1. 01:13:651 - might want to insert a break here, this is quite a long time without having any notes in play
   
   SPOILER

   ps: drag the break to start on the downbeat
   

1. 00:15:985 - 5% volume on repeat; delete timing point here
2. 00:53:651 (4,4,4) - i feel that the 1/4 density is a bit too high here coming off of the Normal, especially since the Insane above this is less dense in some areas. i recommend changing the sliders i highlighted here into 1/2 sliders to help balance out the density

1. 00:01:651 (2) - looks like a snapping error? shouldn't this be 1/6 like the other diffs? played back on slower speeds just to confirm and it does sound more like 1/6 than 1/8 here
2. 00:36:762 (3,4) - i kind of expected the patterning here to be similar to 00:36:318 (1,2) - and 00:37:207 (1,2) - , so why is it stacked? stacking it breaks the patterning emphasis
3. 01:52:540 (5) - there's barely a sound here, let alone one that would imply a clickable point. circle here feels inappropriate as a result; would recommend deleting it

1. 00:15:985 (5) - delete the timing point here; circle is at 5% volume here

1. 00:02:874 (2) - 01:18:874 (2) - 01:20:651 (2) - 01:25:985 (2) - 01:27:762 (5) - hi yes it's the hitsound police you have violated the law with your circle at 5% volume at multiple points
2. 00:04:762 (3,1) - ok so i know that there's like this faint bass sound here, but i still think that the point at 00:04:985 - should be clickable instead due to how much more louder it is, and especially when the rest of the rhythm setup you use follows that melody. same with 00:11:874 (3,1) -

Doormat wrote:

i have trouble keeping to my time commitments i feel ya LOL

[Easy]

1. 01:13:651 - might want to insert a break here, this is quite a long time without having any notes in play for sure
   
   SPOILER

   ps: drag the break to start on the downbeat
   

applying for 6006 as well
[6006]

1. 00:15:985 - 5% volume on repeat; delete timing point here y e s
2. 00:53:651 (4,4,4) - i feel that the 1/4 density is a bit too high here coming off of the Normal, especially since the Insane above this is less dense in some areas. i recommend changing the sliders i highlighted here into 1/2 sliders to help balance out the density imo its fine because the kawamilr diff features more rhythmic complexity (and the flow is a notably faster paced), which in turn leads into nowas diff adding more technical complexity too. i think the repeat sliders are pretty average for what you'd expect from a hard diff density. if anything, i think it would damage the spread if i changed to 1/2 because then the transition of not using 1/4 rhythm in this section from the normal diff to diverse use of 1/4 in the milr diff would be a bit too much of a gap in the spread.

proud of you bby i l o v e y o u g u y s

handsome wrote:

why are there like 600 broken stacks on fanzhen's diff liek bro

00:03:429 (1,2,3) - 00:06:985 (1,2,3) - 00:10:540 (1,2,3) - 00:14:096 (1,2,3) - 00:41:651 (1,3) - 01:17:651 (3,1) - 01:25:207 (1,2,3) - 01:27:874 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 01:42:096 (1,2,3,1,2,3) -

-Mo- wrote:

Hi, responding to a report we received.

The map looks fine to me, including the slider in Pho's diff since I believe the path of the slider is still readable despite the overlap.

Do you mind writing a quick summary of what was/wasn't changed from -Vanilla's mod from a while back though?

-Vanilla wrote:

random mod


Pho

1. 00:04:762 (3,1) - I see no reason to start the 1 slider on the blue tick, as more emphasis comes from the 1/2 beat red tick before it
   00:08:540 (4) - you even did it here where it starts on the emphasized sound.
   00:11:874 (3,1) - also be sure to fix this
   
   *the sliders no longer start on a blue tick, and instead uniformly fall on a 1/2 beat
   
2. 00:32:985 (1,2,3) - Aesthetically this doesn't seem right, for one, the 2 slider isn't of the same shape as 1 and 3. But I feel like they could have more cohesion, perhaps by aligning them in a symmetrical triangle? Not sure, but compared to 00:40:096 (1,2,3) - the pattern here doesn't seem very tight.
   
   *these actually used to look pretty goofy honestly lol, he changed their shapes to be uniform
   
3. 00:58:985 (3) - I'm not good with rankable stuff, but since this slider goes back into itself, isnt that unrankable? i think i saw something on rrtyui's exit this earth's atomosphere that had the same issue.
   
   *wasn't a reading issue so he left it