Apparently in the future, background dim will be limited to 90% instead of 100%. This change makes no sense, because it provides the older players an unfair advantage. New records with the 90% dim background will have to compete with old records at 100% dimming- which, presumably, will give the newer players a disadvantage.
Now, peppy has said that there is no measurable difference between 100% and 90%. If this was true, then why limit it to 90% in the first place?
Please let backgrounds be dimmed to 100%.
Alternatively, and perhaps an idea that peppy would favour more:
Now, peppy has said that there is no measurable difference between 100% and 90%. If this was true, then why limit it to 90% in the first place?
Please let backgrounds be dimmed to 100%.
Alternatively, and perhaps an idea that peppy would favour more:
This would mean that a mapper could decide whether or not they want every player to see the background, so that anybody who is really opposed to bg deletion could choose to disallow it. I think this is better than my original idea, as it lets peppy have what he wants, too.Gens wrote:
So, what about the idea of letting the mapper choose what to disable and what not? For some gimmick maps it'd totally destroy the joke, and in that case, everyone would still have the same advantages and disadvantages.