Gabe wrote:

hii

22:27 Gabe: hi baby Noffyy
22:27 Noffy: hi Gabe! ~
22:28 *Gabe is playing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1346980 scop - Yubikiri [Muzukashii]] <Taiko> +Hidden
22:28 *Noffy takes a second to remember how to spec
22:29 Gabe: oh shit
22:29 Gabe: phone call
22:29 Noffy: ring ring
22:46 Gabe: ok good
22:46 Gabe: im done
22:47 Noffy: welcome back
22:52 Gabe: eh
22:53 Noffy: *raises hand* as someone that can't play hari senbon that was fascinating to watch
22:53 Gabe: uh what
22:53 Gabe: I feel like I fucked it up so much
22:53 Gabe: LMAO
22:53 Noffy: yyyyes but you could MOSTLY DO IT
22:56 *Gabe is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1346980 scop - Yubikiri [Muzukashii]]
22:57 Noffy: unsure if you sent this np twice or if osu goofed
22:57 *Noffy readies editor
22:57 Gabe: osu surely goofed lmao
22:57 Gabe: 00:04:982 (5,6,7,8) - This got my attention the moment I started playing the map. The thing about those notes is that they have a really similar sound effect with the four previous ones, but you are not emphasizing it the right way. I see you were technically using the opposite of them, but it's not following anything.
22:57 Gabe: (Tell me if that didn't make sense)
22:58 Noffy: (makes sense)
22:58 Gabe: So.. I'm technically suggesting you to delete them and copy 00:03:751 (1,2,3,4) - instead
22:59 Noffy: makes sense, but is it ok to be so heavy in just red? :o
22:59 Gabe: it's all good
22:59 Noffy: ok :D
22:59 Gabe: on a muzu, it makes all sense
23:00 Gabe: and anyways, it's another measure
23:00 Gabe: you're not really looking at the notes
23:00 Gabe: in this case
23:00 Noffy: i see
23:01 Noffy: since they'd be divided by the barline? :o
23:01 Gabe: yeah, there's this also
23:02 Noffy: changed that and the 00:13:598 -  as well
23:02 Noffy: 02:28:982 -  though in this case, unsure what to do here, if I should.. have it the same as the others or kkdk since it's like
23:02 Noffy: higher than the last two?
23:09 Gabe:  hm yeah, keep it
23:09 Gabe: just like 00:55:444 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 
23:10 Noffy: okk
23:12 Gabe: 00:35:444 (10) - I wonder if it would be better to delete this note
23:12 Gabe: I mean, you are technically following the vocals
23:12 Gabe: but it would be better to follow the instruments
23:12 Gabe: and there's none here
23:14 Noffy: hmm..
23:14 Noffy: the piano is there but I see.. hmm
23:15 Noffy: still feels weird to skip it entirely though
23:15 Gabe: yeh
23:15 Gabe: keep it
23:15 *Noffy keeps 
23:21 Gabe: 01:33:598 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - these notes feels kind weird and you're not really ready to play these neither, I got surprised at that moment. I know you were following the piano, but I feel like you should follow the previous notes, since it's technically what you would focus on https://gabe.s-ul.eu/wFYfIvGa
23:23 Noffy: I see, I actually couldn't figure out how to manage that part  but this seems like a pretty dang good sugges- is that your own website
23:23 Noffy: (changed as suggested)
23:24 Gabe: L MA O
23:24 Gabe: nope
23:24 Noffy: WHAT
23:24 Gabe: https://s-ul.eu/
23:24 Noffy: ooooooh
23:24 Noffy: ok time to bookmark this page for future use
23:26 Gabe: 01:37:905 (31,32,33,34,35,36,37) - this might be a 'piano' case, but I like it
23:26 Gabe: since there is a breaktime which allows the player to adjust to another instrument
23:26 Gabe: not like the previous ones which two patterns weren't following the same thing
23:26 Noffy: helps that it's more than 3 notes as well
23:27 Noffy: I see
23:28 Gabe: 02:00:982 (31) - don?
23:28 Noffy: don'e
23:28 Gabe: 02:00:982 (31,32) - I don't feel like they should have the same note as they do not have the same strenght
23:28 Gabe: ...
23:28 Gabe: OMG NOFFY
23:28 Gabe: AHAHAHAHAHA
23:28 Noffy: hehehee
23:28 Noffy: :>
23:28 Noffy: i'VE BEEN WAITING ALL THIS TIME TO GET TO USE THAT LINE
23:29 Noffy: AND AT LAST .. !!
23:29 Gabe: YOU DID IT
23:29 Gabe: LMAO
23:29 Gabe: 02:05:905 (15,16) - switch them
23:29 Gabe: (it looks like the previous suggestion)
23:29 Noffy: (ooo)
23:29 Gabe: 02:06:828 (18) - a finish would be naise
23:30 Gabe: cause of the guitar
23:30 Noffy: -bwaaamp-
23:30 Gabe: 02:10:982 (32) - why is this slider fucked up https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9071287
23:30 Gabe: LMAO
23:30 Noffy: finished adding finish- though I think I actually had it like that before
23:30 Noffy: oh yeah
23:31 Noffy: i had it snapped oddly before to avoid that
23:31 Noffy: but then i read in the mapping associations taiko channel that this bug will be fixed/ sliders snapped weirdly to get around it will be borked in the nearish future
23:31 Noffy: i think that was said by.. ono? so I changed it back to this weird thing
23:31 Gabe: uh
23:31 Gabe: I kinda fixed it https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9071293
23:32 Noffy: :O
23:32 Noffy: how did
23:32 Gabe: delete reverse arrow
23:33 Noffy: hum, i still get it after deleting the reverse
23:33 Gabe: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9071302
23:34 Gabe: idk where its supposed to end tho
23:34 Gabe: o wait
23:34 Noffy: looks like the 1/4
23:35 Gabe: ok yeah
23:35 Noffy: oh
23:35 Gabe: well
23:35 Gabe: your slidertick is set to 3
23:35 Gabe: put it at 2
23:35 Noffy: it actually gets fixed if i change the tick rate to 1-
23:35 Noffy: o
23:35 Gabe: L MA O
23:36 Noffy: will put it at 1 then since 2 may draw some quizzical raised eyebrows >:3c
23:36 Gabe: why 1
23:36 Gabe: yeah ok
23:36 Gabe: it's cool
23:36 Gabe: 1 works too
23:36 Noffy: from some experiments i did in the past, 1 2 and 4 all behave the same in taiko
23:36 Noffy: 3 makes it 1/3 snapping or something
23:36 Noffy: ye
23:36 Gabe: ooo
23:36 Gabe: thanks for teaching me that
23:37 Noffy: ;D
23:37 Noffy: learn something new erryday
23:37 Gabe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8v-e05cufw&ab_channel=ArianaGrandeFan
23:37 Gabe: EVERYDAY
23:38 Noffy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKQhRZS6S6Q HALLOWEEN
23:39 Noffy: wow the bass in this song is very sooth smooth
23:41 Gabe: yehh
23:42 Noffy: though looking at the image and the related songs.. is the bunny mask a theme?
23:45 Gabe: I think it was
23:46 Gabe: 02:30:213 (5,6,7,8) - I guess this was fixed and all?
23:47 Noffy: yup
23:47 Gabe: cool
23:47 Gabe: nothing else to point out
23:47 Gabe: woo
23:47 Noffy: \o/
23:49 Noffy: thank you for taking a gander gabe c:
23:52 Noffy: [strike]please post irc in thread so i dont forget this happened and accidentally ask again like[/strike]
23:52 Noffy: [strike]TWO MONTHS LATER[/STRIKE]
23:53 Noffy: (unless there's a specific reason not in which case.. stay tuned)

Taikocracy wrote:

Peep, promised I would mod this like a month ago and now I'm finally getting around to it lmao rip 2kds bribes
Not much to do here, the taiko diffs seem polished enough, but here are some minor notes- ok~

[Muzukashii]
00:03:751 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - I think a more appropriate coloring of the notes is d d k k d d k k d d k d d. I think this is more appropriate because the pitch of the (what I think is an) accordion changes every 2 beats, and the d d k d d d k d d I feel did not do a good job of representing that. I see o: . I had actually considered this when talking to Gabe yesterday (ddkk) but didn't do it cause the end (00:06:213 - ) would be the same, and lack distinction.. but making the end part ddkdd fixes that, hadn't thought of that. Changed!
00:35:444 (10) - Could possibly delete for "effect" after the 2 1/3 doublets. (That effect being an appropriate 2/1 break) While I understand it'd be for the 2/1 break, I can't get behind removing the note. Not having the vocal before the bar mapped would be inconsistent with a lot of parts throughout the map where it was ensured that it would be charted.
00:43:751 (3,4) - These could be kat finishers because the vocal is rising in pitch noticeably here, keeping them all as dons disregards that change in pitch, which is the most prominent feature of the kiai at this point. (This can apply to all of the finishers at the beginning of the kiai) Changed as suggested C:


After these are addressed, you can call me back for a bubble. (Already talked to Monstrata about bubbling this set and if he would be dropping in to change anything after, and he confirmed a recheck so... yeet) Alright, will do once Ayyri can take a gander at her difficulty! edit: she took a gander, talked to you on discord, yee.

For those who are wondering: The monocolor 1/3 usage in the Muzukashii is appropriate due to the somewhat low BPM, and the extremely high usage that it is used in Ayyri's Hari Senbon. In my opinion, removing or decreasing the usage of 1/3 in the Muzukashii will make Ayyri's difficulty seem like too big of a difficulty jump, where as right now I feel that both difficulties are spread equally.

Taikocracy wrote:

Talked to Ayyri about 1/6 usage, and it was confirmed with other BNs that its usage is okay. Taiko diffs are fine, spread is okay and structure is accurate, good luck with the standard ones~

Monstrata wrote:

diddle doned congrats~

Akitoshi wrote:

oh hey gratz!

Skylish wrote:

Sorry to break the HYPE party, the naming of Normal is questionable.

Just 'Normal' please

Noffy wrote:

1.) it's not a custom name. it does not take place of the difficulty name "normal". 2.) it is a thematic replacement of where the word "collab" would typically go. When two people are "fated" they are "joined together" by something that was inevitable, when two people collab they are "joined together" by making the map... and this collab was inevitable, so...~

Skylish wrote:

Fyi in case you are not very clear with naming system: I'm very clear:

Ranking Criteria wrote:

A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to a username. Mapsets may also use a complete set of custom difficulty names that clearly indicate their level of difficulty to the player. Marathon maps with a single difficulty may use free naming.

The difficulty indicated "normal" is unchanged. There is nothing against adding a descriptive adjective.

Either one case below should exist:

+ Collab Normal

+ Mapper1+2's Normal

+ Mapper1+2's Collab Difficultynamehere does exist although rarer.

===========

> Any thing after 's is considered as 'difficulty name'. In the current case, 'Fated Normal' is treated as an isolated difficulty. And it properly indicates its level of difficulty. The actual difficulty indicator is unchanged.

> Fated =/= Collab, it is not a usual naming habit and imo 'fated' means 'destinate'. If you use a combined mapper's name already in front of difficulty name, there is no need to put 'collab' keywords any more. Yes it's not usual, it's just for this song. It wouldn't work for other songs. Not having any "collab" keyword risks the difficulty name being misread as "Ayyri's Normal" or Ayyffy being mistaken for a third mapper.

===========

I don't mind 'Fated Ayyffy's Normal' , but not 'Ayyffy's Fated Normal' . They have 2 different meanings. Fated Ayyffy's Normal no longer makes grammatical sense. Besides breaking grammar, I do not see other difference between these two.

Skylish wrote:

Fyi in case you are not very clear with naming system:

Either one case below should exist:

+ Collab Normal

+ Mapper1+2's Normal

===========

> Any thing after 's is considered as 'difficulty name'. In the current case, 'Fated Normal' is treated as an isolated difficulty.

> Fated =/= Collab, it is not a usual naming habit and imo 'fated' means 'destinate'. If you use a combined mapper's name already in front of difficulty name, there is no need to put 'collab' keywords any more.

===========

I don't mind 'Fated Ayyffy's Normal' , but not 'Ayyffy's Fated Normal' . They have 2 different meanings.

IamKwaN wrote:

back!

Renumi wrote:

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! aaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Weber wrote:

cute noffy

Akitoshi wrote:

oh hey gratz!

KittyAdventure wrote:

Akitoshi wrote:

oh hey gratz!

Pachiru wrote:

CONGRATZ!!!

jack1817 wrote:

Congratulations Noffy!! (((o(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)o)))♡

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

I would like to point out that base slider velocity is bugged in both Taiko difficulties. Please contact me for disqualification so you can fix them via notepad to 1.40 sharp.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Disqualified as requested to fix the bugged base SV.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Back as no gameplay elements are affected upon the change.

strickluke wrote:

delete pepsi gj ayyri

(also im probably wrong, but dont hybrid sets need a bubble from each mode?)