omg every single thing said in this thread is useless
it's especially useless to point out people like WWW who "are good" with "an old" tablet.
so what if someone is, for example, #8 with a 0.48% less acccurate tablet than the #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 players?
if they had a 0.48% more accurate tablet then perhaps they would be #7 instead because they avoided 0.07% of their misses... don't act like you know the impact of everything on everything.
even if you had all the possible information about the equipment, settings, or whatever, you wouldn't be able to quantify the results.
perhaps a tablet that tracks your movement slightly more accurately would actually DECREASE your pp by causing a miss in your top ranks? perhaps 0.005% of circles hit in your entire career were actually due to the tablet's INACCURACY?
so if someone cares about small improvements, maybe just let them apply those improvements.
IMAGINE if cookiezi was using some ancient inaccurate 50hz tablet from 1997, and was #3.
People would be literally saying "a thing that has 2% impact on your aim has 0% impact on your aim"