Isn't it more incentive to go and fix up horrible accuracy runs on your other map plays then?bomber34 wrote:
Kinda disagree because i don't wanna see a permanentliy "A" on my Profile ... that would depress me, because i would never try to master all Approved maps i play.
Next to stats image != On stats imagetheowest wrote:
I can see why you guys would support this. But let's think about this for a second..
It would just be extremely depressing to have anything lower than 95%. and besides, it would just look ugly. I don't even like the way the rank look.
C'mon, look at this
it's perfect as it is, and you want a ugly S, SS or A on it too? That would just make it look so bad.
But if you guys really, really want to have this, wouldn't it be better with just A, S and SS ranks? Since almost nobody have anything under 90% anyways. It should count how many A ranks you have. If you have more A ranks than S ranks or SS ranks, then you should have a big fat A on your ugly profile. If you have more SS ranks, then you should have a SS rank. Get it?
I think that's much better.
Do you still think that would look any good?dragonxcz wrote:
Next to stats image != On stats imagetheowest wrote:
I can see why you guys would support this. But let's think about this for a second..
It would just be extremely depressing to have anything lower than 95%. and besides, it would just look ugly. I don't even like the way the rank look.
C'mon, look at this
it's perfect as it is, and you want a ugly S, SS or A on it too? That would just make it look so bad.
But if you guys really, really want to have this, wouldn't it be better with just A, S and SS ranks? Since almost nobody have anything under 90% anyways. It should count how many A ranks you have. If you have more A ranks than S ranks or SS ranks, then you should have a big fat A on your ugly profile. If you have more SS ranks, then you should have a SS rank. Get it?
I think that's much better.
lol
yha, I think it, it's your problem when you dislike it, I didn't said you must like it.. loltheowest wrote:
Do you still think that would look any good?
Shouldn't the majority like it before you want something like that implemented?dragonxcz wrote:
yha, I think it, it's your problem when you dislike it, I didn't said you must like it.. loltheowest wrote:
Do you still think that would look any good?
Argh... Why people haves problems and stupid questions?theowest wrote:
Shouldn't the majority like it before you want something like that implemented?
I'm giving counterarguments. I have the right to do so.dragonxcz wrote:
Argh... Why people haves problems and stupid questions?theowest wrote:
Shouldn't the majority like it before you want something like that implemented?
This should be locked, because I don't want have spamers here.
They only approve of things osu! needs and would be better off having.dragonxcz wrote:
Did I said osu! needs accuracy sign? Almost everything accepted in feature requests wasn't need.
But am I being childish? I'm just asking for an argument. I don't see why that would be hard.Sakura Hana wrote:
Ok you both please stop it, this has gone from discussion to just childish behavior.
Locking something isn't the way to handle things, just stop replying to each other or something.dragonxcz wrote:
^ Sakura Hana - Yeah. I wanted to stop, I said: "This should be locked, because I don't want have spamers here." So I stop, but he still asks on something..
I'm pretty sure I am allowed to say why osu! doesn't need an accuracy sign.Sakura Hana wrote:
Locking something isn't the way to handle things, just stop replying to each other or something.dragonxcz wrote:
^ Sakura Hana - Yeah. I wanted to stop, I said: "This should be locked, because I don't want have spamers here." So I stop, but he still asks on something..