Zekks killed our clones.abraker wrote:
How do you think you are live to know about your own executions by Zekks?
abraker wrote:
. . . I am a clone.
Westonini wrote:
I'm not even sure what's real anymore.
I agree with you. However, there is some sentimental value attached to objects. Let's say that you have a friend named Joe. You love him and grew up with him, and you two have many great memories together growing up. One day, he dies, and because it's the future, you bring back a clone of him. Even though this clone has the same memories and acts the same way, it's going to be hard to start back where you left off. You may be able to convince yourself that this clone is the original, but it's not going to be the same as the real Joe.Tad Fibonacci wrote:
If there are two things that are exactly the same and have no differences.
But one is real and one is fake.
So then, which one do you think has a higher value?
Most people would say that the real one has a higher value, because real is always better than fake.
Some people say that the fake is more valuable since if it can mimic the real thing perfectly, then it has already surpassed the real thing.
What I think is that they're of the same value. Since the only difference between them is one is real and one is fake. They're virtually the same, so does it really matter which one is real or fake?
The real can easily replace the fake and vice versa.
It's like this, you really love your mother. But then one day, you found out that you're adopted. Would you stop loving her just because she's not your real mother?