No idea on that yet. BTW, I agree on not voting Aomi today however it did make me curious where this doctor claim came from
I have nothing new to offer and I've been insanely busy lately so I can't help but do that, sorryZexion wrote:
Seems to overly explain herself over and over again.
I'm very curious to know what you think is up.abraker wrote:
Hika's need for VC is less scummy than Ace's refusal to help explain why Hika is a townread by requesting a VC himself. Sounds like a setup for something. Also considering how Dawnsday previously decided to push for zekks lynch, there is def something up.
To be perfectly honest, I have no idea what to do. This is my first game playing and my second game of experience (I've only read last game) and I'm kinda basing reads and actions from there, as well as my gut feeling. I know I'm not posting much, but I just don't know what to post.Aomi wrote:
@johnmedina999
Why aren't you being active in the thread?
It's fine. Don't base everything from another game though, it could very well prove to be fatal.johnmedina999 wrote:
To be perfectly honest, I have no idea what to do. This is my first game playing and my second game of experience (I've only read last game) and I'm kinda basing reads and actions from there, as well as my gut feeling. I know I'm not posting much, but I just don't know what to post.Aomi wrote:
@johnmedina999
Why aren't you being active in the thread?
imo this how I feel about foxAomi wrote:
@johnmedina999
Why aren't you being active in the thread?
You're pretty active elsewhere.
I think you're just trying really hard to fit in, hence why you repeat information over and over again, as Zexion mentioned.
All of your votes so far haven't been solid.
You tend to change your mind about a player after a post or two from them.
You seem to be really insecure.
The way he did it though. He did it is a taunt and as a "no" to me in regards on why he thinks Hika is town. About the dawnsday's push on zekks, it's just my view on it. Here is the ISO that made me think that:Zexion wrote:
Hold on. What makes you think Ace has a real reason for waiting for a VC or it's just something to taunt Hika's way of playing? About Dawnsday push's on Zekks, I thought someone said it was genuine due to being few minutes after that post? Now it's scum indicative? Foxtrot may as well be scum for that same last reason. Your conclusion is quite hasty.
Dawnsday wrote:
Foxtrot wrote:
interesting that you mention a connection between Lincolm and Zekks, Dawnsday
Zekks recently wrote this
Zekks wrote:
idc, as long as I'm walking, there's no stopping for me 'w'
and I asked her to clarify on this, but she hasn't told me anything yet. I know, I might be looking too hard for clues, but that is such an odd thing to say
It is odd agreed. It's possible this is just fluff memery (however inappropriate one may deem it in a thread). I'm also quite eager to hear the reasoning for it but on the whole I don't think there's too too much that can be read into.
Dawnsday wrote:
Vote: Zekks
Maybe this gives you the incentive to "look things over". You're setting off my scumdar now.
Dawnsday wrote:
looking forward to posts from rEdo and Zexion honestly, haven't seen enough to get reads.
Also even if Zekks isn't a redname his posts don't exactly scream "pro-town" to me so I'm still entirely set on getting some info from him, obviously I'm open to let him go and follow other reads if we get any but this is defo the flavor of the day controversy for me.
Dawnsday wrote:
Zekks play is anti town but I think he's just a bit clueless. I'm gonna drop it for now but if we turn up nothing I'm going to go for a policy lynch.
unvote
If zekks is a town, then we can expect zekks to be the victim at night. Depending on the PR dawnsday thinks zekks might have, and if Dawnsday is scum, it would be in his best interest to lynch zekks. However, we seem him let zekks go. Doesn't make sense if dawnsday is scumDawnsday wrote:
I actually catch a hint of Zekks possibly being PR because of his "lynch me and mafia have a higher chance" post. It just seems that something a noob with a power role would say, could be entirely wrong but it's 100% a possibility in my mind and one that wouldn't shock me if it were to be true.
Also +1 to Foxtrot's point about John and Zexion needing to post more content. It's hard to get reads on people who don't converse
Will post later
Dawnsday wrote:
Lincolm wrote:
, but I hate policy lynch also.
Why? If he's not commited to reading he's going to hurt town in the long run. It's not FUN to policy lynch rest assured I'd rather the idea was never even conceived but honestly.
I agree we shouldnt straight call it a day here and lynch but it should 100% be an option for us moving forward.
Dawnsday wrote:
I have little to no faith in the power of PoE currently, seriously it's day 1.
Also, how and why does selfvoting exist in mafia; I seriously fail to see it's applications in any useful scenario. The last time I saw it used was BBoy last game and he did it to CLAIM he was scum.
Any other time it's used it's just straight up weird. Anyone explain it's use here? (Sorry I'm still learning mafia apparently).
unvote
removing my vote on Zekks because this is a weird gamestate
I mean, why would you refuse to justify a town read for someone who is likely to be lynched? You are saying town, but your refusal says you are ok with the lynch. Your unvoting Hika doesn't even make sense with your refusal to explain. Hence, it sounds like a setup for somethingAce Timing wrote:
abraker wrote:
Hika's need for VC is less scummy than Ace's refusal to help explain why Hika is a townread by requesting a VC himself. Sounds like a setup for something. Also considering how Dawnsday previously decided to push for zekks lynch, there is def something up.
I'm very curious to know what you think is up.
Anyway, abraker's self-vote is just bad and I found his reaction is highly scummy. He did that in the sake of his integrity when he under pressured. I don't know why his integrity is more important than town information. He completely ignored the reason why he is bandwagoned. For me, he looks like already plan this from start, trying to denying information for town when a lot of people are passive, and asking for other town sympathy. And there is no reason for town to self-vote except to avoid no-lynch.abraker wrote:
No shit sherlock. I can see how self votes lean toward scum, but for the same reason I fail to see how the lean towards scum. I saw it as safe move because it would indeed lead toward scum and that everyone knows it's a scum move.
What make you think abraker can't unvote at that time?Foxtrot wrote:
Considering abraker is L-2 and the final day is almost over, that worries me though.
Uh... my question is not why you need VC to vote, but why didn't you vote someone who you suspect as scum with lesser vote. But actually, everyone lack of serious vote (even myself), so I don't really know.Hika wrote:
And it's more suspicious that three people are still on my case about it
I will completely disagree at this. If she is scum, don't you think she would just do her own vote count? No need to post "I need VC" in his post.abraker wrote:
Event #1: If she is scum, then vote count is needed to know how to form your read to target others
Not sure about this one, but JohnMedina's "wording" is somehow bad? Personally I think you can defend yourself in that case and I don't see how you and Ace is both scum. (I know it was for Foxtrot but I really want to comment on this)Hika wrote:
2.) Ace isn't my scum read because he can explain what I'm trying to do better than I can. I take kindly to him defending me as I can't do it myself. Scum woudn't even dare defend their partner so openly, so you're making a connection where there isn't one. If he was bothering you so much why not vote him? It would make him look more scummy than me, no?
Eh? It is only pre-game and nightchat. Are you doing this on purpose?Ace Timing wrote:
2. there's daychat, ergo his whole team would be on that wagon.
I really want to see what Ace is going to say about this.Zexion wrote:
What makes you think Ace has a real reason for waiting for a VC or it's just something to taunt Hika's way of playing?
Because I know that I'm town. It is the best reaction I can get because I know my alignment. As I said, we really lack of serious votes, they only said "this guy or this guy might be scum, but I'm not sure" and not voting anyone. I have no idea, they said I might be scum that time, but not voting.Aomi wrote:
@Lincolm I've read your ISO and you kept saying "then why not vote me" or something of the sort. Why is that?
You seem very confident, but then again that could just be a mask to win towncred.
no it fucking doesn't lolabraker wrote:
You are saying town, but your refusal says you are ok with the lynch.
Didn't I already answer this? It was here. Here is the quote in case you won't find it still:Ace Timing wrote:
@abraker: what am I setting up tho
abraker wrote:
But going deeper, the fact you are refusing to share your read on Hika makes me suspicious of whether you are doing it so to not to talk about your scum partner or to allow the setup of an unconditional bandwagon on Hika.
You need to explain that with a little more than just "no it fucking doesn't"Ace Timing wrote:
no it fucking doesn't lolabraker wrote:
You are saying town, but your refusal says you are ok with the lynch.
About Ace: Okay, but that's just your interpretation. Maybe you're just exaggerating.abraker wrote:
The way he did it though. He did it is a taunt and as a "no" to me in regards on why he thinks Hika is town. About the dawnsday's push on zekks, it's just my view on it.Zexion wrote:
Hold on. What makes you think Ace has a real reason for waiting for a VC or it's just something to taunt Hika's way of playing? About Dawnsday push's on Zekks, I thought someone said it was genuine due to being few minutes after that post? Now it's scum indicative? Foxtrot may as well be scum for that same last reason. Your conclusion is quite hasty.
These kind of posts make me wonder how to reply. I understand having a busy life, but it's better just to say "prod dodge" rather than repeating stuff, trust me, it goes a long way in mafia games.Foxtrot wrote:
I have nothing new to offer and I've been insanely busy lately so I can't help but do that, sorryZexion wrote:
Seems to overly explain herself over and over again.
Perhaps. It bothers me like a needle poking at skin.Zexion wrote:
About Ace: Okay, but that's just your interpretation. Maybe you're just exaggerating.
Thank you for the advice. This is literally my first mafia game ever so any tip is helpful for later onZexion wrote:
These kind of posts make me wonder how to reply. I understand having a busy life, but it's better just to say "prod dodge" rather than repeating stuff, trust me, it goes a long way in mafia games.
Related to what you said in here, Foxtrot pushed this but in blatantly manners. Here is the quote:abraker wrote:
This is a response to Lincolm saying that while we can attempt to lynch zekks, if he flips town, then that would be super bad. Yet Dawnsday still want to convince that doing that to zekks is a good consideration... right after choosing to unvote. He is still pushing to make zekks lynched and it's becomming how subtly, yet forcefully he is doing that. Given my previous comment regarding Dawnsday needing to lynch zekks instead of NK because of PR, this makes perfect sense. And he had to unvote as insurance that vote won't draw uneeded attention.
Please give your opinion regarding thisFoxtrot wrote:
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?
I still don't get why we should back off from Zekks if he's scum, like Hika and Lincolm are suggesting. Sure, there's not enough content, but does it really matter if there's enough evidence that shows Zekks having higher chances of scum instead of town? I'd like to see more content from Zexion and John, as well
I think it's sensible I won't be voted. I've only just arrived and the day is basically over, any type of discussion that props up regarding me/my role today is simply too late and wouldn't reach a conclusion in time or would be reached in a hurry leading to plenty of mistakes in reasoning from either end of the spectrum. I fully expect this psuedo vote immunity to expire tommorow but for now it just seems logical.Lincolm wrote:
What do you think about people not going to vote you, at least for today?
Hmm maybe i'm being too iffy on activity. I feel like I might just be projecting that onto you because I'm struggling to read you as anything other than a null (town). You're right, inactivity/rareposting happens often in mafia. I'll reread your ISO and see what I can determine.Zexion wrote:
Also why people keep saying "I can't read Zexion because he posts too little". Stuff like this often happens in mafia, and we can't really let scum slip past the inactivity excuse.
Hika's needing of VC made me suspicious and the ISO didn't seem to be that big, so I got down to itLincolm wrote:
Abraker is somehow still rubbing me wrong, but he is doing interesting analyzed ISO. Hika -> rEdo -> Ace
@abraker : What makes you decide to analyze those people, in that order?
Johnmedina's comment here doesn't help either. She might have just looked for logical reasoning within actions. It's hard for me to judge not went over the ISOs in detail.Lincolm wrote:
Related to what you said in here, Foxtrot pushed this but in blatantly manners. Here is the quote:Foxtrot wrote:
yeah, we do have PRs, but what makes you think Zekks is one and not just vanilla? Just chance?
I still don't get why we should back off from Zekks if he's scum, like Hika and Lincolm are suggesting. Sure, there's not enough content, but does it really matter if there's enough evidence that shows Zekks having higher chances of scum instead of town?