]You did your part of work, but for me hoping enough would not be enough. Taking more action to improve your mapping would be the optimal solutionp
Winter Story wrote:got nothing on normal
-Moving onto modding the diff itself ok, i want to clear something up. when i made mod for your map, i read previous mods, and i noticed huge one with pointing out all instances of overmaps (placing object to no sound related). i pointed out overmap too in my mod, but not every single one, since i didn't see any reason to it. You answered "your mod is very subjective with overmaps" to that guy which is.. basically false on every aspect. Also you wrote "try to understand mappers intention" to the guy. As I can see, you don't do what you expect from others. I could see only one intension in your map - pp. Whose mod is subjective - so is yours If that is what on your mind then you are wrong on a few things.. The fact that you are calling my intention in maps as 'pp' and nothing elsec felt wrong in some case. The intention of me mapping a certain mp3 is to reflect a song properly through a clean exhibition of patterns whilst trying to provide a good gameplay experience, albeit a repetitive, seemingly pp farming gameplay (at which you are correct, but deducing my reasoning my rejection of overmapping felt wrong as there are shit ton of maps that is overmapped but still got through the ranking process. If they are being tolerated then why would I still be discriminated with the overmapping bs?)[/color]
actually this is just one diff. Was planning to add more at later date so call me back and we can discuss more about this beatmap nah, not interested in this tbh. you are acting passively-aggressively for some unknown to me reason and your sense of self-importance is a bit too high I am doing this in contrary to assist you in ranking this. If I were to call someone who likes to shit on maps then I would gladly call on one. But the reason I am trying to make reasoning is to avoid your seemingly hardwork go to waste, forcing your work to square one again even when a nominator seemed like giving it a chance. And I am doing this because I once had experienced where I thought a map of this quality can get into a ranked section, but a nominator proved me wrong in many level. To the point even other BNs can agree. I reflect on that and strived on improvement. What I am saying is that something like this can be pushed forward (bubble) but expect it to be popped by another BN or QAT.
if you think that i got something I don't deserve, try to keep in mind that i started mapping ~13 months ago, and for this mapset i spent ~8 hours per day for 2 weeks A mapper's quality, or even a map's quality itself, is not calculated based on how long have you mapped. It's how you interpret a quality map. In my case, reviewing positive feedback maps and a handful of ranked section maps help determine my map's quality and, when I compare it to yours, this has a long way to go before nominator nowadays can deem this as ready
also Kurai, I'd appreciate it if you can reconsider the bubble on this map since quality is not on an acceptable level (If, by chance this map is not going to get popped, should it be bubbled, I'm going to have conflicted feelings on the mapping standard nowadays) mapping is basically a subjective thing, nowadays ranking section is filled with a huge amount of maps of different variety, from ones concerned about pp to the ones which are unique and don't have any other of their own kind. I still think and hope that this one deserves place there