yes please
4n3c wrote:
insofar as the reasoning in https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/833523 is concerned the ideal timeframe is around the maximum time maps can stay in qualified before moving to ranked. or alternatively, within the 24 hours leading up to a map being ranked since this is the shortest time maps can remain in qualified when dq'd within that time. (any concerns resulting from this i.e nominators needing more time to check maps can be solved by adjusting the variables in squirrel's second proposal)
4n3c wrote:
we should use a variable time in place of 24 hours to prevent situations where maps dq'd within 24 hours after surpassing the 2 days until ranked would take longer to rank after a veto is resolved than a map dq'd, for example, an hour before then. in other words, maps would need to wait 48 hours minus however long the map would stay in qualified before being re-qual'd
pimpG wrote:
a qualified map getting vetoed for things that are considered flawed concepts (but still not unrankable) by the vetoing nominator is the same as a reported qualified map getting disqualified for ongoing discussions.
BN Rules wrote:
At least 24 hours must pass between a first nomination and a qualification on every beatmap set if...Other situations do not require a 24 hour wait. This gives other Beatmap Nominators and also the wider community the chance to provide additional suggestions before qualification and veto the placed nomination if necessary.
- the beatmap set has received no nominations prior.
- a new difficulty/storyboard has been added.
- a segment of a difficulty, its storyboard, or its hitsounding have been redone.
- complex timing has been adjusted.
- the beatmap set has been changed in response to a nominator's veto.
BN Rules wrote:
You can veto a beatmap set by placing a bubble pop icon or a problem stamp on the set that you disagree with being fit for being Ranked. Placing a beatmap veto over any kind of quality issues that you think need to be addressed before the map can move anywhere is one of your main responsibilities. A proper discussion with attempting to reach a mutual agreement by both sides of the argument has to follow.
BN Rules wrote:
You can veto a qualified beatmap set by posting the issues you think need to be addressed before reaching ranked, and then contacting a member of the QAT. You must participate in the resulting discussion and attempt to reach a mutual agreement. The following conditions must be met before the veto is applied and the set is disqualified, however:Additional time in qualified may be requested by the vetoing nominator, or applied as deemed necessary by the QAT, as long as the mapper does not request a disqualification themselves.
- The veto post must include a clear problem and reasoning for stopping the beatmap set.
- The veto post must be at least 1 day old to allow for observation of test plays and additional feedback.
- The beatmap set must have been in qualified for at least 2 days in total between all qualifications.