1. Collab Hard (2,73 stars, 214 notes)
2. Normal (1,82 stars, 151 notes)
3. So sweet ~ (3,92 stars, 307 notes)

I like the Kpop
Thank you!
Namki
DeRandom Otaku

1. Порежь бг, он сейчас больше чем максимально возможно.
2. Не заметил где указаны авторы коллаба.

1. подумай насчет цс, 3.5 для такого стиля смотрелось бы лучше
2. 01:24:142 (1) - сделала бы слайдер арту тут вместо брейка, пару-тройку слайдеров
3. 01:53:039 - тут можно добавить круг, имо отлично подходит
4. а вообще довольно интересно замапано, мне понравилось

1. 00:07:377 (1) - ускорили бы этот слайдер под 1\6 который там, имо лучше подходит под основную линию музыки тут
2. 01:32:083 (3) - ^
3. 00:14:877 (5,1) - спйсинг\джамп тут будет лучше подходить музыке да и более вписываться в стиль "харда с какими-то джампами" + добавит немного системности в джампах
4. 00:21:936 (4,1) - ^ да и тут \\ 00:29:436 (1) начало новых частей в музыке, тут скорее всего это будет каждый 4й даунбит \\ итд
5. 01:24:142 (1) - см. Нормал
6. 01:40:024 - круг бы
7. 01:47:083 (1) - 01:52:377 (3) - эта часть просто сама просится быть замапаной под лирику и более интенсивно, бтв это сделано в инсе и отчасти в нормале
8. 01:53:039 - см. Нормал

1. 00:01:201 (5,1) - я бы сказал более корректно сделать конец слайдера на 00:01:862 , а круги начать с 00:02:083
2. 00:02:965 (4) - ^
3. 00:04:730 (4) - 2 рипит в инсе\харде, закрывающий треть интро? оч. лениво, в моем стиле, но лучше напрячься и намапать играбельных объектов
4. 00:09:803 (5,1) - попробуй ритм https://puu.sh/y0mvA/bf221752b1.png имо, гораздо лучше т.к. следует основной линии тут - вокалу
5. 00:13:553 (1) - алсо не советовал бы ее выбрасывать тут
6. 00:20:612 (1,2) - а что тут случилось со спейсингом? хотя-бы до 1.8 растянуть, а то совсем как 00:25:906 (1,2) - 1\4 будет прожиматься на рандоме
7. 01:02:965 (1,2) - ^ \\ 01:10:024 (1,2) -
8. 00:50:612 (1) - свапнуть с 00:51:274 (2) - будет лучше подходить под ритм\лирику
9. 01:24:142 (1) - см. Нормал
10. 01:53:039 - ^

Sieg wrote:

привет

General

1. Порежь бг, он сейчас больше чем максимально возможно.
2. Не заметил где указаны авторы коллаба.

Normal

1. подумай насчет цс, 3.5 для такого стиля смотрелось бы лучше
2. 01:24:142 (1) - сделала бы слайдер арту тут вместо брейка, пару-тройку слайдеров
3. 01:53:039 - тут можно добавить круг, имо отлично подходит
4. а вообще довольно интересно замапано, мне понравилось

Collab Hard

1. 00:07:377 (1) - ускорили бы этот слайдер под 1\6 который там, имо лучше подходит под основную линию музыки тут
2. 01:32:083 (3) - ^
3. 00:14:877 (5,1) - спйсинг\джамп тут будет лучше подходить музыке да и более вписываться в стиль "харда с какими-то джампами" + добавит немного системности в джампах
4. 00:21:936 (4,1) - ^ да и тут \\ 00:29:436 (1) начало новых частей в музыке, тут скорее всего это будет каждый 4й даунбит \\ итд
5. 01:24:142 (1) - см. Нормал
6. 01:40:024 - круг бы
7. 01:47:083 (1) - 01:52:377 (3) - эта часть просто сама просится быть замапаной под лирику и более интенсивно, бтв это сделано в инсе и отчасти в нормале
8. 01:53:039 - см. Нормал

So very very sweet ~

1. 00:01:201 (5,1) - я бы сказал более корректно сделать конец слайдера на 00:01:862 , а круги начать с 00:02:083
2. 00:02:965 (4) - ^
3. 00:04:730 (4) - 2 рипит в инсе\харде, закрывающий треть интро? оч. лениво, в моем стиле, но лучше напрячься и намапать играбельных объектов
4. 00:09:803 (5,1) - попробуй ритм https://puu.sh/y0mvA/bf221752b1.png имо, гораздо лучше т.к. следует основной линии тут - вокалу понимаю что по вокалу лучше, но лучше хочется подчеркнуть 00:10:024 (1) - этот звук на финише
5. 00:13:553 (1) - алсо не советовал бы ее выбрасывать тут
6. 00:20:612 (1,2) - а что тут случилось со спейсингом? хотя-бы до 1.8 растянуть, а то совсем как 00:25:906 (1,2) - 1\4 будет прожиматься на рандоме
7. 01:02:965 (1,2) - ^ \\ 01:10:024 (1,2) -
8. 00:50:612 (1) - свапнуть с 00:51:274 (2) - будет лучше подходить под ритм\лирику
9. 01:24:142 (1) - см. Нормал
10. 01:53:039 - ^

мило, чуть-чуть внимания к деталям и сет вполне себе готов

vanucik wrote:

м4м
чёт киаи не по-русски стоят

инс

00:04:067 (1,2,3,4) - неровный паттерн ровный
00:08:259 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - ооочень странно замапано, сначала слайдеры под вокал, потом ноты под более слабые биты, это чередование вызывает желание немедленно удалить эту карту и дискомфорт при игре, когда не понимаешь чему следует песня. можно было 00:09:803 (5,1) - ctrl+g, 00:10:465 - сюда слайдер. уверен, ты меня нахуй пошлёшь только потому что это мой мод нет, только в этом моменте
00:15:097 (4,1) , 00:56:789 (1,2,3,4) - - вот на первом слайдере начинается дроп (тоесть начинается киаи), а тут тупо джамп без какого-то угла, мб сделаешь типа такого http://puu.sh/y0ib2/73a3869af5.jpg , а еще у тебя на 00:15:097 (4) - спейсинг маленький, когда тон вокала постепенно увеличивается, классно мапаешь спасибо
00:20:171 (2,1,2) - хороший консистенстный спейсинг, и да я вижу что там ты вокал выделяла, но расстояние на 1\4 больше чем на 1\2 джампе, ору все
00:30:098 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - для ровной звезды существуют полезные инструменты, (ctrl + shift + d) , а ещё у тебя 00:29:877 (1,6) - тут оверлап уже нету
01:00:318 (3,4,5,6) - в чём прикол единственных стакоджампов в этой карте? ы они не единственные
01:25:686 - - ну хотя бы его кликабельным сделала...... ок
01:40:024 (5) - где нк есть
01:49:950 (1,2,3) - ебать заорал в голос с этих юзлес киков, ты бы их хотя бы 1\6 сделала, а то слышится как один стрим 1\4 хорошая идея
01:50:943 (2) - а че этот слайдер не 1\2? ты же в предыдущих паттернах его выделяла сделано

хард

00:44:877 (3) - предлагаю сделать более даунский паттерн (х 170 у 70)
01:14:436 (2) - мб нк а то я его прожал сразу же

нормал норм, ну хоть хард получше, на этом спасибо. будь бы хостом этого сета я бы удалил этот инс нахуй подальше

1. 
   according to their official YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/MBKTARA and to their official websites http://www.mbk-ent.com/main_tara and http://www.mbk-ent-official.com/T-ARA/, isn't the artist supposed to be in caps?
2. the normal diff ends more earlier than hard and insane, on 01:52:377 - how about ending on 01:52:377 - as you did for hard and insane by replacing the 1/1 hitcircle with a 3/4 slider?
3. disable countdown as there's no enough time for inverse counting (actually it does not even appear lol)
4. disable widescreen support as the black corners does not have something to support like a video or storyboard for instance

1. 00:00:319 (1) - isn't supposed to have the volume set around 40-45%? sounds pretty noisy for volume set to 100% in comparison with other sections
2. 00:01:201 (1) - NC to distinguish that there's a new offset?
3. 00:13:112 (3,4) - watch out at spacing
4. 00:13:553 (4,1) - for the sake of newbie players, i would suggest to unstack both of them as they might confuse it with a regular 1/2 stack which is,in reality, a 2/1 gap between them which results in a 2/1 stack
5. 00:15:318 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - using here constant hitclaps doesn't suit very well with the music background as the snares aren't everywhere and instead makes it sound more noisy and unpleasant tbh. i would recommend to tune down a bit the hitclaps like using hitclaps on every 2nd and 4th tick (reffering at 1/1 ticks only) where the snares are present obviously // same applies for the rest of the difficulty starting from 00:36:495 (1) -
6. 00:47:083 (1,2,3) - how about breaking the 1/2 chain here by replacing the 1/2 sliders with 2 hitcircles? there's too much 1/2 for this part by counting 00:41:789 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:43:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - parts and that might be too overwhelming for target players

1. the difficulty is NOT hitsounded. only 01:52:377 (1) - got hitsounded
2. 01:00:318 (3,4) - i don't quite understand your spacing usage like the vocal and also the instruments are getting more intensity here if i'm not wrong and the build-up is missing here because of antijump usage you used here. spacing them more would actually give some build-up as you did for 00:58:553 (3,4) -
3. 01:40:024 - seems like something's missing here, as you added an hitcircle on this spot in normal and insane, but you likely forgot to do it here
4. 01:36:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is the only hitcircle-patterns based you used in this section how about using something like this instead https://puu.sh/yo0sA/0edb33c7f7.jpg to avoid any potential difficulty spike here? ok i'm out of ideas rn lol
   
   nice

1. 00:15:318 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - same problem as i said in normal with using constant hitclaps
2. 00:03:848 (1) - i think you missed an hitwhistle here
3. 00:04:730 (1,2) - these aren't hitsounded that's kinda weird and same goes for 00:49:950 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - and 01:10:024 (1,1,2) -
4. 00:35:833 (5,6,7,8) - consider spacing them more as 00:36:274 (8) - got more impact here and the build-up is missing here
5. 00:40:686 (2,3) - what do you think of applying ctrl+G here? switching the rhythm here would work more better than before as on 00:40:906 - the sliderhead would give more emphasis for the drum than the sliderend // 00:49:730 (3,4,5) - same applies here, the hitcircle would give more emphasis to 00:50:170 -, which has got more impact, then the sliderend // 00:51:495 (3,4,5) - same
6. 01:02:524 (2) - by applying ctrl+G here, the flow would be more smoothly and fun to play
7. 01:49:950 (1,2,3) - if you listen carefully on 25% speed, these are actually on 1/4 and not on 1/6 because the vocals are most likely on 1/4

ByBy wrote:

random mod for my sis <3

[general]

1. 
   according to their official YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/MBKTARA and to their official websites http://www.mbk-ent.com/main_tara and http://www.mbk-ent-official.com/T-ARA/, isn't the artist supposed to be in caps? I must ask an qat about this
2. the normal diff ends more earlier than hard and insane, on 01:52:377 - how about ending on 01:52:377 - as you did for hard and insane by replacing the 1/1 hitcircle with a 3/4 slider?All is correct, all the diffs ends 01:53:039 -
3. disable countdown as there's no enough time for inverse counting (actually it does not even appear lol) fixed lol
4. disable widescreen support as the black corners does not have something to support like a video or storyboard for instance ^

[normal]

1. 00:00:319 (1) - isn't supposed to have the volume set around 40-45%? sounds pretty noisy for volume set to 100% in comparison with other sections
2. 00:01:201 (1) - NC to distinguish that there's a new offset?
3. 00:13:112 (3,4) - watch out at spacing
4. 00:13:553 (4,1) - for the sake of newbie players, i would suggest to unstack both of them as they might confuse it with a regular 1/2 stack which is,in reality, a 2/1 gap between them which results in a 2/1 stack
5. 00:15:318 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - using here constant hitclaps doesn't suit very well with the music background as the snares aren't everywhere and instead makes it sound more noisy and unpleasant tbh. i would recommend to tune down a bit the hitclaps like using hitclaps on every 2nd and 4th tick (reffering at 1/1 ticks only) where the snares are present obviously // same applies for the rest of the difficulty starting from 00:36:495 (1) -
6. 00:47:083 (1,2,3) - how about breaking the 1/2 chain here by replacing the 1/2 sliders with 2 hitcircles? there's too much 1/2 for this part by counting 00:41:789 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:43:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - parts and that might be too overwhelming for target players Do not really understand
   other fixed

[hard]

1. the difficulty is NOT hitsounded. only 01:52:377 (1) - got hitsounded
2. 01:00:318 (3,4) - i don't quite understand your spacing usage like the vocal and also the instruments are getting more intensity here if i'm not wrong and the build-up is missing here because of antijump usage you used here. spacing them more would actually give some build-up as you did for 00:58:553 (3,4) - Hello Ctrl+G
3. 01:40:024 - seems like something's missing here, as you added an hitcircle on this spot in normal and insane, but you likely forgot to do it here puting
4. 01:36:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is the only hitcircle-patterns based you used in this section how about using something like this instead https://puu.sh/yo0sA/0edb33c7f7.jpg to avoid any potential difficulty spike here? ok i'm out of ideas rn lol interesting fixed
   
   nice

[insane]

1. 00:15:318 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - same problem as i said in normal with using constant hitclaps
2. 00:03:848 (1) - i think you missed an hitwhistle here
3. 00:04:730 (1,2) - these aren't hitsounded that's kinda weird and same goes for 00:49:950 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - and 01:10:024 (1,1,2) -
4. 00:35:833 (5,6,7,8) - consider spacing them more as 00:36:274 (8) - got more impact here and the build-up is missing here
5. 00:40:686 (2,3) - what do you think of applying ctrl+G here? switching the rhythm here would work more better than before as on 00:40:906 - the sliderhead would give more emphasis for the drum than the sliderend It's better to accent on vocals here than on the sound the vocals are stronger here // 00:49:730 (3,4,5) - same applies here, the hitcircle would give more emphasis to 00:50:170 -, which has got more impact, then the sliderend // 00:51:495 (3,4,5) - same
6. 01:02:524 (2) - by applying ctrl+G here, the flow would be more smoothly and fun to play If I apply ctrl+G here I must be reconstruct 01:16:642 (2) -
   here jumps too
7. 01:49:950 (1,2,3) - if you listen carefully on 25% speed, these are actually on 1/4 and not on 1/6 because the vocals are most likely on 1/4 yea 1/4

cool map thanks
gl!

wajinshu wrote:

ByBy wrote:

[normal]

1. 00:47:083 (1,2,3) - how about breaking the 1/2 chain here by replacing the 1/2 sliders with 2 hitcircles? there's too much 1/2 for this part by counting 00:41:789 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:43:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - parts and that might be too overwhelming for target players Do not really understand
   other fixed

ByBy wrote:

i was reffering at 1/2 sliders from 00:41:789 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:43:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - when i said about 1/2. "there's too much 1/2" was meant to be "there are too much 1/2 sliders and that might be too overwhelming for target players"

target players = newbie players, beginner players

when i said "how about using _____ for breaking the 1/2 chain" was meant to reduce the 1/2 usage as in that way it would be less overwhelming for newbie players

1. 00:00:319 - Decrease volume to like 40, its 100 right now
2. 00:06:495 (1) - This is what you have in hard https://puu.sh/yuDtC/cd403f62e1.jpg and doing a spinner in this difficulty isn't too cool for the spread
3. 00:10:024 (1) - Since you are following vocals it would be more natural to have 00:10:245 - this clickable instead of 00:10:024 -
4. 00:15:318 - The entire kiai plays kinda weird since the movement between the sliders is extremely slow compared to the movement between circles. Buffing up the sv a bit more and re sorting everything a bit would work. Also increasing the SV by just 0.1x doesn't really feel that drastic here considering the song gets a lot more intense in kiai
5. 00:29:436 - This is something i complained abotu your difficulty on shmik's christmas set aswell. So the thing is that this part of the song is a lot weaker than the kiai YET the spacing between your object and playability stays the same which is really bad for the kiai because its getting poor emphasis this way
6. 00:57:671 - Same thing for the rest of the kiais as 00:15:318 -
7. 01:00:318 (3,4,5,6) - The momentum breaker here played really awkwardly since you never had a movement like 01:00:318 (3,4,5) - this in the difficulty before. Also having 01:00:318 (3,4) - 01:00:759 (5,6) - as antijumps doesn't emphasize the vocals that well
8. 01:10:906 (1,2,1,2) - The usage of stacks here is what i really disagree with too as the lalala vocals are a lot stronger than any other vocals in the song having them stacked is also a poor way of emphasizing them
9. 01:14:877 (4,1) - Whats with this sudden decrease in spacing lol
10. 01:49:509 (3,4,1,2,3) - The whole pattern plays badly because the almost linear movement between them. Replacing 01:49:730 (4) - so that the angle between 01:49:509 (3,4,1) - these is less wider would work
11. 01:52:377 (1) - You should really do something like https://puu.sh/yuDRd/621bb6ef05.jpg instead as the vocal at 01:53:039 - is equally emphasized as the as the vocal at sliderhead

1. 00:07:377 (1) - Kinda Unnecessary NC here
2. 00:44:436 (1) - 00:46:200 (1) - the usage of NC on these feels kinda overdone lol. You don't really need these ,you didn't nc these in other difficulties too so yea
3. 00:53:480 (2,3,4) - Instead of 3 ,isn't 4 supposed to have the highest spacing here like 00:50:612 (1) - 00:52:377 (1) -
4. 00:56:789 - feels really empty without object here. Having something like 00:14:436 (1,2) - would be cool for consistency as well

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

[So very very sweet ~]

1. 00:00:319 - Decrease volume to like 40, its 100 right now ✓
2. 00:06:495 (1) - This is what you have in hard https://puu.sh/yuDtC/cd403f62e1.jpg and doing a spinner in this difficulty isn't too cool for the spread ✓
3. 00:10:024 (1) - Since you are following vocals it would be more natural to have 00:10:245 - this clickable instead of 00:10:024 - ✓
4. 00:15:318 - The entire kiai plays kinda weird since the movement between the sliders is extremely slow compared to the movement between circles. Buffing up the sv a bit more and re sorting everything a bit would work. Also increasing the SV by just 0.1x doesn't really feel that drastic here considering the song gets a lot more intense in kiai
5. 00:29:436 - This is something i complained abotu your difficulty on shmik's christmas set aswell. So the thing is that this part of the song is a lot weaker than the kiai YET the spacing between your object and playability stays the same which is really bad for the kiai because its getting poor emphasis this way
6. 00:57:671 - Same thing for the rest of the kiais as 00:15:318 -
7. 01:00:318 (3,4,5,6) - The momentum breaker here played really awkwardly since you never had a movement like 01:00:318 (3,4,5) - this in the difficulty before. Also having 01:00:318 (3,4) - 01:00:759 (5,6) - as antijumps doesn't emphasize the vocals that well ✓
8. 01:10:906 (1,2,1,2) - The usage of stacks here is what i really disagree with too as the lalala vocals are a lot stronger than any other vocals in the song having them stacked is also a poor way of emphasizing them ✓
9. 01:14:877 (4,1) - Whats with this sudden decrease in spacing lol ✓
10. 01:49:509 (3,4,1,2,3) - The whole pattern plays badly because the almost linear movement between them. Replacing 01:49:730 (4) - so that the angle between 01:49:509 (3,4,1) - these is less wider would work 01:49:730 (4) - There is a strong sound (and I changed
11. 01:52:377 (1) - You should really do something like https://puu.sh/yuDRd/621bb6ef05.jpg instead as the vocal at 01:53:039 - is equally emphasized as the as the vocal at sliderhead ✓

[Hard] ✓

1. 00:07:377 (1) - Kinda Unnecessary NC here
2. 00:44:436 (1) - 00:46:200 (1) - the usage of NC on these feels kinda overdone lol. You don't really need these ,you didn't nc these in other difficulties too so yea
3. 00:53:480 (2,3,4) - Instead of 3 ,isn't 4 supposed to have the highest spacing here like 00:50:612 (1) - 00:52:377 (1) -
4. 00:56:789 - feels really empty without object here. Having something like 00:14:436 (1,2) - would be cool for consistency as well

Fix your HS volume and stuff because you have same volumes across the whole difficulties fixed

interested in nominating this so star for now but get like 2-3 mods for whole set ,Especially insane

1. 01:32:965 - add kiai

1. Increase hp to 6 for spread, right now its 4 lol

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

[normal]

1. 01:32:965 - add kiai

[Insane]

1. Increase hp to 6 for spread, right now its 4 lol

much better now. call me!!

1. 00:10:906 - lesser spacing does not make much sense here as vocals are pretty prominent.
2. 01:13:553 (1) - the same as above, vocalist is giving such a big emphasis on that last continious "na".
3. 01:22:818 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - this one looks like this 00:26:348 (2,3,1,2,1,2) - so consider makin that 1-2 NCing.
4. 01:31:200 (1,2,3,4) - why does spacing differ for 01:31:642 (2,3,4) - . Is sound here kind of special 01:31:642 - ? Equal spacing looks more logical here.
5. 01:37:377 (4,5,6,7) - 1-2 NCing?

1. 00:54:142 (4) - nc.
2. 00:56:789 (1,2,1) - try avoiding sliderend overlaps. It harms overall visuality of the diff. Try this out.
3. 01:32:083 (3) - emphasis it by rotating like you've done here 00:07:377 (3) - ?
4. You've done these stacks twice per diff and I think it's better to get rid of them. 01:05:392 (2) - and 01:12:450 (2) -

Namki wrote:

few things

[insane]

1. 00:10:906 - lesser spacing does not make much sense here as vocals are pretty prominent.
2. 01:13:553 (1) - the same as above, vocalist is giving such a big emphasis on that last continious "na".
3. 01:22:818 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - this one looks like this 00:26:348 (2,3,1,2,1,2) - so consider makin that 1-2 NCing.
4. 01:31:200 (1,2,3,4) - why does spacing differ for 01:31:642 (2,3,4) - . Is sound here kind of special 01:31:642 - ? Equal spacing looks more logical here.
5. 01:37:377 (4,5,6,7) - 1-2 NCing?

[hard]

1. 00:54:142 (4) - nc.
2. 00:56:789 (1,2,1) - try avoiding sliderend overlaps. It harms overall visuality of the diff. Try this out.
3. 01:32:083 (3) - emphasis it by rotating like you've done here 00:07:377 (3) - ?
4. You've done these stacks twice per diff and I think it's better to get rid of them. 01:05:392 (2) - and 01:12:450 (2) -