1. Easy (1.48 stars, 106 notes)
2. Last Confession (5.62 stars, 417 notes)
3. Noffy's Normal (2.35 stars, 200 notes)
4. Zallies' Hard (3.64 stars, 282 notes)

iSwitch wrote:

01:33:797 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - I feel like this stream is too long (by 2 circle or so).
01:31:587 (8,9,1) - Isn't the spacing too small compared to the following jumps and the intensity?

Keep in mind that I'm probably 10 times worse than you at mapping so I might just be saying crap ^^"

1. i still see a bunch of unintended overlaps (01:14:849 (3,5) - etc), might wanna fix those for visuals
2. your patterns can still be arranged much better than this (eg a diamond for 01:05:376 (3,4,5,6) - , a perfect hexagon for 01:18:481 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - ). ctrl shift d helps a lot in making shapes, you should use it more often
3. 00:03:572 (2) etc- would be nice if you made the bends in the sliders correspond to vocals, like have a bend every vocal or sth. would emphasize them while still keeping the feeling of calmness
4. 00:24:323 (5,6) - i see no reason to break implied slider flow; unless it's for emphasis on a really strong sound or it's used consistently as a concept, sliders should look like they flow into each other. this isn't either.
5. 00:24:955 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - having a hexagon here would be nice
6. 00:25:586 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) // 00:38:376 (4,5,1) etc - flow here is too wide to be comfy imo
7. 00:59:060 (4,1) - stack? 1 is spaced further apart than (6,7) already anyway
8. 01:01:744 (2,3) // 01:14:692 (2,3) - stack is off
9. 01:03:323 (3) - youre ending this slider on a more important sound than it starts
10. 01:09:165 (1,2,1,2) - would be nice to space these out further, they seem too close for comfort rn
11. 01:17:692 (4) - would prefer having the vocal and/or downbeat clickable
12. 01:29:376 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this is spaced a lot further than the rest without any apparent reason as to why, sometimes it's ok to sacrifice flow/spacing for aesthetics when done sparingly but this is crossing the line
13. 01:33:482 (4,7) - nc so combo doesnt get too long
14. 01:55:902 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - nice, hexagon can be made neater tho

newton- wrote:

q

[last confession]

1. i still see a bunch of unintended overlaps (01:14:849 (3,5) - etc), might wanna fix those for visuals
2. your patterns can still be arranged much better than this (eg a diamond for 01:05:376 (3,4,5,6) - , a perfect hexagon for 01:18:481 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - ). ctrl shift d helps a lot in making shapes, you should use it more often
3. 00:03:572 (2) etc- would be nice if you made the bends in the sliders correspond to vocals, like have a bend every vocal or sth. would emphasize them while still keeping the feeling of calmness
4. 00:24:323 (5,6) - i see no reason to break implied slider flow; unless it's for emphasis on a really strong sound or it's used consistently as a concept, sliders should look like they flow into each other. this isn't either.
5. 00:24:955 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - having a hexagon here would be nice
6. 00:25:586 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) // 00:38:376 (4,5,1) etc - flow here is too wide to be comfy imo
7. 00:59:060 (4,1) - stack? 1 is spaced further apart than (6,7) already anyway
8. 01:01:744 (2,3) // 01:14:692 (2,3) - stack is off
9. 01:03:323 (3) - youre ending this slider on a more important sound than it starts
10. 01:09:165 (1,2,1,2) - would be nice to space these out further, they seem too close for comfort rn
11. 01:17:692 (4) - would prefer having the vocal and/or downbeat clickable
12. 01:29:376 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this is spaced a lot further than the rest without any apparent reason as to why, sometimes it's ok to sacrifice flow/spacing for aesthetics when done sparingly but this is crossing the line
13. 01:33:482 (4,7) - nc so combo doesnt get too long
14. 01:55:902 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - nice, hexagon can be made neater tho

good luck!

-Aqua wrote:

m4m

[Easy]

1. 00:03:144 - Why didn't you map this
2. 00:25:902 (1,1) - Try avoiding overlaps like these to avoid confusion. And for more cleanliness in your map
3. 00:26:218 (2,1) - Can be blanketed
4. 00:30:007 (3,4) - Move (4) lower to (3)'s slider tail so the players won't be forced to move up when hitting (4)
5. 00:31:270 (1,1) - The recovery time for the spinner is too short for this diff. Easy diffs should have at least 4 beats of recovery time before clicking the next object
6. 00:33:797 (1) - Slider velocity changes are very discouraged in lower diffs, specially Easy. Also you can use 1/1 rhythms here instead of long sliders. The slider arts just don't represent the song well.
7. 00:45:165 (3,5) - Blanket
8. 01:24:955 (2,3) - ^
9. 01:37:586 (2) - I think it's better to adjust this slider up to 01:38:060 -
10. 01:44:534 (3,4) - This is very confusing. Not that they aren't allowed but, this is the only time you've used a 1/2 rhythm. If you were to use 1/2 rhythms you should've introduced them earlier in the map.
11. I think the spacing is a little bit crowded, try adjusting your distance spacing and the diff feels undermapped with those long sliders occupying those clickable beats.

[Last Confession]

1. 00:43:271 (5) - Like I said before, I personally think the sv change here doesn't fit, because this part of the song is still calm, imo stick to 0.50x sv change until you reach this part 00:48:955 (1) - Where the song is starting to build up.
2. 01:03:481 (3) - I think this circle would fit more in a opposite direction where 01:03:165 (2) - is facing.
3. 01:04:744 (1) - Unnecessary NC?
4. 01:14:849 (3,4) - Blanket plz
5. 01:35:693 (7) - I think slow sv fits here
6. I think you're using too much NCs everywhere and from what I observed you're using too much repetitive patterns which breaks the variety and more creative things to do with circlejerking, also you can be more creative with sv changes like in the chorus where you used slow and fast, though some doesn't fit well so yeah, be more creative or sth.

Glhf