Sognux wrote:

Hello! M4M here!

Can't mod Easy and Normal for shit, will try to mod Normal though but will skip Easy ^^

Normal
00:49:553 (2) - Maybe you can move this so it's like on the same row as the circle before? You've got the point, but I felt it's strange if removing this note because the sound becomes empty and wait-time occurs until next note.

Hard
01:54:696 (1) - Why have the sliders go so slow at this part? I didnt like it ._. Just following the BPM-change. I see your point but it's not so hard to read here.
01:57:439 (1,2,3,4) - I don't think that the sliders should be exactly after each other, i didnt like how it sounded or how it played out. You're right! It's indeed unkind. Changed a pattern.

Insane
02:19:725 (3,4,5,1,2) - Same pattern as the Hard diff, another pattern possible maybe? I think the current one is best and note-placement is not same as Hard.

I'd say that this map is ready for ranking. It was really good, i could barely find any errors on it. Good luck getting it ranked!

Bye~

Celizavia wrote:

M4M
calling all the bat to rank this map ASAP o/

Easy

1. 00:50:925(3) the finish is too loud, considering lowering the volume or remove it OK made it lower.
2. 01:07:725(4) same like above, but imo in here the finish isnt giving a emphasis since the part is quite soft Uun, I couldn't find a finish around here.
3. 01:35:496(3,2) slight overlap, mind place it somewhere to make it better? I think it's not a problem since they has anenough break. Skin doesn't overlap.
4. 01:49:896(2,3) NC? Not like Normal, these three notes are put near each other with lower SV, so adding NCs makes a risk it could be misread.
   
   
   Normal
5. AR=4/4,5? imo AR5 is too fast at Normal diff Since this mapset has Easy, this is not for newbie. AR5 is enough reasonable and better than lower one to this difficulty from the view point of readability.
6. 00:37:553(4) a finish at here instead? Clap fits into the drum sound here.
7. 01:22:982(3) put a clap Uhm, I think it doesn't fit into the guitar.
8. 01:49:896(2,3) NC? Haha I like your suggestion. Added NCs.
9. 02:00:182(2,4) a slight overlap I see your point. But it's ok because there's an enough break between them.
10. 02:06:867(3,4) improve blanket? Changed a little.
    
    Hard
11. AR8 please Even with AR7, it's so easy for hard-player to read notes because the flow and the timing is simple. So I think AR7 is enough reasonable for this diff.
12. 00:35:667(1) remove NC To let player know the next SV change, it's useful imo.
13. 00:46:982(3,4) this placing looks weird imo, consider change it? You think so? Aw, I like this one
14. 02:06:696(4,5) make a blanket? Uhm...I think making a blanket makes the flow a bit worse here. But I made a litte change to make the flow natural.

Clean Mapset, considering find a a better BG since it wasnt covering the whole place. Ya I wanna find another BG too, but this official CD jacket is better than others.
Good Luck o/

Mei wrote:

idm._.

first you need uncheck "widescreen support" because it is only for storyboard ya, changed.

[insane]

1. 00:35:667 (1,2,3) - try this? and also make a better blanket .-. Wow, creative suggestion! fixed~
   
   Picture

   
2. 00:43:382 (1,2,3,4) - try this? Yours is actually good pettern, but I prefer a flow of the current one :/
   
   Picture

   
3. 01:05:153 (1,3) - swap nc Not a big deal but having the same color at stack is better to see imo. Ofc, if it's hard to READ due to a new combo, what you said is indeed right.
   
4. 01:33:953 (1,2,3) - try this? Looks good! changed~
   
   Picture

   
5. 01:37:210 (6,7,8,1) - try this?i think you missed vocal in 01:38:067 I see your point, but I followed a big back-sound than vocal here.
   
   Picture

   
6. 01:54:696 (1,2) - fix stack? aw, ok.
   
7. 01:55:725 (3,4,5) - vocal start from 01:55:896(cin~) and end at 01:56:410(de re~), so i suggest this following not a vocal but a bass here, hehe. Your suggestion is good. Just my preference.
   
   Picture

   
8. 02:00:182 (1) - remove the clap on the head is better for me Agreed. removed.
   
9. 02:08:410 (1,2) - try this? I prefer the current form, sorry!
   
   Picture

   
10. 02:09:610 (4,5) - kinda overlap there, move 5 for 2 grip left Aw that's true. Fixed.
    

[hard]

1. 00:36:867 (1,2,3) - ninja jump tthere? i suggest you stack 1,2 on 3's head and since they are 1/2 tap not 1/1 hum, as you told they're a bit difficult maybe. Since there's a strong sound tthere, I think stacking doesn't fit. So I made a jump litte close.
   
2. 01:19:039 (1,2) - tthis blanket make me feel not that good, why not just stack rhis under the slider's end? Stacking is also really good. Changed.
   
3. 01:57:439 (1,2,3,4) - this rhythm sounds better for me As I wrote in insane, not fixed here. ty for advice : )
   
   Picture

   
4. 02:00:182 (1,2) - the gap between this 2 slider is 3/2 beat, which may give misread to players, although it is not thar matter for me(and i am not sure if ist is a matter in hard) but try this Changed. Your thought is right. That's not a big deal, but game-play becomes better thank you.
   
   Picture

   

[normal]

1. 00:28:639 (3) - add whistle at the end? Added. Also added to some notes around here.
   
2. 00:59:496 (1,2) - fix blanket? Fixed.
   
3. 01:23:496 (4,1) - fix blanket? Fixed.
   
4. 01:38:753 (2,3) - try this? Changed. I feel the rhythm became better.
   
   Picture

   
5. 01:44:410 (2) - i suggest you extend this slider to 01:45:096 Adjusting to a white line is good at the point of view of rhythm, so I see your point. But this slider follows a guitar here.
   
6. 02:08:410 (1,2) - fix balnket? ok fixed.

[easy]

1. 00:37:553 (3) - you can remove this note, to make it easier removed.
   
2. 00:52:296 (2) - i suggest this Looks good. Changed.
   
   Picture

   
3. 01:07:039 (3) - remove this note? removed.
   
4. 01:51:782 (1) - this is an unrankable issue since QAT said tthere should be 4 beat blank after a spinner in easy. so maybe remove 01:54:010 (1,2) - Let me explain about this stuff. In Easy, there should be enough blanck after the spinner. That why QAT said so. However, the "enough blanck" doesn't depend on the amount of beat after spinner only. It's also affected by BPM, the length of spinner, and a pettern of next notes. At this map, spinner length and next blanck make enough break here. So I think it's not a problem.

good luck~~