1. galv's Heavy (5 stars, 485 notes)
2. Light (2.99 stars, 124 notes)
3. Normal (3.77 stars, 147 notes)
4. Standard (5 stars, 365 notes)
5. Taiko (4.83 stars, 609 notes)

1. 00:00:221 (1) - Hmm, why don't you start your claps here (as galvenize did in his difficulty)? The claps from the song already started even from the beginning (:
2. 00:00:869 (2) - (optional) As this is your easiest diff (which will be played by beginners), I think it's better to simplify the rhythm here to help beginners, for example you can make 00:00:221 (1) as a 2/1 slider followed by a note 1/1 after
3. 00:05:085 (x) - The beat you're skipping here is very distinctive, it's best to map this beat as well (maybe you can arrange like this: )
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:09:302 (5) - It will be much better to follow the synth here (by using 3/2 repeat slider) rather than forcing with the bass, about the placement you don't have to worry because this slider could be easily moved to x:44 y:300 without ruining the flow~
5. 00:10:599 (1) afterwards - Hmm, why don't you start your 1/1 clapping here? Clapping every 2/1 is usable, yes, but it doesn't sound that good considering you only have a little amount of objects here (on harder diffs, it will sound better though, but not on LIGHT)
6. 00:14:166 (x) - Add a note here? From what I've seen, 2/1 delay between notes is easier to read for beginners rather than 3/1 delay (plus, this is a good place for a clap as well)
7. 00:15:464 (2,1) - (optional) Structure around here could be better imo, for example:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:20:977 (x) - This is an excellent place for finish hitsound - I strongly suggest to add a note here with finish and move the spinner 1/4 later
9. 00:28:112 (5,6) - Uh... unstack this if possible (you can move (5) to x:328 y:160) because this stack will be overlapped by (4) in play mode - if you don't want to fix this, at least move them one grid down (:
10. 00:30:058 (2,3) - This rhythm could be greatly improved by using 1/2 short sliders on 00:30:058 and 00:30:545
11. 00:33:950 (1,2) - Try to make them not overlapping each other? Simple arrangement like this will do:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:37:518 (2) - Move this one grid down to follow 00:36:220 (6)'s placement, but this is barely noticeable
13. 00:56:977 (x) - (optional) Considering the song will go intense with the bass after this, a note with clap here would be good~
14. 01:04:112 (4) - Move this few grids up/down, so (3,4,5) will create an arc, thus creating a better flow?
15. 01:07:031 (4,5) - Again, due to stacking's nature, I suggest to unstack these or at least stack (5) above (1) instead to avoid (4) overlapping your next slider
16. 01:10:274 (1) - The fact that this slider's end got overlapped by 01:08:977 (3) will make this slider look weird in play mode, maybe you can try this to avoid overlap:
    
    SPOILER

    
17. 01:12:220 (4) - Minor stuff, but move the midpoint one grid down to encircle (3) better
18. 01:18:058 (1,2,3) - Hmm, I get what pattern you're trying to create here, but I think it will be better if you curve (1) this way so it will perfectly encircle (3)'s start:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 01:41:410 (3,4,5) - (optional) Stacking three notes in a row with a huge delay like this will create a weird stack, it's not that hard anyway to unstack this while keeping your symmetry ><

1. 00:00:221 (1) - Why no finish hitsound here (as you did in [LIGHT]) o.o
2. 00:03:464 (x) - Add a note here? The synth continues here, also adding a circle here will create a more intuitive rhythm
3. 00:08:004 (6,7) - (optional) Try to unstack (7) and create a diamond pattern here? Stack here is fine, but it will ruin your spacing from (5) to (6)
4. 00:10:599 (1) - I like your idea to use 2.0x spacing on your previous (1,2,3) here, but continuing it on this slider will create clustering. A jump like this will play better imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:10:923 (2,5,...) - Again about the clapping here, claps following the synths are basically usable but I prefer to let the clapping consistent every 1/1
6. 00:14:977 (4) - Move this one grid down? This is a minor stuff indeed, but would be nice to be done because currently your (4) almost touches (3) and doing this will avoid so
7. 00:20:491 (4) - Why don't you continue to encircle (3) here, like below? The square formation is nice, but it would be much better if this isn't curved overlapping (1)'s curve:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:20:977 (x) - Same as [LIGHT] here - add a circle with finish and start the spinner 1/4 after?
9. 00:24:058 (1) - Hmm, don't put this circle in the center - the 3/2 delay after the spinner is basically quite hard to read (especially on Hidden), and it will be even harder because the spinner's hitburst will cover this (moving it up/down a bit will be better)
10. 00:28:923 (2,4) - (optional) Would be nice if these two is curved into an opposite direction (example: curving (2) upward and (4) downward) to create an antagonistic effect here, they will look fancier
11. 00:32:653 (7,8,9,10) - This diamond pattern is uneven on (10), is it intentional?
12. 00:34:923 (6) - (optional) imo it will be good to create a sparser jump here with this slider encircling (2)'s start like below:
    
    SPOILER

    
13. 00:39:626 (4) - Do you really need the whistle here? I think it's better to remove it, as it will emphasize your next whistles
14. 00:41:410 (10) - CTRL+R this for a good jump? xD
15. 00:46:923 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,...) - (optional) Again, with some CTRL+R, you can alter their order to create a jumpy formation:
    
    SPOILER

    
16. 00:50:815 (5) - Not perfectly stacked to (1), is this intentional?
17. 00:58:599 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - (optional) Arrange these eight circles in a wave formation instead of an arc? Will be much better before the spinner imo
18. 01:01:761 (1,2,3,4,5) - Definitely you're stacking this too much here, I think it's best to alter (1,2,3) as a repeating slider to avoid overstack like this and give more variation to this part
19. 01:10:437 (3) - As your next (5) is curved already, it feels kinda weird having this uncurved (you can just simply curve this upward, it will do good here)
20. 01:12:869 (1,2,3) - They're not perfectly stacked, but it's barely noticeable
21. 01:16:112 (6) - (optional) To give more variation to this part, how about facing this slider to the right instead of left? Don't worry - your approach rate is fast enough here, overlap won't happen[u]
22. 01:33:193 (8,4) - They're not perfectly stacked as well, but [u]this one is quite easy to notice - won't be hard to fix, though~
23. 01:43:356 (x) - A note with whistle is supposed to be here - I suggest to add it, and move the spinner 1/4 later (yes, in the rules spinner's minimum limit is 1000 now, and this spinner is still easy to 300 although it's cut short by 1/4)

1. 00:02:645 (2) - Minor stuff, but move both midpoints (the red and bezier one) 1 grid left to encircle (3) better
2. 00:04:104 (1) - CTRL+R this? I like the jump from (5) to (1) here :3
3. 00:05:240 (3) - (optional) Perhaps add a red waypoint somewhere here? Plays fancier imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:08:321 (6,7,8,9,10) - Something bugs my mind about this fan pattern... I personally feel (10)'s endpoint should be dragged upward more, but probably that's just my feeling
5. 00:10:591 (1,2) - Perhaps try to curve (1) more or curve (2) less to create equality here?
6. 00:14:158 (6,1) - Not perfectly stacked, but this would be hard to notice (especially for players without transparent hitburst)
7. 00:16:104 (2,3) - (optional) I think it will be good to combine these two as a slider which starts on your current (3), the jump here will play good imo
8. 00:20:969 (1) - Add finish here? I like how the finish splashes here~
9. 00:21:618 (6) - Hmm, I personally feel the whistle here isn't required, it can emphasize your next whistle in (7) if removed imo
10. 00:33:780 (4) - Is it intentional to put this further compared to (1,2,3)? I know they aren't hard to catch, but still...
11. 00:35:726 (3) - (optional) Dunno why, I just feel better if the notes are placed like below so (1,2,3)'s jump will look less random:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:39:456 (4) - Hmm, why the clapping pattern stops here? Feels kinda weird having it suddenly stopping (as the claps from the music still continues here) o.o
13. 00:52:429 (2) - (optional) Make this as a jump also? (in this blue combo, everything is a jump/stack except this one)
14. 00:55:672 (1) - Why don't you curve this encircle (3) instead? I like the angle the created with your next slider as well:
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 01:01:672 (1,2,3) - Try to create a manual stacking or a moving stream from the bottom-right here? Due to stacking's nature, in play mode (1) will be overlapped by (14)
16. 01:06:212 (6) - I'd rather move this ~2-3 grids up to keep the spacing consistent with your previous (1,2), but it's fine as is as well
17. 01:07:672 (6) - (optional) New combo here to break your long combo chain?
18. 01:12:537 (1,2) - These two isn't placed perfectly below the previous (1,2), is it intentional? (if not, I think it's better to move them more to the right to emphasize the jump here)
19. 01:20:807 (2,3) - A jump here is good, but I wonder why don't you add a triple here as well (as you previously did before)? Sounds kinda weird without a triple here imo...
20. 01:41:834 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I personally dislike the overstack on the end... A moving stream like this would be great, though:
    
    SPOILER

    

1. fine

1. 00:27:302 (4) - stack with next note?
2. 01:05:085 (1,2) - I think stacking them on 3's head is better.. = =

1. 00:36:537 (1) - stack with (2)..? back jump doesn't fit here I think...
2. 00:41:564 (2) - move to (164,44) ? position with slider is better in this way.
3. 00:43:456 (3) - why is it not stacked..
4. 00:46:267 (4,5,6) - ._.
5. 00:51:618 (2) - move to (392,180) ? I think it plays better when it's on the right
6. 01:19:510 (2) - move 2 grids right 0.0
7. 01:24:537 (4,7) - new combo 0.0

[LIGHT]

1. 00:12:537 (4) - last point 2 grid down ?
2. 00:17:402 (4) - 2rd point 2 grid up ?
3. 00:27:294 (4,6) - how about like 00:25:834 (2,3) 's distance ?
4. 00:33:942 (1) - 1st point 1 grid up and last point 1 grid left
5. 00:54:699 (1) - 2rd point 1 grid left ?
6. 01:10:267 (1,2) - (1)'s 2rd point 1 grid left and (2)'s 2rd point 1 grid right ?

[STANDARD]

1. 00:04:591 (3) - 2rd point 2 grid up ?
2. 00:09:294 (2) - last point 1 grid right
3. 00:41:726 (1,2,3,4) - let them become this ?
4. 00:53:564 (7) - last point 1 grid left?
5. 00:55:672 (3) - last point 1 grid right ?
6. 01:36:861 (1) - remove NC ?
7. 01:38:158 (1) - ^

[galv's HEAVY]

2. 00:08:483 (7) - NC?
3. 00:19:185 (5) - ^
4. 01:17:350 (1) - 2rd point 1 grid down and right ?

NatsumeRin wrote:

[General]
...Strongly suggest you to add something between Light/Standard, (and it can't be called TAIKO)

[LIGHT]
00:26:158 (3,4) - the sliders could be made better?
00:41:077 (4) - a bit harsh for newbies?
01:12:212 (4) - ^
01:22:591 (4) - ...^

[TAIKO] all fixed
00:05:321 - add a note?
00:44:104 (12) - change to d? then it shows a different with 00:46:699 (12) -
00:49:293 (12) - same
01:25:617 (12) - same thing
01:30:806 (12) - ^

[STANDARD]
...This is in fact the best diff but i totally missed before.
00:01:834 - add a note? it would make a difference with 00:03:456 - (the latter one is a more obvious empty beat)
00:04:915 (1,2,3,4,5) - 123should be a smalll jump but 4,5 should be in the next group? (also change new combos) fixed
00:07:023 - add a note?
00:54:050 (9) - make 10 a slider and http://puu.sh/ANfr ? fixed
01:22:591 (9,10) - a farther jump?

[galv's HEAVY]
...the hitsounds for the common parts are too simple and something like STANDARD would be appreciated.
00:35:564 (2,3) - change to slider-circle so the jump goes more fluently?
00:36:699 (2) - just 2 circles is enough
01:22:915 (3) - new combo?
tbh i don't really like the 2/3 notes parts... but yeah maybe nothing better to arrange.

1. 00:26:158 (3) - blanket around 1 and 2 can be neater like this, more round:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:27:294 (4) - if u followed above suggestion then do it here too, copy and flip or something xD
3. 00:34:591 (2) - move to x:128 y:244 , and then adjust spacing of next note with distance snap
4. 00:46:915 (1) - remove finish, not necessary
5. 01:04:429 (5) - move to x:200 y:136 to form a triangle with (1,2,4)?
6. 01:28:429 (1) - if you removed the finish on 00:46:915 (1) - , then remove here as well (i noticed the finishes were in your other diffs. too so i guess you can keep if u want ><)

1. 00:11:402 (5) - remove clap and place on next note (6) (b/c i hear loud beat on 6 rather than 5)
2. 00:18:375 (8) - NC , follows the instruments more
3. 00:19:023 (1) - remove NC if u did the above suggestion
4. 00:26:158 (3) - NC , and then remove NC on next note (because combo is inconsistent with 00:28:429 (7,1) - )
5. 01:25:834 (1) - you forgot a finish

1. 00:08:645 (8,9) - try ctrl+r , might flow better
2. 00:37:672 (8) - NC
3. 01:02:726 (2) - unstack like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:04:591 (2) - stack with the end of 01:05:402 (3) - for neater appearance?

1. 00:00:213 (1,2) - Uhm, I felt this pattern is a bit harsh in first place of a map...if you continue to use this pattern on the same sound after them, I think it'd be a good experience for the beginner, but not so in this case. Well, just use a 1/1 slider instead?
2. 00:48:861 (2,4) - This is the easiest diff. You should avoid overlapping a circle with a slidertail if possible. It should be hard for the beginner to read.
3. 01:30:375 (2,4) - ^

1. 00:04:915 (4,5,6) - This spacing change can be read enough easily. But the player, who usually plays a hard difficulty, probably gets confused. I think it'd be better and kind for them to add a new combo to (4).
2. 00:10:104 (4) - If fixed above try to consider about this one too.
3. 00:20:969 (9) - Finish finish.
4. 01:15:942 (4,5,6) - I kinda don't see why you use a quick triple on this, comparing with other parts(01:13:348 (4), 01:18:699 (5), 01:21:294 (4)). If there's such a sound in back anyway.

1. 00:26:645 (4) - Why don't you add a finish to the top of slider? Refering to 00:23:564 (1,3) and 00:25:510 (1,3), I think it would be better.
2. 00:28:753 (1,3) - ^
3. 00:29:726 (1,5) - ^
4. 00:30:699 (1) - ^
5. 00:31:023 (1) - ^
6. 00:37:672 (8,9,10,11,1) - Yeah, their placement looks very good, but when playing, I felt the flow was prevented by nearer space between (8) and (9). In other parts overall flow is great, only in this part I felt something worse. Can you find some way to make it better?
7. 00:41:726 (1) - (kinda nazi) To readjust its shape surrounding (2) would be better and looks beautiful.
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 01:43:348 (T) - Not slow SV down here would be better even if KIAI ended.

1. これDiffバランス大丈夫なんです？LIGHTとSTANDARDの差が酷くない？

1. 00:11:888 (3) - このスライダー折り返して00:12:861ここにサークル置いてみたりしたら曲に合うんじゃね（完全に好み
2. 01:07:348 (5) - add note?
3. 01:10:915 (2,4) - 4が見難いんじゃないかな
4. 01:21:294 (2,4) - ^

1. 00:39:618 (4,5,6) - 音取りこんな感じにすれば少し簡単になるような
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:46:267 (4,5,6) - 遠すぎでは？
2. 01:10:429 (2,3,4) - ここも他と合わせて少し離してみればいいのでは？