A little later than I wanted, here are some of the proposals for the RC changes I brought up for discussion a while ago.
The following changes provide a more fluid definition for the gap between objects and spinners.
Discussion for these proposed rule changes will be open for two weeks, ending at 23:59 UTC+0, Tuesday the 17th of April. If there are no open discussions that warrant revision by this point, the proposal will be amended into the Ranking Criteria with immediate effect. Therefore, if you have questions, concerns, or ideas for further improvement, please continue to discuss them here over the next two weeks.
The following changes provide a more fluid definition for the gap between objects and spinners.
Cup
The following rule:
The following rule:
The following rule:
The following rule:
The following rule:
The following rule:
- At least 250 ms must be left between objects and the start and end of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/3 gap would be required at 80 bpm, whereas a 1/2 gap would be required at 120 BPM.
- Adequate time must be left between objects and the start and end of spinners to ensure readability. Depending on the BPM of the song, this time must conform to the following:
- BPM < 120 - 1/2 bar
- BPM < 240 - 1 bar
- BPM ≥ 240 - 2 bars
The following rule:
- At least 250 ms must be left between objects and the start and end of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/3 gap would be required at 80 bpm, whereas a 1/2 gap would be required at 120 BPM.
- Adequate time must be left between objects and the start and end of spinners to ensure readability. Depending on the BPM of the song, this time must conform to the following:
- BPM < 120 - 1/2 bar
- BPM < 240 - 1 bar
- BPM ≥ 240 - 2 bars
The following rule:
- At least 125 ms must be left between objects and the start of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/4 gap would be required at 120 BPM, whereas a 1/3 gap would be required at 160 BPM.
- At least 250 ms must be left between objects and the end of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/3 gap would be required at 80 bpm, whereas a 1/2 gap would be required at 120 BPM.
- Adequate time must be left between objects and the start of spinners to ensure readability. Depending on the BPM of the song, this time must conform to the following:
- BPM < 120 - 1/4 bar
- BPM < 240 - 1/2 bar
- BPM ≥ 240 - 1 bars
- The gap between the end of a spinner and the next object must be at least 1/2 a bar regardless of BPM.
The following rule:
- At least 125 ms must be left between objects and the start and end of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/4 gap would be required at 120 BPM, whereas a 1/3 gap would be required at 160 BPM.
- Adequate time must be left between objects and the start of spinners to ensure readability. Depending on the BPM of the song, this time must conform to the following:
- BPM < 120 - 1/4 bar
- BPM < 240 - 1/2 bar
- BPM ≥ 240 - 1 bars
- The gap between the end of a spinner and the next object must be at least 1/2 a bar regardless of BPM.
The following rule:
- At least 62 ms must be left between objects and the start of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/6 gap would be required at 160 BPM, whereas a 1/4 gap would be required at 240 BPM.
- At least 125 ms must be left between objects and the end of spinners to ensure readability. As an example, a 1/4 gap would be required at 120 BPM, whereas a 1/3 gap would be required at 160 BPM.
- Adequate time must be left between objects and the start of spinners to ensure readability. Depending on the BPM of the song, this time must conform to the following:
- BPM < 240 - 1/4 bar
- BPM ≥ 240 - 1/2 bars
- The gap between the end of a spinner and the next object must be at least 1/2 a bar regardless of BPM.
Discussion for these proposed rule changes will be open for two weeks, ending at 23:59 UTC+0, Tuesday the 17th of April. If there are no open discussions that warrant revision by this point, the proposal will be amended into the Ranking Criteria with immediate effect. Therefore, if you have questions, concerns, or ideas for further improvement, please continue to discuss them here over the next two weeks.