Yuuki Katsuki wrote:

Etto...

i want to make a Guest Difficulty... please.. let me do it ÒWÓ !!!

1. Spacing could be regulated in places where it is currently inconsistent. 01:34:625 (1,2,3) - example. Instead of using 1.0, 1.0, 1.5 distance spacing, 1.25, 1.25, 1.25 leads into the 01:35:125 (3,4,5) jump better. (screenshot) This is an example of using acceleration as opposed to more sudden increases in spacing. On a somewhat related note, using one combo per measure helps keeps things organized and readable.
2. Design could look better. I would have used a slightly higher slider velocity to start with, such as 1.6. Note that using a multiple of 0.16 or preferably 0.32 as your slider velocity helps keep things aligned in the map. 00:03:125 (1,2,3,1) - example. If the start of (2) doesn't overlap with the body of the first (1), and the end of (2) doesn't overlap with the start of the second (1), the pattern looks better visually. (screenshot)
3. Patterns could use more creativity. I'd like to see patterns that are not only visually appealing, but memorable and keep with you after you play the map. 01:13:125 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - example. Since I focus a lot on patterns, I lined up the two (1) start points after making them both the same (rotated) shape, made the first (1,2,3) into an equilateral triangle and had (4) be horizontally symmetrical to (3). You don't have to be as obsessive as me, and this probably isn't the most memorable pattern, but it's an example of how you can put effort into the structure and design of patterns.
4. Rhythms should be varied but still make sense. 02:33:125 (3,1,2) - example. It'd be fitting to start the next combo on the downbeat at 02:34:125 as opposed to the offbeat at 02:34:000. It's more intuitive for the combo to start on the downbeat as opposed to the offbeat, giving a better playing experience. Here's what I used personally: (screenshot). I could explain it, but I think you've had enough explaining for now.