forum

Diao ye zong feat. Meramipop - Saifu 'Kamiasobi no Uta' [Tai

posted
Total Posts
60
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 5 декабря 2017 г. at 22:45:52

Artist: Diao ye zong feat. Meramipop
Title: Saifu 'Kamiasobi no Uta'
Source: 東方風神録 ~ Mountain of Faith.
Tags: Touhou Project 東方 ネイティブフェイス Native Faith Extra Stage Theme 洩矢 諏訪子 Suwako Moriya 明日ハレの日、ケの昨日 掲 光収容 RD-Sounds Hikarisyuyo ZUN 上海アリス幻樂団 Hakurei Shrine Reitaisai 13 博麗神社例大祭13 Kakage 掲 Team Shanghai Alice Shanhai Arisu Gengakudan
BPM: 133
Filesize: 21705kb
Play Time: 05:57
Difficulties Available:
  1. Festival is far from over (4,62 stars, 2150 notes)
Download: Diao ye zong feat. Meramipop - Saifu 'Kamiasobi no Uta'
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Dance with your life on the line

Saifu Kamiasobi no Uta
#1 for Rank and #1 Ranked!

Difficulties and progress

Festival is far from over by ASPIRIN
SB by ASPIRIN
Thanks for mods and stars!
  1. Nifty
  2. Namki
  3. teaMblack19 - mod and 2
  4. Senritsu
  5. Tyistiana - mod and
  6. Ron
  7. PoPoii - mod and 5
  8. davidminh0111
  9. Kith190
  10. game rock
  11. Thousand
  12. Acnos - thanks for 2
  13. rew0825
  14. Marm - mod and 2
  15. Faputa
  16. tokiko
  17. Protonori
  18. Vulkin - thanks for 3
  19. Consified
  20. Ulqui - for longest irc mod in my life
  21. -Alcaida - thanks for 12
  22. Lasse
  23. Hanswall - thanks for
  24. Smallwu - mod and
  25. Joe Castle - thanks for 20 OWO
  26. whosthebox
  27. Mantle - thanks for
  28. Dinocrit thanks for 2
  29. frukoyurdakul - mod and
  30. Surono - mod and
Dates
15.06.17 - First upload!
01.08.17 - Full rework, SB updated!
08.09.17 - Full rework again, minor SB update
03.12.17 - Bubble!
05.12.17 - Qualified!

Nifty
From queue~

- The only diff lole -
Note for ASPIRIN: Delete almost all of these finishers. They not only make this set super unrankable (ddD is unrankable in 1/4ths) but uncomfortable to play, and they don't match the music or Rudmorph's parts at all.

The notes sound a little behind, consider toying with the offset.

00:05:144 (15) - You have a finisher here and it doesn't even follow the sound you used finisher on, there's no bass drum.

00:05:595 (17) - If you're gonna use finishers, please be consistent. This should be a D.

00:08:753 (31) - Again remove please, and same for everything after.

00:20:181 (1,1) - unrankable spinners, according to RC spinners must be at least 1/2 spaced from the next note. Repeats on the next set.

For the next section of singing with spammed finishers, only put finishers where the voice ACTUALLY hits, meaning on 1 - 3 - 1 - 2 - 3

00:47:531 (3) - Ok just highlight everything past this point and click "finish" twice, you're gonna needa reconsider this. Read the RC please

01:16:557 (147,148,149) - Make all of these k, fits the piano and the 'd every bass kick' rhythm

01:47:044 (356,357) - ctrl-g this to emphasize the hi hat

01:48:699 (367) - k for hi hat

01:53:277 (400,401) - ctrl-g like above

01:54:933 (411) - ok you copy pasted this but yes same as above

goddamnit aspirin stop putting finishers everywhere lmao

02:15:193 - to 02:20:648 - oh my god please actually map this, do anything other than this.

02:28:829 (606,607,608,609,610) - kkddk fits rhythm etc etc

Rudmorph's parts are noticeably better in this song, so Aspirin should be looking at what he's doing in terms of rhythm and stream placement and pretty much copying it because I'm not making more than 1 change per section for him.

I noticed that there is nobody highlighted in the sb for mapping from 05:37:790 - here on (it's pretty obviously Rudmorph tho). Also Rudmorph took the last 4 sections which seems a little odd. Nice sb overall though.

Hope I could help ^^
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Nifty wrote:

From queue~

- The only diff lole -
Note for ASPIRIN: Delete almost all of these finishers. They not only make this set super unrankable (ddD is unrankable in 1/4ths) but uncomfortable to play, and they don't match the music or Rudmorph's parts at all. Ok, this is good tip

The notes sound a little behind, consider toying with the offset.

00:05:144 (15) - You have a finisher here and it doesn't even follow the sound you used finisher on, there's no bass drum. fixed

00:05:595 (17) - If you're gonna use finishers, please be consistent. This should be a D. Understood. but i will don't use finishers in this section - ill use kat to map sounds like that 00:02:888 (5) -

00:08:753 (31) - Again remove please, and same for everything after. fixed

00:20:181 (1,1) - unrankable spinners, according to RC spinners must be at least 1/2 spaced from the next note. Repeats on the next set. spinners are mistake, fixed

For the next section of singing with spammed finishers, only put finishers where the voice ACTUALLY hits, meaning on 1 - 3 - 1 - 2 - 3 i cant understand what you mean here, but, i fix this section using tips from the top

00:47:531 (3) - Ok just highlight everything past this point and click "finish" twice, you're gonna needa reconsider this shit. [ulr=https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/Taiko_Ranking_Criteria]Read the RC please[/url] i just unfinish last note

01:16:557 (147,148,149) - Make all of these k, fits the piano and the 'd every bass kick' rhythm fixed

01:47:044 (356,357) - ctrl-g this to emphasize the hi hat fixed

01:48:699 (367) - k for hi hat fixed

01:53:277 (400,401) - ctrl-g like above fixed

01:54:933 (411) - ok you copy pasted this but yes same as above

goddamnit aspirin stop putting finishers everywhere lmao removed all finishers :)

02:15:193 - to 02:20:648 - oh my god please actually map this, do anything other than this. I removed the finishers and made a couple of triples for the vocal

02:28:829 (606,607,608,609,610) - kkddk fits rhythm etc etc fixed

Rudmorph's parts are noticeably better in this song, so Aspirin should be looking at what he's doing in terms of rhythm and stream placement and pretty much copying it because I'm not making more than 1 change per section for him. I will try to be better

I noticed that there is nobody highlighted in the sb for mapping from 05:37:790 - here on (it's pretty obviously Rudmorph tho). Also Rudmorph took the last 4 sections which seems a little odd. Nice sb overall though. about 05:37:790 - i did this just for piano part on last slider... and last sections are realy mapped by Rudmorph. It was his wish. And about sb - it is still WIP, just concept, not final ver, ill to it better, biggest and more laggy :D

Hope I could help ^^ thanks for your help!
Namki
прив

  1. Че по св, я там сильно не читал рц, но вроде можно 1.60/ 1.40 и 1.96. хз, почитай там.
  2. Немного не понял, почему некоторые каты ставишь вистлом, а некоторые клепом. Разницы там как бы и нет, что одно, что другое. Странно звучит просто лол
  3. Весь парт до 00:18:678 - предлагаю пересмотреть его полностью. Ритм емхазис отсутвует — к примеру, 00:02:888 - сильное звучание, следовало бы выделить его не как остальные. 00:03:791 - сейм, сделать 00:03:791 - катом, чтоб соответствовал 00:04:091 (10,11,12,13) - паттерну. Ну и так далее, там куча таких моментов. Алсо, мне не оч нравится, что из ритма ты выбрал просто два 1/3 серкла с гапом в 1/3. Скучно.
  4. 01:00:193 (68) - идк почему выделяешь его по-другому, не как 00:59:803 (66,67) - . Звук в точности такой же.
  5. 01:04:479 (96) - странный финиш. Не ставил же на такой звук до этого. Кип консистенси. В тайко это типа важно.
  6. 01:05:648 (103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112) - прислушай внимательнее. 01:05:940 - вот тут есть звук. 01:06:232 (108,109,110,111,112) - а тут просто 1/2. Предлагаю просто свитчнуть ритм. По типу.
  7. 01:13:635 (134,135,136,137,138) - / 01:15:193 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151) - ну вообще идк. Слишком интенсивность повышаешь, если сравнивать с той же частью тут 01:07:011 (112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124) - .
  8. 01:39:544 (303,304,305,306,307,308) - вот посмотри, ты там чередовал паттерн 5нот стрим - серкл. А тут зачем-то поставил два трипла, не очень такая штука вписывается, по ритму там лучше этот 5нот + серкл паттерн тбх. Структура и консистенси.
  9. 01:48:310 (364) - предлагаю его катом сделать, чтоб соответствовал след. триплу. А то у тебя там все триплы такие — 01:44:998 (342,343,344,345,346,347) - / 01:46:557 (352,353,354,355,356,357) - зеркальные, я б сказал.
  10. 02:06:037 (474) - по рц нельзя финиш ставить при снаппинге 1/4 или больше при таких бпмах. Не буду всё искать, сам найдешь. 02:11:881 - ну и так дальше.
  11. Алсо, к предыдущему поинту, такие рандомные финиш — плохо в тайко. Они выбиваются из общего ритма, и делают акцент на этом звуке, который, в принципе, не отличается от других таких же.
  12. От 02:14:609 - до 02:21:037 - слишком недостает всего в ритме. Если сравнить со вторым и третьим киаями, разница-то получается огромная. Интенсивость очень сильно разнится. И всякие триплы по вокалу не выделяешь даже 02:16:264 - и так далее.
  13. 02:36:135 - оп-па, звук. Зря андермапнул.
  14. 03:35:648 (156) - тоже немного инконсистент, у тебя ж не было этого серкла ни 03:35:648 (156) - , ни 03:35:648 (156) - , ни 03:41:881 - тут.
  15. 04:56:979 - / 04:57:174 - ну не знааааю. Нет как-то особо большого смысла скипать звуки, итак у тебя там куча всякого 1/4.
всё. не буду все досконально писать.
просто иди пройдись по рц и исправь анранки
гл
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Namki wrote:

прив

  1. Че по св, я там сильно не читал рц, но вроде можно 1.60/ 1.40 и 1.96. хз, почитай там. Исправил
  2. Немного не понял, почему некоторые каты ставишь вистлом, а некоторые клепом. Разницы там как бы и нет, что одно, что другое. Странно звучит просто лол Это к Рудморфу, зачем он это делает, непонятно... Ну ноты становятся катами и ладно
  3. Весь парт до 00:18:678 - предлагаю пересмотреть его полностью. Ритм емхазис отсутвует — к примеру, 00:02:888 - сильное звучание, следовало бы выделить его не как остальные. 00:03:791 - сейм, сделать 00:03:791 - катом, чтоб соответствовал 00:04:091 (10,11,12,13) - паттерну. Ну и так далее, там куча таких моментов. Алсо, мне не оч нравится, что из ритма ты выбрал просто два 1/3 серкла с гапом в 1/3. Скучно. Исправил. Я не знаю как сделать этот момент более весёлым...
  4. 01:00:193 (68) - идк почему выделяешь его по-другому, не как 00:59:803 (66,67) - . Звук в точности такой же. Исправил
  5. 01:04:479 (96) - странный финиш. Не ставил же на такой звук до этого. Кип консистенси. В тайко это типа важно. Исправил.
    Я вообще все финишеры убрал, они правктически все не в тему.
  6. 01:05:648 (103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112) - прислушай внимательнее. 01:05:940 - вот тут есть звук. 01:06:232 (108,109,110,111,112) - а тут просто 1/2. Предлагаю просто свитчнуть ритм. По типу.
  7. 01:13:635 (134,135,136,137,138) - / 01:15:193 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151) - ну вообще идк. Слишком интенсивность повышаешь, если сравнивать с той же частью тут 01:07:011 (112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124) - Исправил
  8. 01:39:544 (303,304,305,306,307,308) - вот посмотри, ты там чередовал паттерн 5нот стрим - серкл. А тут зачем-то поставил два трипла, не очень такая штука вписывается, по ритму там лучше этот 5нот + серкл паттерн тбх. Структура и консистенси. Исправил
  9. 01:48:310 (364) - предлагаю его катом сделать, чтоб соответствовал след. триплу. А то у тебя там все триплы такие — 01:44:998 (342,343,344,345,346,347) - / 01:46:557 (352,353,354,355,356,357) - зеркальные, я б сказал. Исправил
  10. 02:06:037 (474) - по рц нельзя финиш ставить при снаппинге 1/4 или больше при таких бпмах. Не буду всё искать, сам найдешь. 02:11:881 - ну и так дальше. Исправил
  11. Алсо, к предыдущему поинту, такие рандомные финиш — плохо в тайко. Они выбиваются из общего ритма, и делают акцент на этом звуке, который, в принципе, не отличается от других таких же. Я это понял уже, поубирал все финишеры, оставил только в паре месь,
    там где в тему
  12. От 02:14:609 - до 02:21:037 - слишком недостает всего в ритме. Если сравнить со вторым и третьим киаями, разница-то получается огромная. Интенсивость очень сильно разнится. И всякие триплы по вокалу не выделяешь даже 02:16:264 - и так далее. услышал там пару триплов на вокале и один стрим из 5 нот
  13. 02:36:135 - оп-па, звук. Зря андермапнул. Исправил
  14. 03:35:648 (156) - тоже немного инконсистент, у тебя ж не было этого серкла ни 03:35:648 (156) - , ни 03:35:648 (156) - , ни 03:41:881 - тут.Исправил
  15. 04:56:979 - / 04:57:174 - ну не знааааю. Нет как-то особо большого смысла скипать звуки, итак у тебя там куча всякого 1/4.Исправил
всё. не буду все досконально писать.
просто иди пройдись по рц и исправь анранки
гл Я всё понял, большое спасибо за мод ^^
Fallmorph
~ Taiko Mod #5 ~

In-Game Mod
18:14 teaMblack19: Привет. Ну я начинаю тогда :)
18:14 ASPIRIN: го
18:17 teaMblack19: 00:03:640 (8,9) - если прислушаться, тут много где можно услышать триплеты. Если их маппнуть, было бы интереснее начало играть.
18:19 teaMblack19: 00:05:445 (16,17) - 00:07:249 (24,25) - 00:09:054 (32,33) - 00:10:858 (40,41) - 00:12:663 (48,49) - 00:14:467 (56,57) - 00:16:272 (64,65) - 00:18:076 (72,73) -
18:19 teaMblack19: Перед каждым белым тиком, короче.
18:19 teaMblack19: *Большим белым тиком.
18:20 ASPIRIN: угу, понял
18:22 teaMblack19: 00:41:084 (139) - тут тоже триплет можно сделать, как ты это делал раньше 00:37:475 (129,130,131) - например.
18:25 teaMblack19: 00:41:881 (1) - спиннер, думаю, можно назад на белый тик сдвинуть. Мне кажется, в этом сличаи это допустимо будет.
18:25 teaMblack19: Тем более оверлапов при игре никаких нет.
18:26 teaMblack19: И при 1/3 ритме небольшой BPM получается. Так что, думаю, можно.
18:29 teaMblack19: 00:57:271 (52,55) - финишеры, про которые я говорил.
18:30 ASPIRIN: напомни, что с ними сделать?
18:30 teaMblack19: Либо убирай финишеры, либо меняй предыдущую ноту в стриме на синюю, если не хочешь убирать. Иначе анранк.
18:31 ASPIRIN: Скрин с дискорде
18:31 teaMblack19: Но если честно, триплеты с финишерами в конце - это странно. )
18:35 teaMblack19: Хм, я думаю часть, которая начинается отсюда 00:54:154 (29) - можно было бы по другому замапать...
18:35 ASPIRIN: инвентирова?
18:36 teaMblack19: Там если прислушаться, можно услышать такие четкие звуки на 1/4 битах
18:36 teaMblack19: И по ним уже тройки и пятерки разставлять
18:36 ASPIRIN: я ремапну
18:36 teaMblack19: Окей
18:37 teaMblack19: 01:08:570 (122) - d звучит хорошо. И по вокалу подходит
18:41 teaMblack19: Так, до 01:25:323 (218) - всё супер
18:43 teaMblack19: Дальше немного спорное положение троек и пятерок..
18:44 ASPIRIN: Конкретнее, я тупой же
18:44 teaMblack19: Хотя, сойдёт. Могу разве что посоветовать использовать разные пятерки
18:44 teaMblack19: Щас пример
18:45 ASPIRIN: дискорд скнины
18:45 ASPIRIN: тебе потом эти картинки в мод впихивать
18:46 teaMblack19: 01:27:076 (228,229,230,231,232) - тут у тебя kdddk, а сюда 01:32:141 (262,263,264,265,266) - уже можно сделать kkddk для вариативности.
18:47 teaMblack19: И насчёт таких троек 01:26:687 (225,226,227) -
18:48 teaMblack19: Я против них ничего не имею, но kkd намного удобнее играть. Можешь оставить как есть, но это немного сложнее играется (совсем немного, но сложнее).
18:49 teaMblack19: Ну или идеально чередовать kdd и kkd для разнообразия. Но желательно не рандомно, конечно.
18:52 teaMblack19: 01:38:862 (304,305,306,307,308,309) - начинать стрим с синего тика очень не хорошо. Фу фу фу :D
18:53 teaMblack19: Можешь добавить красную ноту в начало. Будет типа на вокал.
18:55 teaMblack19: 01:41:979 (329,330,331,332,333,334) - то же
18:58 teaMblack19: 01:40:225 (316) - можешь перенести на красный тик справа, но это субъективно. Пока даже не знаю, как тут лучше поступить.
18:59 teaMblack19: 01:47:044 (367) - там звук слышно. Можно мапнуть
19:00 ASPIRIN: финишер?!
19:01 teaMblack19: Не, не, не то
19:01 teaMblack19: Там триплет
19:01 teaMblack19: До синей ноты
19:02 ASPIRIN: услышал
19:03 teaMblack19: 01:48:797 (378) - лучше перенести сюда 01:48:602 (377) -
19:03 teaMblack19: типа влево
19:04 teaMblack19: Получится две тройки, как раньше, а дальше стрим.
19:04 teaMblack19: 01:53:180 (411,412) - Тут тоже триплет
19:05 teaMblack19: Если перенес ноту в прошлый раз ^, то эту тоже надо 01:55:031 (422) -
19:06 teaMblack19: 02:02:141 (466) - k (?)
19:10 teaMblack19: Припев по сути хорошо замапан. Могу разве что как раньше посоветовать чередовать kdd/kkd и kdddk/kkddk для разнообразия.
19:10 ASPIRIN: окке
19:16 teaMblack19: 02:31:751 (652) - можно удалить (по желанию)
19:17 teaMblack19: Типа чтобы подчеркнуть там всё и вся >_<
19:18 teaMblack19: 02:38:959 (699) - синим можно сделать
19:19 teaMblack19: 02:58:829 (809) - у тебя тут звук уменшается до 60%, хотя по сути не должен
19:23 teaMblack19: 03:13:245 (4) - красный как раньше
19:24 teaMblack19: 03:14:803 (7,8) - поставь ноту между ними, как ты это сделал тут 01:10:518 (126) -
19:28 teaMblack19: 03:42:466 (62) - начиная от сюда та же ситуация со стримами, которые начинаются на синих тиках. По твоему желанию.
19:30 teaMblack19: 03:48:699 (115) - отсюда опять тоже самое. Пропустил пару троек.
19:31 teaMblack19: Второй припев норм
19:33 teaMblack19: 04:32:336 (394) - "красный - синий - красный - синий - ... "
19:34 teaMblack19: Можно убрать эти ноты 04:33:310 (399,409) - или ещё что-то придумать
19:43 teaMblack19: Ещё начиная отсюда 04:57:466 (573) - ты мапаешь стримами, а начиная отсюда 05:00:388 (593) - какими-то странным ритмом. Думаю, надо выбрать что-то одно.
19:46 teaMblack19: По третьему припеву всё тоже самое, что и по первому. Просто можно больше вариативности.
19:48 teaMblack19: 05:48:894 (71) - тут можно убрать финишер.
19:48 teaMblack19: Конец.
19:49 ASPIRIN: ПАРУ СЛОВ ПРО СБ
19:51 teaMblack19: СБ АГОНЬ! Я так не умею ;)
19:51 teaMblack19: Мне очень нравится )
Удачи в продвижении карты! :)
Senritsu
sorry for late! im only available on Friday T_T
im only suggesting things here, so you don't have to accept all of it

[Festival]
  1. I'm not hating the difficulty name, but somehow it's really long and thus it's no longer a diff name but summary of the song lol just saying
  2. Do you have a grudge against 1.40? lol 154 with 1.60 is too fast imo probably lower them? Not to mention that this is a marathon, keeping up with that fast pace is kinda hard, also with some of the streams, it's already hard enough.
  3. Also, HP is too high with those streams and the length. Try 5, and also OD to 5.
  4. 00:04:994 (15,16) - can be changed to k, to suits the vocal and the bell
  5. 00:08:603 (33) - ^
  6. 00:11:760 (49,50,51,52) - ddkk for same reason as above. just to make a variation too, so it wont be a boring dd dk dd dk etc
  7. 00:24:542 (104,105,107) - i feel comfortable with them as K when i play it, because the sound of something click there makes it feel lighter than the heavy D. I feel all the click there (on the triplets also) can be changed to k because it's really really weird to have a heavy tone on the music here :( don't be afraid with the repetitions, because the song is similar there so i hope you change this orz
  8. 00:40:783 (147) - change to K? 00:41:234 (148,149,150,151) - weird pattern. my suggestion is delete them, then make dddk d k on 00:40:933 and delete the SV change. it overlaps and looks ugly u,u
  9. No comment on the stream because i dont know :D
  10. 02:05:258 (508,509,510,511,512) - flows better as kkddk
  11. 02:19:089 (602) - delete, maybe? for breaks. 2/1 all over is kinda boring
  12. 02:20:648 (610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617,618) - dkkdkdkkd flows better with the music :> and 02:21:816 (619,620,621,622) - change to k k d d for following the vocal. and 02:23:180 (623) - can be deleted for also following the vocal. just a suggestion but it flows better like this~
  13. 02:24:544 (629,630) - k for instrumentals
  14. 02:26:881 (638,639,640,641,642,643,644,645,646) - kkkkddddk? it also flows better with the drum
  15. 02:28:829 (653,654,655,656,657) - kddkk for following the strings too
  16. 02:29:609 (659,660,661,662,663) - dkdkk for the same reason as above
  17. 02:30:972 (668) - also can be deleted for break and the echo of the strings from the note before
  18. 02:42:466 (734,735,736,737,738) - 02:44:803 (745,746,747,748,749) - just k d k 3/2 is enough here, no need for stream
  19. 02:45:680 (751,752) - just 1/1 k here is enough
Yeah i dont know if i have to list all of them but there are many unnecessary notes on calm parts, i hope you remove some, especially the stream parts. Need a lot improvements also, on the hitsounds. I have my reasons why i don't mod till the end, because if i have to say, i will say many things, that may completely replace your mapping style u_u

And btw, nice SB, though i doubt taiko players pay enough attention to the SB.

Gluck!
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Senritsu wrote:

sorry for late! im only available on Friday T_T
im only suggesting things here, so you don't have to accept all of it

[Festival]
  1. I'm not hating the difficulty name, but somehow it's really long and thus it's no longer a diff name but summary of the song lol just saying This diff name has MEANING! Im really don't want to change it, but if this will be reason why i can't rank this map, i'll change it...
  2. Do you have a grudge against 1.40? lol 154 with 1.60 is too fast imo probably lower them? Not to mention that this is a marathon, keeping up with that fast pace is kinda hard, also with some of the streams, it's already hard enough. True, edited
  3. Also, HP is too high with those streams and the length. Try 5, and also OD to 5. Ok
  4. 00:04:994 (15,16) - can be changed to k, to suits the vocal and the bell Good tip
  5. 00:08:603 (33) - ^ +
  6. 00:11:760 (49,50,51,52) - ddkk for same reason as above. just to make a variation too, so it wont be a boring dd dk dd dk etc You know more than me
  7. 00:24:542 (104,105,107) - i feel comfortable with them as K when i play it, because the sound of something click there makes it feel lighter than the heavy D. I feel all the click there (on the triplets also) can be changed to k because it's really really weird to have a heavy tone on the music here :( don't be afraid with the repetitions, because the song is similar there so i hope you change this orz Yeah, edited
  8. 00:40:783 (147) - change to K? 00:41:234 (148,149,150,151) - weird pattern. my suggestion is delete them, then make dddk d k on 00:40:933 and delete the SV change. it overlaps and looks ugly u,u I again listened to the rhythm in this moment, you are right
  9. No comment on the stream because i dont know :D Dragon-touhou-force :D
  10. 02:05:258 (508,509,510,511,512) - flows better as kkddk Ok
  11. 02:19:089 (602) - delete, maybe? for breaks. 2/1 all over is kinda boring I dont unrestand, you mean delete all noted in this momen to make Break Time or what?
  12. 02:20:648 (610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617,618) - dkkdkdkkd flows better with the music :> and 02:21:816 (619,620,621,622) - change to k k d d for following the vocal. and 02:23:180 (623) - can be deleted for also following the vocal. just a suggestion but it flows better like this~ Ok
  13. 02:24:544 (629,630) - k for instrumentals *Made a note sticker on the wall*
  14. 02:26:881 (638,639,640,641,642,643,644,645,646) - kkkkddddk? it also flows better with the drum Ok
  15. 02:28:829 (653,654,655,656,657) - kddkk for following the strings too ok
  16. 02:29:609 (659,660,661,662,663) - dkdkk for the same reason as above Ok
  17. 02:30:972 (668) - also can be deleted for break and the echo of the strings from the note before Maybe my map a bit boring in some moments, but i'm basically don't want make a break time in my map
  18. 02:42:466 (734,735,736,737,738) - 02:44:803 (745,746,747,748,749) - just k d k 3/2 is enough here, no need for stream i'll work on it
  19. 02:45:680 (751,752) - just 1/1 k here is enough ok
Yeah i dont know if i have to list all of them but there are many unnecessary notes on calm parts, i hope you remove some, especially the stream parts. Need a lot improvements also, on the hitsounds. I have my reasons why i don't mod till the end, because if i have to say, i will say many things, that may completely replace your mapping style u_u Interesting thing - In this time, while i was waiting your mod i was started playing taiko (Before that I just passed 1* maps 2 years ago) and my perception of taiko mapping changed radically, I can not look at my map without tears, i needs to be completely redone! Thanks for your advices (muzukashii dif is wip too)


And btw, nice SB, though i doubt taiko players pay enough attention to the SB. SB as how much i love this song :D

Gluck! Thanks!
Tyistiana
Hi, ASPIRIN~
Sorry for late, too ;;w;;

If my modding are affects to your mapping style, feel free to reject them! :3

[ Unrankable caution]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Try to leave at least a 1/2 beat between a note and a spinner.
Nothing much, let's have a look of spinner on 05:50:258
A gap between note and spinner is not enough. Here I have 2 ways to suggest you.
  1. Delete 05:50:161 , to make a gap become larger. If follow this suggestion, please ignore 00:41:685 suggestion for the map's consistency.
  2. Add d on 05:50:258 , and moved a a start of spinner to 05:50:453
[ Difficulty name problem proof]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to a username. Mapsets may also use a complete set of custom difficulty names that clearly indicate their level of difficulty to the player. Marathon maps with a single difficulty may use free naming.
So about difficulty name , no problem , keep going on! :D

[ General]
To be honest, HP7 is seems too merciless somehow , considered by this map length is exceed 5 minutes.
Maybe decrease HP a little might be good! :3

[ Overall]
  1. Still shocked after see the stream patterns. Let me help you to delete some note. It's too long somehow ;;w;;
    **Please note that here is only my opinion**
    00:53:667 / 00:55:031 / 00:55:810 / 00:56:394 / 00:56:784 / 04:50:161 / 04:50:940 / 04:51:524 / 04:52:303
    And here is the part that it's calm, but have too many note, consider to delete it. Let the silence emphasize the music :3
    04:33:310 / 04:33:505

  2. Some parts are seems too boring to play because it's k d k d k d k d pattern. Maybe add a note for some variation.
    **Please note that here is only my opinion**
    01:34:381 / 01:34:576 / 02:18:992 / 03:41:979 / 04:24:057 / 04:29:511

[ Festival is far from over]
00:10:407 - Change to k , similar pitch to 00:10:106
00:12:212 (51,52) - Since the vocal here is high, how about k to emphasize these vocal?
00:41:535 moves to 00:41:685 - I think that to follow the vocal here might be better. I really don't understand the note on 00:41:535 that which pitch it's follow. At least in my opinion, there shouldn't have a note on 00:41:535
00:41:685 moves to 00:41:881 - In taiko , we can place a spinner after the pitch too if we have a note which it's follow that pitch.
00:56:102 (45,46) - Change to d , in order to emphasize the pitch like 00:56:297
00:56:881 - Change to d , the pitch here seems not high enough compare to 00:57:076 / 00:57:174
00:59:706 moves to 00:59:316 - Seems fitter and have more power to emphasize the finisher on 00:59:803
01:02:336 - Remove finisher here, even this pitch is dominate, but it isn't strong enough in my opinion.
01:05:063 - Here are only my opinion
01:06:427 - Don't have any pitch here , should delete. ;;w;;
01:07:401 / 01:08:180 / 01:08:959 - Change to d , let's have a look on 01:10:128 , it's similar pitch. Sure, I didn't talk about vocal. Change for the consistency of the pitch might be better in my opinion. uwu
01:12:758 - Delete , for the ease to emphasize 01:12:855
01:12:855 - Sure, same pitch as 01:10:128. (I guess it's drum pitch) Change to d for the consistency of the map :3
01:29:024 - Change to d
01:29:219 - Change to k , seems fitter in my opinion.
02:21:427 - Change to d , similar pitch to 02:21:816
02:23:570 - Change to k , the vocal here seems higher than 02:23:764
02:42:758 - Change to k , a special pitch appears here.
03:43:342 - Delete , for the consistency as you've decide to use 5-notes pattern so far. (Usually, 6-notes pattern are not common to use.)
03:43:537 moves to 03:43:440 - For the note's position consistency on 03:44:219
03:44:219 - Sure, change to d for the color consistency on 03:43:537
04:53:375 - High pitch, might change to k
05:23:764 - Change to d , same reason as 02:21:427

[ Storyboard]
My definition : I'll represent the circle like 01:44:803 as circle
Some strong pitch are not have circles , which I think that it'll be good to emphasize that pitch
Like 02:21:427 / 02:21:806 / 02:22:206 / 02:22:596 / 02:22:985 / 02:23:375 / 02:23:764 / 02:24:154 / 02:24:544 / 02:24:933 / 02:25:323 / 02:25:712 / 02:26:102 / 02:26:492 // 05:23:764 part

Wait, I'm not SB modder, lmao
It's been a long time that I haven't see a SB on taiko! Nice!!
So, take my star (/・ω・)/
Good luck for ranking~ :D
[R]
yo

[Long diff name]
00:17:625 - change kat
00:22:888 - add note, the break feels akward, similiar pattern with 00:19:129 -
00:26:497 - ^
00:30:106 - ^
00:33:715 - ^
00:37:324 - ^
00:47:336 - ddk change kkk, sounds will more clear
00:59:706 - delete, there has finisher with SV forward that make a bit hard
01:16:167 (152,153) - invert, make drum sound consistent 01:15:193 -
01:16:557 (154,155) - change kat, high picth piano
02:08:959 - change D, consistency 02:02:725 -
02:32:920 - change kat, give a variety
03:42:076 - change kat
04:34:868 - make kkk ?? following 04:33:310 - have triplet here
04:59:414 - change don ?

maybe just that from me
good luck
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

[R] wrote:

yo

[Long diff name]
00:17:625 - change kat Ok
00:22:888 - add note, the break feels akward, similiar pattern with 00:19:129 - Ok
00:26:497 - ^Ok
00:30:106 - ^Ok
00:33:715 - ^Ok
00:37:324 - ^Ok
00:47:336 - ddk change kkk, sounds will more clear Last note is K, this is rankable if it kkK
00:59:706 - delete, there has finisher with SV forward that make a bit hard Edited everywhere
01:16:167 (152,153) - invert, make drum sound consistent 01:15:193 - Ok
01:16:557 (154,155) - change kat, high picth piano Ok
02:08:959 - change D, consistency 02:02:725 - Ok
02:32:920 - change kat, give a variety Ok
03:42:076 - change kat Ok
04:34:868 - make kkk ?? following 04:33:310 - have triplet here Ok
04:59:414 - change don ? Ok

maybe just that from me
good luck Thank you very much!
Tyistiana
Still wait for your replies. uwu
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Tyistiana wrote:

Still wait for your replies. uwu
oops, i forgot about it, give me hour
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Tyistiana wrote:

Hi, ASPIRIN~
Sorry for late, too ;;w;;
I too was late, I'm sorry. I've been very busy since the beginning of September and I just forgot to answer you ... Better late than never!

If my modding are affects to your mapping style, feel free to reject them! :3

[ Unrankable caution]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Try to leave at least a 1/2 beat between a note and a spinner.
Nothing much, let's have a look of spinner on 05:50:258
A gap between note and spinner is not enough. Here I have 2 ways to suggest you.
  1. Delete 05:50:161 , to make a gap become larger. If follow this suggestion, please ignore 00:41:685 suggestion for the map's consistency.Edited!
  2. Add d on 05:50:258 , and moved a a start of spinner to 05:50:453 Edited!
[ Difficulty name problem proof]

Ranking Criteria wrote:

A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to a username. Mapsets may also use a complete set of custom difficulty names that clearly indicate their level of difficulty to the player. Marathon maps with a single difficulty may use free naming.
So about difficulty name , no problem , keep going on! :D Yea! Cool! I really like this diff name!

[ General]
To be honest, HP7 is seems too merciless somehow , considered by this map length is exceed 5 minutes.
Maybe decrease HP a little might be good! :3 Edited!

[ Overall]
  1. Still shocked after see the stream patterns. Let me help you to delete some note. It's too long somehow ;;w;;
    **Please note that here is only my opinion**
    00:53:667 / 00:55:031 / 00:55:810 / 00:56:394 / 00:56:784 / 04:50:161 / 04:50:940 / 04:51:524 / 04:52:303
    And here is the part that it's calm, but have too many note, consider to delete it. Let the silence emphasize the music :3
    04:33:310 / 04:33:505

  2. Some parts are seems too boring to play because it's k d k d k d k d pattern. Maybe add a note for some variation. Edited everywhere
    **Please note that here is only my opinion**
    01:34:381 / 01:34:576 / 02:18:992 / 03:41:979 / 04:24:057 / 04:29:511 Edited everywhere too

[ Festival is far from over]
00:10:407 - Change to k , similar pitch to 00:10:106 Edited everywhere!
00:12:212 (51,52) - Since the vocal here is high, how about k to emphasize these vocal? Edited!
00:41:535 moves to 00:41:685 - I think that to follow the vocal here might be better. I really don't understand the note on 00:41:535 that which pitch it's follow. At least in my opinion, there shouldn't have a note on 00:41:535 Edited!
00:41:685 moves to 00:41:881 - In taiko , we can place a spinner after the pitch too if we have a note which it's follow that pitch. Edited!
00:56:102 (45,46) - Change to d , in order to emphasize the pitch like 00:56:297 Edited!
00:56:881 - Change to d , the pitch here seems not high enough compare to 00:57:076 / 00:57:174 Edited!
00:59:706 moves to 00:59:316 - Seems fitter and have more power to emphasize the finisher on 00:59:803
01:02:336 - Remove finisher here, even this pitch is dominate, but it isn't strong enough in my opinion. Finisher here was accidentally
01:05:063 - Here are only my opinion Looks really cool! Added!
01:06:427 - Don't have any pitch here , should delete. ;;w;; Edited!
01:07:401 / 01:08:180 / 01:08:959 - Change to d , let's have a look on 01:10:128 , it's similar pitch. Sure, I didn't talk about vocal. Change for the consistency of the pitch might be better in my opinion. uwu Edited!
01:12:758 - Delete , for the ease to emphasize 01:12:855 Here is important sounds, i think i don't need to delete it
01:12:855 - Sure, same pitch as 01:10:128. (I guess it's drum pitch) Change to d for the consistency of the map :3Edited!
01:29:024 - Change to d Edited!
01:29:219 - Change to k , seems fitter in my opinion. Edited!
02:21:427 - Change to d , similar pitch to 02:21:816 Edited!
02:23:570 - Change to k , the vocal here seems higher than 02:23:764 Edited!
02:42:758 - Change to k , a special pitch appears here. this part I completely remade, now there is no note on this place
03:43:342 - Delete , for the consistency as you've decide to use 5-notes pattern so far. (Usually, 6-notes pattern are not common to use.) Edited!
03:43:537 moves to 03:43:440 - For the note's position consistency on 03:44:219 Edited!
03:44:219 - Sure, change to d for the color consistency on 03:43:537 Edited!
04:53:375 - High pitch, might change to k Edited!
05:23:764 - Change to d , same reason as 02:21:427 Edited!

[ Storyboard]
My definition : I'll represent the circle like 01:44:803 as circle
Some strong pitch are not have circles , which I think that it'll be good to emphasize that pitch
Like 02:21:427 / 02:21:806 / 02:22:206 / 02:22:596 / 02:22:985 / 02:23:375 / 02:23:764 / 02:24:154 / 02:24:544 / 02:24:933 / 02:25:323 / 02:25:712 / 02:26:102 / 02:26:492 // 05:23:764 part this circles need to emphasize finishers, but at this moments i'll a other effects, but when i think up of something interesting

Wait, I'm not SB modder, lmao
It's been a long time that I haven't see a SB on taiko! Nice!!
So, take my star (/・ω・)/ Aww, thank you very much!
Good luck for ranking~ :D After your mod, i thoroughly revised my view on mapping and fully remade 02:46:362 - 02:52:596 and 04:57:466 - 05:05:063 parts and remade every pattern, now this looks better! Thanks!
Poii
i want to go to the festival


festival is not here
00:08:753 - make it kk, bcuz mostly u use that doublet for vocal
00:09:655 - to dk, same reason^
00:09:956 - kk ^
00:19:580 (90,91,92,93) - to kdkk ? it fit with drum flow, dkdk isnt good enough
00:41:234 - why not add k there ? i can hear sound there, also if you add k, add don 00:41:385 - for the flow
01:12:271 - how about ? k for snare don for tom/bass
01:18:505 - same as above^
01:25:031 (221,222,223,224) - its kkkd tho, :3 bcuz its have differ pitch
01:38:180 (305,306,307,308,309) - same like above, try kkkkd
01:40:128 - this one is don, and del this 01:40:225 -

overall your map is good but isnt good enough, why i can said that, bcuz some part need more consistency, sometime you use d for snare and use k for bass drum, some of your stream need to be fixed ? oh not fixed hmmm need more impruvment, but its already good tho like 01:48:505 - i like that part

sorry i do a shortmod, bcuz i cant pass this map xD that stream is demn
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

PoPoii wrote:

i want to go to the festival

General


This is not successful SB remake, maybe a bit later i'll use it

festival is not here
00:08:753 - make it kk, bcuz mostly u use that doublet for vocal oks before it a bit too
00:09:655 - to dk, same reason^ Ok!
[/color]00:09:956 - kk ^ Edited!
00:19:580 (90,91,92,93) - to kdkk ? it fit with drum flow, dkdk isnt good enough Ok
00:41:234 - why not add k there ? i can hear sound there, also if you add k, add don 00:41:385 - for the flow Oops, i forget note here :o
01:12:271 - how about ? k for snare don for tom/bass Looks better!
01:18:505 - same as above^ Edited!
01:25:031 (221,222,223,224) - its kkkd tho, :3 bcuz its have differ pitch Edited!
01:38:180 (305,306,307,308,309) - same like above, try kkkkd Looks cooll!
01:40:128 - this one is don, and del this 01:40:225 - Oops, my mistake, edited!

overall your map is good but isnt good enough, why i can said that, bcuz some part need more consistency, sometime you use d for snare and use k for bass drum, some of your stream need to be fixed ? oh not fixed hmmm need more impruvment, but its already good tho like 01:48:505 - i like that part Good reason to remap it again, haha :D

sorry i do a shortmod, bcuz i cant pass this map xD that stream is demn

Thanks for mod!
davidminh0111
Hello ASPIRIN, from my queue:
Thank you for M4M

[General]
OD/HP : 6/5

[Festival is far from over]
00:04:994: kk for high pitch

00:55:907: k to fit the pitch

00:58:635: dkd, you may use 50% speed to listen for the music pitch

01:23:277: Delete to emphasize at 01:23:375

01:33:894 to 01:35:842: Don't you see this part is boring

01:47:920 and 01:51:037: Change to k for consistency in 01:54:154 - 01:52:596

01:55:907: Change to d to emphasize the next k

05:24:154: How about kkd?

Good luck
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

davidminh0111 wrote:

Hello ASPIRIN, from my queue:
Thank you for M4M

[General]
OD/HP : 6/5 ok!

[Festival is far from over]
00:04:994: kk for high pitch No, dk better here i think, it emphasize pitch before it

00:55:907: k to fit the pitch ok!

00:58:635: dkd, you may use 50% speed to listen for the music pitch ok!

01:23:277: Delete to emphasize at 01:23:375 Good tip

01:33:894 to 01:35:842: Don't you see this part is boring ok, this part is remaped

01:47:920 and 01:51:037: Change to k for consistency in 01:54:154 - 01:52:596 hmm, somebody once told me "note between finisher with same color - unranked", so, i'll not edit momentz like this

01:55:907: Change to d to emphasize the next k ok!

05:24:154: How about kkd? Maybe you mean 05:25:518 (878,879,880) ? So, kkd here sounds better!

Good luck
Thank you very much!
Kith190
Hi, here for NM from my modding queue.
[Festival is far from over]
from here 01:37:790 - to 01:42:661 - there is quite a mess, 01:38:180 (308,309,310,311,312) - this sound is mapped differently from 01:38:959 (314,315,316,317,318) - and you placed some notes that to me are not so much "player friendly" like 01:38:862 - 01:40:420 - 01:41:979 -
In order to make hem more playable I would suggest you to move all of them of a 1/4 before but here is actually a sound so idk, check somehow
04:43:245 (588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597) - Here I hear something like dkddk twice
04:44:511 - this note is definitively a higher pitch than this one 04:44:414 - so I would place a k
04:51:232 - I hear this stream a bit different, ignore me if you don't agree:
04:51:719 - d , 04:52:109 (662,663) - control+g , 04:52:206 (663,664,665,666,667) - all the opposite, so dddkd
04:53:472 - maybe here is a d sound, not sure
same thing here 05:44:511 -
Nice consistency
Hope it was helpful! Good luck for ranking!
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Kith190 wrote:

Hi, here for NM from my modding queue.
[Festival is far from over]
from here 01:37:790 - to 01:42:661 - there is quite a mess, 01:38:180 (308,309,310,311,312) - this sound is mapped differently from 01:38:959 (314,315,316,317,318) - and you placed some notes that to me are not so much "player friendly" like 01:38:862 - 01:40:420 - 01:41:979 - i'll rework this moments, cuz it need reword
In order to make hem more playable I would suggest you to move all of them of a 1/4 before but here is actually a sound so idk, check somehow
04:43:245 (588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597) - Here I hear something like dkddk twice Ok
04:44:511 - this note is definitively a higher pitch than this one 04:44:414 - so I would place a k Ok, i made it like dkdkk
04:51:232 - I hear this stream a bit different, ignore me if you don't agree:
04:51:719 - d , 04:52:109 (662,663) - control+g , 04:52:206 (663,664,665,666,667) - all the opposite, so dddkd Now it sounds better!
04:53:472 - maybe here is a d sound, not sure Ok
same thing here 05:44:511 -Ok, i did it in same places after it
Nice consistency
Hope it was helpful! Good luck for ranking! Thank you very much! <3
Gemu-
Hi! ^w^

Request from Gemu's Taiko & Mania Queue (NM, M4M & GD)



d
k
D (Big d)
K (Big k)






  • HP: 6
  1. 00:05:144 (16) - Change to k, the voice have a hight tone, also sounds very good with this structure 00:01:986 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - for the low voices and notes 00:02:287 (2,3) - to increases here 00:04:091 (11,12,13,14,15,16) -
  2. 00:09:655 (39,40,41,42) - Change to d, and then change to k 00:11:911 (50,52) - to keep consistency with 00:01:986 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) -
  3. 00:53:570 (24) - Change to d flow much better the stream 00:53:472 (23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) -
  4. 00:57:953 (57,60) - Make Ctrl G flows much better the pitch.
  5. 01:22:693 (203) - Change to k sounds much better.
  6. 01:49:868 (398) - You forgot change to k to keep the sequence you have with the kats 01:48:699 (386,387,390,391,394,395) -
  7. 02:14:316 (563) - Change to k to variate bevause you have some kdd so a variation is much better for much fun.
  8. 02:18:310 (589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597,598,599,600) - This is a bit repetitive, add notes how you make here 02:15:388 (572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587) - I suggest you add a d 02:18:797 - and add a k 02:19:381 -
  9. 03:00:388 (863,864,865) - , 03:01:167 (868,869,870) - , 03:01:946 (873,874,875) - This is a bit repetitive do not you think? I recommend move 03:02:044 (874) - to 03:01:849 -
  10. 03:03:602 (886) - Change to k to variate a bit.
  11. 03:31:751 (110,111,112,113,114,115) - This would sound much better if you move this note 03:31:849 (111) - here 03:32:044 -
  12. 03:37:985 (153,154,155,156,157,158) - This part too for a similar consitency with the previous suggestion, move 03:37:693 (151) - to 03:37:888 -
  13. 03:40:712 (172,173,174,175,176,177,178) - Change to ddkkdddd sounds much better with the instrumental.
  14. 04:22:985 (457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,467,468) - You remember this part, right? is this same part 02:18:310 (589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597,598,599,600) - so to keep consistency in both parts please add a d 04:23:472 - and add a k 04:24:057 -
  15. 04:26:979 - , 04:27:174 - Add a k for variation and make much fun the map, because this is a bit repetitive 04:26:102 (477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485) -
  16. 04:28:921 - Add a d and add a k here 04:29:122 - for a similar reason and density with the previous suggestion.
  17. 04:42:758 - You forgot add a note, similar to 04:40:323 (566,567,568) - so please add a d and change to k to flow much better 04:42:709 (585) -
  18. 04:50:014 (642,643) - Same ^ (Just move 04:50:014 (642,643) - to 04:49:966 - and add a d 04:50:112 - )
  19. 05:20:648 (859,860,861,862,863,864,865,866,867,868,869,870) - You know what to do here right?
  20. 05:42:368 - Add a k and add a d 05:42:953 - sounds very nice and to increase the density a bit.

Amazing map! I hope my mod has been helpful :33, Good Luck!
Todotrucks
Hi~ :3 NM from here

SPOILER
d = small don
k = small kat
D =big don
K = big kat
^ = again

Festival is far from over
  • change 00:41:535 (153) - to k
    delete 00:41:687 (154) -
    move 00:41:881 (1) - to 00:41:687 and end it in 00:44:803
    change 00:53:375 (22) - to d
    change 00:54:057 (29) - to k
    change 00:54:154 (30) - to D
    change 00:54:349 (31,32) - to k
    01:01:167 (80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - here you can change 01:01:557 (84,85) - to d and 01:01:751 (86) - to k or just change 01:01:751 (86) - to k
    00:53:570 (24,25) - ctrl + g
    change 01:02:725 (93) - to d
    change 01:02:920 (94) - to k, 01:03:018 (95,96) - to d and 01:03:407 (99) - to d
    change 01:03:797 (102) - to k
    01:04:089 (104,106) - ctrl + g
    01:04:381 (107,108) - ^
    change 01:04:674 (110) - to d
    01:04:771 (111) - ^
    change 01:05:453 (118) - to k
    change 01:05:842 (122) - to d
    make 01:18:505 (168,169,170,171,172,173,174) - a kkdkkkd
    01:20:355 (184,187) - ctrl + g
    01:22:693 (203,206) - ^
    change 01:22:888 (205) - to k
    change 01:23:764 (212) - to d
    01:25:323 (226) - ^
    change 01:44:609 (359) - to d
    change 01:44:803 (360) - to K
    01:44:998 (361,364) - ctrl + g
    change 01:46:167 (369) - to d
    change 01:46:362 (370) - to K
    01:46:557 (371,372) - ctrl + g
    change 01:46:946 (374) - to k
    01:47:531 (378,379) - ctrl + g
    02:52:596 (808,809,810,811) - ^
    02:53:375 (813,814) - ^
    02:53:667 add d
    02:53:764 (816,818) - ctrl + g
    move 02:54:251 (820) - to 02:54:446
    02:54:544 (822,823) - ctrl + g
    move 02:54:836 (824) - to 02:55:420
    02:55:323 (829,830) - ctrl + g
    02:55:712 (831,832,833,834) - ^
    02:56:492 (836,837,839,840) - ^
    02:57:271 (841,843) - ^
    change 02:57:855 (846) - to k
    change 02:58:440 (849) - to D
    make 02:59:024 (852,853,854) - a kkd
    02:59:414 (855,857,859,861) - ctrl + g
    02:59:414 (855,857,859,861,863,864) - ^
    03:00:583 (866,867,868,869,871,872,873,874) - ^
    change 03:02:141 (876) - to k
    03:02:920 (882,884) - ctrl + g
    03:02:920 (882,884,885,886) - ^
    03:03:699 (888,889) - ^
    change 03:04:089 (890) - to k
    move 04:50:014 (642) - to 04:49:998 (1/6)
    change 05:04:089 (745) - to K
    delete 05:53:375 (1) -
    move 05:53:764 (1) - to 05:53:375 and make it end on 05:57:271

All of this are just suggestions, what you accept or reject is up to you. Good luck with ranking :D
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

game rock wrote:

Hi! ^w^

Request from Gemu's Taiko & Mania Queue (NM, M4M & GD)



d
k
D (Big d)
K (Big k)






  • HP: 6
  1. 00:05:144 (16) - Change to k, the voice have a hight tone, also sounds very good with this structure 00:01:986 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - for the low voices and notes 00:02:287 (2,3) - to increases here 00:04:091 (11,12,13,14,15,16) - Ok
  2. 00:09:655 (39,40,41,42) - Change to d, and then change to k 00:11:911 (50,52) - to keep consistency with 00:01:986 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) -
  3. 00:53:570 (24) - Change to d flow much better the stream 00:53:472 (23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) - Ok, but i think 00:10:106 (41) - is need to be k, cuz here other sound
  4. 00:57:953 (57,60) - Make Ctrl G flows much better the pitch. Ok
  5. 01:22:693 (203) - Change to k sounds much better. Ok
  6. 01:49:868 (398) - You forgot change to k to keep the sequence you have with the kats 01:48:699 (386,387,390,391,394,395) -Ok
  7. 02:14:316 (563) - Change to k to variate bevause you have some kdd so a variation is much better for much fun. Ok
  8. 02:18:310 (589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597,598,599,600) - This is a bit repetitive, add notes how you make here 02:15:388 (572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587) - I suggest you add a d 02:18:797 - and add a k 02:19:381 - Added
  9. 03:00:388 (863,864,865) - , 03:01:167 (868,869,870) - , 03:01:946 (873,874,875) - This is a bit repetitive do not you think? I recommend move 03:02:044 (874) - to 03:01:849 - Edited
  10. 03:03:602 (886) - Change to k to variate a bit. Ok
  11. 03:31:751 (110,111,112,113,114,115) - This would sound much better if you move this note 03:31:849 (111) - here 03:32:044 - Ok
  12. 03:37:985 (153,154,155,156,157,158) - This part too for a similar consitency with the previous suggestion, move 03:37:693 (151) - to 03:37:888 -Ok
  13. 03:40:712 (172,173,174,175,176,177,178) - Change to ddkkdddd sounds much better with the instrumental. Ok
  14. 04:22:985 (457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,467,468) - You remember this part, right? is this same part 02:18:310 (589,590,591,592,593,594,595,596,597,598,599,600) - so to keep consistency in both parts please add a d 04:23:472 - and add a k 04:24:057 - Ok
  15. 04:26:979 - , 04:27:174 - Add a k for variation and make much fun the map, because this is a bit repetitive 04:26:102 (477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485) - Ok
  16. 04:28:921 - Add a d and add a k here 04:29:122 - for a similar reason and density with the previous suggestion. Ok
  17. 04:42:758 - You forgot add a note, similar to 04:40:323 (566,567,568) - so please add a d and change to k to flow much better 04:42:709 (585) - Ok. But I thought that in this moment 2 1/8 notes!
  18. 04:50:014 (642,643) - Same ^ (Just move 04:50:014 (642,643) - to 04:49:966 - and add a d 04:50:112 - )Ok
  19. 05:20:648 (859,860,861,862,863,864,865,866,867,868,869,870) - You know what to do here right? Ok
  20. 05:42:368 - Add a k and add a d 05:42:953 - sounds very nice and to increase the density a bit.Ok

Amazing map! I hope my mod has been helpful :33, Good Luck!
Amazing mod! :D Thank you very much for help!
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Thousand wrote:

Hi~ :3 NM from here

SPOILER
d = small don
k = small kat
D =big don
K = big kat
^ = again

Festival is far from over
  • change 00:41:535 (153) - to k Ok
    delete 00:41:687 (154) - Ok
    move 00:41:881 (1) - to 00:41:687 and end it in 00:44:803 Ok
    change 00:53:375 (22) - to d No, cuz here is stream flow
    change 00:54:057 (29) - to k ^
    change 00:54:154 (30) - to D ^
    change 00:54:349 (31,32) - to k Ok
    01:01:167 (80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - here you can change 01:01:557 (84,85) - to d and 01:01:751 (86) - to k or just change 01:01:751 (86) - to k Ok
    00:53:570 (24,25) - ctrl + g previous mod - here is kk
    change 01:02:725 (93) - to d Ok
    change 01:02:920 (94) - to k, 01:03:018 (95,96) - to d and 01:03:407 (99) - to d Ok
    change 01:03:797 (102) - to k Ok
    01:04:089 (104,106) - ctrl + g Ok
    01:04:381 (107,108) - ^ Ok
    change 01:04:674 (110) - to d Ok
    01:04:771 (111) - ^ Ok
    change 01:05:453 (118) - to k Ok
    change 01:05:842 (122) - to d Ok. Now this stream sounds really cool!
    make 01:18:505 (168,169,170,171,172,173,174) - a kkdkkkd Ok
    01:20:355 (184,187) - ctrl + g Ok
    01:22:693 (203,206) - ^ - here is kk
    change 01:22:888 (205) - to k Ok
    change 01:23:764 (212) - to d Ok
    01:25:323 (226) - ^ Ok
    change 01:44:609 (359) - to d not really, here is d k d D#BFFF00]d[/color] k d D
    change 01:44:803 (360) - to K В becouse sound is clunk
    01:44:998 (361,364) - ctrl + g No. First triple is up for high pitch, second for pitch down
    change 01:46:167 (369) - to d not really, here is d k d D#BFFF00]d[/color] k d D
    change 01:46:362 (370) - to KВ becouse sound is clunk
    01:46:557 (371,372) - ctrl + g Ok, just for variate
    change 01:46:946 (374) - to k Ok
    01:47:531 (378,379) - ctrl + g Ok
    02:52:596 (808,809,810,811) - ^ Ok
    02:53:375 (813,814) - ^ Ok
    02:53:667 add d Ok
    02:53:764 (816,818) - ctrl + g Ok
    move 02:54:251 (820) - to 02:54:446 Ok
    02:54:544 (822,823) - ctrl + g Ok
    move 02:54:836 (824) - to 02:55:420 Ok
    02:55:323 (829,830) - ctrl + g Ok
    02:55:712 (831,832,833,834) - ^ Ok
    02:56:492 (836,837,839,840) - ^ Ok
    02:57:271 (841,843) - ^ Ok
    change 02:57:855 (846) - to k Ok
    change 02:58:440 (849) - to D unranked
    make 02:59:024 (852,853,854) - a kkd
    02:59:414 (855,857,859,861) - ctrl + g Ok
    02:59:414 (855,857,859,861,863,864) - ^ Ok
    03:00:583 (866,867,868,869,871,872,873,874) - ^ Ok
    change 03:02:141 (876) - to k Ok
    03:02:920 (882,884) - ctrl + g Ok
    03:02:920 (882,884,885,886) - ^ Ok
    03:03:699 (888,889) - ^ Ok
    change 03:04:089 (890) - to k Ok
    move 04:50:014 (642) - to 04:49:998 (1/6) Ok
    change 05:04:089 (745) - to K no, here is 2 clunk sounds
    delete 05:53:375 (1) - Ok
    move 05:53:764 (1) - to 05:53:375 and make it end on 05:57:271 Ok


All of this are just suggestions, what you accept or reject is up to you. Good luck with ranking :D
Thank you very much! <3
Akunosu
WOW, Your SBs are AWESOME!
Take two stars, you deserve it :3
rew0825
Hello from my modding queue!

Festival is far from over
  1. 00:52:985 (20) - Change to k? 00:52:596 (18,19,20,21) - The melody of this part is gradually increase. I think change that to k is look better.
  2. 00:54:057 (29) - Remove this note? When i intend to heard this. I unheard a melody here.
  3. 01:05:842 (122,123,124,125) - The melody on here is look similar all. I suggest change to d all.
  4. 01:13:635 (146,147,148,149,150) - How about change this to d k k k d? Look it's follow a melody better.
  5. 01:14:803 to 01:17:336 - I think your note on this is not follow a melody a bit. I suggest 01:15:583 (155,156) - change to k and 01:16:946 (162,163) - ctrl+g. Look it's better?
  6. 01:23:959 (213,214,215,216,217,218) - These notes the melody is similar like 01:23:570 (210,211,212) - . I suggest change 01:23:959 (213,214,215) - to kkd. and change 01:24:349 (216,217,218) - to kkd too.
  7. 01:29:803 (256,258) - Ctrl+g? Look it's follow a melody better.
  8. 01:56:394 (446) - Change to d? The sound is look similar like a before note.
  9. 02:24:154 (620) - Change to k? Look the vocal is high.
  10. 03:18:115 (20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27) - I suggest to change this to opposite color. It's similar like 01:13:635 (146,147,148,149,150) -
  11. 03:20:648 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36) - Same as above ^.
  12. 04:32:920 (524,525) - Ctrl+g? look (524) the sound is higher (525)
  13. 04:34:479 (533) - Change to k? The sound is look high.
  14. 04:38:959 (564,565) - Ctrl+g? look (564) the sound is higher (565)
  15. 04:39:738 (568) - Change to k? The sound is look high.
  16. 04:40:323 (572,573,574) - I think use 1/8 is look very sudden. Can you change to 1/6?
  17. 04:42:661 (590,591,592) - Same as above ^.

This is all from me. Good luck :) //Sorry look i mod this not as good as it should be because i'm so sleepy. T^T
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

rew0825 wrote:

Hello from my modding queue!

This is not extra Festival is far from over
  1. 00:52:985 (20) - Change to k? 00:52:596 (18,19,20,21) - The melody of this part is gradually increase. I think change that to k is look better.Not really, 18 and 20 are equal, but 21 is higher than 19 ... So d k d k is best pattern here
  2. 00:54:057 (29) - Remove this note? When i intend to heard this. I unheard a melody here. Yeap, you are right
  3. 01:05:842 (122,123,124,125) - The melody on here is look similar all. I suggest change to d all. Edited, but like ddkD, cuz finishers need note with other color before
  4. 01:13:635 (146,147,148,149,150) - How about change this to d k k k d? Look it's follow a melody better. Ok
  5. 01:14:803 to 01:17:336 - I think your note on this is not follow a melody a bit. I suggest 01:15:583 (155,156) - change to k and 01:16:946 (162,163) - ctrl+g. Look it's better? definitely better
  6. 01:23:959 (213,214,215,216,217,218) - These notes the melody is similar like 01:23:570 (210,211,212) - . I suggest change 01:23:959 (213,214,215) - to kkd. and change 01:24:349 (216,217,218) - to kkd too. ok
  7. 01:29:803 (256,258) - Ctrl+g? Look it's follow a melody better. Here is selected 2 katu notes... I changet it for ddkdk k (it was dddkk k)
  8. 01:56:394 (446) - Change to d? The sound is look similar like a before note. ok
  9. 02:24:154 (620) - Change to k? Look the vocal is high. ok
  10. 03:18:115 (20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27) - I suggest to change this to opposite color. It's similar like 01:13:635 (146,147,148,149,150) -
    ok
  11. 03:20:648 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36) - Same as above ^. ok
  12. 04:32:920 (524,525) - Ctrl+g? look (524) the sound is higher (525) ok
  13. 04:34:479 (533) - Change to k? The sound is look high. ok
  14. 04:38:959 (564,565) - Ctrl+g? look (564) the sound is higher (565)
  15. 04:39:738 (568) - Change to k? The sound is look high.
  16. 04:40:323 (572,573,574) - I think use 1/8 is look very sudden. Can you change to 1/6? wow, it looks better!
  17. 04:42:661 (590,591,592) - Same as above ^. ok changed, but i need to think about this moment, because here is not 4 1\3 notes...

This is all from me. Good luck :) //Sorry look i mod this not as good as it should be because i'm so sleepy. T^T
Thank you very much!
Marm
heya, mod from my queue.

festival
  1. 00:40:933 (148) - deleting this would flow better as ddkk is more common for 1/6 snappings.
  2. 00:41:687 - move slider beginning to here? The vocals are stronger here than on where it is right now.
  3. Also, new inherited timing point here is skipping 2ms, is that intentional? If not then fix it to be on 00:41:685. If it is then put a new inherited timing point here 00:41:629 - ommiting first bar line to avoid the double bars.
  4. 01:06:135 (132,133) - invert those colours as the finisher has a snare sound, more suitable for kat.
  5. 01:06:427 - don here would help the flow in the transition with 1/4 notes > 1/2 notes > 2/1 notes. The way it is right now (1/4 > 1/1 > 2/1) doesn't play so well. Also there's a nice drum sound there :p
  6. I think deleting 01:14:024 (155) - would be better here as it feels less over mapped and dk kd on calm parts usually fits very nice.
  7. 01:15:388 (161) - could remove too, this section feels too overmapped for the intensity of the song.
  8. 01:15:777 (163) - ^
  9. 01:16:557 (167) - ^. Consider checking the last 4 suggestions together before accepting or declining.
  10. 01:17:531 (172,173,174) - these should be dons as they are the same sound on 01:17:141 (170) - and on previous notes.
  11. 02:21:427 (621,622,623,624) - good place for finishers to go with the intensity on vocals.
  12. 02:27:661 (649) - finisher here doesn't fit well as the sound here is not too strong and there's a note of the same colour on the stream very close to it, making it hard to play.
  13. 02:36:362 (707) - this note is 1/4, not 1/6. Idk about the previous one though, seems like it is between 1/4 and 1/6 but 1/4 plays much better than 1/6 here, I'd go for that for consistency on the map. This one 02:36:946 (713,714) - is better as there's a break after it so the player can recover later, but 1/4 would still be better here.
  14. 02:52:596 (827) - again, weird place for finisher, end of stream with a note of the same colour near it. also it has no increased intensity compared to the other drum sounds on the white lines. 02:52:206 (823) - this would fit much better for a finisher if you removed the following note.
  15. 03:02:271 (897) - no reason for this 1/6 note as you didn't map any of the 1/6 drum sounds before it like 03:01:881 - or 03:02:076 - , this just breaks consistency and flow.
  16. 03:04:381 - don here before the finisher as you already have used many ddK or kkD over the map?
  17. 04:47:920 - the 1/6 used on this section makes much more sense imo as it gives emphasis on the guitar solo that's happening, however it's still ugly for the eyes to see :v
  18. I think the sv on this note 05:03:407 (770) - was supposed to be x0,66?
  19. 05:23:764 (914,915,916,917) - again, good place for finishers using the vocals intensity.
  20. Last thing, I think it's important to warn players somewhere (If it's not already) that the SB (finishers effect to be more precise) works only on 4:3 resoltion.

nice song and fun sb here, get some stars and be aware of the 1/6 consistency! Good luck o/
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Marm wrote:

heya, mod from my queue.

festival
  1. 00:40:933 (148) - deleting this would flow better as ddkk is more common for 1/6 snappings. ok
  2. 00:41:687 - move slider beginning to here? The vocals are stronger here than on where it is right now. This is unrankable, cuz overlap
  3. Also, new inherited timing point here is skipping 2ms, is that intentional? If not then fix it to be on 00:41:685. If it is then put a new inherited timing point here 00:41:629 - ommiting first bar line to avoid the double bars. That is intentional
  4. 01:06:135 (132,133) - invert those colours as the finisher has a snare sound, more suitable for kat. ok
  5. 01:06:427 - don here would help the flow in the transition with 1/4 notes > 1/2 notes > 2/1 notes. The way it is right now (1/4 > 1/1 > 2/1) doesn't play so well. Also there's a nice drum sound there :p ok
  6. I think deleting 01:14:024 (155) - would be better here as it feels less over mapped and dk kd on calm parts usually fits very nice.
  7. 01:15:388 (161) - could remove too, this section feels too overmapped for the intensity of the song.
  8. 01:15:777 (163) - ^
  9. 01:16:557 (167) - ^. Consider checking the last 4 suggestions together before accepting or declining. hmm, i'll think about this moment
  10. 01:17:531 (172,173,174) - these should be dons as they are the same sound on 01:17:141 (170) - and on previous notes. ok
  11. 02:21:427 (621,622,623,624) - good place for finishers to go with the intensity on vocals. ok
  12. 02:27:661 (649) - finisher here doesn't fit well as the sound here is not too strong and there's a note of the same colour on the stream very close to it, making it hard to play. ok. Just forgot to delete it
  13. 02:36:362 (707) - this note is 1/4, not 1/6. Idk about the previous one though, seems like it is between 1/4 and 1/6 but 1/4 plays much better than 1/6 here, I'd go for that for consistency on the map. This one 02:36:946 (713,714) - is better as there's a break after it so the player can recover later, but 1/4 would still be better here. ok
  14. 02:52:596 (827) - again, weird place for finisher, end of stream with a note of the same colour near it. also it has no increased intensity compared to the other drum sounds on the white lines. ok 02:52:206 (823) - this would fit much better for a finisher if you removed the following note. I hear stream here, so i cant
  15. 03:02:271 (897) - no reason for this 1/6 note as you didn't map any of the 1/6 drum sounds before it like 03:01:881 - or 03:02:076 - , this just breaks consistency and flow. ok
  16. 03:04:381 - don here before the finisher as you already have used many ddK or kkD over the map? ok
  17. 04:47:920 - the 1/6 used on this section makes much more sense imo as it gives emphasis on the guitar solo that's happening, however it's still ugly for the eyes to see :vok
  18. I think the sv on this note 05:03:407 (770) - was supposed to be x0,66?ok
  19. 05:23:764 (914,915,916,917) - again, good place for finishers using the vocals intensity. ok
  20. Last thing, I think it's important to warn players somewhere (If it's not already) that the SB (finishers effect to be more precise) works only on 4:3 resoltion. I want to rework this effect, so that it would look good on all types of monitors

nice song and fun sb here, get some stars and be aware of the 1/6 consistency! Good luck o/
Thank you very much! 1\6 was just test.
Faputa
From my Queue,
o/

[Storyboard]
⏩00:01:535 - Shouldn’t ‘さあ’ appear on this line instead of the next one?
⏩I think the light particles can be more at the upper section of the screen, close to the Japanese lyrics because I think the upper part seems kinda empty now.
⏩02:52:596 (828) - Remove the dark ring at the hit section because you don’t have a big note there now.
⏩05:23:764 (914,915,916,917) - 05:26:102 (923,924,925,926) - For tidiness I think you should add those black rings on these big notes.
⏩05:53:375 (125) - Just a suggestion, but you may let the sound spectrum at the below less sensitive to let the credit screen more static?

[General]
⏩Maybe capitalise the diffname from [Festival is far from over] to [Festival Is Far From Over]?
⏩Remove tags Diao ye zong 凋叶棕 since they already showed up at the metadata.
⏩Add tags めらみぽっぷ for the Japanese of meramipop,
Team Shanghai Alice Shanhai Arisu Gengakudan for both the official english name and the romanised form,
Touhou for relation to the source’s game’s theme,
めらみぽっぷ for the singer’s name that sings this song.

Here are the problems with SV I think you should definitely check them out:
⏩04:19:868 (444) - At least a gradual SV of 04:19:479 (440,441,442,443,444) - . Right now it is very unsatisfying visually and I would notice the (444) as not a ¼ following the previous 4 ¼ notes and combo-broke when testplaying. OR Make the SV line a ½ tick later just like 02:15:193 (580,581) - so that that confusion will not happen again ;)
⏩Starting from 05:00:583 (749,750,751,752,753,754,755,756,757,758,759,760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767,768,769,770,771) - I think the SV change is way too large that it makes it a sight-read of notes, and this kills many HD players as well :(

Here are the suggestions with SV that I think it may make the map more clean in SV
⏩04:06:622 (348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355,356) - Maybe a grudual increase in SV.


[Festival is far from over]
Generally I don’t really get why you usually use a Big note after streams or ¼ -ples. That would be a style, but I don’t think would be a good one.
⏩00:41:881 (1) - Why starting this spinner here? I believe there aren’t sounds at 00:41:881 - but instead you can follow the vocal at 00:41:687 - .
⏩01:05:842 (129,130,131,132) - For the k, there is the same sound with (130,131,132) so kddd here maybe questionable.
⏩01:08:570 (138) - This section which there’s k covering the drum sounds aren’t the best spots to put the ks I think.
⏩02:08:180 (530,531,532) - ddK K K feels uncomfortable when playing. I think d K K K would work better.
03:15:193 (8,9) - Ctrl+g this? again kdkd at least can make it sounds better.
⏩03:48:699 (235) - Remove this finisher? I think it would balance more since you don’t have finisher at 03:51:816 (254) - 03:53:375 (264) - 03:54:933 (279) - 03:56:492 (289) - ..
Be sure to change that storyboard settings as well ;)
⏩04:35:745 (552) - Remove this note? There isn’t piano sounds and I think it can let the player rest a bit to prepare for the next stream.
04:42:855 (606) - Remove this? The sound impart of that trill ends at 04:42:790 (605) - I think you can certainly have a dkd here instead of dkdk.


Really satisfying map to play and watch! Good luck on approval!! :)
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN
;)

Faputa wrote:

From my Queue,
o/

[Storyboard]
⏩00:01:535 - Shouldn’t ‘さあ’ appear on this line instead of the next one? Ok, i'll edit this moment
⏩I think the light particles can be more at the upper section of the screen, close to the Japanese lyrics because I think the upper part seems kinda empty now. Ok, i'll fix it.
⏩02:52:596 (828) - Remove the dark ring at the hit section because you don’t have a big note there now. When i updating the SB, these rings are automatically added or deleted. By the way, i have problems with displaying this effects on 4:3 monitors, so, i'll change it by other effect soon (I guess that these will be particles flying in all directions every finisher note, although you can suggest an idea for the better).
⏩05:23:764 (914,915,916,917) - 05:26:102 (923,924,925,926) - For tidiness I think you should add those black rings on these big notes.^

⏩05:53:375 (125) - Just a suggestion, but you may let the sound spectrum at the below less sensitive to let the credit screen more static?
Ok, i'll edit this moment

[General]
⏩Maybe capitalise the diffname from [Festival is far from over] to [Festival Is Far From Over]? On my opinion, first is looking better. Most likely because I'm just used to the old name.
⏩Remove tags Diao ye zong 凋叶棕 since they already showed up at the metadata.
⏩Add tags めらみぽっぷ for the Japanese of meramipop,
Team Shanghai Alice Shanhai Arisu Gengakudan for both the official english name and the romanised form,
Touhou for relation to the source’s game’s theme,
めらみぽっぷ for the singer’s name that sings this song.
if you are reading this now, please contact me in any way and tell me - did I put it right, because I did not fully understand where to put any points .... :?

Here are the problems with SV I think you should definitely check them out:
⏩04:19:868 (444) - At least a gradual SV of 04:19:479 (440,441,442,443,444) - . Right now it is very unsatisfying visually and I would notice the (444) as not a ¼ following the previous 4 ¼ notes and combo-broke when testplaying. OR Make the SV line a ½ tick later just like 02:15:193 (580,581) - so that that confusion will not happen again ;) Fixed, I forgot to fix this moment before
⏩Starting from 05:00:583 (749,750,751,752,753,754,755,756,757,758,759,760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767,768,769,770,771) - I think the SV change is way too large that it makes it a sight-read of notes, and this kills many HD players as well :( One way - i'll delete it
By the way, what's about 05:50:355 (94) - and next SVs?


Here are the suggestions with SV that I think it may make the map more clean in SV
⏩04:06:622 (348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355,356) - Maybe a grudual increase in SV. Cool idea!


[Festival is far from over]
Generally I don’t really get why you usually use a Big note after streams or ¼ -ples. That would be a style, but I don’t think would be a good one. Im trying to make finishers and next note is not same color, for comfortable playable
⏩00:41:881 (1) - Why starting this spinner here? I believe there aren’t sounds at 00:41:881 - but instead you can follow the vocal at 00:41:687 - . ok
⏩01:05:842 (129,130,131,132) - For the k, there is the same sound with (130,131,132) so kddd here maybe questionable. Hm, i hear it like kdkk
⏩01:08:570 (138) - This section which there’s k covering the drum sounds aren’t the best spots to put the ks I think. I mapped this part with vocal, cuz frum sounds is boring here
⏩02:08:180 (530,531,532) - ddK K K feels uncomfortable when playing. I think d K K K would work better. Ok, changed it and same
03:15:193 (8,9) - Ctrl+g this? again kdkd at least can make it sounds better. ok
⏩03:48:699 (235) - Remove this finisher? I think it would balance more since you don’t have finisher at 03:51:816 (254) - 03:53:375 (264) - 03:54:933 (279) - 03:56:492 (289) - .. ok
Be sure to change that storyboard settings as well ;) Sure 8-)
⏩04:35:745 (552) - Remove this note? There isn’t piano sounds and I think it can let the player rest a bit to prepare for the next stream. ok
⏩04:42:855 (606) - Remove this? The sound impart of that trill ends at 04:42:790 (605) - I think you can certainly have a dkd here instead of dkdk. ok


Really satisfying map to play and watch! Good luck on approval!! :)

Thank you very much! <3
tokiko
[Festival is far from over]
добавь слово "project" в теги
если сделать "Festival is Far from Over" или сделать заглавную букву маленькой, то будет эстетичнее, наверное
  1. 01:21:622 - эта пауза кажется такой неестественной
  2. 01:31:167 (274) - d будет лучше, потому что 01:31:037 (272) - здесь я не слышу ничего особенного для выделения
  3. 01:44:803 (370) - не знаю конечно, но раз ты поставил k 01:46:362 (380) - 01:47:920 (390) - тут и на других идентичных ударах, то лучше это сделать и там
  4. 02:08:959 (534) - финиш бы подошёл к таким штукам, в этом и других киаях тоже + 02:02:725 (492) - здесь же ты его ставишь
  5. 02:32:725 (682,684) - лучше k поставить, звук же одинаковый. 02:33:894 (688) - а тут k и с финишем можно
  6. 03:54:933 (279) - может d поставить? как тут 03:48:699 (235) - , если это сильно ничего ломать не будет конечно


тайко модинг такой трудный
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

tokiko wrote:

[Festival is far from over]
добавь слово "project" в теги
если сделать "Festival is Far from Over" или сделать заглавную букву маленькой, то будет эстетичнее, наверное
  1. 01:21:622 - эта пауза кажется такой неестественной всё хорошо, там просто звуков нет, так что нечего туда пихать считаю я
  2. 01:31:167 (274) - d будет лучше, потому что 01:31:037 (272) - здесь я не слышу ничего особенного для выделения О, вот и фолоу!
  3. 01:44:803 (370) - не знаю конечно, но раз ты поставил k 01:46:362 (380) - 01:47:920 (390) - тут и на других идентичных ударах, то лучше это сделать и там Оп, ты на 200% прав, я просто забыл там поставить кату
  4. 02:08:959 (534) - финиш бы подошёл к таким штукам, в этом и других киаях тоже + 02:02:725 (492) - здесь же ты его ставишь Тут скорее с второго надо убирать финишер, ибо ну не такой сильный звук как те K K K паттерны
  5. 02:32:725 (682,684) - лучше k поставить, звук же одинаковый. 02:33:894 (688) - а тут k и с финишем можно Чисто флоу, не могу ничего тут сделать
  6. 03:54:933 (279) - может d поставить? как тут 03:48:699 (235) - , если это сильно ничего ломать не будет конечно Первоё чёткий звук тарелок, второе звук что-то более басового, так что нет. Кстати, я убрал там финишеh, так что отчасти этот пункт был полезен :)


тайко модинг такой трудный
От души! Спасибо!
Protonori
From my modding queue~

[Festival is far from over]
00:19:881 (92) - d? It helps emphasize the finisher at 00:20:031 (93).

00:41:009 (148,149,150) - Delete. If you listen at 50% playback, the drums are 1/6, not 1/4. Replace with:
00:41:084 and 00:41:159 - Add d.

01:19:868 (188) - Change to d.
01:28:050 (251,252,253,254) - kdk d for consistency? You mapped 01:34:674 (298) with d.
01:43:829 (364,365,366) - ddK? You used K for every finisher in this section [excluding 01:44:024 and 01:44:803]
01:44:803 (370) - K? Same reason as above.
01:50:161 (411,412) - dK?

01:55:128 - This whole stream is a bit awkward to play imo. I'd suggest:
01:55:420 (447) - Change to k.
01:55:615 (449) - Change to d.
01:55:810 (451) - ^
01:55:907 (452) - Change to k.

Good luck with ranking this! :)
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Protonori wrote:

From my modding queue~

[Festival is far from over]
00:19:881 (92) - d? It helps emphasize the finisher at 00:20:031 (93). Ok

00:41:009 (148,149,150) - Delete. If you listen at 50% playback, the drums are 1/6, not 1/4. Replace with:
00:41:084 and 00:41:159 - Add d. I listened attentively to this moment and concluded that there is ddk

01:19:868 (188) - Change to d. Yeap
01:28:050 (251,252,253,254) - kdk d for consistency? You mapped 01:34:674 (298) with d. Ok
01:43:829 (364,365,366) - ddK? You used K for every finisher in this section [excluding 01:44:024 and 01:44:803] Ok
01:44:803 (370) - K? Same reason as above. Ok
01:50:161 (411,412) - dK? Ok

01:55:128 - This whole stream is a bit awkward to play imo. I'd suggest:
01:55:420 (447) - Change to k.
01:55:615 (449) - Change to d.
01:55:810 (451) - ^
01:55:907 (452) - Change to k.
I listened attentively to this moment and concluded that there is dkkddkkddkdkddk

Good luck with ranking this! :)
Thanks! ;)
Vulkin
i just tried to mod this, and osu! just went "nope" and erased my mod
so imma just shoot stars for ya :P
Cinnamon_54
Sorry for late D:

[General]
Diao Ye Zong
I think it's chinese name,so why dont you put capital letters on first word?

btw GOD SB wtf D:


[Storyboard]
00:01:535 - First lyric should put here,since the vocal start at that time

[Map]
00:01:535 - start here?reason same as storyboard
00:47:920 - I would put a stream here NVM
00:53:375 (22,23,24,25,26,27,28) - add some 1/6?There is instrument flow sound
01:05:940 - and 01:06:135 - change to k?Follow drums
01:08:570 - d,same sound and dont have any high pitch
01:10:907 - d, drum
01:15:583 - k,no drum sound
01:16:946 - ^
01:30:972 (270,271,272,273) - ddkk?kdkd didnt suit the sound effect
02:02:725 - preview point here?since there is the climax of the music
04:40:453 (583) - k
04:41:102 (589,590,591,592,593,594,595) - kdkdddk?



:thinking:
nice patterns,BN plz notice here \:D/
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Consified wrote:

Sorry for late D:

[General]
Diao Ye Zong Ye XD
I think it's chinese name,so why dont you put capital letters on first word?

btw GOD SB wtf D:
:D

[Storyboard]
00:01:535 - First lyric should put here,since the vocal start at that time Hmm... Maybe you have old sb version? Cuz lyrics start here already :roll:

[Map]
00:01:535 - start here?reason same as storyboard Hm, ok!
00:47:920 - I would put a stream here NVM I was thinking about it, but it will be longest stream in map, so... sounds good, but i care about difficulty
00:53:375 (22,23,24,25,26,27,28) - add some 1/6?There is instrument flow sound I afraid of 1/6 will break my map for DT players. in any case many of all 1/6 moments sounds like inaccuracy of playing a musical instrument. (2 exceptions is bookmarked in map)
01:05:940 - and 01:06:135 - change to k? Follow drums Here i mapped by drums pitch, so this notes has lower pitch than notes before and 01:06:232 (132) - is K so i cant to put k before
01:08:570 - d,same sound and dont have any high pitch Yeap, edited!
01:10:907 - d, drum Ok
01:15:583 - k,no drum sound Ok
01:16:946 - ^ Ok
01:30:972 (270,271,272,273) - ddkk?kdkd didnt suit the sound effect Ok!
02:02:725 - preview point here?since there is the climax of the music I like when preview point is in tranquil moments before something interesting, i think this is best moment for it. In any case i just accustomed to this part :lol:
04:40:453 (583) - k Ok, sounds good, but i afraid about feelings of this moment with DT
04:41:102 (589,590,591,592,593,594,595) - kdkdddk? Sounds good!


:thinking:
nice patterns,BN plz notice here \:D/
Thanks for mod! <3
Ulqui
Hi!

irc mod from queue :D

irc
13:55 ASPIRIN: Hi! I was waiting for you :D
13:56 Ulqui: yo
13:56 Ulqui: wait a sec
13:56 ASPIRIN: ok ;)
14:01 Ulqui: okay
14:01 Ulqui: i'll play ur map again
14:08 Ulqui: okay
14:09 ASPIRIN: I listen carefully to you
14:09 Ulqui: 00:01:535 - 00:20:031 - this part is ok
14:09 Ulqui: pretty well mapped
14:10 Ulqui: 00:20:933 - i don't know if sv change is a good idea here
14:11 ASPIRIN: i have question about SV in this part
14:11 Ulqui: kiai time 00:20:031 - here to 00:41:685 - here would be nice
14:12 ASPIRIN: Is this part has normal SV? it seems to me that it is too slow
14:12 Ulqui: normal sv es x1.00
14:13 Ulqui: the first part has x0.70 sv, its ok imo
14:13 Ulqui: 00:20:031 - here is the beggining of the second part okay?
14:13 ASPIRIN: ok
14:14 Ulqui: in the second part
14:14 Ulqui: do you want to keep the sv?
14:14 Ulqui: or just raise de velocity
14:15 ASPIRIN: what are you mean?
14:15 Ulqui: first part = x0.70 ----> second part = x0.85 (that's what you done)
14:15 ASPIRIN: you sad about sv from 00:20:933 (95) - and i deleted it, i made Kiai and up SV to 0.75 of all this section
14:16 Ulqui: okay
14:16 Ulqui: 00:20:031 - so here's the x0.75?
14:17 ASPIRIN: from 00:00:182 to 00:47:336 is x0.75
14:17 Ulqui: okayokay
14:17 Ulqui: so, why not
14:18 ASPIRIN: 00:20:031 (94) - here is just kiai start, like you said
14:18 Ulqui: 00:19:730 - x0.80, 00:19:881 - x0.85 and 00:20:031 - x0.90 (?
14:19 ASPIRIN: like gradual rise?
14:19 Ulqui: yes
14:20 ASPIRIN: one mapper said me about sv changes - it can be hard for HD players
14:20 Ulqui: i'm hd player, and that gradual rise is readable
14:21 Ulqui: and sv x0.75 is slow itself, so pls don't kill us Dx
14:21 Ulqui: also you can make a difference between part 1 and part 2 with that sv
14:21 Ulqui: also seems pretty good with kiai
14:21 Ulqui: imo
14:21 ASPIRIN: so, your idea with 0.80, 0.85 and 0.90 is looks strange
14:22 Ulqui: :thinking
14:22 Ulqui: :
14:22 ASPIRIN: Ok, i'll work with SV a bit later
14:23 Ulqui: oh you're right
14:23 Ulqui: seems strange
14:23 Ulqui: x0.05 --> x0.05 is too fast
14:24 Ulqui: but okay, sv latter
14:24 Ulqui: later*
14:24 ASPIRIN: maybe i can make gradual rise with 0.02 steps in all 00:19:580 (91,92,93,94) - notes here?
14:24 Ulqui: ye
14:24 ASPIRIN: Just say me comfortable sv in this moment, i'll remember that
14:25 ASPIRIN: 0.85 is ok? or 0.90?
14:25 Ulqui: up to you
14:26 Ulqui: 00:58:245 (63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73) - this stream es kinda weird
14:26 Ulqui: 00:58:829 - why not remove that?
14:27 ASPIRIN: i changer it for kdddkkddkkd
14:27 ASPIRIN: changed*
14:27 Ulqui: oh, nice
14:28 ASPIRIN: ok, good
14:28 Ulqui: 01:03:407 -i dont like that d, the stream feels better without it
14:30 ASPIRIN: You mean just delete the note?
14:30 Ulqui: yes
14:30 ASPIRIN: Oh, yeah, this was overmapped note, i dont hear sound here
14:30 Ulqui: 01:04:089 (109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131) - hmmmm
14:31 Ulqui: 01:04:381 - 01:04:771 - delete cuz overmapped i think
14:32 Ulqui: 01:05:745 - ^
14:32 ASPIRIN: wait a sec, i'll listen this stream attentively
14:33 ASPIRIN: i was changed it for kdk kddkkdddkkddddkdddkdkdK
14:34 ASPIRIN: 01:04:381 - i cant delete this note, cuz i hear sound here
14:35 ASPIRIN: 01:04:771 - deleted
14:35 ASPIRIN: 01:05:745 - ok, deleted too
14:35 Ulqui: 01:05:842 (125,126,127,128,129) - that stream
14:35 Ulqui: ddddK(?
14:36 ASPIRIN: 01:06:232 (129,130,131) - i want to ask about this notes - is it comfortable?
14:36 Ulqui: no problem with them
14:37 ASPIRIN: 01:05:842 (125,127) - i think this notes is k cuz pitch is higher than next notes
14:37 Ulqui: oh, thats because instrument
14:38 Ulqui: in my opinion the drums are more intense, but you're free to follow instrument too
14:40 Ulqui: 01:12:271 - dkddkkd(? just a suggestion
14:40 ASPIRIN: in 100% listening i hear only drums, so ddddK is ok here
14:40 Ulqui: 01:08:959 - that note sounds like d
14:41 ASPIRIN: Yeap, i accept your suggestion
14:41 ASPIRIN: Ok
14:41 Ulqui: 01:08:180 - and that should be k, because piano sound ---> 01:09:738 - that you are following here
14:41 ASPIRIN: 01:08:180 (133) - what are you thinking about k here?
14:41 Ulqui: Y E S
14:42 ASPIRIN: I was faster :)
14:42 Ulqui: :^)
14:43 Ulqui: 01:21:037 - why not kdkkd? like 01:19:479 - that????
14:43 ASPIRIN: 01:15:972 (161) - about this note - if i'll change it for k it will be boring, right?
14:43 Ulqui: yeah
14:43 Ulqui: just keep it
14:44 ASPIRIN: ok, changed
14:44 Ulqui: 01:20:063 - change to d
14:44 ASPIRIN: ok
14:45 Ulqui: 01:23:959 (218,219,220) - kkd would be nice, cuz they're similar to 01:23:570 (215,216,217) - that
14:46 Ulqui: 01:24:349 (221,222,223) - this is also similar but not THAT simiar, so kdk(?
14:47 Ulqui: 01:22:596 (206,207,208,209,210) - change that stream to kdkkd(?
14:47 ASPIRIN: 01:24:349 (220,221,222) - i'll change it for kdk
14:48 Ulqui: kay
14:48 ASPIRIN: ok
14:49 Ulqui: 01:28:050 - d?
14:49 ASPIRIN: yeap
14:50 Ulqui: 01:30:193 - 01:30:583 - 01:31:362 - why not delete that notes?? i think it feels better
14:50 Ulqui: 01:30:972 (266,267,268,269) - also why is this 1/6?
14:51 ASPIRIN: i cant delete notes here, cuz i hear sounds here
14:52 Ulqui: kay
14:52 Ulqui: 01:42:855 - change to d
14:52 ASPIRIN: 01:30:972 (267,268,269,270) - about this moment - i just dond know how to make it different
14:52 ASPIRIN: ok
14:53 Ulqui: wot about removing 1/6 and 01:31:167 - K
14:54 ASPIRIN: You mean ddK?
14:54 Ulqui: no, just d K
14:54 Ulqui: but ddK is fine
14:55 Ulqui: OH
14:55 Ulqui: slider velocity is 1,45
14:55 Ulqui: change to 1,40
14:56 ASPIRIN: stop, this wierd sound is in 01:31:102 - and this is 1/6
14:56 ASPIRIN: oh, ok
14:56 Ulqui: Dx
14:57 Ulqui: 01:48:797 - delete, i think its overmapped
14:57 ASPIRIN: Yeap, you right
14:58 Ulqui: change kiai time to 02:02:725 - here
14:59 ASPIRIN: 02:02:725 (485,486) - two SV points in kiai - osu AI mod will kill me
14:59 ASPIRIN: (i mean at same time)
15:00 Ulqui: 02:02:920 - just remove this
15:01 Ulqui: 02:15:096 (571,572) - swap?
15:01 ASPIRIN: ok, changed
15:02 ASPIRIN: ok
15:02 Ulqui: 02:21:816 (615,616,617,618) - hmmmm, change to big notes(?
15:03 Ulqui: and do the same with similars
15:04 ASPIRIN: no, you can notice that with each kiai this part becomes another, at first here just notes, then there are more sounds, and for the third time there are already finishers
15:04 Ulqui: okay
15:04 Ulqui: 02:40:128 (728,729,730,731,732,733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748,749,750,751,752,753,754,755,756,757,758,759,760,761,762,763,764,765,766,767,768,769,770,771,772,773,774,775) -
15:04 ASPIRIN: but if this idea is bad, i can change to finishers as you said
15:04 Ulqui: isn't that part overmapped?
15:06 ASPIRIN: I need to remap it?
15:06 Ulqui: i hear sound
15:06 ASPIRIN: cuz this part is overmaped, yeah
15:06 Ulqui: but
15:06 Ulqui: not too loud
15:06 Ulqui: for mapping
15:06 Ulqui: but re map is a nice idea
15:07 ASPIRIN: ok
15:07 Ulqui: why not 02:40:128 - low sv part and 02:52:596 - back to normal sv
15:07 ASPIRIN: 02:46:751 (1) - since here is ok?
15:07 Ulqui: hmm
15:08 ASPIRIN: ok, o can change it
15:08 Ulqui: slow part can be a "rest" for players
15:08 Ulqui: after kiai
15:08 Ulqui: 02:54:154 - sounds like d
15:09 ASPIRIN: ok
15:09 Ulqui: 02:54:933 - ^
15:09 Ulqui: 02:55:518 - and that is k ;-;
15:09 ASPIRIN: Yeap
15:09 Ulqui: change stream to dkdkddk(?
15:10 ASPIRIN: 02:55:420 (64,65) - can i swap this notes?
15:10 Ulqui: if you want
15:10 Ulqui: 03:00:388 - d
15:11 Ulqui: 03:01:362 (880,881,882,883,884) - think about that 5plet
15:11 ASPIRIN: i think here is ddkkddk
15:11 ASPIRIN: ok, yeap
15:11 Ulqui: kdkdk is a weird pattern and is used when music sounds exactly like that
15:12 ASPIRIN: kdddk?
15:12 Ulqui: sounds cool
15:12 ASPIRIN: Ok
15:13 Ulqui: 03:12:855 (3,4,5) - k d d, like the other
15:13 Ulqui: 03:11:297 (1,2) - swap or just change both to d
15:14 Ulqui: 03:18:115 (20,21) - swap those too(?
15:14 Ulqui: 03:18:894 (24,25) - ^
15:14 ASPIRIN: ok,ok and ok
15:14 Ulqui: 03:19:479 (26,27) - change to d uwu
15:14 ASPIRIN: ok
15:15 Ulqui: 03:21:622 - k would be nice
15:15 ASPIRIN: what are you thinking about K here? 03:11:297 (1) -
15:15 Ulqui: no problem
15:15 Ulqui: cuz crash sound
15:16 ASPIRIN: Yeah, ok, everything is accepted ;)
15:16 ASPIRIN: 03:20:648 (30) - i changed it for k, cuz here is no drum sound
15:16 Ulqui: okay
15:17 Ulqui: 03:38:375 (155) - k?
15:17 Ulqui: 03:44:414 (199,200,201,202,203) - think about that pattern
15:17 ASPIRIN: kkd?
15:17 Ulqui: kay
15:18 ASPIRIN: Changed :)
15:18 Ulqui: 03:41:589 - add a note here(?
15:19 ASPIRIN: no, i dont hear any sound
15:19 Ulqui: okay
15:20 Ulqui: 03:57:855 - i hear hi hat, so k?
15:20 Ulqui: 03:58:245 - d?
15:20 Ulqui: ^because no hi hat sound
15:21 ASPIRIN: stop
15:21 ASPIRIN: i hear
15:21 ASPIRIN: i hear here ddk
15:21 ASPIRIN: ok
15:21 ASPIRIN: 03:59:024 (305,306,307,308,309,310) - kdk kdd?
15:21 Ulqui: 03:59:024 (302,303,304) - hmmmmmmm
15:22 Ulqui: kdk kdd is good
15:22 ASPIRIN: ok
15:23 Ulqui: 03:59:803 - 03:59:901 - 03:59:998 - kdd?????
15:24 ASPIRIN: ddk
15:24 Ulqui: okay
15:24 Ulqui: 04:07:011 - this sv is unsnapped
15:24 Ulqui: adjust it pls
15:25 Ulqui: 04:07:206 - same here
15:25 Ulqui: 04:07:303 - ^
15:25 ASPIRIN: how to snap SV?
15:25 Ulqui: just press Use in current time in timing setup panel
15:26 Ulqui: is just 1 offset but makes the difference
15:26 ASPIRIN: ok
15:26 Ulqui: 04:07:401 - kiai
15:26 ASPIRIN: yeap, thanks
15:26 Ulqui: 04:07:596 - and rip this, like the other part
15:27 Ulqui: 04:14:219 (402,403,404) - hmmm, that ddk is weird
15:27 Ulqui: 04:07:985 (358,359,360) - ^
15:27 ASPIRIN: 04:14:219 (405,406,407) - kdk?
15:28 Ulqui: kay
15:28 ASPIRIN: Ok
15:28 Ulqui: 04:19:771 - 04:19:868 - swap
15:28 Ulqui: 04:22:401 - why not kdddk?
15:29 ASPIRIN: Oh, ok
15:29 Ulqui: 04:23:959 - and this........
15:29 ASPIRIN: Oops uwu
15:29 ASPIRIN: 04:23:959 - here is kdddk
15:29 Ulqui: 04:22:401 - dkddk?
15:30 Ulqui: 04:25:712 - that sounds like k
15:30 Ulqui: 04:25:518 - and i hear nothing here
15:31 Ulqui: 04:33:310 - kkddk?
15:32 ASPIRIN: kkddk, ok, oh me too i'll delete it,ok
15:32 Ulqui: 04:38:764 (570,571,572,573,574,575) - HM
15:33 Ulqui: not following drum?
15:35 ASPIRIN: d k k k kdd
15:35 ASPIRIN: i thing my version is not good
15:35 Ulqui: DDDx
15:35 Ulqui: update it
15:35 Ulqui: please
15:35 ASPIRIN: d k k d, yeah
15:36 ASPIRIN: ok, wait a sec
15:37 ASPIRIN: updated
15:39 Ulqui: 04:42:076 (599,600) - swap?
15:40 ASPIRIN: ok
15:40 Ulqui: 04:47:336 (639,640,641,642,643,644,645) - that pattern
15:41 ASPIRIN: i hear it like kkdkdkd :'(
15:42 Ulqui: fine
15:42 ASPIRIN: ok
15:43 Ulqui: 04:59:609 - ddk? 04:59:998 - k?
15:43 Ulqui: 05:02:725 - same here
15:44 Ulqui: 05:03:310 - ^
15:44 ASPIRIN: 05:04:089 (770,771) - to K?
15:44 ASPIRIN: Ok
15:44 Ulqui: yes
15:45 Ulqui: 05:17:725 - why not some overmap here?
15:46 Ulqui: like
15:46 Ulqui: 05:19:576 - add note
15:46 Ulqui: 05:19:966 - add k
15:46 Ulqui: 05:21:524 - add note
15:46 Ulqui: 05:22:498 - add k
15:47 ASPIRIN: Ok
15:48 Ulqui: 05:49:479 (86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125) -
15:48 Ulqui: hmm
15:50 ASPIRIN: What's wrong with it?
15:51 Ulqui: 05:51:914 - 05:52:011 - swap?
15:51 ASPIRIN: imp this is nice end, sounds cool maybe...
15:51 Ulqui: 05:50:453 - i dont hear sound
15:52 Ulqui: forget the swap thing
15:53 ASPIRIN: yeap, i was changet it for kkkdk
15:53 Ulqui: perfect
15:53 ASPIRIN: Ok
15:54 Ulqui: that's it
15:54 ASPIRIN: i dont hear anything form 05:50:258 - to 05:50:453 -
15:55 ASPIRIN: from*
15:55 Ulqui: 05:50:355 - i hear k here
15:56 ASPIRIN: ok
15:56 Ulqui: 02:46:362 - 02:52:206 - hmm...
15:57 ASPIRIN: Deleted, i'll remap it
15:57 Ulqui: okay
15:57 Ulqui: good luck o nit
15:57 Ulqui: on it*
15:57 ASPIRIN: Thanks! <3

suggested some patterns, few notes and fixed kiai times
Lasse
do you really think hp6 is necessary on such a long map at this difficulty level? 5 seems like a nicer choice

i think in some parts your patterning becomes a bit too monotonous, like in this part 00:55:323 - basically the streams are kkdd/ddkk
could use more more variety, for example why not make 00:56:492 - into something like https://i.imgur.com/6BU89dC.jpg ?
I think that would fit nicely since it switches back to the high pitched instrument on 00:56:881 -
01:00:388 - this part seems more engaging patterning wise

parts like 01:56:881 - and 04:01:557 - could utilize a bit lower sv to get a nice contrast with the more intense ones

01:14:803 - this doesn't fit the intensity of this part very well since you suddenly map it so much more dense. also makes it really unclear what you want to follow since it mixes piano, vocals and drums
=> 01:15:388 - 01:16:946 (165) - deleting these two would make it more fitting density wise and be emphasize vocals a bit

01:24:349 (220,221) - think this would work better as dd since then you get a change in patterning to match instruments and vocal phrase better
01:30:193 (263,265) - removing these would work really well with the sudden really pronounced 1/1 emphasis in the song + drums are only 1/1 too, only 1/2 is the hihat
01:31:362 (271) - could be removed for similar reasoning, gives the start of the next part also much more impact
01:36:232 - similar 1/1 suggestion here as 1:30

chorus could use a little more 1/4 stuff since it seems a bit lacking compared to the verse
for example 02:07:790 (522,523,524,525) - could be ddkkd instead
similar for chorus 2 (also toning down the other parts slightly, like a few points here suggest, might help too)
third seems nicer since you mapped it way more dense


02:21:816 (617,618,619,620) - these would be great if you added finish, same for when it happens again right after
just like you did on 05:24:154 - which is basically the same thing
02:42:271 (743) - think this could be deleted to match the overall lower intensity of this part since it's only mapped to really quiet background drums that you skipped a lot
02:43:245 (747,748,749,750,751,752,753) - combining white and red tick triple in the same pattern when nothing in the song suggests it feels really awkward, how a bout just deleting 02:43:342 (748) - ?

03:34:674 (131,132,133,134,135) - same 1/1 thing as before since it's a repeating part, other stuff mentioned before will apply here too
04:41:199 (592) - deleting this would emphasize the piano you follow before and after much better
04:41:687 (597,598,599,600) - could be kddk instead to follow the switch from piano to only drums on 04:41:881 (598,599) - since it seems you tried to follow piano with kat things before
04:49:868 (660) - whole streams seems to ignore blue tick emphasis of the guitar which is sad, how about a rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/2dHvo5f.jpg ?
04:57:953 - could be mapped since it's basically continuous guitar spam here
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Lasse wrote:

do you really think hp6 is necessary on such a long map at this difficulty level? 5 seems like a nicer choice Ok

i think in some parts your patterning becomes a bit too monotonous, like in this part 00:55:323 - basically the streams are kkdd/ddkk
could use more more variety, for example why not make 00:56:492 - into something like https://i.imgur.com/6BU89dC.jpg ?
I think that would fit nicely since it switches back to the high pitched instrument on 00:56:881 -
01:00:388 - this part seems more engaging patterning wise Ok. But i think this pattern is ddkdkdkkd

parts like 01:56:881 - and 04:01:557 - could utilize a bit lower sv to get a nice contrast with the more intense ones Sure, i'll think up something interesting

01:14:803 - this doesn't fit the intensity of this part very well since you suddenly map it so much more dense. also makes it really unclear what you want to follow since it mixes piano, vocals and drums
=> 01:15:388 - 01:16:946 (165) - deleting these two would make it more fitting density wise and be emphasize vocals a bit yeap, you are right

01:24:349 (220,221) - think this would work better as dd since then you get a change in patterning to match instruments and vocal phrase better no because 01:24:349 has a higher pitch than next note
01:30:193 (263,265) - removing these would work really well with the sudden really pronounced 1/1 emphasis in the song + drums are only 1/1 too, only 1/2 is the hihat oh, sounds good
01:31:362 (271) - could be removed for similar reasoning, gives the start of the next part also much more impact ok
01:36:232 - similar 1/1 suggestion here as 1:30 ok

chorus could use a little more 1/4 stuff since it seems a bit lacking compared to the verse
for example 02:07:790 (522,523,524,525) - could be ddkkd instead
similar for chorus 2 (also toning down the other parts slightly, like a few points here suggest, might help too)
third seems nicer since you mapped it way more dense


02:21:816 (617,618,619,620) - these would be great if you added finish, same for when it happens again right after
just like you did on 05:24:154 - which is basically the same thing you can notice that with each kiai this part becomes another, at first here just notes, then there are more sounds, and for the third time there are already finishers. Well, a lot of people tell me about it, so I'll make finishers here.
02:42:271 (743) - think this could be deleted to match the overall lower intensity of this part since it's only mapped to really quiet background drums that you skipped a lot ok
02:43:245 (747,748,749,750,751,752,753) - combining white and red tick triple in the same pattern when nothing in the song suggests it feels really awkward, how a bout just deleting 02:43:342 (748) - ? ok

03:34:674 (131,132,133,134,135) - same 1/1 thing as before since it's a repeating part, other stuff mentioned before will apply here too ok
04:41:199 (592) - deleting this would emphasize the piano you follow before and after much better ok
04:41:687 (597,598,599,600) - could be kddk instead to follow the switch from piano to only drums on 04:41:881 (598,599) - since it seems you tried to follow piano with kat things before ok
04:49:868 (660) - whole streams seems to ignore blue tick emphasis of the guitar which is sad, how about a rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/2dHvo5f.jpg ? In editor is sounds strange, but in game is ok
04:57:953 - could be mapped since it's basically continuous guitar spam here ok
Thanks for mod! <3
Smallwu
Hii from queue
[General]
  1. Diff name: How about Festival is Far from Over?
  2. Everything Perfect. But there's one thing to tell you that I guess the pic was already removed by the painter. (reason)
[Festival is far from over]
  1. 00:53:959 (28) - kat to follow the instrument, it's from low to high. (Sounds like lute but I don't know.)
  2. 01:02:336 (95) - kat to follow the instrument. The others are already kat, so follow it is a better choice imo.
  3. 01:12:271 (143) - kat to follow drum, and keep consistency. [01:18:505 - 03:16:946 - 03:23:180]
  4. 03:15:972 (10,11,12) - k k d if you follow vocal.
  5. 03:34:479 - I think here can add a kat to follow cymbal? kat won't decline the vocals' existence feeling. and You also add it at 01:29:803.
  6. 03:42:271 (181,182) - Maybe you can remove these ones. The main reason is the part is too long if you don't give a breaktime.
  7. 03:51:816 (250) - Why here is KAT ?W?
  8. 04:06:232 (345,346) - How about d d? To follow vocal pitches, they sound from high to low. (Tho k k is also good.)
  9. 04:25:615 (485,486,487,488,489,490) - kddddd or kdddkd, the last 5 notes sound like drums imo, so use ddddd. (k cuz read easily)
  10. 04:41:492 (596) - kat if you follow piano.
Nice song and nice map, good luck with rank!
thanks for Eng subtitle btw
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

Smallwu wrote:

Hii from queue
[General]
  1. Diff name: How about Festival is Far from Over? I do not know, I'm used to the name that I have now. I just do not like the way it looks ...
  2. Everything Perfect. But there's one thing to tell you that I guess the pic was already removed by the painter. (reason) I cant read it :roll:
[Festival is far from over]
  1. 00:53:959 (28) - kat to follow the instrument, it's from low to high. (Sounds like lute but I don't know.) Ok
  2. 01:02:336 (95) - kat to follow the instrument. The others are already kat, so follow it is a better choice imo. Ok
  3. 01:12:271 (143) - kat to follow drum, and keep consistency. [01:18:505 - 03:16:946 - 03:23:180] Yeap, it was little misstake
  4. 03:15:972 (10,11,12) - k k d if you follow vocal. I think no, cuz here is k k k
  5. 03:34:479 - I think here can add a kat to follow cymbal? kat won't decline the vocals' existence feeling. and You also add it at 01:29:803. it's made for vocal singing, so I do not know, d k d k looks boring
  6. 03:42:271 (181,182) - Maybe you can remove these ones. The main reason is the part is too long if you don't give a breaktime. If you mean about triple - this triple is unnecessary.
  7. 03:51:816 (250) - Why here is KAT ?W? woops, edited
  8. 04:06:232 (345,346) - How about d d? To follow vocal pitches, they sound from high to low. (Tho k k is also good.) Yeap, you are right, here is d d
  9. 04:25:615 (485,486,487,488,489,490) - kddddd or kdddkd, the last 5 notes sound like drums imo, so use ddddd. (k cuz read easily) here is long stream, it is dkkdkkkkd
  10. 04:41:492 (596) - kat if you follow piano. sure
Nice song and nice map, good luck with rank!
thanks for Eng subtitle btw I'm glad you liked it.

Thank you very much! <3
whosthebox
Hello there! I'm here for the M4M request!

Festival is far from over
most of these are suggestions, don't feel forced to change them ~

00:21:836 (96) - change this one to K, or change 00:22:287 (97,98) - this two to D, the sound is the same in those three beats, they should be mapped the same, you mapped it as a K 00:27:249 (114) - here.
00:23:640 (104) - change this to K? the intensity of that part reaches it's peak right there.
00:26:648 (109,110,111,112,113,114) - this part is exactly the same as 00:23:039 (99,100,101,102,103,104) - this one, why did you change the mapping that much? try doing something a bit more similar, at least.
00:32:663 (134,135,136) - same as above, same sound, make them either D D D or K K K. Since you seem to be following the vocals in this part, the proper mapping would be D K K.
00:36:272 (148,149,150) - again, same sound, i suggest K K K here or K K D if you want to follow the vocals.
00:50:648 (13) - change this to k, it's pitch is way higher than the k 00:50:453 (12) - here. yet you mapped this as a d.
00:53:472 (23,24) - ctrl+g here, you mapped the instrument 00:53:570 (24) - here almost everytime with a k, why ignore it here when it's both clearly audible and has a higher pitch than the note 00:53:472 (23) - here?
00:55:712 (42) - this one is clearly a k.
00:56:492 (48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56) - this stream should finish with a k, intensity reaches it's peak there. I suggest you to do something like ddkdkkddk, but feel free to change it as you wish, as long as it has a k as it's last note.
01:05:648 (124) - this is a k too, it's also the same sound as 01:05:258 (120) - here, and you did map that one as a k.
01:12:563 (146) - k too.
01:21:622 - add a k here, there's a CLEARLY audible sound, also, considering how you mapped everything else in that part, it does not play very nice.
01:23:667 (213) - i think this one should be a d.
01:45:485 (366,367) - ctrl+g these two, 01:45:583 (367) - this one has a higher pitch than 01:45:485 (366) - this one, you also mapped it as k both 01:47:141 (377) - here and 01:48:699 (387) - here.
01:51:719 (411,412) - same as above
01:59:998 (464) - this one should be a k, the vocal and the instrumental are the same as 01:59:609 (463) - here.
02:02:433 (479) - i can't hear any sound worth this note, you might be mapping the cymbal from the previous note, but it's already mapped here. I suggest you to remove this note and change 02:02:336 (478) - this one to a K.
02:14:316 (570,571) - ctrl+g again, same stuff as mentioned before.
02:21:427 (620) - this and 02:21:816 (621) - this, both should be D, you seem to be following the vocals in this part, and the vocals in those two notes are exactly the same.
02:29:609 (661,662,663,664,665) - ctrl+g this one, it sounds and follows the instrumental here a lot better imo.
02:31:946 (677) - k here?
02:32:531 (680) - , 02:32:920 (682) - you mapped both this sounds as k and 02:32:725 (681) - this one as d everywhere before this, why change it here? Keep the mapping the same, or, if you want to keep 02:32:725 (681) - this one as a k, you should still change this 02:32:725 (681) - and 02:32:920 (682) - this to k.
02:34:966 (694,695) - ctrl+g sounds a lot better imo.
02:35:745 (700,701) - same as above, ctrl+g, you also mapped 02:35:258 (697) - this one as a k, and the same sound 02:35:842 (701) - here is mapped as k.
02:36:232 (704) - again, the same sound as before, this one should be a k.
02:36:622 (708) - k here too, clearly audible.
03:15:972 (10) - this one should be a k, higher pitch than the rest of the notes, you also mapped the same sound as a k 03:14:414 (6) - here.
03:48:699 (232) - this one is a k, either make it a k, or ctrl+g 03:48:602 (231,232) - these two if you want to emphasize the last one.
03:50:161 (241,242) - ctrl+g this one, i mentioned this several times before.
03:56:394 (285,286) - same as above.
03:59:609 (306) - k here, same reason as above.
04:04:284 (335,336) - i mentioned this before, both instrumental and vocals (mainly the vocals) here sound the same, both should be k.
04:06:622 (346,347,348,349,350,351,352,353,354) - apply the same changes as i mentioned earlier ( 04:07:109 (351) - here). This stream is different than the first one tho, map them both the same, as both vocal and instrumental are the same in that part.
Try making both the first and the second kiai be a bit more consistent with each other, the mapping is pretty different, even the instrumental and vocals in both parts being basically the same.
04:37:693 - add a k here, there's a clearly audible sound here, and i suggest to change 04:37:790 (570) - this one to k, sound better that way imo.
04:37:790 (570) - ctrl+g this one, 04:39:738 (581) - this one must be a k, the pitch goes higher starting from 04:39:544 - here,
04:46:362 (631,632,633,634,635,636,637,638,639) - imo, this stream both follows the instrumental and sounds A LOT better by making it kddkddkdk.
04:49:479 (657) - i see what you tried to do here, but i think you can improve it. Try mapping it like this https://imgur.com/a/NcPfo
04:51:329 (673,674) - i suggest you to ctrl+g this two, and to change 04:51:622 (676) - this one to d, sounds and plays better imo.
05:50:648 (96) - change this one to k
05:52:011 (110,111,112) - these three notes should be kdk instead of dkd, the stream plays a lot better like that, and it follows the instrumental a lot better too.

most of the suggestions are small hitsound changes, the map is pretty good tbh.

THAT'S ALL MY FRIEND, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, THIS IS A NICE MAP AND HAS A FANTASTIC STORYBOARD, I HOPE TO SEE THIS RANKED SOON!

pssst, i love how you used the finishers here, ignore what everyone else says about them, big notes ftw :^)
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

whosthebox wrote:

Hello there! I'm here for the M4M request! Hi!

Festival is far from over
most of these are suggestions, don't feel forced to change them ~

00:21:836 (96) - change this one to K, or change 00:22:287 (97,98) - this two to D, the sound is the same in those three beats, they should be mapped the same, you mapped it as a K 00:27:249 (114) - here. yeah, but i hear i like K D K, i think 00:22:287 - is clunk
00:23:640 (104) - change this to K? the intensity of that part reaches it's peak right there. Yeap, you right
00:26:648 (109,110,111,112,113,114) - this part is exactly the same as 00:23:039 (99,100,101,102,103,104) - this one, why did you change the mapping that much? try doing something a bit more similar, at least. Yeap, it is same moments, i'll try to make is similar as posibble
00:32:663 (134,135,136) - same as above, same sound, make them either D D D or K K K. Since you seem to be following the vocals in this part, the proper mapping would be D K K. Ok, changed to it
00:36:272 (148,149,150) - again, same sound, i suggest K K K here or K K D if you want to follow the vocals. K K D sounds cool
00:50:648 (13) - change this to k, it's pitch is way higher than the k 00:50:453 (12) - here. yet you mapped this as a d. i changed it to kdd k
00:53:472 (23,24) - ctrl+g here, you mapped the instrument 00:53:570 (24) - here almost everytime with a k, why ignore it here when it's both clearly audible and has a higher pitch than the note 00:53:472 (23) - here? Because the begining of this beatmap has a stupid issues from last 10-20 reamaps. by the way - accepted
00:55:712 (42) - this one is clearly a k. Here is low bass kick. hmmm. I think this isn't k:roll:
00:56:492 (48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56) - this stream should finish with a k, intensity reaches it's peak there. I suggest you to do something like ddkdkkddk, but feel free to change it as you wish, as long as it has a k as it's last note. ok. I'll edit it to ddkkdkkdk
01:05:648 (124) - this is a k too, it's also the same sound as 01:05:258 (120) - here, and you did map that one as a k. ok
01:12:563 (146) - k too. yeap
01:21:622 - add a k here, there's a CLEARLY audible sound, also, considering how you mapped everything else in that part, it does not play very nice. Playability is important thing, ok, i'll add it
01:23:667 (213) - i think this one should be a d. You are right
01:45:485 (366,367) - ctrl+g these two, 01:45:583 (367) - this one has a higher pitch than 01:45:485 (366) - this one, you also mapped it as k both 01:47:141 (377) - here and 01:48:699 (387) - here. Ok
01:51:719 (411,412) - same as above Ok
01:59:998 (464) - this one should be a k, the vocal and the instrumental are the same as 01:59:609 (463) - here. Yeap, you are right
02:02:433 (479) - i can't hear any sound worth this note, you might be mapping the cymbal from the previous note, but it's already mapped here. I suggest you to remove this note and change 02:02:336 (478) - this one to a K. wow, it's really true that there is no sound! And idea with finmisher is great!
02:14:316 (570,571) - ctrl+g again, same stuff as mentioned before. Yeap, and i add finisher at last note of this triple and edit next stream a bit
02:21:427 (620) - this and 02:21:816 (621) - this, both should be D, you seem to be following the vocals in this part, and the vocals in those two notes are exactly the same. Nope, vocal at 02:21:816 - is higher than 02:21:427 - and 02:22:206 soo... this is D K D
02:29:609 (661,662,663,664,665) - ctrl+g this one, it sounds and follows the instrumental here a lot better imo. changed for kkdkd
02:31:946 (677) - k here? yeap!
02:32:531 (680) - , 02:32:920 (682) - you mapped both this sounds as k and 02:32:725 (681) - this one as d everywhere before this, why change it here? Keep the mapping the same, or, if you want to keep 02:32:725 (681) - this one as a k, you should still change this 02:32:725 (681) - and 02:32:920 (682) - this to k. Ok.
02:34:966 (694,695) - ctrl+g sounds a lot better imo. Yeah, you right, but is kdkdk is good pattern? No, i'll change it for kdddk
02:35:745 (700,701) - same as above, ctrl+g, you also mapped 02:35:258 (697) - this one as a k, and the same sound 02:35:842 (701) - here is mapped as k.
02:36:232 (704) - again, the same sound as before, this one should be a k. ok
02:36:622 (708) - k here too, clearly audible. ok
03:15:972 (10) - this one should be a k, higher pitch than the rest of the notes, you also mapped the same sound as a k 03:14:414 (6) - here.
03:48:699 (232) - this one is a k, either make it a k, or ctrl+g 03:48:602 (231,232) - these two if you want to emphasize the last one. ok. i'll emphasize last one
03:50:161 (241,242) - ctrl+g this one, i mentioned this several times before. ok
03:56:394 (285,286) - same as above. ok
03:59:609 (306) - k here, same reason as above. ok
04:04:284 (335,336) - i mentioned this before, both instrumental and vocals (mainly the vocals) here sound the same, both should be k. Yeap
04:06:622 (346,347,348,349,350,351,352,353,354) - apply the same changes as i mentioned earlier ( 04:07:109 (351) - here). This stream is different than the first one tho, map them both the same, as both vocal and instrumental are the same in that part. Yeap
Try making both the first and the second kiai be a bit more consistent with each other, the mapping is pretty different, even the instrumental and vocals in both parts being basically the same. ok
04:37:693 - add a k here, there's a clearly audible sound here, and i suggest to change 04:37:790 (570) - this one to k, sound better that way imo. Ok, k is added, but last note is not edited for k because next notes is K K K, i afraid of unranked things
04:37:790 (570) - ctrl+g this one, 04:39:738 (581) - this one must be a k, the pitch goes higher starting from 04:39:544 - here, ok
04:46:362 (631,632,633,634,635,636,637,638,639) - imo, this stream both follows the instrumental and sounds A LOT better by making it kddkddkdk. ok
04:49:479 (657) - i see what you tried to do here, but i think you can improve it. Try mapping it like this https://imgur.com/a/NcPfo I thought for a very long time at this moment, but your version is the best, thank you!
04:51:329 (673,674) - i suggest you to ctrl+g this two, and to change 04:51:622 (676) - this one to d, sounds and plays better imo. Ok
05:50:648 (96) - change this one to k k
05:52:011 (110,111,112) - these three notes should be kdk instead of dkd, the stream plays a lot better like that, and it follows the instrumental a lot better too. Yeap

most of the suggestions are small hitsound changes, the map is pretty good tbh.

THAT'S ALL MY FRIEND, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, THIS IS A NICE MAP AND HAS A FANTASTIC STORYBOARD, I HOPE TO SEE THIS RANKED SOON!
When I read this, I almost cried, thank you very much!

pssst, i love how you used the finishers here, ignore what everyone else says about them, big notes ftw :^) :^)
A1caida
best map ever
12/10
Dinocrit
NIHUYA SEBE KARTA CHETKAYA! EZ KUDOSU
frukoyurdakul
Hi there.

[Festival is far from over]

Well, generally the patterns are good, some of the parts are a bit inconsistent though, but the map is definitely promising.

  1. 00:41:685 - Put a red line here, and omit it. It is required to prevent the double line appearance on BPM changing.
  2. 01:30:193 - 01:30:583 - 01:30:972 - Umm, I'm not comfortable with these gaps to be honest. Because the open hi-hat sound is way more prominent than the keyboards and the main melody, hence I suggest putting kats on these spots. Relevant spots needs to be changed too.
  3. 01:49:479 - Well, starting from here kdkkdkkkD sounds way better to me. Follows the drums exactly.
  4. 02:27:661 - End the kiai here. The pace of the song is changing at that spot. Remainder: Aimod error is not important on kiai SV changes.
  5. 03:49:479 - I couldn't really understand what those kinds of finishers are emphasizing. They are spreaded out to the entire section (including the 1st one) but I don't hear a specific sound on them so I simply recommend removing the finishers on all of them.
  6. 04:32:336 - Same issue as 02:27:661
  7. 05:05:063 - Start the kiai here, it starts late now.
  8. 05:24:154 - I don't think changing the SV is appropriate here, considering what you have done on the 1st kiai at 02:21:816 - this spot. Just keep it fixed to keep the SV changes consistent.
  9. 05:29:998 - End the kiai here for the same reasons I've mentioned before.
Really good map, the storyboard is also nice. Call me back when you fix these issues.
Topic Starter
ASPIRIN

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hi there.

[Festival is far from over]

Well, generally the patterns are good, some of the parts are a bit inconsistent though, but the map is definitely promising.

  1. 00:41:685 - Put a red line here, and omit it. It is required to prevent the double line appearance on BPM changing. Ok, fixed
  2. 01:30:193 - 01:30:583 - 01:30:972 - Umm, I'm not comfortable with these gaps to be honest. Because the open hi-hat sound is way more prominent than the keyboards and the main melody, hence I suggest putting kats on these spots. Relevant spots needs to be changed too. Ok, fixed
  3. 01:49:479 - Well, starting from here kdkkdkkkD sounds way better to me. Follows the drums exactly. I like your suggest, edited, but I don't agree with the last two notes because last finisher is high cymbal and note before finisher is should be not same color, so it is dK
  4. 02:27:661 - End the kiai here. The pace of the song is changing at that spot. Remainder: Aimod error is not important on kiai SV changes. Ok, fixed
  5. 03:49:479 - I couldn't really understand what those kinds of finishers are emphasizing. They are spreaded out to the entire section (including the 1st one) but I don't hear a specific sound on them so I simply recommend removing the finishers on all of them.Ok, all finishers are deleted. Except 01:44:024 (361) - 03:48:699 (235) - this
  6. 04:32:336 - Same issue as 02:27:661 Ok, fixed
  7. 05:05:063 - Start the kiai here, it starts late now. Ok, fixed
  8. 05:24:154 - I don't think changing the SV is appropriate here, considering what you have done on the 1st kiai at 02:21:816 - this spot. Just keep it fixed to keep the SV changes consistent. Ok, fixed
  9. 05:29:998 - End the kiai here for the same reasons I've mentioned before.Ok, fixed
Really good map, the storyboard is also nice. Call me back when you fix these issues.
Thank you! I did my best!
frukoyurdakul
IRC mod with ASPIRIN (03/12/2017 16:41 UTC)
18:44 ASPIRIN: Hello! Can i ask little question? I do not understand the first point about the red line, what do you mean?
18:44 frukoyurdakul: 00:41:685 - the red line was supposed to be here
18:44 frukoyurdakul: but it's 2ms on the right
18:45 ASPIRIN: ahh, wrong timing
18:45 frukoyurdakul: let's say
18:45 frukoyurdakul: 00:40:332 - press f5 at that spot
18:45 frukoyurdakul: and you'll see two lines
18:45 frukoyurdakul: 00:41:685 - adding an omitted red timing point will block to happen
18:47 ASPIRIN: I understand you, thank you!
18:47 frukoyurdakul: no problem
18:58 ASPIRIN: done
18:59 frukoyurdakul: let's have a look
19:00 frukoyurdakul: hmm
19:00 frukoyurdakul: considering the latter usages of finishers
19:00 frukoyurdakul: I think kdkkdkkdK is okay
19:00 frukoyurdakul: due to the BPM
19:01 frukoyurdakul: 00:41:685 - hmm
19:01 frukoyurdakul: change the green point SV to 0,6909
19:01 frukoyurdakul: the spinner is coming a bit fast, and I think the SV should stay the same
19:02 ASPIRIN: if i'll change volume of this green point to 5% will it be good?
19:03 frukoyurdakul: too low, make it 20%
19:03 frukoyurdakul: and I recommend if you do that, 00:47:139 - move the next green point to here
19:03 ASPIRIN: Ok
19:03 frukoyurdakul: sometimes it might get buggy
19:04 ASPIRIN: ok
19:04 frukoyurdakul: 02:27:659 - close kiai here
19:04 frukoyurdakul: but leave the SV change ones open
19:05 ASPIRIN: Next kiai ends is fixed too
19:05 frukoyurdakul: good
19:06 frukoyurdakul: 01:36:425 - also add notes here
19:07 ASPIRIN: done, I accidentally forgot about this moment
19:07 frukoyurdakul: 01:44:801 - 01:46:360 - remove these etc. since you changed the 2nd section
19:07 frukoyurdakul: the other section*
19:08 ASPIRIN: Ok
19:09 frukoyurdakul: 04:32:334 - 05:29:996 - also close these ones if you haven't done already
19:09 frukoyurdakul: I mean, the kiai
19:11 ASPIRIN: I did this when you wrote about what I did wrong first kiai end
19:11 ASPIRIN: What's about this note? 01:50:256 (408) - Is finisher here ok?
19:11 frukoyurdakul: yeah
19:11 frukoyurdakul: it's fine due to your other usages
19:12 ASPIRIN: Ok
19:13 frukoyurdakul: 05:50:256 - and lastly, put a green point here and close the kiai on that spot
19:13 frukoyurdakul: to prevent it flash one more time
19:15 ASPIRIN: done
19:15 frukoyurdakul: you can update
19:20 ASPIRIN: done
19:21 frukoyurdakul: I'll check once more just in case
19:22 frukoyurdakul: lol I've miscalculated one thing
19:22 frukoyurdakul: 00:41:685 - change the green point SV to 0,777
19:22 ASPIRIN: me too, i broke flashes
19:23 frukoyurdakul: what do you mean
19:23 ASPIRIN: flashes in sb
19:23 ASPIRIN: accidentally
19:23 frukoyurdakul: ah, well I can't help on that, because I don't know how to fix it
19:24 ASPIRIN: I know it's all right, it just takes a couple of minutes
19:24 frukoyurdakul: okay
19:26 frukoyurdakul: let me know when you are done
19:26 ASPIRIN: ok
19:30 ASPIRIN: done
19:33 frukoyurdakul: 03:43:438 - delete this note to keep the structure you follow
19:34 ASPIRIN: ok
19:35 frukoyurdakul: the rest looks good
19:35 frukoyurdakul: you can update one last time
19:39 ASPIRIN: done
19:40 frukoyurdakul: do you want to change anything else?
19:40 ASPIRIN: No, everything is fine
19:40 frukoyurdakul: okay then

Changes: Fixed some consistency issues and arranged some kiai closing.

Bubbled!
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply