
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply