SapphireGhost wrote:

Lucky you, I'm modding this right now.

[Insane Collab]]
00:30:225 (1,2,3,4) - (Valentiino) Seeing how the rest of your part has a relatively high spacing, the switch to 0.6x here doesn't seem to make sense with the song or map. EDIT3: Valentiino fixed this.

Gabe wrote:

Insane
Valentiino's part seems a bit weird in my opinion... First time in editor orz

Circle emplacement
00:18:844 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Use the Distance snap for it. Maybe you should do something like that;

Redid the part, and made the upcoming parts more fitting for it.

Hitsounds
Note to Valentiino: Make your hitsounds consistent. Claps are mostly on the second and forth line.
I'm really not familiar with hitsounds at all D: could you give me like an example, or something like that, so I could understand what you mean by this : x

Valentiino wrote:

Gabe wrote:

Hitsounds
Note to Valentiino: Make your hitsounds consistent. Claps are mostly on the second and forth line.
I'm really not familiar with hitsounds at all D: could you give me like an example, or something like that, so I could understand what you mean by this : x

Cheater Hater wrote:

A random question, but how do you set the genre/artist before the map gets ranked? I don't see any option to do so in the editor. That's how I found this map, so presumably it would help non-ranked maps get visibility.

Cheater Hater wrote:

Easy:
00:55:783 (4) - Starting this slider on an offbeat seems like a really bad idea for an easy, starting it at 00:55:982 seems better.

Cheater Hater wrote:

00:26:432 (4) - Put a note here with a clap, since it feels empty--I put at X:208 Y:120 and it fit, though it could use a bit of adjustment so all three of 00:25:633 (2,4,2) are closer to a line. I didn't understand this part ;___; *fixing for FisHie*

Insane:
I know it's collab, but the parts seem to vary wildly in difficulty--part 1 feels like a difficult hard (while following the music), part 2 feels like a easy to medium insane (with some passing notes), and parts 3 and 4 are just crazy (many jumps, not as much resembling the music). My opinion is that either the last two parts should be toned down a bit, or that they should be moved into a new crazy-extreme part--however, I'm not really the one to judge since I can't play the crazy maps :/ Does anyone else have comments about this?

Cheater Hater wrote:

Normal:
00:33:220 (5,6) - This delay seems odd for a normal, and it doesn't especially fit with the music either. Odd things make the map more interesting.
00:36:016 (4,5) - I don't like this stacking combined with the quick jump to the slider I made 3 different newbie players test this map, all of them could pass that part without a problem. So, it is okay.

LunaticMara wrote:

Alright, so apparently it's unrankable to have this kind of mapset if I don't have an own diff in here. This may take some time.

Soaprman wrote:

The ranking criteria raise the bar on beatmap quality yet again! Call this a victory for good taste.

Soaprman wrote:

[General]The hitsounding, on the other hand, is wildly inconsistent. I know it's a collab but you guys should work something out. I'd recommend soft samples all the way with whistles and finishes where needed. Get rid of the claps; they're jarring and sound outright bad much of the time. Also, make sure the volume is consistent and on the quieter side... this isn't a loud song. Because of this, I'm not going to mention hitsounds in my difficulty mods. Hopefully this is all a side effect of the map being WIP.
;_______; You can't guess how much I want to play with hitsounds on this song ;_; Claps <_<

[Normal]
00:38:811 (5) - This sounds very awkward to me. It's a little better if you end 6 1/2 beat earlier but going with something else is probably the best option here. Well, If I didn't have to use 50% Normal hitsounds, I was planning to try something different for that part. That part is a bit shitty, I changed it into a simple one then.

[HitObjects]
296,280,31623,5,0
260,188,32022,1,2
336,120,32422,1,0
416,180,32821,1,2
396,280,33220,2,0,B|348:280,1,50,8|0
296,280,33620,2,0,B|120:176,1,200,8|2
120,80,34818,5,0
32,128,35217,1,2
40,228,35617,1,0
32,128,36016,1,2
76,152,36215,2,0,B|208:224,1,150,8|8
292,172,37214,1,0
296,268,37613,1,2
384,224,38012,5,8
416,188,38212,1,0
444,144,38411,1,2
416,104,38611,1,0
384,64,38811,2,0,B|284:64,1,99.9999999999999,8|2
184,64,39610,6,0,B|84:64,2,99.9999999999999,0|0|8
236,152,40808,1,2
152,208,41207,2,0,B|216:208|232:248|232:248|248:208|324:208,1,200,4|8
384,104,42405,1,2
436,188,42804,2,0,B|480:208,4,50,6|2|0|2|4

LunaticMara wrote:

Soaprman wrote:

The ranking criteria raise the bar on beatmap quality yet again! Call this a victory for good taste.

I hope that's sarcasm, because my insanes suck balls.