I....can't tell if you were being sarcastic or nottheowest wrote:
Of course!
this, and the other points, should make the mp much more enjoyable. it prevents jerks that go crazy with superhard maps and mods, thus ruining the fun for lesser players. like me!kriers wrote:
3. Room creator can disable mods even if host is passed on
ExactlyTanzklaue wrote:
this, and the other points, should make the mp much more enjoyable. it prevents jerks that go crazy with superhard maps and mods, thus ruining the fun for lesser players. like me!kriers wrote:
3. Room creator can disable mods even if host is passed on
I support this
that is my dreamGabe wrote:
peppy is supporting.
You actually have chance to have this implemented.
My dream tootheowest wrote:
that is my dreamGabe wrote:
peppy is supporting.
You actually have chance to have this implemented.
Suspicious username aside, this is to make sure that everyone has peace of mind when playing in multiplayer, because they can always take the host privileges back.Wishy22 wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
maybe room disappears? unless the creator passes that power to someone else first.Saten wrote:
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
that's evil :< I think the name of the room should change to the most trusted person.silmarilen wrote:
maybe room disappears? unless the creator passes that power to someone else first.Saten wrote:
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
I kind of agree with this.silmarilen wrote:
maybe room disappears? unless the creator passes that power to someone else first.Saten wrote:
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
I meant with the room disappearing but ending with host privileges sounds okay too.....except the room gets the same problems all over againdeadbeat wrote:
i don't. creator privileges should end with the creator. passing it on seems senseless. there is still the host spot to do anything of any importance
do remember that this is for the creator of the room, not the most important person in the room. all privileges that the creator has should be non-transferable. even if the creator leavesShoily wrote:
I meant with the room disappearing but ending with host privileges sounds okay too.....except the room gets the same problems all over againdeadbeat wrote:
i don't. creator privileges should end with the creator. passing it on seems senseless. there is still the host spot to do anything of any importance
True, I agree with them being non-transferable, but then what will happen to the room if the creator leaves? ( If we are assuming in this situation the room doesn't disappear after the creator leaves and all the people in the room are d-bags) People will just mess around in the room again. I just wish I knew a better solution to this other than "room disappears" because that's not too good a solution either.deadbeat wrote:
do remember that this is for the creator of the room, not the most important person in the room. all privileges that the creator has should be non-transferable. even if the creator leaves
That's a good point too... so I guess everyone agrees the room doesn't disappear when the creator leaves . u .Arnold0 wrote:
Support too
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
Something like that is called reserving a slot. It could like hold the slot for around 3-5 minutes or so before it ends up being transferred to someone else.Arnold0 wrote:
Support too
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
maybe you want to give everyone a chance to choose their own song, then some loser chooses big black with full mods.Wishy22 wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
That sounds like a REALLY good ideaXierra wrote:
Something like that is called reserving a slot. It could like hold the slot for around 3-5 minutes or so before it ends up being transferred to someone else.
My idea is, before the creator leaves the room, he should be given a choice whether you want to stay or really leave the room. If stay is chosen (Like, he wants to go to options, changing skins, or something), then that privilege will be held temporarily. And I guess privileges shouldn't be held if the internet crashes.
But anyways, I kinda want to support this.
But you gave me your heartMacacito wrote:
i dont have stars to give
supportShoily wrote:
revive \o\
btw is it still "host" or "creator" would be an other feature?I think creator could be another feature.
lol no oopsdeadbeat wrote:
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
but host is transferable and creator shouldn't be (as i read in posts above) so?deadbeat wrote:
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
ReVeNg3r wrote:
but host is transferable and creator shouldn't be (as i read in posts above) so?deadbeat wrote:
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
It would be pretty awesome to be able to let a friend pick songs and let myself kick people without mapsKaoru wrote:
I think it would be a great idea for the creator to differ from the host. Each should have their own unique priveledges. A lot could be done with MP as it is to make it more of an awesome party fest