1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps

posted
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 4:56:44 PM

Artist: Chelsy
Title: I will
Source: アオハライド
Tags: Aoharaido Blue Spring Ao Haru Ride ending insert song blizs fantastica
BPM: 89
Filesize: 3707kb
Play Time: 01:50
Difficulties Available:
  1. F Ant's Promise (2.53 stars, 213 notes)
  2. Hard (2.12 stars, 182 notes)
  3. Normal (1.53 stars, 131 notes)


Download: Chelsy - I will
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
#1
What is your favorite memory?
Normal by me
Hard by me
F Ant's Promise by Blizs
Hitsound by <strong>Shurelia</strong>
Special Thanks to <strong>Shurelia</strong>
He recommended the song and keep spying on my mapset xD
And a BIG THANKS to <strong>Kisses</strong> that patiently guide me and doing IRC, even if im being stupid.
posted
recommend offset +10 (not really important)

nice song, nice background, NOT NICE PROFILE PICTURE

no kudos
posted

Kondou-Shinichi wrote:

recommend offset +10 (not really important)

nice song, nice background, NOT NICE PROFILE PICTURE

no kudos
Thanks for complementing my Profile Picture.

(yes kds)
posted
2017-10-26 14:35 Uta: hey mo do you accepting a quick look or a bit chat about my map?
2017-10-26 14:35 -Mo-: I can quick look
2017-10-26 14:35 Uta: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1451266 Chelsy - I Will]
2017-10-26 14:36 Uta: hard diff
2017-10-26 14:36 Uta: i know DS quality seems like a person that just started mapping for 1 day
2017-10-26 14:39 -Mo-: 00:20:898 (2) - Probably wouldn't overlap the reverse arrow so much
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: hmm did you just said "probably"?
2017-10-26 14:40 -Mo-: I use that word way too liberally
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: you mean a little bit to the right?
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: i mean left
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: xD
2017-10-26 14:40 -Mo-: Well I wouldn't overlap it at all given the choice
2017-10-26 14:41 -Mo-: [https://puu.sh/y7CUt.jpg This seems good enough]
2017-10-26 14:41 Uta: seems good!
2017-10-26 14:43 -Mo-: 00:53:932 (1,3,5) - This overlap is kinda meht oo
2017-10-26 14:44 -Mo-: 01:06:741 (2,3) - I think this is the only spacing thing I have an issue with in the whole map
2017-10-26 14:44 -Mo-: Since you did use larger spacing for some places, but this is a place I would expect it
2017-10-26 14:45 Uta: should the overlap is really necessary to be remove
2017-10-26 14:45 -Mo-: It's not like it's unrankable, but I do think it looks pretty cluttered as it is currently
2017-10-26 14:46 -Mo-: Would be better if it wasn't there
2017-10-26 14:46 Uta: the snap change to 1/3 in that part. i dont know where else to put it (fit the map's structure and flow)
2017-10-26 14:47 -Mo-: [https://puu.sh/y7D4K.jpg What about that]
2017-10-26 14:47 -Mo-: Small overlaps indicate that the rhythm is different from everything else so it should read like 1/3
2017-10-26 14:48 Uta: hmm ill check
2017-10-26 14:48 Uta: in some of the maps i played
2017-10-26 14:48 Uta: they use new combo to show indicate a different rythm
2017-10-26 14:49 -Mo-: NC spamming is a pretty messy way to do it
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: well nice grammar...
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: me
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: yea i agree
2017-10-26 14:49 -Mo-: It indicates a change sure, but it's not immediate to the player what that change is
2017-10-26 14:49 -Mo-: In a lot of places it also just looks bad
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: agreed
2017-10-26 14:50 -Mo-: NC ontop of 00:55:280 (3) - and 00:55:955 (6) - isn't a bad idea though
2017-10-26 14:51 Uta: yes
2017-10-26 14:51 Uta: since 00:55:280 (1,2,3) - and 00:55:955 (1) - have a differenty snap
2017-10-26 14:51 Uta: umm typo there
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: what about these jumps? 00:56:629 (1,2,3,4) - some said that its overmapping etc
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: no i mean
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: the DS is over
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: plz teach me proper english :>
2017-10-26 14:53 -Mo-: "The spacing is too large"
2017-10-26 14:53 -Mo-: I do think that the change is a bit too sudden
2017-10-26 14:53 Uta: exactly xD
2017-10-26 14:54 -Mo-: Also since 1-3 and 2-4 are close to each other, it makes the actual spacing seem larger than it is
2017-10-26 14:55 Uta: kekz i dont think its bad :>
2017-10-26 14:55 -Mo-: Yeah, I don't think it's too bad either
2017-10-26 14:55 Uta: so that's it for now?
2017-10-26 14:56 -Mo-: Oh 01:00:674 (3,4) - this spacing could be slightly larger too to match 01:01:348 (4,5) -
2017-10-26 14:56 -Mo-: 01:08:089 (1,2,3) - I also think this looks kind of cluttered
2017-10-26 14:56 Uta: hmm i dont think its an emphasis didnt it
2017-10-26 14:57 -Mo-: 01:01:348 - Has a louder vocal sound than 01:01:685 -
2017-10-26 14:57 Uta: DS 1.3x 01:01:348 (4,5) - ?
2017-10-26 14:57 Uta: oh
2017-10-26 14:57 Uta: so 4 need to have more spacing?
2017-10-26 14:58 -Mo-: Just saying that 4-5 shouldn't have more spacing than 3-4
2017-10-26 14:58 -Mo-: So you can either make 3-4 larger or 4-5 smaller
2017-10-26 14:59 -Mo-: My suggestion is mvoe 01:01:348 (4) - to (440, 215)
2017-10-26 14:59 Uta: 3-4 larger!
2017-10-26 14:59 Uta: how about 01:01:685 (5) - ?
2017-10-26 14:59 -Mo-: That should be fine where it is
2017-10-26 15:00 Uta: just perfect
2017-10-26 15:01 -Mo-: 01:08:764 (2) - I think easiest fix for this is to move it to (89, 283)
2017-10-26 15:01 Uta: honestly tho
2017-10-26 15:01 Uta: i dont know what to say about this 01:08:089 (1,2,3) -
2017-10-26 15:01 -Mo-: So that 1-2 and 2-3 have the same gap between them visually
2017-10-26 15:02 Uta: ahh, i get your point
2017-10-26 15:02 Uta: seems better
2017-10-26 15:03 -Mo-: 01:14:157 (7) - Straight slider seems kind of boring to me for this sound
2017-10-26 15:03 -Mo-: So maybe some sort of curve upwards
2017-10-26 15:03 Uta: 01:22:921 (2,3,4) -
2017-10-26 15:03 -Mo-: That has the same problem as bfeore yeah
2017-10-26 15:03 Uta: upwards?
2017-10-26 15:04 -Mo-: https://puu.sh/y7DCV.jpg
2017-10-26 15:04 Uta: 15 clockwise?
2017-10-26 15:04 Uta: ahh
2017-10-26 15:04 Uta: ok
2017-10-26 15:05 -Mo-: 01:19:550 (1,2,3) - Spacing thing here too
2017-10-26 15:05 Uta: so rather 01:22:921 (2,3) - have more space or smaller space?
2017-10-26 15:06 -Mo-: Listen to the sounds
2017-10-26 15:06 -Mo-: 01:23:595 (4) - is louder than 01:23:258 (3) -
2017-10-26 15:07 Uta: 01:20:898 (4) - going to have more space then before (2,3) and an nc?
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: 01:20:561 (3) - less spacing
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: ?
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: well i do think this is fine, in a bad way tho
2017-10-26 15:08 -Mo-: I think we're looking at two different things now
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: 01:23:258 (3,4) -
2017-10-26 15:09 Uta: what
2017-10-26 15:09 -Mo-: 01:22:921 (2,3,4) - Let's take a look at this one first
2017-10-26 15:09 Uta: ok
2017-10-26 15:10 -Mo-: Which sounds are louder and should have more emphasis
2017-10-26 15:10 -Mo-: ?
2017-10-26 15:10 Uta: hmm
2017-10-26 15:10 Uta: these 01:22:584 (1,2,3) - have the same sound
2017-10-26 15:11 Uta: not this tho
2017-10-26 15:11 Uta: 01:23:595 (4) -
2017-10-26 15:11 -Mo-: Yeah
2017-10-26 15:11 -Mo-: So 3-4 should not be smaller than 2-3, would you agree?
2017-10-26 15:12 Uta: yes!
2017-10-26 15:13 -Mo-: 01:19:550 (1,2,3) - And for this one can you see how it should be changed?
2017-10-26 15:14 Uta: idk i think 01:20:224 (2) - have a smaller sound
2017-10-26 15:14 Uta: 01:20:561 (3) - then this
2017-10-26 15:15 -Mo-: I would've said 2 has more emphasis
2017-10-26 15:15 -Mo-: Because it has a higher pitch
2017-10-26 15:16 Uta: same as before, this 01:19:550 (1,2,3) - should have the same distance and this 01:20:898 (4) - should have more distance
2017-10-26 15:16 Uta: i know its a higher pitch, but its kinda not noticeable
2017-10-26 15:17 -Mo-: If you listen to only those sounds, it might not be very noticable
2017-10-26 15:18 Uta: yes, are the players going to tho ;) ?
2017-10-26 15:18 -Mo-: But if you listen to the whole combo, you'll be able to pick out which one has the most emphasis
2017-10-26 15:18 -Mo-: https://puu.sh/y7E39.jpg
2017-10-26 15:18 Uta: ah get your point know :v
2017-10-26 15:20 Uta: fixed
2017-10-26 15:21 -Mo-: I think that's about it
2017-10-26 15:22 Uta: ah, was that a quick look tho xD
2017-10-26 15:22 Uta: probably not
2017-10-26 15:22 Uta: and thank you so much!!!
2017-10-26 15:22 -Mo-: Oh well
posted

-Mo- wrote:

2017-10-26 14:35 Uta: hey mo do you accepting a quick look or a bit chat about my map?
2017-10-26 14:35 -Mo-: I can quick look
2017-10-26 14:35 Uta: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1451266 Chelsy - I Will]
2017-10-26 14:36 Uta: hard diff
2017-10-26 14:36 Uta: i know DS quality seems like a person that just started mapping for 1 day
2017-10-26 14:39 -Mo-: 00:20:898 (2) - Probably wouldn't overlap the reverse arrow so much
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: hmm did you just said "probably"?
2017-10-26 14:40 -Mo-: I use that word way too liberally
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: you mean a little bit to the right?
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: i mean left
2017-10-26 14:40 Uta: xD
2017-10-26 14:40 -Mo-: Well I wouldn't overlap it at all given the choice
2017-10-26 14:41 -Mo-: [https://puu.sh/y7CUt.jpg This seems good enough]
2017-10-26 14:41 Uta: seems good!
2017-10-26 14:43 -Mo-: 00:53:932 (1,3,5) - This overlap is kinda meht oo
2017-10-26 14:44 -Mo-: 01:06:741 (2,3) - I think this is the only spacing thing I have an issue with in the whole map
2017-10-26 14:44 -Mo-: Since you did use larger spacing for some places, but this is a place I would expect it
2017-10-26 14:45 Uta: should the overlap is really necessary to be remove
2017-10-26 14:45 -Mo-: It's not like it's unrankable, but I do think it looks pretty cluttered as it is currently
2017-10-26 14:46 -Mo-: Would be better if it wasn't there
2017-10-26 14:46 Uta: the snap change to 1/3 in that part. i dont know where else to put it (fit the map's structure and flow)
2017-10-26 14:47 -Mo-: [https://puu.sh/y7D4K.jpg What about that]
2017-10-26 14:47 -Mo-: Small overlaps indicate that the rhythm is different from everything else so it should read like 1/3
2017-10-26 14:48 Uta: hmm ill check
2017-10-26 14:48 Uta: in some of the maps i played
2017-10-26 14:48 Uta: they use new combo to show indicate a different rythm
2017-10-26 14:49 -Mo-: NC spamming is a pretty messy way to do it
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: well nice grammar...
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: me
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: yea i agree
2017-10-26 14:49 -Mo-: It indicates a change sure, but it's not immediate to the player what that change is
2017-10-26 14:49 -Mo-: In a lot of places it also just looks bad
2017-10-26 14:49 Uta: agreed
2017-10-26 14:50 -Mo-: NC ontop of 00:55:280 (3) - and 00:55:955 (6) - isn't a bad idea though
2017-10-26 14:51 Uta: yes
2017-10-26 14:51 Uta: since 00:55:280 (1,2,3) - and 00:55:955 (1) - have a differenty snap
2017-10-26 14:51 Uta: umm typo there
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: what about these jumps? 00:56:629 (1,2,3,4) - some said that its overmapping etc
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: no i mean
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: the DS is over
2017-10-26 14:52 Uta: plz teach me proper english :>
2017-10-26 14:53 -Mo-: "The spacing is too large"
2017-10-26 14:53 -Mo-: I do think that the change is a bit too sudden
2017-10-26 14:53 Uta: exactly xD
2017-10-26 14:54 -Mo-: Also since 1-3 and 2-4 are close to each other, it makes the actual spacing seem larger than it is
2017-10-26 14:55 Uta: kekz i dont think its bad :>
2017-10-26 14:55 -Mo-: Yeah, I don't think it's too bad either
2017-10-26 14:55 Uta: so that's it for now?
2017-10-26 14:56 -Mo-: Oh 01:00:674 (3,4) - this spacing could be slightly larger too to match 01:01:348 (4,5) -
2017-10-26 14:56 -Mo-: 01:08:089 (1,2,3) - I also think this looks kind of cluttered
2017-10-26 14:56 Uta: hmm i dont think its an emphasis didnt it
2017-10-26 14:57 -Mo-: 01:01:348 - Has a louder vocal sound than 01:01:685 -
2017-10-26 14:57 Uta: DS 1.3x 01:01:348 (4,5) - ?
2017-10-26 14:57 Uta: oh
2017-10-26 14:57 Uta: so 4 need to have more spacing?
2017-10-26 14:58 -Mo-: Just saying that 4-5 shouldn't have more spacing than 3-4
2017-10-26 14:58 -Mo-: So you can either make 3-4 larger or 4-5 smaller
2017-10-26 14:59 -Mo-: My suggestion is mvoe 01:01:348 (4) - to (440, 215)
2017-10-26 14:59 Uta: 3-4 larger!
2017-10-26 14:59 Uta: how about 01:01:685 (5) - ?
2017-10-26 14:59 -Mo-: That should be fine where it is
2017-10-26 15:00 Uta: just perfect
2017-10-26 15:01 -Mo-: 01:08:764 (2) - I think easiest fix for this is to move it to (89, 283)
2017-10-26 15:01 Uta: honestly tho
2017-10-26 15:01 Uta: i dont know what to say about this 01:08:089 (1,2,3) -
2017-10-26 15:01 -Mo-: So that 1-2 and 2-3 have the same gap between them visually
2017-10-26 15:02 Uta: ahh, i get your point
2017-10-26 15:02 Uta: seems better
2017-10-26 15:03 -Mo-: 01:14:157 (7) - Straight slider seems kind of boring to me for this sound
2017-10-26 15:03 -Mo-: So maybe some sort of curve upwards
2017-10-26 15:03 Uta: 01:22:921 (2,3,4) -
2017-10-26 15:03 -Mo-: That has the same problem as bfeore yeah
2017-10-26 15:03 Uta: upwards?
2017-10-26 15:04 -Mo-: https://puu.sh/y7DCV.jpg
2017-10-26 15:04 Uta: 15 clockwise?
2017-10-26 15:04 Uta: ahh
2017-10-26 15:04 Uta: ok
2017-10-26 15:05 -Mo-: 01:19:550 (1,2,3) - Spacing thing here too
2017-10-26 15:05 Uta: so rather 01:22:921 (2,3) - have more space or smaller space?
2017-10-26 15:06 -Mo-: Listen to the sounds
2017-10-26 15:06 -Mo-: 01:23:595 (4) - is louder than 01:23:258 (3) -
2017-10-26 15:07 Uta: 01:20:898 (4) - going to have more space then before (2,3) and an nc?
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: 01:20:561 (3) - less spacing
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: ?
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: well i do think this is fine, in a bad way tho
2017-10-26 15:08 -Mo-: I think we're looking at two different things now
2017-10-26 15:08 Uta: 01:23:258 (3,4) -
2017-10-26 15:09 Uta: what
2017-10-26 15:09 -Mo-: 01:22:921 (2,3,4) - Let's take a look at this one first
2017-10-26 15:09 Uta: ok
2017-10-26 15:10 -Mo-: Which sounds are louder and should have more emphasis
2017-10-26 15:10 -Mo-: ?
2017-10-26 15:10 Uta: hmm
2017-10-26 15:10 Uta: these 01:22:584 (1,2,3) - have the same sound
2017-10-26 15:11 Uta: not this tho
2017-10-26 15:11 Uta: 01:23:595 (4) -
2017-10-26 15:11 -Mo-: Yeah
2017-10-26 15:11 -Mo-: So 3-4 should not be smaller than 2-3, would you agree?
2017-10-26 15:12 Uta: yes!
2017-10-26 15:13 -Mo-: 01:19:550 (1,2,3) - And for this one can you see how it should be changed?
2017-10-26 15:14 Uta: idk i think 01:20:224 (2) - have a smaller sound
2017-10-26 15:14 Uta: 01:20:561 (3) - then this
2017-10-26 15:15 -Mo-: I would've said 2 has more emphasis
2017-10-26 15:15 -Mo-: Because it has a higher pitch
2017-10-26 15:16 Uta: same as before, this 01:19:550 (1,2,3) - should have the same distance and this 01:20:898 (4) - should have more distance
2017-10-26 15:16 Uta: i know its a higher pitch, but its kinda not noticeable
2017-10-26 15:17 -Mo-: If you listen to only those sounds, it might not be very noticable
2017-10-26 15:18 Uta: yes, are the players going to tho ;) ?
2017-10-26 15:18 -Mo-: But if you listen to the whole combo, you'll be able to pick out which one has the most emphasis
2017-10-26 15:18 -Mo-: https://puu.sh/y7E39.jpg
2017-10-26 15:18 Uta: ah get your point know :v
2017-10-26 15:20 Uta: fixed
2017-10-26 15:21 -Mo-: I think that's about it
2017-10-26 15:22 Uta: ah, was that a quick look tho xD
2017-10-26 15:22 Uta: probably not
2017-10-26 15:22 Uta: and thank you so much!!!
2017-10-26 15:22 -Mo-: Oh well
Thanks for a "quick" mod
oh yeah, this is a mod on the hard difd
posted
Mir's Suggestion about the song's setup
22:22 Uta: mir do you have time for a quick check or talk about my map, probably will talk about my mistakes and what should i do etc
22:22 Mir: i can look at it quickly
22:22 Uta: ok "quickly"
22:22 *Uta is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1451266 Chelsy - I Will]
22:23 Mir: the hard diff?
22:23 Uta: ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
22:23 Uta: yes i know
22:23 Uta: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9400803
22:24 Uta: :thinking:
22:24 Mir: it's not a problem i was just asking what diff you wanted me to look at
22:24 Uta: oh
22:24 Uta: bad me
22:24 Uta: hard
22:24 Mir: tbh you can make the cs higher
22:24 Mir: 3.5 or something
22:25 Uta: a friend of my actually said that, but he said like cs 4, and i said no :3
22:25 Uta: 3.5 it is
22:25 Mir: also ar is pretty low, try ar 6
22:26 Uta: let me guess
22:26 Uta: od is low too
22:26 Mir: overall looks like it can be further polished but it stands on its own structurally
22:26 Mir: od 2 lol
22:26 Mir: at least 4
22:27 Uta: changed
22:28 Mir: yeah i guess it's fine
22:28 Mir: but needs a bit of work overall
22:28 Mir: mainly visual spacing
22:29 Mir: but its ok
22:29 Mir: ye
22:29 Uta: ok now can i ask 1 question about 01:32:359 (5,6,7,1,2,3,4) -
22:30 Uta: is it sounded weird to you
22:30 Mir: yes
22:30 Mir: 01:31:685 (4) - nc this
22:31 Mir: then use something like https://i.imgur.com/Tu95a3b.png
22:31 Mir: 01:33:707 - two circles here probably
22:31 Mir: then should be fine
22:32 Uta: gootttttttttttttt


song setup on hard difficulty is changed such as AR, OD etc
https://osu.ppy.sh/u/mir
posted
quick thing check a i dont mod maps

normal
00:15:505 (4,5) - looks inconsistent to me compared to 00:04:719 (4,5,4,5) - as suddenly you decide not to break movement from slider to slider and instead curve (4) in such a way to where it leads into (5). for consistency i think ctrl+h on 00:15:505 (4) - might work well here to fix the issue (also looks better imo)
00:21:574 (5) - personally don't agree with the design. cause of the heavy use of red anchors suddenly the slider stands out a damn lot, while in the song i don't think that's what you should be aiming for. (also if you wanna keep the slider at least make it symmetrical, it becomes easy to do if you make it with grid snap)
00:26:966 (4) - i think this situation would benefit a lot from a 1/2 reverse slider. the vocals intensify and i don't think simplifying them so much would do the song justice at this point. a reverse should keep the same pressure at the player but it just catches a little more of the song
00:56:629 (1,2,3,4) - oof this could easily be perfected to a proper ruby, just make a triangle, then mirror that and put it on top of it. delete the notes you dont need
00:58:652 (2) - actually a circle might be good here since the song is creating a lot of impact. a circle here would mean greater impact on 00:59:326 (1) - and i think that is what the song is doing here
01:00:674 (3,4,5,6) - this rhythm seems to be way more simplified than what you had before that wasn't kiai, feels really weird to have the peak of the song be the least intense. i think 01:03:371 (5,6) - would work great as 1/2 sliders to emphasise more of the vocals
01:11:123 (2,3) - seems rather weird to have a big momentum break here when you didn't have that before in similar situations. try to adjust the shape of (3) a bit more so that the flow from (2) leads better into it
01:15:505 (1,2) - why do i feel like this could've been more intense rhythm-wise? it feels really empty to have the instrumental peak in the song be mapped by just 1/1 reverses
01:36:404 (8) - more could be done here to emphasise the extra drum roll in the song. would be fun to have this stand out more as it clearly does in the song
01:46:516 (1) - no circle here and a spinner after? :(

ok just wrote some quick things in 10 mins if you need help pm me bye!
posted

HighTec wrote:

quick thing check a i dont mod maps

normal
00:15:505 (4,5) - looks inconsistent to me compared to 00:04:719 (4,5,4,5) - as suddenly you decide not to break movement from slider to slider and instead curve (4) in such a way to where it leads into (5). for consistency i think ctrl+h on 00:15:505 (4) - might work well here to fix the issue (also looks better imo) Changed to something that looks similar to this
00:21:574 (5) - personally don't agree with the design. cause of the heavy use of red anchors suddenly the slider stands out a damn lot, while in the song i don't think that's what you should be aiming for. (also if you wanna keep the slider at least make it symmetrical, it becomes easy to do if you make it with grid snap) I think it play just fine and this is normal diff
00:26:966 (4) - i think this situation would benefit a lot from a 1/2 reverse slider. the vocals intensify and i don't think simplifying them so much would do the song justice at this point. a reverse should keep the same pressure at the player but it just catches a little more of the song I'm going to keep this, ofc it looks cool. but i think spamming sound on that part would ruin the next object where I stack two circles to emphasize and introduce that the next object will look like this 00:32:359 (4,5) -
00:56:629 (1,2,3,4) - oof this could easily be perfected to a proper ruby, just make a triangle, then mirror that and put it on top of it. delete the notes you dont need my bad
00:58:652 (2) - actually a circle might be good here since the song is creating a lot of impact. a circle here would mean greater impact on 00:59:326 (1) - and i think that is what the song is doing here True, but I think im just going to keep that part calm. and the next slider that will make an impact in kiai part
01:00:674 (3,4,5,6) - this rhythm seems to be way more simplified than what you had before that wasn't kiai, feels really weird to have the peak of the song be the least intense. i think 01:03:371 (5,6) - would work great as 1/2 sliders to emphasise more of the vocals since this 01:19:550 (1,2) - share the same sound and i think both will need 1/2. thanks!
01:11:123 (2,3) - seems rather weird to have a big momentum break here when you didn't have that before in similar situations. try to adjust the shape of (3) a bit more so that the flow from (2) leads better into it :D
01:15:505 (1,2) - why do i feel like this could've been more intense rhythm-wise? it feels really empty to have the instrumental peak in the song be mapped by just 1/1 reverses nah, i feel like it's just fine. the rythm plays well too
01:36:404 (8) - more could be done here to emphasise the extra drum roll in the song. would be fun to have this stand out more as it clearly does in the song No changes
01:46:516 (1) - no circle here and a spinner after? :(ayy lmao

ok just wrote some quick things in 10 mins if you need help pm me bye!
NOICE NOICE NOICE
posted
Hello

[General]
  1. You can add the tags アオハライド, Aoharaido. For the Japanese of Ao Haru Ride, and delete the tag Cutted version since it's not needed.
[Hard]
  1. 00:05:056 (2) - I kind of disagree here on how the downbeat's mapped unclickable while there's some other pretty strong instrument there active. How about trying this?
  2. 00:20:898 (2) - The same here too, as above. The downbeat is mapped unclickable while the instrument active there's pretty strong. Please make 00:21:573 - clickable.
  3. 00:26:629 (2,3,4,5) - The single notes seems spammed here, when it's still in a calm part. I prefer the rhythm you made at 00:37:415 (4,1,2,3) - as presents a calm part better, and it also fits the other instruments there too.
  4. 00:28:988 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This too seems spammed. It doesn't present a calm part at all, when you hand should click so many times.
  5. 00:42:977 - Probably, you can map this without worrying about 1/4 rhythms, as you made extended sliders before, 00:24:269 (1,2,1) - and 00:35:056 (1,2,3) - . You focus on vocals everywhere when it's active, so it'd be inconsistent with this not being mapped.
  6. 00:43:483 - You should map the one here too as I explained above. [url=C:\Users\Computer\Documents\ShareX\Screenshots\2017-10\osu!_2017-10-27_16-48-04.jpg]How about trying this.[/url]
  7. 00:48:539 (7,8) - The jump here should be unnecessary, there is nothing to emphasize there.
  8. 00:55:280 (1,2,3) - I'd recommend changing this into a reversed slider, same as 00:53:932 (1,2) - . It'd be pretty hard to spam 1/3s in Hards.
  9. 01:05:393 (3,4,5,1,2,3) - This'll be pretty stressful for a Hard, especially with jumps present there. I'd highly recommend changing some of them into sliders.
  10. 01:17:528 (5,6) - The jumps here is pretty big itself, when you didn't do this kinds anywhere else.
[]
That should be all. Remember to pay attention on how you use clickable notes and unclickable notes, and make them balance, especially in lower diffs. And also, keep in mind that you aren't only mapping vocals everywhere, from the beginning until the end. Focusing on something is nice itself, but don't forget that you map the whole song, which has drums, cymbals, and many others in it. So you should pay attention to the other instruments too. From what i see here, you focused on vocals entirely when it's active and leave the other strong instruments behind. For example, 01:31:179 - when it's so obvious to hear. You can PM me in-game if you need my help.
posted

William K wrote:

Hello

[General]
  1. You can add the tags アオハライド, Aoharaido. For the Japanese of Ao Haru Ride, and delete the tag Cutted version since it's not needed. aaaaaaaa
[Hard]
  1. 00:05:056 (2) - I kind of disagree here on how the downbeat's mapped unclickable while there's some other pretty strong instrument there active. How about trying this? Same sound same treatment, no changes
  2. 00:20:898 (2) - The same here too, as above. The downbeat is mapped unclickable while the instrument active there's pretty strong. Please make 00:21:573 - clickable. No, this part is easy. Will still stand to my mapping structure
  3. 00:26:629 (2,3,4,5) - The single notes seems spammed here, when it's still in a calm part. I prefer the rhythm you made at 00:37:415 (4,1,2,3) - as presents a calm part better, and it also fits the other instruments there too.
  4. 00:28:988 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This too seems spammed. It doesn't present a calm part at all, when you hand should click so many times. Hmm, this is actually not a major problem, the sounds is clickable. also sounds in this is part is clearly getting intense. so why not emphasize it with the pattern. it's nice that you point this out tho
  5. 00:42:977 - Probably, you can map this without worrying about 1/4 rhythms, as you made extended sliders before, 00:24:269 (1,2,1) - and 00:35:056 (1,2,3) - . You focus on vocals everywhere when it's active, so it'd be inconsistent with this not being mapped. Ay ay agree
  6. 00:43:483 - You should map the one here too as I explained above. [url=C:\Users\Computer\Documents\ShareX\Screenshots\2017-10\osu!_2017-10-27_16-48-04.jpg]How about trying this.[/url]
  7. 00:48:539 (7,8) - The jump here should be unnecessary, there is nothing to emphasize there.nerf a bit. cuz its visually the same.
    and not jumps
  8. 00:55:280 (1,2,3) - I'd recommend changing this into a reversed slider, same as 00:53:932 (1,2) - . It'd be pretty hard to spam 1/3s in Hards. I did introduced 1/3 reverse, lets give the player a challenge! (seriously will take other opinions about this)
  9. 01:05:393 (3,4,5,1,2,3) - This'll be pretty stressful for a Hard, especially with jumps present there. I'd highly recommend changing some of them into sliders. nah, low bpm+ AR 6 is fine imo
  10. 01:17:528 (5,6) - The jumps here is pretty big itself, when you didn't do this kinds anywhere else.hehehe
[]
That should be all. Remember to pay attention on how you use clickable notes and unclickable notes, and make them balance, especially in lower diffs. And also, keep in mind that you aren't only mapping vocals everywhere, from the beginning until the end. Focusing on something is nice itself, but don't forget that you map the whole song, which has drums, cymbals, and many others in it. So you should pay attention to the other instruments too. From what i see here, you focused on vocals entirely when it's active and leave the other strong instruments behind. For example, 01:31:179 - when it's so obvious to hear. You can PM me in-game if you need my help. THANKS!
posted
It literally only gave one point, so I'll just paste it manually
Object at 00:49:550 - should be placed at: [192, 226] currently at: [193, 221] to blanket slider body at time 00:49:887 -
posted
lagu masa lalu

[general]
  1. matiin suara slider-slide nya dong. Lagunya pelan dan instrumentnya jga ga terlalu keras jadi suara slider-slide rada ngeganggu
[nm]
  1. 00:02:697 (1,2) - kesalahan DS buat 1>2 , 1.27 itu perbedaan yg terlalu besar dari 1.20
  2. 00:02:697 (1,5) - kedua slider ini menutupin suara yg sama persis namun tanpa alasan yg kuat kamu membuat mereka terlihat berbeda sehingga bisa mengurangi kecantikan mapmu. Coba gunakan wujud slider yg sama persi
  3. 00:02:697 (1) - untuk saya personal, saya lebih memilih untuk tidak mengeskip suara yg ada 00:03:033 - karena lumayan kencang untuk di map. Oleh karena itu akan lebih baik jika slider ini diganti dengan 1/2 repeat saja untuk menutupi semua suara yg bisa terdengar dari bagian sini. 00:05:393 (5) - ini dan lain lain jga termasuk
  4. 00:07:078 (7) - repeat ini kurang masuk buat saya karena sebenarnya ga ada suara yg terdengar jelas di 00:07:752 - sehingga bisa dibilang overmap yg tidak diperlukan. Cukup diganti dengan 2 circle atau 1 1/2 slider aja buat nutupin suara yg ada di 00:07:078 - 00:07:415 -
  5. 00:15:505 (4,5) - kamu bisa mencoba untuk memberikan blanket di sini.
  6. 00:17:865 (7) - sama seperti sebelumnya
  7. 00:23:595 (6) - DS yg ga konsisten dan juga flow yang terlalu tajam untuk dimainkan oleh pemain normal. Mungkin kamu bisa mencoba untuk meletakkan ini di tempat lain seperti 71|166
  8. 00:28:314 (5,6,1,2) - bukan sesuatu yg bisa dibilang terlihat "bagus" untuk dilihat. Coba kurang2in dalam melakukan overlap jika dirimu masih belum yakin dengan overlap itu sendiri
  9. 00:24:270 (1,4) - ini juga bukan sesuatu yang termasuk golongan "terstruktur" karena bisa dilihat dari peletakkan objek yg cukup asal
  10. 00:42:472 (3,4) - ini juga bisa ditingkatkan lagi, seperti : https://shurelia.s-ul.eu/KEo298yO.png , kamu bisa lihat kalau kamu bisa membuat segitiga dengan 2 objek ini.
  11. 00:53:932 (5,6) - merupkana flow yg terlalu tajam walaupun tidak ada suara yang cukup kuat untuk mengikuti flow tajam ini. jadi lebih baik 6 untuk diletakkan di tempat lain dengan sudut yg lebih kecil
  12. 00:34:382 (6,1) - ini juga bisa ditingkatkan lagi strukturnya seperti yg saya contohkan tadi
  13. 00:19:887 (2,3) - ini juga ada kesalahan di DSnya
  14. 00:56:629 (7,8,9,10,1) - mungkin akan lebih baik kamu bisa mengurangi jumlah objek yg diklik di bagian ini. Coba ganti (7,8) dan (9,10) jadi 1/2 slider biasa dan ganti 1 dengan 2 cirlce karena di sini adalah dimana suaranya yang paling kuat
  15. 00:58:652 (2,1) - bukan sebuah contoh overlap yg bagus
  16. 01:03:370 (5,6,1) - kesalahan DS lagi
sampe di sini dlu, perlu diingat bahwa mod ini saya belum menyebut hal-hal yang termasuk dengan masalah Hitsound dan penggunaan rhythm yg lebih spesifik lagi. Jadi coba review ulang kembali diffmu ini

mungkin link ini bisa mebantumu : https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/Ranking_Criteria/osu! , https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/Mapping_Techniques/Rhythm
posted

Arphimigon wrote:

It literally only gave one point, so I'll just paste it manually
Object at 00:49:550 - should be placed at: [192, 226] currently at: [193, 221] to blanket slider body at time 00:49:887 -
lol thanks for mentioning that this is the hard diff
posted

Shurelia wrote:

lagu masa lalu :(

[general]
  1. matiin suara slider-slide nya dong. Lagunya pelan dan instrumentnya jga ga terlalu keras jadi suara slider-slide rada ngeganggu kekekek i think its fine for now lets see how others think about this
[nm]
  1. 00:02:697 (1,2) - kesalahan DS buat 1>2 , 1.27 itu perbedaan yg terlalu besar dari 1.20 what?
  2. 00:02:697 (1,5) - kedua slider ini menutupin suara yg sama persis namun tanpa alasan yg kuat kamu membuat mereka terlihat berbeda sehingga bisa mengurangi kecantikan mapmu. Coba gunakan wujud slider yg sama persis ayy fixed
  3. 00:02:697 (1) - untuk saya personal, saya lebih memilih untuk tidak mengeskip suara yg ada 00:03:033 - karena lumayan kencang untuk di map. Oleh karena itu akan lebih baik jika slider ini diganti dengan 1/2 repeat saja untuk menutupi semua suara yg bisa terdengar dari bagian sini. 00:05:393 (5) - ini dan lain lain jga termasuk nah, will stay at my current structure. i ignore everything to make these calming but not too calming
  4. 00:07:078 (7) - repeat ini kurang masuk buat saya karena sebenarnya ga ada suara yg terdengar jelas di 00:07:752 - sehingga bisa dibilang overmap yg tidak diperlukan. Cukup diganti dengan 2 circle atau 1 1/2 slider aja buat nutupin suara yg ada di 00:07:078 - 00:07:415 - It's to build up tention. and making up consistency at 00:12:472 (7) - . for normal diff i think this is fine
  5. 00:15:505 (4,5) - kamu bisa mencoba untuk memberikan blanket di sini. okay
  6. 00:17:865 (7) - sama seperti sebelumnya ^
  7. 00:23:595 (6) - DS yg ga konsisten dan juga flow yang terlalu tajam untuk dimainkan oleh pemain normal. Mungkin kamu bisa mencoba untuk meletakkan ini di tempat lain seperti 71|166 did something
  8. 00:28:314 (5,6,1,2) - bukan sesuatu yg bisa dibilang terlihat "bagus" untuk dilihat. Coba kurang2in dalam melakukan overlap jika dirimu masih belum yakin dengan overlap itu sendiri yakin dong
  9. 00:24:270 (1,4) - ini juga bukan sesuatu yang termasuk golongan "terstruktur" karena bisa dilihat dari peletakkan objek yg cukup asal hmm
  10. 00:42:472 (3,4) - ini juga bisa ditingkatkan lagi, seperti : https://shurelia.s-ul.eu/KEo298yO.png , kamu bisa lihat kalau kamu bisa membuat segitiga dengan 2 objek ini. :D
  11. 00:53:932 (5,6) - merupkana merupakan? flow yg terlalu tajam walaupun tidak ada suara yang cukup kuat untuk mengikuti flow tajam ini. jadi lebih baik 6 untuk diletakkan di tempat lain dengan sudut yg lebih kecil thinking, jedanya fine-fine aja
  12. 00:34:382 (6,1) - ini juga bisa ditingkatkan lagi strukturnya seperti yg saya contohkan tadi eyyy
  13. 00:19:887 (2,3) - ini juga ada kesalahan di DSnya yeee
  14. 00:56:629 (7,8,9,10,1) - mungkin akan lebih baik kamu bisa mengurangi jumlah objek yg diklik di bagian ini. Coba ganti (7,8) dan (9,10) jadi 1/2 slider biasa dan ganti 1 dengan 2 cirlce karena di sini adalah dimana suaranya yang paling kuat fixed i guess
  15. 00:58:652 (2,1) - bukan sebuah contoh overlap yg bagus diubah strukturnya
  16. 01:03:370 (5,6,1) - kesalahan DS lagi :(
sampe di sini dlu, perlu diingat bahwa mod ini saya belum menyebut hal-hal yang termasuk dengan masalah Hitsound dan penggunaan rhythm yg lebih spesifik lagi. Jadi coba review ulang kembali diffmu ini YEAAAAAAA

mungkin link ini bisa mebantumu : https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/Ranking_Criteria/osu! , https://osu.ppy.sh/help/wiki/Mapping_Techniques/Rhythm :thinking:
typo for lyfe
posted
let's quick m4m!
offset 0 lol nice.

meta
Title should be "I will -TV MIX-" (if this mp3 is tv size)

ref http://aoha-anime.com/product/cds/03.html

gemeral

remoeve check countdown?

normal

AR is overdone. it's like Hard diff. 4 better because this map is low bpm. and change OD,HP to 4?
01:04:719 (1,2,3) - vs 01:07:415 (4,5,6) - pls consistent spacing (DS)

hard
00:10:112 (3,4) - looks bad to me
00:16:179 - wistle instead of finish better. the finish dosent suit here.
00:25:617 (1,3) - swap nc?
00:33:033 - ^^
00:39:775 (4) - ^^^
00:48:539 (7) - i dont think this revrse slider does good work xd
maybe https://gyazo.com/4a5fafb4867dfe5bedecf95ed65a7330.png
01:20:898 (4) - should be NC
01:34:044 (1,2) - swap nc
01:36:404 - 25%? because finish of here is so loud to me.
01:41:123 (4) - you can put nc here. because you put nc same sound at 01:37:078 (1,1) -

[]
ok, good luck!!
posted
ah there is ranked map already.
ok then, meta is fine lol
posted
normal
I think the AR should be 4 or 5 at max.. AR6 is not really necessary here.

00:02:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - Well, I think those are too spaced compared to the intensity of the song (like, there isn't much going on), you should consider placing them a little closer to each other.. Even though this is Normal not Easy, it still can get people consufed. Also you should prob make new combos at each 4 notes.. 1234, 1234, 1234..
00:57:977 (1,2,3,4) - This can get newbies confused too mainly 00:58:988 (4,1) since the player will have to change from CCW to CW quickly and they're not really used to do that out of a sudden
01:06:067 (3,4) - The 3rd note is a bit too much spaced to the 4th and it's not proportional to other spaced notes
01:46:516 (7,1) - Spinner immediately appears after the 7th note which will def get newbies confused, give them some time to click and think about doing the spin movement, my suggestion would be from 01:47:191 to 01:49:213 it can also be on the other white tick.. or whatever works best for you, but make it a bit longer.
hard
00:20:898 (2) - Remove the reverse arrow and add a spinner from 00:21:910 to 00:22:921, there is room for this
01:15:505 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - During first Kiai time (and second too), space things up a little more, since it's the most 'intense' part, but it doesn't look so different from the first part which isn't much intense.. add more jumps, make things more difficult here, it's the memorable part of the song after all, so the map should reflect that more..



Not much to say about it honestly.. because you did a great job mapping this, I really like it! you seem like you know what you're doing ;)
Sorry for this mod being very short, it's literally the first time I ever do this.. but I hope I could be any helpful with this, smh.

All the best with the map!
posted

Asuka_- wrote:

let's quick m4m!
offset 0 lol nice.

meta
Title should be "I will -TV MIX-" (if this mp3 is tv size)

ref http://aoha-anime.com/product/cds/03.html kekekekekezzz

gemeral

remoeve check countdown? ?

normal

AR is overdone. it's like Hard diff. 4 better because this map is low bpm. and change OD,HP to 4?
01:04:719 (1,2,3) - vs 01:07:415 (4,5,6) - pls consistent spacing (DS) oops

hard
00:10:112 (3,4) - looks bad to me me too
00:16:179 - wistle instead of finish better. the finish dosent suit here. demn it. agree
00:25:617 (1,3) - swap nc? no
00:33:033 - ^^ yes
00:39:775 (4) - ^^^ yes
00:48:539 (7) - i dont think this revrse slider does good work xd
maybe https://gyazo.com/4a5fafb4867dfe5bedecf95ed65a7330.png it works ;), also the image expired
01:20:898 (4) - should be NC yes
01:34:044 (1,2) - swap nc no, it's fine
01:36:404 - 25%? because finish of here is so loud to me. changed to 50%
01:41:123 (4) - you can put nc here. because you put nc same sound at 01:37:078 (1,1) - lol i did

[]
ok, good luck!! thanks!
posted

fffffffffffffxD wrote:

normal
I think the AR should be 4 or 5 at max.. AR6 is not really necessary here. ehehe, fixed after asuka's mod. thanks

00:02:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5) - Well, I think those are too spaced compared to the intensity of the song (like, there isn't much going on), you should consider placing them a little closer to each other.. Even though this is Normal not Easy, it still can get people consufed. Also you should prob make new combos at each 4 notes.. 1234, 1234, 1234.. ehehehe. ofcourse. blame peppy for making distance snap kappa
00:57:977 (1,2,3,4) - This can get newbies confused too mainly 00:58:988 (4,1) since the player will have to change from CCW to CW quickly and they're not really used to do that out of a sudden yes, newbies can adapt right. its fine. i want to create a big impact at 4 because its chorus time (where the music becomes amazinnnnnnnnn)
01:06:067 (3,4) - The 3rd note is a bit too much spaced to the 4th and it's not proportional to other spaced notes yes its confusing because its flow. well i change the structure and angle a bit
01:46:516 (7,1) - Spinner immediately appears after the 7th note which will def get newbies confused, give them some time to click and think about doing the spin movement, my suggestion would be from 01:47:191 to 01:49:213 it can also be on the other white tick.. or whatever works best for you, but make it a bit longer. Oops. me being stupid here xD changed to slider.
hard
00:20:898 (2) - Remove the reverse arrow and add a spinner from 00:21:910 to 00:22:921, there is room for this lel what can i say. its a hard diff ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
01:15:505 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - During first Kiai time (and second too), space things up a little more, since it's the most 'intense' part, but it doesn't look so different from the first part which isn't much intense.. add more jumps, make things more difficult here, it's the memorable part of the song after all, so the map should reflect that more.. lel. ruining emphasize. i know its hard but, since the map have a low bpm, and to build up tention. i think its fine



Not much to say about it honestly.. because you did a great job mapping this, I really like it! you seem like you know what you're doing ;)
Sorry for this mod being very short, it's literally the first time I ever do this.. but I hope I could be any helpful with this, smh. KEKEKEKEKEK HONESTLY I DON'T KNOW WHAT IM DOING XD

All the best with the map! THANKS!
posted
Some minor changes on emphasize (hard diff)
21:03 Uta: yo doormat
21:03 Uta: can i ask you for a quick opinion
21:03 Doormat: hi hi
21:03 Doormat: uhh sure?
21:03 Uta: dont worry i guess it wont take long
21:03 *Uta is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1451266 Chelsy - I will [Hard]]
21:04 Doormat: ok
21:04 Doormat: what am i looking for
21:04 Uta: 00:04:382 (1,2) -
21:04 Uta: are red ticks in this part clickable for you
21:04 Doormat: it makes sense
21:05 Uta: i do feel weird when playing it
21:05 Doormat: that's because the music is placing emphasis on all four ticks
21:05 Doormat: but you only chose to emphasize the red ticks
21:05 Uta: someone have suggested to chose white ticks tho
21:06 Doormat: maybe try something like this? https://i.imgur.com/fHmESzI.png
21:06 Uta: ayyy
21:06 Uta: changed
21:06 Uta: thanks
Please sign in to reply.