This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Monday, February 19, 2018 at 1:13:36 PM

Artist: soraru
Title: Mata Ashita
Tags: soraai male vocal utaite cover fuwari p fuwarip kisses
BPM: 84
Filesize: 8170kb
Play Time: 05:22
Difficulties Available:

1. Reunion (4.41 stars, 836 notes)

Download: soraru - Mata Ashita
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Hitsounding by Kisses
Timing by GoldenFurry

why is this male vocals but not galileo galilei?

anyway I mod you first even if you don't pick up mine
[Reunion]
keep the sliderslide silent is better
00:14:474 (5,1) - OK, a NC here but these still easy to misreading
01:49:474 (1,2,3) - the DS between these three slider hmmm...
02:14:831 (1) - no NC
02:18:045 (1,2,3) - DS
02:20:545 (1) - no NC
04:14:236 (2,1) - clearly here is 1/6 but we know 1/6 stream always three groups. here is no exception
beautiful song

00:05:188 (1) - Throughout the intro, you seem to keep slider ends off of prominent sounds, but you have this slider ending on quite a loud sound. If that's intentional, ignore this.

00:25:188 (5) - I think this should be spaced more to put emphasis on the piano.

00:26:617 (8) - NC possibly, since it falls on a large white tick. I also think it should be spaced a bit more instead of just snapped due to it landing on both a vocal and a piano sound.

01:19:831 (2,3,1) - The spacing between 2 to 3 and 3 to 1 look incredibly similar, which might cause players to think it's a 1/2 beat instead of a full beat rhythm.

01:25:188 (1,2,3,4) - I think it would be cool if these ramped up in spacing over the 4 beats, before going small spacing again for the next combo since it does slightly ramp up in intensity then drop off.

01:27:688 (4,3) - These two sound a bit louder then the rest, and you may want to space it a bit larger.

02:08:045 (7,1) - This sounds a bit weird when the louder drum noises are on the slider ends.

02:13:760 (5) - I think this should be changed to two circles to provide more emphasis on the drums.
02:25:188 (4) - Same as above.

02:32:152 (1,2,3) - Same spacing visually, not rhythm wise.

03:09:117 (1,2,3) - I think these could be all NC'd to provide a better indication that this is 1/6.

02:06:617 (5,6) - Could be easily misread as another 1/2 beat jump.

03:12:331 (1) - I think this should be moved lower to not only continue the back and forth momentum the player could be building up, but also to provide better emphasis on the loud sound.

04:05:009 (1,2,3,4) - This could also be all NC'd so that it gives a better indication that this is 1/12.

04:09:117 (1,2,3) - I can't really hear what is supposed to be played here, but if I'm missing something, then this should also be all NC'd so that players might notice it's 1/3 instead of 1/4 or something

04:14:117 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - This might need better indication that this is 1/3, also 1-2 may be mistaken for a 1/2 jump instead.

This is a really fun map!

Here for the M4M:

[Reunion]

01:00:762 - Might be cool to have a slider here like you have at 00:57:986 (1)
01:05:545 (1,2,3) & 01:06:260 (1,2,3) - Shouldnt the spacing of these two be reversed since the vocals are more/ just as intense as the piano? You make the vocals higher spacing later on so im not sure why this only happens in the intro part
01:12:688 (4,1) - stack xd
01:25:188 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe rotate this a bit clockwise so it follows what 01:23:760 (1,2,1,2) are doing, something like https://puu.sh/xM3Wo/5e432b03f6.jpg ?
02:22:510 (2,3) - If the spacing is meant to be different from 02:22:331 (1,2) I'd make it mroe apparent
02:23:045 (4,5,1) - ^
02:40:724 (2,3,4) - Visuals here look pretty wierd
02:32:152 (1) - Maybe change the NC from here to 02:32:331 (2)?
03:22:331 (2,3,1) - spacing is a bit wierd
03:09:117 (1,2,3) - Might be cooler to put this even farther away from 03:09:474 (1)
03:31:974 - This jump section just looks pretty messy
03:35:188 (4) - Maybe start kiai time here instead of 03:33:760 (1)?
04:05:009 (1,2,3,4) - Feels weird to have this in one of the calmest parts, maybe put a slider instead?
04:13:581 (5,6,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4) - NGL this played really bad on my dt testplay, this was easily the hardest part of the whole song, not sure if that was inteded to be or not. If youre gonna keep it like that, shouldnt 04:14:355 (1) be emphasized as well as 04:14:117 (1,2)?
04:29:117 (1,2,3) - Spacing's inconstistent
04:38:045 (2) - maybe move this down a bit so it makes a triangle with 04:37:1 52 (3,4)?
04:46:260 (1,2,3) - Shouldn't this have the same spacing as 04:45:188 (1,2,3)?
04:49:117 (1,2,3) - Spacing on this feels a little intense
05:07:331 (2,3) & 05:08:760 (1,2) - Might be better to have these as 1/4 notes

Fun to play dt, now i just gotta wait til its ranked

M4M from Q
[Reunion]
check the AImod, there are some unsnapped objects.
01:12:688 (4,1) - how about stack it , it can be more clean than before imo
01:51:617 (4,1) - ^
02:43:045 (5,3) -03:00:188 (3,4) - ^
02:04:474 (7,1,2,3) - how about this? we can avoid uncessary overlap
01:50:188 (2,3) - if we can increase the spacing here to different with 01:49:474 (1,2) - , it would be more consisntent imo
02:16:438 (1) - maybe we need some good reason for NC here? cuz you NCed 02:22:331 (1) -
02:28:581 (1) - 02:32:152 (1) - im not sure if NC like these started at the blue line would be well. Id prefer NC at whitle lines cuz you change the ds at 02:32:152 (1,2,3) - it need a NC to express imo> <
02:38:760 (2,1) - maybe its unrankable? the repeat was lapped by the slider before.
03:09:117 (1,2,3,1) - they are 1/3 but looks like a 1/4 3 streams...how about make it same like 04:09:117 (1,2,3,1) - ?
04:14:117 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - NC here would confuse the players imo... they are 1/3 but NC looks like not

Idk ds here in this diff would be ok...
you used 00:29:117 (2,3,4) -01:05:545 (1,2,3) - at 1/4 ,while you used similar ds at 01:13:760 (1,2) - 01:20:902 (2,3) - which is 1/2 so I think it maybe confused the players.
and 04:45:188 (1,2,3) - 04:46:260 (1,2,3) - the are in same ryhthm but with a quite different ds...maybe we can make it more clearly for others.

GL~ soraru god singer!

Hello, from your q. newbie modder ;-;

Cool music, good map. ^^ I can't find much errors, GL!

edit: fixed formatting rip

applied all mods at some point, kinda lost the responses tho... sorry~

also cant give kds - _ -

Sorry for being a bit late ~ was busy with personal issues but thats solve now so...




Well I did look at it for a while and didn't see no problems with the map as far as gameplay/visuals so I guess just call me back and metadata?

also

all fixed
http://soraruru.jp/discography/soraai/
https://i.imgur.com/Q37tGxq.png

ok

so apparently red/green line with different volume isn't unrankable anymore?
could use that to lower volume on 00:00:545 (1) - a bit by doing https://i.imgur.com/FA8AXie.jpg, think that fits well
00:54:474 (3) - bit weird to suddenly ignore piano on red tick when it's mapped all the time before, why not https://i.imgur.com/snDldA0.jpg
01:00:902 - whistle would be cute with some lower volume // 04:00:902 -
01:03:581 (5,6) - sounds a bit off, but 1/12 also sounds off so whatever lol
01:51:617 - normal hitnormal
probably forgot to nc somewhere in this 02:02:777 - part? so much longer than all others
04:15:902 (2,5,1) - same for these and other cymbals until 04:20:902 -
03:58:045 (1) - would start this on 03:57:956 - already to make it feel more connected to the vocal it follows
04:40:188 (1) - missing finish/clap or something
05:13:700 (1) - think removing one repeat sounds better?
05:22:450 (1) - sounds rly off, should be moved to 05:22:465 - or something

yea

Lasse wrote:

so apparently red/green line with different volume isn't unrankable anymore?
could use that to lower volume on 00:00:545 (1) - a bit by doing https://i.imgur.com/FA8AXie.jpg, think that fits well
00:54:474 (3) - bit weird to suddenly ignore piano on red tick when it's mapped all the time before, why not https://i.imgur.com/snDldA0.jpg idea of this map is to clearly change instrumental layers. i used ncing to signal that, each combo follows a different instrument. this combo follows vocals, and i think the 3/4 slider emphasizes the slight delay and held-ness of the vocal here.
01:00:902 - whistle would be cute with some lower volume // 04:00:902 - applied first cuz piano, no piano 2nd one
01:03:581 (5,6) - sounds a bit off, but 1/12 also sounds off so whatever lol i think its a good enough approximation, dont want to try and map a pickup trill lol
01:51:617 - normal hitnormal
probably forgot to nc somewhere in this 02:02:777 - part? so much longer than all others no layer change no nc
04:15:902 (2,5,1) - same for these and other cymbals until 04:20:902 - same nc idea
03:58:045 (1) - would start this on 03:57:956 - already to make it feel more connected to the vocal it follows meh i like it as is, its not a big difference and i feel like starting on downbeat is nicer
04:40:188 (1) - missing finish/clap or something agree
05:13:700 (1) - think removing one repeat sounds better?
05:22:450 (1) - sounds rly off, should be moved to 05:22:465 - or something

yea

timing fixed thx to gowo

05:15:671 (1) - um this isn't snapped to anything so fix that and i'll bubble

indeed

k

k

hello im in the tags owo


Yh but seriously why am I in the tags?