Lasse wrote:

do you really think hp6 is necessary on such a long map at this difficulty level? 5 seems like a nicer choice Ok

i think in some parts your patterning becomes a bit too monotonous, like in this part 00:55:323 - basically the streams are kkdd/ddkk
could use more more variety, for example why not make 00:56:492 - into something like https://i.imgur.com/6BU89dC.jpg ?
I think that would fit nicely since it switches back to the high pitched instrument on 00:56:881 -
01:00:388 - this part seems more engaging patterning wise Ok. But i think this pattern is ddkdkdkkd

parts like 01:56:881 - and 04:01:557 - could utilize a bit lower sv to get a nice contrast with the more intense ones Sure, i'll think up something interesting

01:14:803 - this doesn't fit the intensity of this part very well since you suddenly map it so much more dense. also makes it really unclear what you want to follow since it mixes piano, vocals and drums
=> 01:15:388 - 01:16:946 (165) - deleting these two would make it more fitting density wise and be emphasize vocals a bit yeap, you are right

01:24:349 (220,221) - think this would work better as dd since then you get a change in patterning to match instruments and vocal phrase better no because 01:24:349 has a higher pitch than next note
01:30:193 (263,265) - removing these would work really well with the sudden really pronounced 1/1 emphasis in the song + drums are only 1/1 too, only 1/2 is the hihat oh, sounds good
01:31:362 (271) - could be removed for similar reasoning, gives the start of the next part also much more impact ok
01:36:232 - similar 1/1 suggestion here as 1:30 ok

chorus could use a little more 1/4 stuff since it seems a bit lacking compared to the verse
for example 02:07:790 (522,523,524,525) - could be ddkkd instead
similar for chorus 2 (also toning down the other parts slightly, like a few points here suggest, might help too)
third seems nicer since you mapped it way more dense


02:21:816 (617,618,619,620) - these would be great if you added finish, same for when it happens again right after
just like you did on 05:24:154 - which is basically the same thing you can notice that with each kiai this part becomes another, at first here just notes, then there are more sounds, and for the third time there are already finishers. Well, a lot of people tell me about it, so I'll make finishers here.
02:42:271 (743) - think this could be deleted to match the overall lower intensity of this part since it's only mapped to really quiet background drums that you skipped a lot ok
02:43:245 (747,748,749,750,751,752,753) - combining white and red tick triple in the same pattern when nothing in the song suggests it feels really awkward, how a bout just deleting 02:43:342 (748) - ? ok

03:34:674 (131,132,133,134,135) - same 1/1 thing as before since it's a repeating part, other stuff mentioned before will apply here too ok
04:41:199 (592) - deleting this would emphasize the piano you follow before and after much better ok
04:41:687 (597,598,599,600) - could be kddk instead to follow the switch from piano to only drums on 04:41:881 (598,599) - since it seems you tried to follow piano with kat things before ok
04:49:868 (660) - whole streams seems to ignore blue tick emphasis of the guitar which is sad, how about a rhythm like https://i.imgur.com/2dHvo5f.jpg ? In editor is sounds strange, but in game is ok
04:57:953 - could be mapped since it's basically continuous guitar spam here ok

Smallwu wrote:

Hii from queue
[General]

1. Diff name: How about Festival is Far from Over? I do not know, I'm used to the name that I have now. I just do not like the way it looks ...
2. Everything Perfect. But there's one thing to tell you that I guess the pic was already removed by the painter. (reason) I cant read it

[Festival is far from over]

1. 00:53:959 (28) - kat to follow the instrument, it's from low to high. (Sounds like lute but I don't know.) Ok
2. 01:02:336 (95) - kat to follow the instrument. The others are already kat, so follow it is a better choice imo. Ok
3. 01:12:271 (143) - kat to follow drum, and keep consistency. [01:18:505 - 03:16:946 - 03:23:180] Yeap, it was little misstake
4. 03:15:972 (10,11,12) - k k d if you follow vocal. I think no, cuz here is k k k
5. 03:34:479 - I think here can add a kat to follow cymbal? kat won't decline the vocals' existence feeling. and You also add it at 01:29:803. it's made for vocal singing, so I do not know, d k d k looks boring
6. 03:42:271 (181,182) - Maybe you can remove these ones. The main reason is the part is too long if you don't give a breaktime. If you mean about triple - this triple is unnecessary.
7. 03:51:816 (250) - Why here is KAT ?W? woops, edited
8. 04:06:232 (345,346) - How about d d? To follow vocal pitches, they sound from high to low. (Tho k k is also good.) Yeap, you are right, here is d d
9. 04:25:615 (485,486,487,488,489,490) - kddddd or kdddkd, the last 5 notes sound like drums imo, so use ddddd. (k cuz read easily) here is long stream, it is dkkdkkkkd
10. 04:41:492 (596) - kat if you follow piano. sure

Nice song and nice map, good luck with rank!
thanks for Eng subtitle btw I'm glad you liked it.

Thank you very much! <3

whosthebox wrote:

Hello there! I'm here for the M4M request! Hi!

Festival is far from over

most of these are suggestions, don't feel forced to change them ~

00:21:836 (96) - change this one to K, or change 00:22:287 (97,98) - this two to D, the sound is the same in those three beats, they should be mapped the same, you mapped it as a K 00:27:249 (114) - here. yeah, but i hear i like K D K, i think 00:22:287 - is clunk
00:23:640 (104) - change this to K? the intensity of that part reaches it's peak right there. Yeap, you right
00:26:648 (109,110,111,112,113,114) - this part is exactly the same as 00:23:039 (99,100,101,102,103,104) - this one, why did you change the mapping that much? try doing something a bit more similar, at least. Yeap, it is same moments, i'll try to make is similar as posibble
00:32:663 (134,135,136) - same as above, same sound, make them either D D D or K K K. Since you seem to be following the vocals in this part, the proper mapping would be D K K. Ok, changed to it
00:36:272 (148,149,150) - again, same sound, i suggest K K K here or K K D if you want to follow the vocals. K K D sounds cool
00:50:648 (13) - change this to k, it's pitch is way higher than the k 00:50:453 (12) - here. yet you mapped this as a d. i changed it to kdd k
00:53:472 (23,24) - ctrl+g here, you mapped the instrument 00:53:570 (24) - here almost everytime with a k, why ignore it here when it's both clearly audible and has a higher pitch than the note 00:53:472 (23) - here? Because the begining of this beatmap has a stupid issues from last 10-20 reamaps. by the way - accepted
00:55:712 (42) - this one is clearly a k. Here is low bass kick. hmmm. I think this isn't k:roll:
00:56:492 (48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56) - this stream should finish with a k, intensity reaches it's peak there. I suggest you to do something like ddkdkkddk, but feel free to change it as you wish, as long as it has a k as it's last note. ok. I'll edit it to ddkkdkkdk
01:05:648 (124) - this is a k too, it's also the same sound as 01:05:258 (120) - here, and you did map that one as a k. ok
01:12:563 (146) - k too. yeap
01:21:622 - add a k here, there's a CLEARLY audible sound, also, considering how you mapped everything else in that part, it does not play very nice. Playability is important thing, ok, i'll add it
01:23:667 (213) - i think this one should be a d. You are right
01:45:485 (366,367) - ctrl+g these two, 01:45:583 (367) - this one has a higher pitch than 01:45:485 (366) - this one, you also mapped it as k both 01:47:141 (377) - here and 01:48:699 (387) - here. Ok
01:51:719 (411,412) - same as above Ok
01:59:998 (464) - this one should be a k, the vocal and the instrumental are the same as 01:59:609 (463) - here. Yeap, you are right
02:02:433 (479) - i can't hear any sound worth this note, you might be mapping the cymbal from the previous note, but it's already mapped here. I suggest you to remove this note and change 02:02:336 (478) - this one to a K. wow, it's really true that there is no sound! And idea with finmisher is great!
02:14:316 (570,571) - ctrl+g again, same stuff as mentioned before. Yeap, and i add finisher at last note of this triple and edit next stream a bit
02:21:427 (620) - this and 02:21:816 (621) - this, both should be D, you seem to be following the vocals in this part, and the vocals in those two notes are exactly the same. Nope, vocal at 02:21:816 - is higher than 02:21:427 - and 02:22:206 soo... this is D K D
02:29:609 (661,662,663,664,665) - ctrl+g this one, it sounds and follows the instrumental here a lot better imo. changed for kkdkd
02:31:946 (677) - k here? yeap!
02:32:531 (680) - , 02:32:920 (682) - you mapped both this sounds as k and 02:32:725 (681) - this one as d everywhere before this, why change it here? Keep the mapping the same, or, if you want to keep 02:32:725 (681) - this one as a k, you should still change this 02:32:725 (681) - and 02:32:920 (682) - this to k. Ok.
02:34:966 (694,695) - ctrl+g sounds a lot better imo. Yeah, you right, but is kdkdk is good pattern? No, i'll change it for kdddk
02:35:745 (700,701) - same as above, ctrl+g, you also mapped 02:35:258 (697) - this one as a k, and the same sound 02:35:842 (701) - here is mapped as k.
02:36:232 (704) - again, the same sound as before, this one should be a k. ok
02:36:622 (708) - k here too, clearly audible. ok
03:15:972 (10) - this one should be a k, higher pitch than the rest of the notes, you also mapped the same sound as a k 03:14:414 (6) - here.
03:48:699 (232) - this one is a k, either make it a k, or ctrl+g 03:48:602 (231,232) - these two if you want to emphasize the last one. ok. i'll emphasize last one
03:50:161 (241,242) - ctrl+g this one, i mentioned this several times before. ok
03:56:394 (285,286) - same as above. ok
03:59:609 (306) - k here, same reason as above. ok
04:04:284 (335,336) - i mentioned this before, both instrumental and vocals (mainly the vocals) here sound the same, both should be k. Yeap
04:06:622 (346,347,348,349,350,351,352,353,354) - apply the same changes as i mentioned earlier ( 04:07:109 (351) - here). This stream is different than the first one tho, map them both the same, as both vocal and instrumental are the same in that part. Yeap
Try making both the first and the second kiai be a bit more consistent with each other, the mapping is pretty different, even the instrumental and vocals in both parts being basically the same. ok
04:37:693 - add a k here, there's a clearly audible sound here, and i suggest to change 04:37:790 (570) - this one to k, sound better that way imo. Ok, k is added, but last note is not edited for k because next notes is K K K, i afraid of unranked things
04:37:790 (570) - ctrl+g this one, 04:39:738 (581) - this one must be a k, the pitch goes higher starting from 04:39:544 - here, ok
04:46:362 (631,632,633,634,635,636,637,638,639) - imo, this stream both follows the instrumental and sounds A LOT better by making it kddkddkdk. ok
04:49:479 (657) - i see what you tried to do here, but i think you can improve it. Try mapping it like this https://imgur.com/a/NcPfo I thought for a very long time at this moment, but your version is the best, thank you!
04:51:329 (673,674) - i suggest you to ctrl+g this two, and to change 04:51:622 (676) - this one to d, sounds and plays better imo. Ok
05:50:648 (96) - change this one to k k
05:52:011 (110,111,112) - these three notes should be kdk instead of dkd, the stream plays a lot better like that, and it follows the instrumental a lot better too. Yeap

most of the suggestions are small hitsound changes, the map is pretty good tbh.

THAT'S ALL MY FRIEND, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, THIS IS A NICE MAP AND HAS A FANTASTIC STORYBOARD, I HOPE TO SEE THIS RANKED SOON!
When I read this, I almost cried, thank you very much!

pssst, i love how you used the finishers here, ignore what everyone else says about them, big notes ftw :^) :^)

1. 00:41:685 - Put a red line here, and omit it. It is required to prevent the double line appearance on BPM changing.
2. 01:30:193 - 01:30:583 - 01:30:972 - Umm, I'm not comfortable with these gaps to be honest. Because the open hi-hat sound is way more prominent than the keyboards and the main melody, hence I suggest putting kats on these spots. Relevant spots needs to be changed too.
3. 01:49:479 - Well, starting from here kdkkdkkkD sounds way better to me. Follows the drums exactly.
4. 02:27:661 - End the kiai here. The pace of the song is changing at that spot. Remainder: Aimod error is not important on kiai SV changes.
5. 03:49:479 - I couldn't really understand what those kinds of finishers are emphasizing. They are spreaded out to the entire section (including the 1st one) but I don't hear a specific sound on them so I simply recommend removing the finishers on all of them.
6. 04:32:336 - Same issue as 02:27:661
7. 05:05:063 - Start the kiai here, it starts late now.
8. 05:24:154 - I don't think changing the SV is appropriate here, considering what you have done on the 1st kiai at 02:21:816 - this spot. Just keep it fixed to keep the SV changes consistent.
9. 05:29:998 - End the kiai here for the same reasons I've mentioned before.

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hi there.

[Festival is far from over]

Well, generally the patterns are good, some of the parts are a bit inconsistent though, but the map is definitely promising.

1. 00:41:685 - Put a red line here, and omit it. It is required to prevent the double line appearance on BPM changing. Ok, fixed
2. 01:30:193 - 01:30:583 - 01:30:972 - Umm, I'm not comfortable with these gaps to be honest. Because the open hi-hat sound is way more prominent than the keyboards and the main melody, hence I suggest putting kats on these spots. Relevant spots needs to be changed too. Ok, fixed
3. 01:49:479 - Well, starting from here kdkkdkkkD sounds way better to me. Follows the drums exactly. I like your suggest, edited, but I don't agree with the last two notes because last finisher is high cymbal and note before finisher is should be not same color, so it is dK
4. 02:27:661 - End the kiai here. The pace of the song is changing at that spot. Remainder: Aimod error is not important on kiai SV changes. Ok, fixed
5. 03:49:479 - I couldn't really understand what those kinds of finishers are emphasizing. They are spreaded out to the entire section (including the 1st one) but I don't hear a specific sound on them so I simply recommend removing the finishers on all of them.Ok, all finishers are deleted. Except 01:44:024 (361) - 03:48:699 (235) - this
6. 04:32:336 - Same issue as 02:27:661 Ok, fixed
7. 05:05:063 - Start the kiai here, it starts late now. Ok, fixed
8. 05:24:154 - I don't think changing the SV is appropriate here, considering what you have done on the 1st kiai at 02:21:816 - this spot. Just keep it fixed to keep the SV changes consistent. Ok, fixed
9. 05:29:998 - End the kiai here for the same reasons I've mentioned before.Ok, fixed

Really good map, the storyboard is also nice. Call me back when you fix these issues.
Thank you! I did my best!

Surono wrote:

* from begining until 0:20, 00:03:640 (9,10,11) - change this etc as kdk to give more emphasis well on vibration beat, ddk would be good for the next other part of song like drum arrange.
* 00:41:685 - change the volume of rednlines to 20%
* 01:23:568 - from here change as kkd? it seems monocolors emphasized for the drum and it breaks the consistency of your patterns coloring or try change 01:23:178 - to ddkkdkd for variation
* 02:36:912 - change kat to avoid monocolors and emphasize the guitar

Namki wrote:

ого!
поздравляю