.
. Fits with every occasion gayfoulcoon wrote:
this is my watch
While I really like the phone itself, I find a phone impractical to check the time on because I'd have to get it out of my pocket every time I need to know the date or time.foulcoon wrote:
this is my watch
While it is a lot of money, the quality of a replica and original are not the same :p, mechanically speaking that is. Obviously I don't buy an expensive watch just for the practicality of it, I also buy it because I'm fascinated by the engineering precision needed to construct such a watch and have it run with such insane precision. Basically that's what made me a watch fan in the first placefoulcoon wrote:
What is impractical is spending over $1,000 USD on a piece of jewelry that can be replicated with cheaper materials for less than 100 dollars.
That's a really nice watch, but I wouldn't wear it because it's so beautiful.failboat wrote:
This watch i got from a friend, who at first about five years ago bought it in turkey.
Only thing that i dislike about it is that the strap keeps breaking, i even had to buy a swatch metal thingy because the old one broke off.
This, except my phone isn't anywhere near that quality. ;_;foulcoon wrote:
this is my watch
Nah, they're just lazy as hell, so am I.failboat wrote:
IT and every other "post your" threads: lack of people owning a camera
It's "post your watches", not "post a photo of your watch while you're wearing it". I think discussing the model itself and the reason why it was chosen or received is more interesting, really. Wrists and hands don't especially excite me anyway. Perhaps related to that last statement, I don't regularly wear a watch because I've not found one that I wanted to do so with.failboat wrote:
IT and every other "post your" threads: lack of people owning a camera
Yeah, exactly, post your watch(es), and not an image of a similar/watch of the same model, and nor "i want a watch like this but for some reason wont/cant buy one so i'll just post an image i found on the internet and claim that i actually have one".Jarby wrote:
It's "post your watches", not "post a photo of your watch while you're wearing it".failboat wrote:
IT and every other "post your" threads: lack of people owning a camera
What?! People lie about themselves on the internet?!failboat wrote:
"i want a watch like this but for some reason wont/cant buy one so i'll just post an image i found on the internet and claim that i actually have one".
You are hillarious.Vext wrote:
What?! People lie about themselves on the internet?!failboat wrote:
"i want a watch like this but for some reason wont/cant buy one so i'll just post an image i found on the internet and claim that i actually have one".
I still <3 you even though you deleted me btw.failboat wrote:
You are hillarious.
Oh please, as if a photo of a watch outside of a stock photo is a valid form of identification. Is that what you want or are you just really keen on independent watch photography? Furthermore, I don't see why it would make much difference to the thread if people were to just lie about the watch they want and claim it as their own regardless, but I don't think that's really happening now anyway.failboat wrote:
Yeah, exactly, post your watch(es), and not an image of a similar/watch of the same model, and nor "i want a watch like this but for some reason wont/cant buy one so i'll just post an image i found on the internet and claim that i actually have one".
I don't entirely disagree, but it doesn't apply in this thread specifically so much.failboat wrote:
The lack of even minimum effort is what makes this whole forum a piece of shit.
I'm sorry princess, if we're not good enough for you, then why don't you pack your bags?failboat wrote:
The lack of even minimum effort is what makes this whole forum a piece of shit.
you put so much effort for this pic mr shellyghost.Shellghost wrote:
My designer vintage wristwatch with built in radio taken with my two million dollar webcam in the best lighting possible.
That's exactly the reason that I started this thread. It would be great if people were to post an actual picture of the watch, but a stockphoto is fine aswellJarby wrote:
I think discussing the model itself and the reason why it was chosen or received is more interesting, really.
. But I heard they're pretty expensive. Does anyone know a good model?You couldn't pull it off sweetie, I'll buy you a hello kitty watch.Firo Prochainezo wrote:
Let's go back in topic, shall we?
Honestly, every time I owned a watch I always lose it, but I'm not really into wrist watches so I guess the loss of it doesn't affect me as much.
But pocket watches are awesome! I always wanted to owe one.
Why.Vext wrote:
You couldn't pull it off sweetie, I'll buy you a hello kitty watch.
Short too.Hika wrote:
Hello Kitty watches = <3
But I agree with Firo 100%.
I love pocket watches so much, they're just really unique & that's something I look forward to owning in the near future.
I'm just as cool as Edward Elric, okay?
You're implying I'm Edward Elric?Vext wrote:
Short too.
I think it went over your head sweetie.Hika wrote:
You're implying I'm Edward Elric?Vext wrote:
Short too.