While i think about your ideas, i also wanted to give one of mine
Give the new (or the old if it doesnt get rehashed or whatever word was it) post count increase, and limit the non-increasable post count stuff to Forum Games, considering there are people that stay away from the whole forums just because they don't want their post count to increase, and with the current state of OT i don't see any real reason for post count not to increase.
Oh and a note about merging posts, use "Merge threads" not "Merge posts" that one works for some reason
When I try to access anything from the MCP it tells me that's "not allowed as quickmod"Ok that is weird, Merge threads works for me (merge posts doesnt), basically just click Merge threads from the dropdown box and it SHOULD give you a list of threads where you can "select for merge" are you seeing this?
Also why not give wojjan access to our BAT cave *runs*--Now for answers!-- (I will answer with what i know tho, since im only half-aware of how this is going to work, dkun and/or awp would be better at explainint this)
Wojjan wrote:
Which actual, new rules will you put in place to change the circlejerk mindset?
iirc these was pending discussion until you accepted but might as well discuss these now.
Wojjan wrote:
This begs the question: who's going to enforce these rules? Will I or dkun get some sort of forum-silencing, or do we just continue serving as OT janitors and write down the repeat offenders for the modmins to check out?
dkun already can silence (silence extends to the forums) since he's a chat-op while so can do any BAT/Admin, you can just report it to us via a !report -post link- reason or a PM and keep doing your job as usual, this is assuming silencing would be the form of application of said punishment, ultimately awp or me can prevent them from posting in OT or modqueuing for repeat offenders.
Wojjan wrote:
I've considered for a long while to implement a new rule in OT that quoting posts by other people, without adding anything of merit outside the quote, will just get your post deleted when I catch it. I never got to actually enforcing it, but it could be a step away from the Offtopic-collective thought.
I always thought of quoting a whole post the same as saying "I agree with this" i never saw a problem with that IMO.
Wojjan wrote:
What's the goal in dispelling the circlejerk? Who do you want to help in doing so?
I always thought the point of this was helping newcomers who usually get shot down immediately by the circlejerk without any hope,

Wojjan wrote:
Are you going to change OT's purpose anything?
I don't think it's purpose will change at all, just the way it's portrayed to the public.
Wojjan wrote:
Perhaps an introductory post by the mods, explaining how OT works in an easy-to-understand manner would be in place? Off-Topic gets criticised often for being so purposeless, actually slapping the purpose on there, in big letters, will shut those people up too.
This is quite a nice idea.
Wojjan wrote:
I want to change forum games. Forum Games has some good threads which are, you know, actual games, but a LOT of bad threads. I propose adding THESE RULES to what constitutes a game.
I havent moderated forum games so i don't really know how stuff works there, but if there are really bad threads in there then they should be locked, simple.
Wojjan wrote:
-About communicating this to OT-
Can't really comment on this, i like transparency, but there is a reason it's being done on the April 1st. awp or dkun may be able to inform you better than me.